Industrialization of previous projects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 LHC-DFBX Procurement Strategy Joseph Rasson LBNL Presented at the DFBX Production Readiness Review October 2002, LBNL Brookhaven - Fermilab - Berkeley.
Advertisements

M. White – June 28, 2004 LCLS Requirements Meeting In a project, we live or die by the schedule. After we’re “baselined” it is our plan for what we will.
Construction Industry Development Board development through partnership Construction Procurement documents 2c.
Question 27: Outline the key steps for industrialization of machine components and the likely remaining vulnerabilities in achieving them. Achieving industrialization.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
IR Quad Cost Estimate Status Marc Kaducak 02-Nov-2012 IR Quad Cost Estimate - M. Kaducak1.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t D e s i g n L a b o r.
Advanced Project Management Project Procurement/Contract Management Ghazala Amin.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
MICE Collaboration meeting (CM20) At RAL 10 – 13 Feb 2008 AFC Magnet – Status and Progress W. Lau, Oxford University.
Key Design Issues and Recent Reviews Tom Peterson, Fermilab DFBX PRR, October 23, 2002 US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley.
1 LHC-DFBX Fabrication Oversight Plan Joseph Rasson LBNL Presented at the DFBX Production Readiness Review October 2002, LBNL Brookhaven - Fermilab.
IARC Milestones completed Sept 2011: End of Tevatron Run, FESS obtains ~full access to infrastructure at CDF, PPD begins D&D in CDF assembly bldg Sept.
Project Procurement Management
MTF – Manufacturing and Test Folder Large Scale Deployment of MTF Sonia Mallón Amérigo Elena Manola-Poggioli on behalf of the EDMS Team, TS-CSE.
VOWTAP Progress Report VOWDA December 2, DOE Grants VOWTAP Extension No Cost Time Extension until May 31, 2016 Conditional upon achievement of two.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
HiLumi-LARP Annual Meeting November 2014 MQXF pre-series and series magnets fabrication plans Ruben Carcagno November 19,
LARP Review, June 10, 2013Magnet Cost and Schedule – M. Kaducak 1 IR Quadrupole Cost and Schedule Marc Kaducak LARP Review June 10, 2013.
Workshop summary Outline  Workshop’s aims  Highlights from the presentations (my selection!)  Costing Exercise – What we learnt  Summary - Roadmap.
LARP CM15, SLAC, 11/3/2010GianLuca SabbiSummary of MS Parallel Sessions Summary of Magnet Systems Parallel Sessions GianLuca Sabbi LARP Collaboration Meeting.
1 MICE Coupling Coil Cryostating and Test Steve Gourlay March 1, Office of Science.
PRESENTED BY HENRY RUHNKE WALD, RUHNKE & DOST ARCHITECTS, LLP SIERRA HOUSE & DROP-IN CENTER.
Tests on production cryomodules Bob Kephart Sept 30, 2006.
19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting 1 S2 Task Force Status (String test definition) Tom Himel.
EMIS Chapter 5 Much of Chap 5 and 6 varies depending on the contract type. Two major types are important so we’ll digress to Contracting 101 for.
ACD Down-Select Criteria and Time Scales for HLRF ML-KOM FNAL September 27 、 2007 S. Fukuda, KEK & Ray Larsen, SLAC For the ILC HLRF Collaboration.
Global design effort Americas 1 FY08-09 ILC-Americas planning G. Dugan ILC-Americas Planning meeting SLAC Sept. 13, 2006.
HCSD Office of Business Services AUGUST 4, Purchasing Procedures  All employees involved in purchasing activities will work to maintain and enhance.
Construction Tender Process Tender steps between Client, Contractor and Subcontractor Dr A Kimmance.
Contracting Officer Podcast Slides
Illinois Distributed generation Procurement program
Contracting Officer Podcast Slides
+ WHY KNOWIFY MAKES SENSE FOR GAF FACTORY-CERTIFIED CONTRACTORS
Resource Loaded Schedule and Budget Profile
Jim Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
By Lillian Irene Stormo, HiB
E-rate Form 470 Filing Guide
CSP 25th November 2010 Technical agreement number 3: overview
Bills of Quantities Introduction to FIDIC - Bills of Quantities -
Illinois Distributed generation Procurement program
Financing of LHC projects and CMS
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Financial Management
MQXF Planning Paolo Fessia, Frederic Savary, Ezio Todesco, Lucio Rossi - CERN Mike Anerella, Peter Wanderer - BNL Giorgio Ambrosio, Mark Kaducak - FNAL.
Oversight Board Meeting October 3, 2017 Rob Michnoff
How To Write An Approvable Change Order
PREPARATION FOR GMP INSPECTION
EDR HLRF Work Packages Draft Summary
Region 5 Acquisition Management
Notes on Ramp-Up and Production
International Review of the Conceptual Design of the Cold Powering system for the HL-LHC Superconducting Magnets J.Ph. Tock
Introduction to New Product Development (Documentation)
Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Proposal Development
Mauro Morandin & Antoine Daël
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
Clinical Trials Budgeting, Part 2
Lesson 1- Operations Management
Lecture # 3 Software Development Project Management
Project Development Quality Program QA/QC – What does ODOT need?
Superintendent’s Proposed Budget
RF System (HLRF, LLRF, Controls) EDR Plan Overview
Construction Contracts
MULTISPORTS CENTRE PRESENTATION
Principles of Cost Accounting 15th edition
Quality Services Subcommittee
Lecture 10 Proposals.
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,
7 KEYS FOR RESPONDING TO AN RFP For many businesses, the first step in generating revenue is responding to a request for proposal (RFP). RFPs are invitations - contraxaware.com
HOME AFFAIRS IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (hanis)
Section 3 FOR HUD USE ONLY.
Presentation transcript:

