Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Carcillo JA, Gerlach.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faculty Mitchell M. Levy, MD, FCCM
Advertisements

R. Phillip Dellinger, MD, MCCM, FCCP
The Duration of Hypotension Prior to Initiation of Effective Antimicrobial Therapy is the Critical Determinant of Survival in Human Septic Shock Anand.
University of Minnesota – School of Nursing Spring Research Day Glycemic Control of Critically Ill Patients Lynn Jensen, RN; Jessica Swearingen, BCPS,
The New Surviving Sepsis Bundles: From Time Zero to Tomorrow
A Randomized Trial of Protocol-Based Care for Early Septic Shock Andrea Caballero, MD January 15, 2015 LSU Journal Club The ProCESS Investigators. N Engl.
Aggressive Hyperglycemia Management. Significant hospital hyperglycemia requires close follow-up Previously diagnosed diabetes and elevated A1C Without.
Perioperative Glucose Management in Cardiothoracic Surgery
MODELING METHOD Glucose-Insulin System Model CLINICAL DATA DATA: Are taken from the SPRINT [3] TGC cohort totalling 393 patients and ~40,000 patient hours.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes Chapter 26 Jean-Claude Tardif, Phillipe L. L’Allier, David.
Shock and Sepsis 2 of 2 William Whitehead, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Anesthesiology.
Severe Sepsis Initial recognition and resuscitation
Early Goal Therapy in Severe Sepsis & Septic Shock
THE TRISS TRIAL Holst, L et al. Lower versus Higher Hemoglobin Threshold for Transfusion in Septic Shock. New England Journal of Medicine October 9, 2014.
Glycemic Control in Acutely Ill Patients Martin J. Abrahamson, MD FACP Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School Senior Vice President for.
Rattan Juneja MD¹; Michael E. Stuart, MD 2,3 ; Sheri A. Strite 3 Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana¹ University of Washington,
Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Carcillo JA, Gerlach H,
Sugar control in Critical care unit Senior clinical pharmacist : Lihua Fang Koo Foundation Cancer Center.
Glycemic Control for myocardial infraction. Why??????
INTRODUCTION Stress-induced hyperglycaemia is common in critical care 1 Hyperglycaemia worsens patient outcomes, increasing risk of infection 2, myocardial.
Mr PS 76 years old COPD, no DM Severe CAP Day 1- intubated, sedated, high o2 requirements, vasopressor dependent Starting early EN Glucose 11.1 mmol/L.
The Patient Undergoing Surgery: Proven Steps to Better Outcomes Ariel U. Spencer, MD Lafayette Surgical Clinic Lafayette, Indiana.
Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critical Ill Patients N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 雙和醫院 劉慧萍藥師.
4-06 CHANGE IS GOOD: THE BASAL BOLUS INSULIN CONCEPT Management of Hyperglycemia in the Adult Hospitalized Patient TEAM MEMBERS: Physicians: Maryann Emanuele,

