of Teaching: Challenges

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing an Outcomes Assessment Plan. Part One: Asking a Meaningful Question OA is not hard science as we are doing it. Data that you collect is only.
Advertisements

Using the Seven Principles as a Framework for the Evaluation of Student Ratings and Teaching Karl Wirth and Adrienne Christiansen Serie Center for Scholarship.
Dr. Hari Singh School of Business Humboldt State University.
IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.
Academic Assessment Workshop: A Review of the Student Satisfaction Inventory Implementation & Implication Liz Baldizan, Ed.D., Assistant Dean, Academic.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
+ Measuring Teaching Quality in the Online Classroom Ann H. Taylor Director, Dutton e-Education Institute College of Earth and Mineral Sciences.
Competency-based Instructional System Design: A Model for Program Assessment 3 rd Annual Texas A&M Assessment Conference Barbara Lyon, Ed.D., SPHR Tarleton.
Outcome Assessment Reporting for Undergraduate Programs Stefani Dawn and Bill Bogley Office of Academic Programs, Assessment & Accreditation Faculty Senate,
PORTFOLIO. Student Uses Students CollectReflectShare Collect class requirements Collect graduation requirements Reflect on learning in class Reflect on.
PARTNERSHIP FOR STUDENT SUCCESS AT SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE Overview and Two Models.
Strategies for Implementing Program-Level Assessment through Outcomes Jeremy Anderson Manager, Academic Computing Dr. Kaitlin Walsh Instructional Designer/Technologist.
December 2010 Board of Trustees Overview of the New Accreditation, Accountability, and Assessment Committee Structure.
Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.
FA Awarding of Supervisory Units. Purpose Investigate issues related to assignment and awarding of supervisory units and respond to questions.
EARLY ALERT GRADE PROPOSAL University Senate, November 2012.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
ELearning and Embedded Librarians Gretchen Keer Mary Beth Parkinson Peter Scheponik.
Concerns, Data, Next Steps.  New Administration Software from Scantron  New Academic Senate Policy  New Items/Survey Form (ACE, Iowa Item Pool)  New.
Teaching Council Recommendations to the Faculty Senate DRAFT 2/9/09 & 3rd DRAFT Feb 13, 2009 for use by the FS Exec Committee, March 4, 2009.
Stefani Dawn Assistant Director of Assessment Office of Academic Program, Assessment and Accreditation eSET.
STEM MEET AND GREET MSJC Academy Spring 2012 Patricia Menchaca : Instructional Activities Leticia Luna-Sims: Student.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
IDEA Ad Hoc Committee Report Submitted by: Andreas Veh, Diane Erickson, Nelta Edwards, Kerri Morris UAA Faculty Senate, Dec. 7, 2007.
ESET: Combined Versus Uncombined Reports Stefani Dawn, PhD Assistant Director of Assessment Academic Programs, Assessment and Accreditation.
2009 C OMMUNITY C OLLEGE S URVEY OF S TUDENT E NGAGEMENT & F ACULTY S URVEY OF S TUDENT E NGAGEMENT RESULTS FOR IVCC (CCSSE AND CCFSSE) Cathy Bangert &
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Learning Assessment Techniques
From Good To Great! Sherrell Wheeler–Director, Online Quality Assurance Tanya Allred–Associate Professor of English Karen May–Adjunct Faculty of Business.
NEFLIN Assessment Basics for Library Instruction
Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using Brightspace
Evidence of Teaching Effectiveness
Development of Quality Initiatives on a Less-Travelled Path: The Online Fellows Program Judith A. Giering, Ph.D. Karyn E. Holt, Ph.D. Drexel University.
LASC 2010 Program Review Orientation
Individual Thinking Time
Finding/Creating Meaning in SLO Assessment
Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
Converging Instructional Technology to Encourage Faculty Adoption
Online Teaching Conference
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Course Evaluation Committee
Administrative Review Process
Fall 2012 Executive Committee Report to the Faculty Senate
Games and Student Motivation
Qualtrics Proposal Gwen Gorzelsky, Executive Director, TILT
QUALITY OF EDUCATION PROPOSED ACTION PLAN FALL 2018
GERT Force October 4, 2018.
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs)
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
SVR: Stage of Assessment SITE VISIT REPORT: Standard 5.1
EDUCAUSE MARC 2004 E-Portfolios: Two Approaches for Transforming Curriculum & Promoting Student Learning Glenn Johnson Instructional Designer Penn State.
Pilot Goals Focus Consistency Response
Academic Affairs Update Monday, November 20, 2017
Faculty Senate January 2013
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
Faculty Senate President’s Report
Senate Meeting Summary
Faculty Senate January 2013
Veronica Acevedo Avila Mae Le Mary Pape Dawn Lee Tu
SLO Assessment Cycle Course and Program
FA Review and Clarification of Appendix 15A
Writing Non-Instructional Outcomes
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Introduction to myIMPACT-Adjuncts
Quality Matters Overview
Presentation transcript:

