BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic 8. Gamma Camera (II)
Advertisements

Observation of beam halo with corona graph
Low energy electron beam as a nondestructive diagnostic tool for high power beams. P. Logachev, D. Malutin, A. Starostenko, BINP, RUPAC’2006, Novosibirsk.
Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Form Factors and Transverse Charge Densities Siddharth Venkat UW REU 2010.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
OTR MEASUREMENTS AND MODELING OF THE ELECTRON BEAM PARAMETERS AT THE E-COOLING FACILITY A. Warner 1, A. Burov 1, K. Carlson 1, G. Kazakevich 2, S. Nagaitsev.
Ultra-sensitive HALO monitor N. Vinogradov, A. Dychkant, P. Piot.
Recent Progress in X-ray Emittance Diagnostics at SPring-8 S. Takano, M. Masaki, and H. Sumitomo * JASRI/SPring-8, Hyogo, Japan SES, Hyogo, Japan *
Experiments on beam deflection by crystals Masataka IINUMA Department of Quantum Matter Graduate School of Advanced Sciences of Matter Hiroshima University.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
1 The results of the study of dp-elastic scattering at the energies from 500 to 1000 MeV/nucleon A.A Terekhin et al. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
Due to the oscillating charge in the antenna Along this line one does not observe any acceleration Radiation from a dipole-antenna To get the dimension.
IPBSM response to non-Gaussian beam K. KUBO.
SPATIAL RESOLUTION OF NON- INVASIVE BEAM PROFILE MONITORBASED ON OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION A.P. Potylitsyn Tomsk Polytechnic University, , pr.
Coherence measurements at P04
1 Yuri Shestakov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia Tagging system of almost-real photons for photonuclear experiments at VEPP-3 Moscow,
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.
Evolution of beam energy distribution as a diagnostics tool Alexey Burov, Bill Ng and Sergei Nagaitsev November 13, 2003.
Understanding mass transport in fuel cells using neutron imaging
Christoph Gabor, ASTeC HIPPI—Meeting (WP 5) 26 th – 28 th September 2007 Non—destructive transverse emittance measurement device The Front End Test Stand.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Neutralized Transport Experiment (NTX) P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, S. Eylon, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M.
1 Possibility to obtain a polarized hydrogen molecular target Dmitriy Toporkov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia XIV International.
The Q Weak Experiment Event tracking, luminosity monitors, and backgrounds John Leacock Virginia Tech on behalf of the Q Weak collaboration Hall C Users.
Goddard February 2003 R.Bellazzini - INFN Pisa A new X-Ray Polarimeter based on the photoelectric effect for Black Holes and Neutron Stars Astrophysics.
--Experimental determinations of radial distribution functions --Potential of Mean Force 1.
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
Chaos and Emittance growth due to nonlinear interactions in circular accelerators K. Ohmi (KEK) SAD2006 Sep at KEK.
The experimental evidence of t+t configuration for 6 He School of Physics, Peking University G.L.Zhang Y.L.Ye.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Coherence measurements at P04
Presentation on SEM (Scanning of Electron Microscope) Represented by:-Ravi Kumar Roll:- (BT/ME/1601/006)
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
Gas jet based diagnostics for beam monitoring
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
MD2243: Coronagraph commissioning at 6.5 TeV
Simulation of Luminosity Variation
A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
AQUA-ADVANCED QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR CNAO
Longitudinal Effects in Space Charge Dominated Cooled Bunched Beams
6th BINP-GSI-FAIR workshop
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools
Status of the VEPP-2000 Collider Project at Novosibirsk
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Effective luminosity simulation for PANDA experiment
Beam size diagnostics using diffraction radiation
Recoil charge state distributions in 12C(a,g)16O at DRAGON
FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
Accelerator Physics Statistical and Beam-Beam Effects
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
LCLS Lehman Review February 7-9, 2005
Presentation transcript:

BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia Calculation and Measurement of Non-Gaussian Beam Tails due to Scattering on Residual Gas Targets O.I.Meshkov, E.B.Levichev, A.N.Zhuravlev, E.V.Kremyanskaya, N.Yu.Muchnoi, Yu.A.Pahotin, N.A.Selivanov, D.N.Shatilov, S.A.Glukhov, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia Sergey Glukhov Beam Dynamics meets Vacuum, Collimations, and Surfaces, 8-10th March 2017, Karlsruhe, Germany

History The experiment was carried out in 2004: O.I.Meshkov, E.B.Levichev, A.N.Zhuravlev, E.V.Kremyanskaya, N.Yu.Muchnoi, Yu.A.Pahotin, N.A.Selivanov, D.N.Shatilov, Study of Beam Tails with the Optical Coronagraph For simulation purposes the following theory was used: K.Hirata, K.Yokoya. Non-gaussian Distribution of Electron Beams Due to Incoherent Stochastic Processes Then a few theoretical calculations were performed: The present talk Now there are plans to repeat the experiment with the X-ray pinhole camera. O.I.Meshkov, A.N.Zhuravlev, V.V.Smaluk, Multi-Pinhole Camera for Beam Position and Vertical Angle Stabilization

Theoretical part

Campbell–Rice theorem Consider a random value ω with distribution density ρ(ω): It is changing due to some stochastic process: This process has single-collision distribution density: Consider its Fourier image: Number of collisions has Poisson distribution: Then Fourier image of the distribution density is the following: Now we can obtain the distribution density function:

Beam density distribution Consider normalized transversal betatron coordinates: Then initial Gauss distribution: new distribution: where and

Residual gas scattering Elastic scattering on residual gas atoms has the following cross-section: Single-collision distribution density: Then and

Some maths... Bessel function was decomposed into Taylor series: Two “tabular” integrals were calculated by hands: The integral of interest was transformed into the rapidly converging series:

Ĉ-function

Experiment and simulations

VEPP-4M facility layout Coronagraph 2 (optical) Pinhole camera (X-ray) Coronagraph 1 (optical)

Optical coronagraph layout

Coronagraph test (I) 0.8mm × 3mm light source (close to beam sizes): without mask: with mask:

Coronagraph test (II) Integrated coronagraph signal vs time during the artificial variations of residual gas pressure:

Simulation results Simulated beam distribution for different energies of VEPP-3, P = 2·10-9 Torr

Experiment at VEPP-3 and simulation Difference between distribution functions at different residual gas pressures, E = 356 MeV, P1 = 2·10-9 Torr, P2 = 3·10-9 Torr

Experiment at VEPP-4 (I)

Experiment at VEPP-4 (II)

X-ray pinhole camera layout (I) * O.I.Meshkov, A.N.Zhuravlev, V.V.Smaluk, Multi-Pinhole Camera for Beam Position and Vertical Angle Stabilization

X-ray pinhole camera layout (II) Unused diagnostic channel at VEPP-4 CCD-camera scintillator mask pinhole primary scintillator

Summary Beam tails measurement is important for detector background assessment, collimation design, lifetime improvement, dynamic aperture measurement, etc. Experiments at VEPP-4M have shown the possibility of such studies using coronagraph. Theory proposed by Hirata & Yokoya and its analytical improvement can be applied to the scattering on residual gas atoms and to other stochastic processes with non-Gaussian distribution tails.

Thank you for your kind attention!