Validation of a Virtual Patient and Virtual Trials Method for Accurate Prediction of TGC Protocol Performance F Suhaimi 1,5, A.J. LeCompte 1, S Penning.
Hyperglycemia-Am I A Control Freak? COPYRIGHT © 2013, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of.
Applying the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines to Clinical Practice
Improving Patient Outcomes GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN PERI-OPERATIVE PATIENTS UTILIZING INSULIN INFUSION PROTOCOLS.
Albumin Safety and Efficacy as a Resuscitative Therapy in the ICU: Are all ICU patients the same? Gary R. Haynes, M.D., Ph.D. Professor, Department of.
Sepsis course – VI: Surviving Sepsis Campaign Zsolt Molnár University of Szeged 2009.
SEPSIS & SEPTIC SHOCK Jaime Palomino, MD Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine Tulane University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, Louisiana.
EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL V. INTENSIVE BLOOD GLUCOSE CONTROL Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients DANELLE BLUME UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA COLLEGE OF.
Hyperglycemia: Is This Still a Concern? Lauren E. Healy BA, PharmD, BCPS NYSCHP Downstate Critical Care Program October 2, 2015.
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: The Sepsis Epidemic: How to Win.
EXPLORING END USERS’ SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS TO A HANDHELD COMPUTER SUPPORTING BOTH SEPSIS TEST WORKFLOW AND CURRENT IT SOLUTIONS Medinfo /08/2013 Lasse.
GRADE for reducing adverse outcomes actions to reduce adverse outcomes should be based on confidence in estimates of effectactions to reduce adverse outcomes.
PowerHour Information 03/09/2011.  Background  Description  Vision  Mission  Measurements  Participation Requirements.
Postoperative Glucose Control and SCIP Measures Gorav Ailawadi, MD Chief, Adult Cardiac Surgery University of Virginia April 25, 2015.
Achieving Glycemic Control in the Hospital Setting Part 1 of 3
Top Papers in Critical Care 2013 Janna Landsperger RN, MSN, ACNP-BC.
Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: UPDATE Glycemic Goals in the Care of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes ADA and AACE Guidelines: Room For Improvement.
Achieving Glycemic Control in the Hospital Setting (Part 2 of 4)
Achieving Glycemic Control in the Hospital Setting
Steroid Therapy.
Anything else? Glucose – tight control must be better NICE-SUGAR study investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill.
Update in Critical Care Medicine Ann Intern Med 2007;147:
Traitements non Antibiotiques du Choc Septique Djillali ANNANE, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré Garches,
Impact of Intensive Insulin Therapy on Neuromuscular Complications and Ventilator Dependency in the Medical Intensive Care Unit Greet Hermans, Alexander.
Review of Recent Developments in Context Greg Maynard MD, MSc
Nallasamy K, Jayashree M, Singhi S, Bansal A
From: Short-term vs Conventional Glucocorticoid Therapy in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseThe REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial.
Surgical ICU, Heart Institute University of São Paulo
Insulin Delivery Systems Atlanta Diabetes Associates
Introduction Methods Results Conclusion
Tight Blood Glucose Control With Insulin in the ICU
The Duration of Hypotension Prior to Initiation of Effective Antimicrobial Therapy is the Critical Determinant of Survival in Human Septic Shock Anand.
Copyright © 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Clinical Evidence for Glucose Control in the Inpatient Setting
Evaluation of a plasma Insulin Model for Glycaemic Control in Intensive Care Jennifer Dickson, Felicity Thomas, Chris Pretty, Kent Stewart, Geoffrey Shaw,
DEBATE: Timing of CRRT in Critical Care
Copyright © 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors work by blocking the reabsorption of filtered glucose in the kidneys. This leads to glucosuria and improved.
Managing Hypoglycemia & Hyperglycemia
A decade after the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial: Weaving firm clinical recommendations from lessons learned  Robert E.
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the American College of Cardiology 2004, Scientific Sessions, in New Orleans, Louisiana on.
Avoiding Hypoglycemia in the Hospital Setting
PowerPoint 16:9 Screen Ratio Template *
Postoperative blood glucose levels and total insulin requirement.
Presentation transcript:

Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Carcillo JA, Gerlach H, Opal S, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally M, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld G, Webb S, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R, and the SSC Management Guidelines Committee Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637 Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165-228 The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) has recently published recommendations and guidelines for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Each of the authors who wrote a section of the publication have prepared a slide presentation for that section, which ESICM and SCCM are making available to physicians around the world. This should help to disseminate the latest guidelines and the up-to-date supporting literature, and advance the care of septic patients.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) 2012 Guidelines Glucose Control Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637 Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165-228 This section relates to glucose control. For many years, physicians were not very aggressive about the treatment of hyperglycemia within the ICU, and it was not unusual to see patients with serum glucose levels above 200 mg/dL. In a 2001 landmark paper in the New England Journal of Medicine, van den Berghe and colleagues showed that intensive insulin therapy could improve survival in ICU patients. This changed the way intensivists approached the problem of glucose control in the ICU.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 Guidelines – Glucose Control We recommend protocolized approach to blood glucose management, commencing insulin dosing when 2 consecutive blood glucose levels are >180 mg/dL. This protocolized approach should target upper blood glucose <180 mg/dL rather than upper target blood glucose <110 mg/dL. Grade 1A NICE-SUGAR. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283–1297 van den Berghe G. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359–1367 Dellinger P. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637 Dellinger P. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:165-228 The 2008 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommended intravenous insulin therapy to reduce blood glucose levels, targeting glucose levels to a range <150 mg/dL. The present recommendations have changed, recommending to commence insulin dosing with a trigger of blood glucose levels >180 mg/dL and targeting blood glucose <180 mg/dL (based on the NICS-SUGAR study) rather than an upper target blood glucose <110 mg/dL (based on the van den Berghe studies).

Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 Guidelines – Glucose Control Large randomized single-center trial (predominantly cardiac surgical ICU) demonstrated reduced ICU mortality with intensive intravenous insulin targeting blood glucose to 80–110 mg/dL. van den Berghe G. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359–1367 Second randomized trial of intensive insulin therapy using this protocol enrolled medical ICU patients with anticipated ICU LOS of >3 days; overall mortality was not reduced. van den Berghe G. N Engl J Med 2006;354:449–461 Dellinger P. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:580–637 Dellinger P. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:165-228 The results of the 2 van den Berghe studies.

Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients Kaplan-Meier curves showing cumulative survival of patients who received intensive insulin treatment or conventional treatment in the ICU (predominantly cardiac surgical ICU patients) in the first van den Berghe study. Patients discharged alive from the ICU (panel A) and from the hospital (panel B) were considered to have survived. In both cases, the differences between the treatment groups were significant (survival in ICU, nominal P=0.005 and adjusted P<0.04; in-hospital survival, nominal P=0.01). Tight glycemic control= 80-110 mg/dL vs. 215 mg/dL + maintenance 180 and 200 mg/dL. van den Berghe et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359

Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients The effect of intensive insulin treatment on the time from ICU admission until death is shown for the intention-to-treat group (panel A) and the subgroup of patients staying in the ICU for 3 or more days (panel B) in the second van den Berghe study in medical ICU patients. P values for the intention-to-treat group were not significant, whereas they were for the subgroup staying in the ICU for 3 or more days. Tight glycemic control= 80-110 mg/dL vs. 215 mg/dL + maintenance 180 and 200 mg/dL. van den Berghe et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:449

But…

Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 Guidelines – Glucose Control Subsequent RCTs studied mixed populations of surgical and medical ICU patients and found that intensive insulin therapy did not significantly decrease mortality, whereas the NICE-SUGAR trial demonstrated an increased mortality. Brunkhorst FM. VISEP. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:125–139 Preiser JC. Glucontrol. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1738 Annane D. COIITSS. JAMA .2010;303:341–348 NICE-SUGAR. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283–1297 Dellinger P. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637 Dellinger P. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165-228 Subsequent randomized controlled trials (RCTs), referenced here, studied mixed populations of surgical and medical ICU patients, and found that intensive insulin therapy did not significantly decrease mortality. In fact, the NICE-SUGAR trial demonstrated an increased mortality.

