Summit County Council February 15, 2017

Iverson Accessory Building Appeal

Background Application received on June 29, 2016 Service Provider Review, Revisions, and Analysis August 23, 2016 - Snyderville Basin Planning Commission Negative recommendation to the Community Development Director August 26, 2016 - Community Development Director Consistent with the recommendation from the Snyderville Basin Planning Commission, denied the Low Impact Permit September 2, 2016 - Community Development Director’s decision appealed

Original Application Request: Accessory Building has a gross floor area of 3,480 sq. ft. Approximately 1,132 sq. ft. Accessory Dwelling unit The applicant has stated the uses for the proposed Accessory Building are for; Guest quarters Storage of: Boat Wave runners Utility terrain vehicle Future tractor and tractor implements Vehicle Camper trailer A future horse and chickens Feed for animals Yard tools

Key Discussion Points: Does the property already have an Accessory Dwelling Unit? Additional driveway to second access road. Size of the proposed Accessory Building and Accessory Dwelling Unit. Architecture of the proposed Accessory Building.

Existing Accessory Dwelling Unit (above garage)

Approx. 400’ distance 50’ elevation difference Separate Driveway

FLOOR AREA: The sum of the gross horizontal areas of the several stories of the building measured from the exterior faces of the exterior walls or from the centerline of party walls. Included shall be any basement floor, interior balconies and mezzanines, elevator shafts, stairwells and enclosed porches. The floor area of accessory uses and of accessory buildings on the same lot shall be included.

Conversion into Bedroom Potential and Easy Conversion into Bedroom Approximately 255 sq. ft. Proposed Floor Area Approximately 1,132 sq. ft. ? Entrance corridor Approximately 140 sq. ft. Porch and Front Door

Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Summit County Council evaluate Staff’s analysis, review the information provided in the Staff Report, and vote to uphold the Community Development Director’s decision to deny the proposed Low Impact Permit as outlined in in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Exhibit F of the Staff Report). Witness - Richard Angell