of Teaching: Challenges Student Evaluation of Teaching: Challenges And Solutions Faculty Senate Forum Thursday, May 31 2012 1

Goals for SETs: Provide meaningful student feedback 2 Goals for SETs: Provide meaningful student feedback concerning instructional success/failure 5/29/12 2

Goals for SETs: Provide meaningful student feedback 3 Goals for SETs: Provide meaningful student feedback concerning instructional success/failure Provide insight for improving student interaction 5/29/12 3

Goals for SETs: Provide meaningful student feedback 4 Goals for SETs: Provide meaningful student feedback concerning instructional success/failure Provide insight for improving student interaction (Historically) Provide a “scale” to compare student satisfaction with instruction 5/29/12 4

Challenges with the SET: 5 Challenges with the SET: Student Bias—consequences in P&T, compensation, assignment 5

Challenges with the SET: 6 Challenges with the SET: Student Bias—consequences in P&T, compensation, assignment Faculty and Administrators misusing process 6

Challenges with the SET: 7 Challenges with the SET: Student Bias—consequences in P&T, compensation, assignment Faculty and Administrators misusing process Meeting the need for anonymity (esp. in small enrollment courses) 7

Challenges with the SET: 8 Challenges with the SET: Student Bias—consequences in P&T, compensation, assignment Faculty and Administrators misusing process Meeting the need for anonymity (esp. in small enrollment courses) Desire to gain student feedback on issues not directly linked to quality of instruction (e.g., assessment of meeting learning outcomes) 8

Role of the Faculty Senate 9 Role of the Faculty Senate Faculty controls the SET instrument and how it may be used in P&T. Cost is borne by the Office for Academic Affairs; we need a cooperative relationship. 9

Role of the Faculty Senate 1010 Role of the Faculty Senate Immediate challenges: Assessment of Teaching; Student anonymity in small enrollment courses 10

Role of the Faculty Senate 1111 Role of the Faculty Senate Immediate challenges: Assessment of Teaching; Student anonymity in small enrollment courses The Bacc. Core Committee is running a voluntary pilot to add questions concerning perceptions about SLOs in Synthesis courses 11

Role of the Faculty Senate 1212 Role of the Faculty Senate Immediate challenges: Assessment of Teaching; Student anonymity in small enrollment courses The Bacc. Core Committee is running a voluntary pilot to add questions concerning perceptions about SLOs in Synthesis courses The Senate President and EC have approved an interim approach to low enrollment courses and respondent anonymity pending Senate approval 12

Today’s Discussion Immediate issues with SET administration 1313 Today’s Discussion Immediate issues with SET administration (Stefani Dawn): Small enrollment courses Slash courses and reporting Inclusion/exclusion of identifying student demographic information Bacc. Core assessment pilot: voluntary vs. mandatory and use of data Where to go with formative vs. summative evaluation 13

Task Force Recommendations Costly to implement Pilot Project requested by Task Force Quarter System makes Formative Reviews a Challenge Many Instructors currently conduct Formative Assessment

Evaluation of Teaching ●Complex Challenge ( OSU Faculty Senate has been discussing this for decades! ) ●Need multiple tools to assess, evaluate and support Teaching Excellence ●Some tools already in place ●Peer Evaluation of Teaching ●Center for Teaching and Learning