VISEP Intensive Insulin Trial The VISEP study showed no significant difference in mortality at 28 days between patients in the tight glycemic control group (24.7%; glucose 80-110 mg/dL) versus those in the control group (26.0%; glucose 180-200 mg/dL). Brunkhorst FM. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:125

Intensive vs. Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Time, days 100 Hospital survival probability (%) P = 0.386 Intensive Glucose Control Control In the Glucontrol study, 30-day mortality also was not different between the intensive insulin group (17.0%) [target blood glucose treatment group, 4.4–6.1 mmol/L (81-108 mg/dL)] and the control group (18.8%) [7.8–10.0 mmol/L (140-180 mg/dL)]. 28-day mortality - treatment group 100/536 (18.7%); control group 83/542 (15.3%); P = 0.14 Hospital mortality - treatment group 125/536 (23.3%); control group 105/542 (19.4%); P = 0.11 Preiser JC. Glucontrol. Intensive Care Med .2009;35:1738

Intensive Insulin Therapy for Septic Shock - COIITSS Study There were also no in-hospital mortality differences in the COIITSS study, with a 45.9% mortality in patients treated with intensive insulin (80-110 mg/dL) and 42.9% mortality in patients treated with conventional insulin therapy (physician discretion). Annane D. JAMA. 2010;303:341-348

Intensive vs. Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients Tight glycemic control= 81-108 mg/dL vs. <180 mg/dL In the NICE-SUGAR study, Kaplan–Meier estimates for the probability of survival at 90 days were greater in the conventional-control group (target blood glucose range, <180 mg/dL) than in the intensive-control group (target blood glucose range, 81-108 mg/dL) [hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.23; P = 0.03]. Mortality rates were 27.5% in the intensive-control group and 24.9% in the conventional-control group. NICE-SUGAR. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283

Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 Guidelines - Glucose Control As there is no evidence that targets between 140 and 180 mg/dL are different from targets of 110 to 140 mg/dL, the recommendations use an upper target blood glucose ≤180 mg/dL without a lower target other than hypoglycemia. Treatment should avoid hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL), hypoglycemia, and wide swings in glucose levels. Dellinger P. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637 Dellinger P. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165-228 Self-explanatory

Tight Glycemic Control in the ICU: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis In a meta-analysis of 7 tight glycemic control trials, Marik showed that tight glycemic control did not reduce the 28-day mortality (odds ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.05). Marik PE. Chest. 2010;137:544

Severe Hypoglycemia ≤40mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L) 5.1% 0.8% 18.7% 3.1% 17% 4.1% 8.7% 2.7% 16.4% 7.8% 6.8% 0.5% As seen in this slide, multiple studies have demonstrated a much higher incidence of hypoglycemia in patients randomized to tight glycemic control. Treatment vs control P<0.001

Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 Guidelines - Glucose Control Mortality in clinical trials of intensive insulin therapy by high or moderate control groups The randomized controlled trials that reported benefit compared intensive insulin therapy to high controls (180–200 mg/dL) [odds ratio, 0.89 (0.73–1.09)], whereas those that did not demonstrate benefit compared intensive therapy to moderate controls (108–180 mg/dL) [odds ratio, 1.14 (1.02 to -1.26)].

Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 Guidelines - Glucose Control We recommend blood glucose values be monitored every 1-2 hours until values and insulin infusion rates are stable, then every 4 hours thereafter. Grade 1C Dellinger P. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637 Dellinger P. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165-228 Recommendations for frequency of glucose monitoring

Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 Guidelines - Glucose Control We recommend that glucose levels obtained with point-of-care testing of capillary blood be interpreted with caution, as such measurements may not accurately estimate arterial blood or plasma glucose values. No Grade Dellinger P. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637 Dellinger P. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165-228 Self-explanatory

Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 Guidelines - Glucose Control Capillary point-of-care testing found to be inaccurate with frequent false glucose elevations over range of glucose levels, but especially in hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic glucose ranges and in hypotensive patients or patients receiving catecholamines.. Hoedemaekers CW. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:3062–3066 Khan AI. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130:1527–1532 Desachy A. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:400–405 Fekih Hassen M. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87:87–91 Dellinger P. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637 Dellinger P. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165-228 Patient populations with inaccuracies for capillary blood point-of-care testing