David Sangcheol Lee Prof R.Cywinski, Dr C.Bungau and Prof R.Seviour

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.
HZDR FLUKA activities in support of the MYRRHA Project Short summary with a focus on activation problems Anna Ferrari, Stefan Müller, Jörg Konheiser.
M3.1 JYFL fission model Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, FIN-40351, Finland V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, , St. Petersburg, Russia.
M. I. Al-Jarallah Future Power Production System 1 Presentation by: M. I. Al-Jarallah Department of Physics King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals.
INTRODUCTION SPALLATION REACTIONS F/B ASYMMETRY FOR Au+p RANKING OF SPALLATION MODELS SUMMARY Title 24/09/2014 Sushil K. Sharma Proton induced spallation.
Design on Target and Moderator of X- band Compact Electron Linac Neutron Source for Short Pulsed Neutrons Kazuhiro Tagi.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Nuclear and Energy Technologies.
Measurements of cross-sections of neutron threshold reactions and their usage in high energy neutron measurements Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute,
MA and LLFP Transmutation Performance Assessment in the MYRRHA eXperimental ADS P&T: 8th IEM, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 9-11, 2004 E. Malambu, W.
Applications of neutron spectrometry Neutron sources: 1) Reactors 2) Usage of reactions 3) Spallation sources Neutron show: 1) Where atoms are (structure)
Preliminarily results of Monte Carlo study of neutron beam production at iThemba LABS University of the western cape and iThemba LABS Energy Postgraduate.
Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target (BURAN) for benchmark studies Pavel Tichý Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target.
Simulations of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS) Aleksander Polanski Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia. The Andrzej Soltan Institute for.
VALSIM status J. Apostolakis, V. Grichine, A. Howard, A. Ribon EUDET meeting, 11 th Sept 2006.
Nuclear Reactions - II A. Nucleon-Nucleus Reactions A.1 Spallation
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
10-1 Fission General Overview of Fission The Probability of Fission §The Liquid Drop Model §Shell Corrections §Spontaneous Fission §Spontaneously Fissioning.
Kayla J. Sax MPhil Candidate in Engineering Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge Supervised by Dr. Geoff T. Parks Investigating the Scope.
ThEC13, Geneva, 28th-31st Oct., 2013 C. H. Pyeon, Kyoto Univ. 1 Cheolho Pyeon Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, Japan
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
Cristian Bungau ThorEA Meeting - Oxford - April 2010.
Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers
Mitja Majerle for the “Energy Plus Transmutation” collaboration.
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
Neutron production in Pb/U assembly irradiated by deuterons at 1.6 and 2.52 GeV Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech.
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
Study on the Neutronic Characteristics of Subcritical Reactors Driven by an Accelerated Pulsed Proton Beam Ali Ahmad.
Pion-Induced Fission- A Review Zafar Yasin Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) Islamabad, Pakistan.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK 3 rd Year PhD student Actinide Breeding and Reactivity Variation in a Thermal.
Validation of Geant4 Bertini cascade nuclide production Aatos Heikkinen Helsinki Institute of Physics FrontierScience, Milano, September 12-17, 2005.
Alex Howard PH-SFT LCG-PV 10 th May 2006 Neutron Benchmark for Geant4 using TARC – initial status 1)TARC – experimental set-up and aims 2)Geant4 Simulation.
A Low Power ADS Demonstrator Hywel Owen School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester.
ADSR Workshop, May ‘08 ADSR Systems for Power Generation: some practical considerations Bob Cywinski 7 May 2008, Daresbury.
Ali Ahmad FLUKA code validation of nuclear data required for the spallation target design in Accelerator Driven Subcritical Reactors ThorEA Meeting – Daresbury.
Transmutation of 129 I with high energy neutrons produced in spallation reactions induced by protons in massive target V.HENZL Nuclear Physics Institute.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
A Study of Reverse MC and Space Charge Effect Simulation with Geant4
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
Study on Neutronics of plutonium and Minor Actinides Transmutation in Accelerator Driven System Reactor By Amer Ahmed Abdullah Al-Qaaod Ph.D student Physics.
Validation of Geant4 against the TARC benchmark: Testing neutron production, transportation and interaction TARC – experimental set-up and aims Geant4.
GEANT4 Simulations of a Beam Shaping Assembly Design and Optimization for Thermal/Epithermal Neutrons Vahagn Ivanyan  Yerevan Physics Institute, Armenia.
The BLAIRR Irradiation Facility Hybrid Spallation Target Optimization
Physics-Based Modeling Robert Reedy (UNM), Kyeong Kim (U. Ariz
Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)
Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK Safety Considerations for the Design of Thorium Fueled ADS Reactors ThorEA.
Report to Delta Review: Hadronic Validation
Summary of session 5: Innovative Ideas and New R&D
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
for collaboration “Energy plus transmutation”
A. R. Garcia, E. Mendoza and D. Cano-Ott
Guidance for hands-on exercise Neutron target
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Pebble Bed Reactors for Once Trough Nuclear Transmutation
Feasibility of Accelerator-Driven System with Current Technology
Intermediate-mass-fragment Production in Spallation Reactions
Seminární soustředění společného doktorského projektu UTEF ČVUT Praha a ÚJF AVČR Řež Transmutation studies on JINR Dubna Phasotron Mitja Majerle.
Using Thorium in conventional reactors: fertile to fissile conversion
Chapter 4 Mechanisms and Models of Nuclear Reactions
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
Neutron production in Pb/U assembly irradiated by p+, d+ at 0. 7 – 2
Design of A New Wide-dynamic-range Neutron Spectrometer for BNCT with Liquid Moderator and Absorber S. Tamaki1, I. Murata1 1. Division of Electrical,
LAHET code simulations in comparison with bare Pb spallation target experiment Daniela Henzlova.
O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová, V. Wagner
Catalin Borcea IFIN-HH INPC 2019, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Presentation transcript:

