2017 Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Student Learning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multi-State Collaborative to Advance Learning Outcome Assessment Pilot Project and PCC.
Advertisements

Weber State University Meeting the Challenges of Library Instruction in Core Writing Courses Carol Hansen Professor and Instruction Services Librarian.
Pilot Study Introduction and Overview 1.  Julie Carnahan Senior Associate - SHEEO MSC Project Director  Terrel Rhodes Vice President.
Multi-State Collaborative 1.  Susan Albertine Vice President, Office of Diversity, Equity, and Student Success, AAC&U Faculty Engagement Subgroup, MSC.
Determining the Validity and Reliability of Key Assessments and Other Questions Regarding Key Assessments.
Ramesh Sabetiashraf Rubrics as a Learning Activity Bring your Classroom to Life Ramesh Sabetiashraf.
1 Feel free to contact us at
W. Ken Farr Economics and Finance GCSU Assessment Day 2010 The Economics Major Assessment Methodology.
 Evolving Assessment & ePortfolio at LaGuardia Community College J. Elizabeth Clark LaGuardia Community College--CUNY.
AAC&U/ Minnesota Collaborative Pilot (MCP) Project: Artifacts and Assessment Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 1.
California State University East Bay
Multi-State Collaborative For Learning Outcomes Assessment (MSC) An initiative sponsored by the Association of American Colleges and Universities and the.
Differential Effects of Participatory Evaluation in a National Multi-site Program Evaluation Frances Lawrenz University of Minnesota.
Task 1: Planning for Instruction and Assessment
Information Literacy Progress & Best Practice Richard Sweeney /16/2009 Agenda – 10 minutes –Institute IL Plan (8 Standards)
Assessment Report School of The Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Department: Sociology Chair: Julie M. Ford Assessment Coordinator: Elliot.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
What do you do when your assessment data are in? Using Assessment Data to Improve Learning 1.
Learning Outcomes Assessment Development of Statewide Plan in Massachusetts & Proposal for Multi-State Collaborative SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference.
VALUE/Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary These slides summarize results from.
Science Inquiry Larry Scheffler November 25, 2009 Parkrose High School.
Faculty Driven Assessment Karla Guilford Shipp Tidewater Community College Virginia Beach, VA.
Program Assessment: What Difference Does it Make? Ross Miller, AAC&U.
Multi-State Collaborative. What is it? Oregon University System (OUS) partnership with 9 states, Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U),
AAC&U VALUE Project: Minnesota Collaborative Demonstration Year 2 ( ) Demonstration Year 3 ( ) 1.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean.
A Paradigm Shift in the Assessment of Learning Outcomes Tara Rose Director of University Assessment University of Kentucky Jeanne Mullaney.
What is Good Assessment? Liberal Education Core Example
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Designing Valid Reliable Grading Tools Using VALUE Rubrics
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Beyond the “A” Word Assessment that Empowers Faculty to
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Assessing GE & Institutional Outcomes
General Overview March 26, 2012
Discourse Faculty Meeting
General Education Assessment
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
General Education Assessment
Preparing Future Faculty/FaCET Assessment Session
SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference | August 8–10, 2012 State Agency Workshop Session Learning Outcomes Assessment Development of Statewide Plan.
Refinement Year Results ( ) – 1/19/2018
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
Continuing to Advance the Culture of Assessment in Massachusetts
LEARNAPALOZZA: SERVICE-LEARNING AT CPCC
The Pain and Promise of CRITICAL CORE Implementation
Aqua Training Webinar for Refinement Year Participants
AY College-Wide Learning Outcomes Results
UH Curriculum Benchmarks
Quantitative Literacy at WOU
HOW DO WE KNOW OUR STUDENTS ARE LEARNING?
Framingham State University
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
Collecting Data to Assess Capstone and Culminating Courses
Refinement Year Results ( ) – 3/6/2018
Learning Outcomes Assessment Update
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
Critical Inquiry (Goal A):
Critical Inquiry (Goal C):
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Critical Inquiry (Goal B):
Assessment Spring 2016.
Department Chair: Liz Brown Date of Presentation: 01/19/18
Tia McNair.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
Presentation transcript:

2017 Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Student Learning RCTC’s participation in an exciting assessment initiative

What is the MSC? 13 state multi-year collaboration Authentic assessment of student work Use of VALUE rubrics (VALUE = Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education) Emphasis on reliable, valid data Assessed student learning outcomes: Quantitative Literacy, Written Communication, Critical thinking

How does the MSC do its work?

What are the MSC results so far? “On Solid Ground” Value Report 2017 Pages 23 and 24: Minnesota Collaborative Pages 40 to 43: Community college results for Critical Thinking Quantitative Literacy Written Communication

What does RCTC have to do? Collect a statistically valid sample across the institution. Submit 200 de-identified student artifacts. Provide faculty “scorers” to assess student artifacts from other institutions.

What about data privacy? What do I have to do? If selected, you will need to provide student artifacts from one appropriate assignment in your course. you will need to make sure your student assignment meets specified MSC parameters. That’s all! What about data privacy? All student artifacts “de-identified”. There is no way to match students, teachers, courses. All MSC data reports will be at the aggregate level.

What are the benefits for RCTC? Sustained assessment initiative. Benchmarked data. Informed decisions about learning outcomes. Questions? Feel free to contact Tricia Olinger Teresa Brown Mike Mutschelknaus (email Mike for a copy of this powerpoint)

Discussion questions How could the MSC initiative help improve…. Student learning in the classroom? Department and program assessment efforts? Meaningful assessment of college core outcomes? Sustaining RCTC’s assessment initiatives?