DCH calibrations 2013 Gordon Lim, UCI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First Steps XFEL S2E with CSRtrack Convert elegant particlefile upstream of BC-3 into CSRtrack input CSRtrack results.
Advertisements

VETO Analysis Update Michael Wood University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline Introduction and basics Reconstruction packages Efficiencies Simulation.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuterium and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li November 3, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Scoping Study of He-cooled Porous Media for ARIES-CS Divertor Presented by John Pulsifer Major contributor: René Raffray University of California, San.
Far Detector Timing Calibration Andy Blake Cambridge University November 2004.
Introduction to Longitudinal Phase Space Tomography Duncan Scott.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
1 TPC online  offline calibration November 2002.
18 February 2009DCH Analysis1 MEG DCH Analysis MEG Review Meeting 18 February 2009 W. Molzon For the DCH Analysis Working Group.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
17 February 2010DCH Analysis1/22 MEG DCH Analysis MEG Review Meeting 17 February 2010 W. Molzon For the DCH Analysis Working Group.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
STAR Collaboration Meeting Rene Bellwied – Wayne State University July 2004 SVT Calibration and STI tracking status An update of work since the SVT review.
Study the discovery potential as a function of the energy cutoff: - Modify ingredients for pex according to each flux model (Ecut) - Run pex for each.
Malte Hildebrandt, PSIMEG - Review Meeting / 1   e  Drift Chambers Charge Division Test Chamber Testsetup for Cosmics Chamber Construction.
21 Jun 2010Paul Dauncey1 First look at FNAL tracking chamber alignment Paul Dauncey, with lots of help from Daniel and Angela.
HLT DT Calibration (on Data Challenge Dedicated Stream) G. Cerminara N. Amapane M. Giunta CMS Muon Meeting.
1 SDD: DA and preprocessor Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – April 11th 2008.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – March 15th 2010.
Some feedbacks from DRS data analysis (very preliminary) F. Scuri - I.N.F.N Sezione di Pisa RD52 – Collaboration Meeting – Pavia, March 12, 2013 F. Scuri.
1 M2-M5 Efficiency and Timing checks on 7TeV beam data Alessia, Roberta R.Santacesaria, April 23 rd, Muon Operation
Quality assurance for TPC. Quality assurance ● Process: ● Detect the problems ● Define, what is the problem ● What do we expect? ● Defined in the TDR.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation 
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Fast offline dE/dx calibrations Y. Fisyak 11/07/02.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
Monitoring of cell to cell inhomogeneity and transfer into simulation M. Vander Donckt.
AliRoot survey: Calibration P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
Check of Calibration Hits in the Atlas simulation. Assignment of DM energy to CaloCluster. G.Pospelov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk,
1 Dead material correction status. Alexei Maslennikov, Guennadi Pospelov. Bratislava/Kosice/MPI Calorimeter Meeting. 8-December Problems with DM.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Monitoring Energy Gains Using the Double and Single Arm Compton Processes Yelena Prok PrimEx Collaboration Meeting March 18, 2006.
June 4, 2009 STAR TPC review Estimation of TPC Aging Based on dE/dx Measurements Yuri Fisyak.
Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Monitoring of cell to cell inhomogeneity and transfer into simulation
Laser Geiger cell (update)
DC monitoring – simulation – calibration - corrections
Marian Ivanov TPC status report.
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
DCH missing turn analysis
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
SuperB LNF meeting March 21st 2012 Marcello Piccolo
HLT & Calibration.
MDC Data Check Wu Linghui
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
KLOE General Meeting - LNF March,
DC monitoring - calibration - simulation - corrections
Status of Phase Feedforward Tests
Current status of run14 VTX alignment
Alignment of the PHENIX Silicon Vertex Tracker (VTX) in 2014
Performance of MDC during New Data Taking
EM Linearity using calibration constants from Geant4
Status report Minjung Kim
Yuxi Pan University of California, Los Angeles
HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs
m -> eg Drift Chambers
Timing Counter analysis
Status of Instrumental Beam Studies and Technical Description of Detectors and DAQ February 24, 2017.
Current status Minjung Kim.
Studies of the Time over Threshold
Current Status of the VTX analysis
Presentation transcript:

DCH calibrations 2013 Gordon Lim, UCI

DCH calibrations Wire & pad time offsets Effective wire lengths Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions DCH calibrations Wire & pad time offsets Effective wire lengths Wire & pad gain corrections Foil bowing corrections TIC-DCH time offset

Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions DCH calibrations Input: Reconstructed Michel tracks from 800 unbiassed runs (202600-203500) Starting point: All calibration constants = 0 Acronyms used in this presentation: UA (DA) = upstream (downstream) anode UH (DH) = upstream (downstream) hood UC (DC) = upstream (downstream) cathode DH UH UA DA DC UC

Wire time offsets Goal: Alignment of all anode waveforms Procedure: Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Wire time offsets Goal: Alignment of all anode waveforms Procedure: Use hits on reconstructed Michel tracks to determine the time offset of the (hit time – track time) distribution of each wire-end. Time offsets are calculated via 3rd order polynomial fits to the corresponding “reverse-cumulative” distributions, e.g.: Reprocess raw data with new time offsets. Repeat steps 1-2 for a number of iterations (typically 5). ΔT0 between successive iterations should converge. Administer persisting time offsets among two ends of the same wire symmetrically across the two ends. time offset hit time – track time [ns] hit time – track time [ns]

Wire time offsets 1st iteration: Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Wire time offsets 1st iteration:

Wire time offsets 6th iteration: Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Wire time offsets 6th iteration: outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Pad time offsets Goal: Alignment of pad and anode waveforms Waveform alignment is done by taking into account the upstream-downstream time difference of hits on each pad (UH-DH and UC-DC) and the time differences of hits on each upstream/downstream wire-pad pair (UA-UH, UA-UC, DA-DH and DA-DC) e.g.:

Hood time offsets (UH-DH) Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Hood time offsets (UH-DH) before calib after calib outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

Hood time offsets (UA-UH) Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Hood time offsets (UA-UH) before calib after calib outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

Hood time offsets (DA-DH) Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Hood time offsets (DA-DH) before calib after calib outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

Cathode time offsets (UC-DC) Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Cathode time offsets (UC-DC) before calib after calib outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

Cathode time offsets (UA-UC) Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Cathode time offsets (UA-UC) before calib after calib outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

Cathode time offsets (DA-DC) Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Cathode time offsets (DA-DC) before calib after calib outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Comparison between the anode time offsets from this time calibration and the preliminary CRC time calibration (DCHCellT0 ID #50) this calib CRC calib time difference

Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Comparison between the hood time offsets from this time calibration and the preliminary CRC time calibration (DCHCellT0 ID #50) this calib CRC calib time difference

Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Comparison between the cathode time offsets from this time calibration and the preliminary CRC time calibration (DCHCellT0 ID #50) this calib CRC calib time difference

Effective wire lengths, wire & pad gain corrections Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Effective wire lengths, wire & pad gain corrections Goal: Improve z-coordinate determination Plot pad charge asymmetry vs. z-anode, and fit the profile with the following function: where It can be shown that: l effective wire length d anode gain ratio h pad gain ratio Pad gain calibration (h) can be improved by doing the above exercise using z-track

outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Effective wire length before calib after calib outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Wire gain corrections before calib after calib outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Hood gain corrections before calib after calib outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

Cathode gain corrections Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Cathode gain corrections before calib after calib outliers due to bad fits – corrected by hand

Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Foil bowing effect Goal: Correct bowing of hood foils due to pressure difference with surroundings Procedure: Plot the pad charge ratio as a function of z for each cell and fit with 3rd order polynomial Calculate correction factor for hood charge of each cell according to fit results Plot the pad charge asymmetry amplitude ratio as a function of the pad total charge ratio for all cells and values of z, and fit with 1st order polynomial before calib / after calib

Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions TIC-DCH time offset The relative time difference between the TIC and DCH is determined by using tracks that have a matching TIC cluster:

Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions DCH status 2013 20 cells with a dead wire: 9-11, 29, 98, 107, 124, 125, 152, 162-166, 196, 213-215, 218, 254 9 cells with a dead pad: 44, 67, 68, 160, 175, 221, 272, 274, 278 20 cells with a “semi-dead” pad: 88, 120, 131, 252-269 (DC14) 4 cells with a weak pad: 97, 117, 216, 229 new in 2013

Conclusions Database: To do: Introduction Wire timing Pad timing Wire lengths Wire gains Pad gains Foil bowing TIC-DCH time Conclusions Conclusions Database: The DCHConfig table for 2013 data (ID #24) has been updated with the following IDs: Wire & pad time offsets: DCHCellT0 ID #51 Eff. wire lengths & dead channels: DCHCellParam ID #31 Wire & pad gain corrections: DCHCellGain ID #37 Foil bowing corrections: DCHHoodAsymRescale ID #8 TIC-DCH time offset: MEGTimeDifference ID #42 Wire positions: DCHWirePosition ID #91 To do: Reprocess a larger data sample and check the DCH performance optical survey 2013