GEANT4 SIMULATIONS OF PROTON-INDUCED SPALLATION FOR APPLICATIONS IN ADSR David Sangcheol Lee Prof R.Cywinski, Dr C.Bungau and Prof R.Seviour International Institute for Accelerator Applications University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom

Introduction to spallation 1 The spallation reactions refer to high-energy hadron-nucleus reactions in the 200 MeV - 3 GeV energy range causing the emission of a large number of hadrons (mostly neutrons) or fragments. Illustration of spallation process The remnant nucleus loses its residual excitation energy by an evaporation-like process emitting neutrons or low energy light particles. GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA: Intro ADS neutron I have started my phd project under the subject of accelerator applications for energy production. This studies aims to optimise neutron production with thorium fuelled ADSR. Spallation is the one of the effective way to produce neutrons. The reaction is triggered by the bombarbment between highly energised proton with nucleons of heavy metal. Neutrons produced are fast neutron with 1-2 MeV (INC, pre equilibrium)Evaporation neutrons with low energy neutrons and light particles ( NOT TOO MUCH DETAIL since they know already)

Importance of spallation neutron The neutrons produced from spallation are mostly categorised as fast neutron due to the their energy range is between 1-2 MeV With the fast neutrons, the rate of the neutron capture for plutonium and minor actinides is often larger than thermal neutrons. The transmuted elements have also less total radiotoxicity. Spallation source is the external source of supplying neutrons in ADSR GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA: Intro ADS neutron Point out that spallation neutrons are in the range of 1-2 MeV Point out the cross-section for tranmutation shows that fast neutron is more favourable due to the high neutron flux demand Point out that the fission percentage for Cm Am etc are around 1% in the flow ( briefly mentioning Total rate of transmutation varies greatly by nuclide) Since spallation target is used to supply neutrons externally for ADS, it is playing as an important role in ADS Neutron multiplicity as function of proton beam energy [1] Energy spectrum of neutrons from spallation compared with fission neutrons [2] [1]H. Nifenecker, O. Meplan, and S. David, Accelerator Driven Subcritical Reactors CRC Press, 2003.. [2] G.J. Russell, Spallation physics–an overview, Proceedings of ICANS-XI, Tsukuba, 1990, KEK-Report Vol. 90-25,1991, pp. 291–299

Introduction of GEANT4 GEANT4 is a Monte-Carlo transport code developed by CERN. Its Hadron data library is maintained and updated by SLAC, Standford, US. Its areas of application include high energy, nuclear and accelerator physics, as well as studies in medical and space science. GEANT4 provides an extensive set of hadronic physics models for energies up to 10 ~15 GeV both for the intranuclear cascade region and for the modelling of evaporation GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work In order to facilitate the study of spallation neutron production, I chose GEANT4 which is highly capable of simulating secondary neutron productions and many more.

GEANT4 benchmarking studies-Introduction Despite the fact that the code is well conceived, the neutronic behaviour and the simulation code need to be studied extensively. In order to use GEANT4 for spallation studies and ADSRs neutron production, the detailed analysis for neutron production in heavy elements needs to be well studied. The data from GEANT4 also need to be compared with published data for the validation so that the results produced by GEANT4 can be proven to be reliable. GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work Say as it is :

GEANT4 benchmarking studies-Introduction The paper (Meigo, S. et.al(1999). Measurements of neutron spectra produced from a thick lead target bombarded with 0.5 and 1.5-GeV proton) provides the validation study of MCNP4A code against experimental data taken from KEK, Japan on neutron spectra produced from a thick lead target bombarded with 0.5 and 1.5 GeV protons. The GEANT4 simulation was carefully designed to carry the exact geometry that the experiment used in KEK, Japan GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work In order to establish the baseline of capability of this program for spallation studies, I have benchmarked a published results from KEK, Japan Explain as it is and the reason for choosing this paper’s result ( The experimental data exist, energy range is close to ideal ADSR range (0.6 GeV-myrrha , 1.0GeV-proposed ADSR optimal energy) Illustration of experimental arrangement Illustration of simulation arrangement

GEANT4 benchmarking studies-Results 1 The neutron flux (n/MeV/sr/proton) was measured in all detectors over entire neutron energy range for both 0.5 GeV and 1.5 GeV incident proton beam energy. GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work Explain the shape and how close the the experimental data is with my results Briefly mentioning that three different physics lists are used. Neutron flux at 0.5 GeV proton beam energy from MCNP4A simulation Neutron flux at 0.5 GeV proton beam energy from GEANT4 with experimental data (shown as dots)

GEANT4 benchmarking studies-Results 2 The neutron flux (n/MeV/sr/proton) was measured in all detectors over the entire neutron energy range for both 0.5 GeV and 1.5 GeV incident proton beam energy. GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work Neutron flux at 1.5 GeV proton beam energy from MCNP4A simulation Neutron flux at 1.5 GeV proton beam energy from GEANT4 with experimental data (shown as dots)

GEANT4 benchmarking studies-Results 3 With same size of spallation target, neutron collision and the changes of neutron yield with different target size was measured. GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work Point out that the most of neutron collision occurred heavily at the point of first impact and spread over the target. Point out that neutron yield at 0.5 GeV has reached its maximum at 60 cm width and 30 cm length. Neutron collision at 0.5 GeV proton beam energy at various lengths Neutron yields at 0.5 GeV proton beam energy for 30 cm, 60cm and 90cm target lengths and various target widths

GEANT4 benchmarking studies - Conclusion The results from GEANT4 in the previous slides showed close matches with MCNP4A in terms of the line shape and close to the experimental results with corresponding neutron energies for each angle. This study of the neutron yield dependents on the target size showed that the neutron yield increases with target length. However, there was no significant increase in the neutron yield for target longer than 60 cm. This validation study shows that there is the good agreement between GEANT4 and MCNP4A prediction of neutron yields measured in various angles. Hence the GEANT4 is proven to be reliable to carry on further spallation and ADSRs simulation studies. GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work Emphasis that GEANT4 is capable of simulating ADSR and neutron production studies.

MYRRHA; first ADS in the world - Introduction GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work MYRRHA, a flexible fast spectrum research reactor (50-100 MWth) is conceived as an accelerator driven system (ADS), able to operate in sub-critical and critical modes located in Belgium. The facility consists of a proton accelerator of 600 MeV, a spallation target and a multiplying core with MOX fuel, cooled by liquid lead-bismuth (Pb-Bi). (H. Aït Abderrahim, “MYRRHA An innovative and unique irradiation research facility,” in Tenth International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Applications of Accelerators (AccApp’11), 2011., P. Baeten, et.al “MYRRHA : A multi-purpose nuclear research facility. 2014.) MYRRHA with full name: multipose hybrid research reactor for high-tech applications I was motivated from the MYRRAH presentation in 2011 by Direactor Hamid.. And