Industrialization of previous projects Tom Himel 19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting

Why look at industrialization? It could be that cryomodules built to jump start industry would be available for system tests and hence the system test is cheaper and can be bigger thant otherwise would be practical. It could be that we feel system tests are needed to test industrial output. It could be that a large system test could be needed to provide some of the motivation and funding for industrialization that we think is needed. It could be that industrialization and our system tests are on different time scales and hence unrelated. 19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting

Overview Have gotten information on SSC and RHIC SC magnet industrialization Intend to get LHC magnets, LEP SC cavities See how it was done, and in particular when it was done compared to funding of the project and how production rate was ramped up. Collect any lessons learned 19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting

SSC Info from Gerry Dugan It’s been a long time so Gerry was a little fuzzy on some details, but was pretty sure he had the broad brush strokes correct. He commented that the SSC was not a model to be copied as he didn’t think it had worked very well. The original development of the SSC SC magnets was done primarily at FNAL, LBNL, and BNL. They were told to design magnets to a certain specification and they succeeded in designing and building such magnets. The industrialization started after formal approval and funding of the SSC in 1989. In a first step, General Dynamics and Westinghouse won bids to build magnet factories. They may have won these bids without ever having built an SC magnet or maybe there was a small bid for a small quantity production first. (Gerry was fuzzy on this.) 19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting

SSC Info from Gerry Dugan They definitely visited FNAL and BNL to get trained on how to build the magnets. They were paid to build factories without having submitted final bids for the full quantity production. The bid for the full quantity was done as a build to specification (as opposed to build to print). There were some options in the contracts to allow SSC to steer more or less of the production to one company or another. This was supposed to provide them incentive to keep their bids low. The first bids were very high. This happened because the companies assumed that all parts without detailed specifications had to be mil-spec. This got straightened out, but the final prices were still considerably higher than the engineering estimates. The string test was done after project approval and was finished in 1992. Gerry thinks it was done with magnets made at the labs, not the companies. He thinks the companies did build some magnets before the SSC project was shut down. 19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting

RHIC info from Mike Anerella FY89 R&D funding started March 1989 – Final Design Review (Internal Review Panel) FY91 (October 1990)-- construction funding started November 1990 – Industrialization Program Prospective vendors came to BNL for 2 day lecture and tour. (First introduction to SC magnets for many vendors) May 1991 – Request For Proposals. Basis Fully engineered assembly and parts drawings created for production Complete set of procedures and material specifications 12 complete magnets built at BNL Elements of proposals Manufacturing plan, Tooling and equipment plan, QA plan Business Response Schedule Cost and pricing 19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting

RHIC info from Mike Anerella 1991 – 1992 Source Evaluation Board for Contract Review June 1992 – Contract Award Phase 1 – 30 10M magnets, “Cost Plus Fixed Fee” Phase 2 – 268 remaining 10M magnets, “Fixed Price Incentive Fee” Phase 3 – 75 insertion dipoles (3 lengths), “Fixed Price Incentive Fee” February 1993 – Technology Transfer May 1994 - 1st dipole delivered May 1996 – Contract Complete FY99 construction ended. 19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting

Summary Both started after funding The details mattered (but not to S2) Very close communication and methods of allowing changes are needed. How much of these examples applies to us needs thought. E.g. SC cable was industrialized earlier than the magnets themselves. 19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting