Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 2010 Report on Oasis Data 2007-2010 Long Beach, CA September 13 -14, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

LEUCEMIA MIELOIDE AGUDA TIPO 0
CAPA Best Practices Open Discussion
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
October 2008 MPDPF and MOC Enhancements – Consolidated Mockups.
RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent (RA) Process Flow Diagram (Move-In) Customer Supplier Customer authorizes Enrollment ( )
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
Company Confidential OASIS Feedback Process (Using OASIS to Drive Improvement) 1.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 OP Assessor Workshop: OASIS Update Bryan Blunt Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego,
Report Card P Only 4 files are exported in SAMS, but there are at least 7 tables could be exported in WebSAMS. Report Card P contains 4 functions: Extract,
ABC Technology Project
Primary research figuresPrimary research figures These are some of the results from my primary research. percentages of people who like/dislike the show.
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.
EIS Bridge Tool and Staging Tables September 1, 2009 Instructor: Way Poteat Slide: 1.
1 / / / /. 2 (Object) (Object) –, 10 (Class) (Class) –, –, – (Variables) [ Data member Field Attribute](, ) – (Function) [ Member function Method Operation.
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
© S Haughton more than 3?
© 2007 Lawrenceville Press Slide 1 Chapter 3 Margins.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
1..
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Roles & Responsibilities San Diego, California January 20, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Ke – Kitchen Elements Newport Ave. – Lot 13 Bethesda, MD.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
CpSc 3220 Designing a Database
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 July 2010 Report on Oasis Data for 2007,2008,2009 & 2010 (YTD May) Atlanta, Georgia July.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 CB and Auditor Performance Expectations Boston, MA July 22, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Report on Oasis Data for Primary focus on 12 month roll starting in November.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Audit Calc Program Palm Beach, Florida January 16, 2014 Tim Lee The Boeing Company.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 July 17, 2014 Bryan Blunt IAQG OASIS Administrator OASIS Tools for Continuous Improvement / Next-Gen.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Audit Outcomes & Appropriate Conclusions July 16, 2014 Bob Cruse ANAB, Aerospace Program Manager.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Certification Body Scorecard Process Database Committee Report R. Darrell Taylor July 17, 2012.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) CB Report Cards – Auditor Influence July 2015 Charleston, SC R. Darrell Taylor RMC Chair 1.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Database Committee Report July 2015 Charleston, SC R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon 1.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Database Committee Report January 2012 (Data from 2011) San Diego, CA January 10-11, 2011.
Company Confidential 1 Tim Lee July 2016 Developed by: Bryan Blunt OASIS Report Availability & Use.
Presentation transcript:

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Report on Oasis Data Long Beach, CA September , 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon Long Beach, CA September 13-14, 2011

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 2 Executive Summary Baselines have been established for 2007 – 2010 No Feedback data, changing metric Review Proposed revision to the CB Report Card

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 3 Agenda OASIS Entries – Audits OASIS Nonconformities AS9100 Elements Feedback Monitoring Model

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 4 Entries – Audits Long Beach, CA September 13-14, 2011

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 5 Comparison of Entries Entries: –2007 – 5114 –2008 – 5972 ^16% –2009 – 6969 ^17% –2010 – 7502 ^7.6% –-2011 – /1/2011 Increase slowing down

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 6 Comparison of Types SUR=Surveillance REC = Recertification INT = Initial 2011 – 72%, 21 %, 7%

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 7 Standards Entered Into Database 38 AS9100C – 2010; 225 in 2011 as 05 8/1/2011

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 8 CRB Comments – 2010 Data baselined Going to Rolling Format

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 9 Nonconformities Long Beach, CA September 13-14, 2011

Registration Management Committee (RMC) Pareto of Total Nonconformities 10 Totals 2010 – 20, , , – 14, – 65% 2 or less

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 11 OASIS Ratio of Total Findings Violates Normal Distribution Strongest fit 3 Parameter Lognormal Identify CBs in the bottom 5% writing nonconformities

Registration Management Committee (RMC) Total - Comments Field Family of Standards states ISO9001:2000 s/b 2008? 35 (<.5%)Entries with N/A in Numbers, what does that mean? –2 Initials, 1 surveillance, 32 recertification 12

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 13 Ratio Majors/Entries On average, one Major is written every fifth audit – NOTE: Average down to.18 per audit for 2010 (1/5 audits) No Change in 2011 (.19).22 for AS9100C audits Totals 2010 – –

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 14 OASIS Ratio of Majors NOT Normal Distribution strongest 3 parameter loglogistic Identify CBs in the bottom 5% writing majors

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 15 Ratio Minors/Entries On average, 2.5 Minors are written every audit 2011 – down to 2.12 AS9100C – 3.18 Totals 2010 – 18, , , –14,087

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 16 OASIS Ratio of Minors NOT Normal Distribution Lognormal Distribution Identify CBs in the bottom 5% writing minors

Registration Management Committee (RMC) Evaluation of Audit Type INT, REC, SUR Chi Squared Test returned a P-Value = MajorAVGSDCountMINMEDMAX INT REC SUR Minor INT REC SUR

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 18 AS9100 Nonconformities Top 10 Top Eight 2010 same as 2009 & 2008 NO CHANGE

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 19 Feedback Analysis 2010 average 103 per month 2009 average 112 per month 2008 average 110 per month As of June 6% of 2010 Feedback Responses still open ON HOLD

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 20 Certification Body Statistical Assessment Model ANAB Audits - 6 Criteria OASIS Results - 3 Criteria Feedback - 3 Criteria General - 1 Criteria ANAB Performance -4 ON HOLD

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 21 Threshold Violations RMC & ANAB need to research –>6 ANAB to report to RMC –4-5 ANAB to investigate –2-3 No Action –<2

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Oversight Results 2011 Major & Minor Numbers 2 WA – 1 Minor / 0 Majors & 2 Minors / 0 Majors 2 OA – 3 Minors / 0 Majors & 10 Minors / 3 Majors 2009 Major & Minor Numbers 2 WA –1 Minor /4 Majors 2 OA –7 Minors /0 Major NCR trends – Not verifying OASIS admin. on site, OASIS accuracy, depth of audit, not documenting all NCRs, various checklist issues CB Activity & AEAs Standard Sites AEAs Applicant OASIS DataSupplemental Activity AB Actions: 2010 – March WA was a 2009 re-audit CB has received 2 OAs per year for two years. 1 major NCR written outside of an assessment RMC Member: (Supplemental oversight data) 2 events, 4 minor NCRs CB Name: XXX -2011

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) CB Name: XXX ANAB Additional Comments

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 24 Questions

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 25 Back Up

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 26 ICOP/ANAB Audit Results

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 27 Performance Metrics

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 28 Oasis Metrics

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 29 Feedback Metrics

Registration Management Committee (RMC) 30 Time – Line, Data Presentation JAN MAR JUL SEP First 6 Months Summary Previous Year Summary RULE VIOLATORS