Research 1 : neutrons in different regions Area Material Size ( mm 𝟐 ) (Annular radius X Length) Spallation target (Blue) PbBi 97.55 × 300 Fuel (Yellow) Thorium 97.55 × 1400 Reflector: Inner dump (green) Inner shielding: Outer dump (Cyan) Zr O 2 Y 2 O 3 Zr 2 O 3 GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work MYRRHA geometry construction in GEANT4 In order to observe the neutron propagation through different region, a simplified geometry was created mimicking the specifications of MYRRHA’s fuel assembly then explain each region with colour. Core specification used in the simulation A preliminary simulation of neutron distributions carried out in a thorium fuelled ADSR A simple geometry was constructed to monitor neutron production in each region The size of each region was placed as same as the size of the a fuel assembly in MYRRHA.

Research 1 : neutrons in different regions GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work Number of outer going neutrons in the core Number of neutrons back-scattered into the core In the figure showing outer going neutrons, neutron spectrum for the region 1 to 2 shows the highest number of neutrons per incident proton. In the figure showing neurons back-scattered, the highest number of neutrons back-scattered was recorded from the region 1 to the spallation target. Start with the left point out that the region 1 to 2 is the highest rate of neutrons outgoing which suggest that this region is the dominant region of increasing number of neutrons Number of neutrons backward. Point out many neutrons are coming backward to the spallation target.

Research 2 : neutrons escaping from the core Area Number of assembly placed Spallation Target (blue) 1 Fuel (yellow) 76 Reflector: Inner dump (green) 36 Inner shielding Outer dump (Cyan) 42 GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work MYRRHA core simulation arrangement After that I have created a configured core arrangement with the specs of MYRRHA core assemblies. This studies monitors effects of reflector and inner shielding area on the neutrons escaping from the core. The current research focuses on neutron production with thorium fuel. For the purpose of this study, the reactor fuel was replaced with fertile thorium. In this study, the simulation did not include the extra shielding assembly area for understanding the effector of the reflector.

Research 2 : neutrons escaping from the core GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work The ratio of escaping neutron per incident proton The result shows that reflector decreases the ratio of neutrons escaped in high energy range. There is no significant difference at the neutron energy range of 0-2 MeV The ratio of escaping neutrons from the core is still high with the reflector so the additional shielding material is necessary for increasing neutron flux inside the core structure. Explain the difference between the reflector and without the reflector. Point out that the maximum neutron energy in each curve.

Research 3 : neutrons escaping from shielding The results indicated that all three material show similar rate of preventing neutrons escaped. Amongst these types of shielding, Zirconium dioxide showed the lowest rate of neutrons escaped. The results suggested that further studies needed with the outer shielding in place. Shielding materials used Yttrium Oxide ( Y 2 O 3 ) Zirconium Sesquioxide ( Zr 2 O 3 ) Zirconium dioxide( ZrO 2 ) GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work Point out that all three curves have similar rate of neutrons escaping from the core and the result may vary when the extra shielding is in place The ratio of escaping neutron with different shielding per incident proton as function of energy

Conclusion GEANT4 simulation for the benchmarking with an experiment showed at least as accurate as MCNPX. The QGSP_INCLXX_HP physics list appears to reproduce the experimental results more closely. For MYRRHA study, the reflector (LBE) showed a significant effect to reduce the neutrons escaping from the core. However, extra shielding area is still needed for increasing neutron flux inside the core. The three materials tested in the inner shielding(i.e outer dump) area showed a similar rate of reducing neutrons escaping from the core. It is suggested that the results combined with the outer shielding area may show some significant changes of the results. GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work

Acknowledgement I would like to express my gratitude to Prof Robert Cywinski for the guidance of this project, Prof Rebecca Seviour for the support of PhD program and Dr Cristian&Adriana Bungau for the technical support of Geant4 program.

Thank you.

Research 4 : neutrons escaping from outer shield GEANT4 Spallation MYRRHA Current Work The ratio of escaping neutron with ZrO 2 shielding per incident proton as function of energy The ratio of escaping neutron with Y 2 O 3 shielding per incident proton as function of energy Point out that all three curves have similar rate of neutrons escaping from the core and the result may vary when the extra shielding is in place