Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

National Town Meeting on Demand Response Session A – Estimate It, Measure It, Verify It Demand Response Coordinating Committee (DRCC) Renaissance Washington.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
California Energy Commission 1 Energy Workshops for W&WW Agencies UTILITY STRATEGIES FOR SHIFTING PEAK DEMAND PERIOD WATER & ENERGY USE REGIONAL STRATEGIES:
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Will CO2 Change What We Do?
1 Conservation: An Alternative Energy Source for Local Communities Ted Coates, Power Manager September 20, 2008.
Ad Hoc West-wide Resource Assessment Team (WRAT) : Assessment of Western System Adequacy in the Short-term Jeff King Northwest Power Planning Council Presentation.
Input-Output Analysis of Climate Change: Case Study of Efficiency Driven Policy Choice of Indian Response Strategy Joyashree Roy Jadavpur University, Kolkata,
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
Over 3,300 Megawatts and Counting Growing and Transforming One of Nation’s Largest DSM Portfolios.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Efficiency and Demand Response NARUC Washington, DC February 14, 2006 Steve Specker President & CEO.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Draft Plan Proposed Regional Conservation Targets for June 9, 2009.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
Sixth Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Plan Generating Resource Assessments Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council Portland, OR July.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 6, 2011.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 2009 Draft Resource Program Released: September 30, 2009 Accepting Comments until: November 30,
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Accelerating Energy Efficiency To Reduce the PNW Power System's Carbon Footprint Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation.
California Energy Commission - Public Interest Energy Research Program Demand Response Research Center Research Overview Load Management Informational.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Revising the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Technical Committee June 23, 2011.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NEET Work Group 6 Update: BPA Demand Response April 21 st Karen Meadows Pam Sporborg.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Action Plan Summary.
DRAFT Preliminary: BPA Summary of 6 th Plan Supply Curves May 15, 2009 Lauren Gage
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
May 31, Resource Adequacy Capacity Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee May 31, 2006 Background Image: Bennett, Christian Science.
June 27, Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2010 and 2012 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting Northwest Power Pool.
Relationship of Regional Resource Adequacy Standards to Utility Planning PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting June 27, 2007.
Conservation Resources Draft Seventh Power Plan Conservation Potential Assessment.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project  Largest Smart Grid Demonstration.
2009 Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment Resource Adequacy Technical Committee October 16, 2009.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Role of Energy Efficiency in Could (and Should) Play in Montana’s Future Insights from the 5 th Northwest.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Role of Energy Efficiency in the Northwest Power and Conservation Plan Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources.
Moving toward a Final Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
11/4/02 NW Energy Coalition Clean Electricity Options for the Pacific Northwest: An Assessment of Efficiency and Renewable Potentials through the year.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Conservation Resources in the (Draft) 5 th Northwest Power Plan Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources Northwest.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
2010 Northwest Regional Forecast Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 22, 2010.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
Data Tables for the OPO Technical Report August 2016.
Conservation and Demand Response Outlook
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Efficiency Power Plants
“Other” Cost Estimates
2018 LTSA Workshop August 2017 RPG Meeting Welcome to.
NW Demand Response Symposium
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Restructuring Roundtable March 24, 2017 Boston, MA
Steering Committee Webinar March 25, 2016
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Integrated Resource Planning and Load Flexibility Analysis
Sixth Power Plan Setting Conservation Targets and Implementation Strategies Jill Steiner, Snohomish Public Utility District Northwest Power and Conservation.
GENESYS Current Functionality
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
2021 Adequacy Assessment Status Report
Capacity Analysis in the Sixth Plan
Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016
Portfolio Analysis Mike Hopkins
Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016
Progress on Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2017
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011
Presentation transcript:

Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan Pacific Northwest Demand Response Symposium September 28th, 2016

Demand Response Actions in 7th Plan Expand regional demand response infrastructure At least 600 MW is cost-effective Form a Demand Response Advisory Committee (DRAC) Support regional market transformation for demand response Collaborate on demand response data collection

Council’s Analytical Process Flow Units & Baseline Unit Use New Energy Efficiency Resource Potential Assessment Load Forecast Model Energy Efficiency “Supply Curves” Baseline Load Forecast (w/o new efficiency) Council Reviews Cost and Risk of Alternative Resource Portfolios Regional Portfolio Model “Supply Side” Resource Cost & Availability New Generating Resource Potential Assessment New Demand Response Potential Assessment

Demand Response Programs Included in Potential Study Summer Peaking Year-Round Peaking When will the RPM likely acquire DR? Irrigation Pumping - DLC and AutoDR (Agricultural /Industrial) Space Cooling – DLC and AutoDR (Residential and Commercial) Water Heating - DLC and AutoDR (Residential) Curtailable/Interruptible Tariffs - DLC and AutoDR (Agricultural/Industrial) Lighting Controls – AutoDR only (Commercial) Load Aggregators – AutoDR only When it is economic and least cost But more likely… When there is insufficient peak capacity to meet system peak demand Winter Peaking Space Heating – DLC and AutoDR (Residential and Commercial)

Developing Demand Response Inputs in RPM Four cost bins of DR available for selection Cost Assumptions Benefits/Potential Included Benefits/Potential Not Included Real, levelized costs calculated in 2012 dollars Seasonal Firm, Peak Capacity Potential Balancing Capability Implementation and Enablement Costs Deferral of New Transmission Deferral of New Distribution Each cost bin uses a weighted average cost for price signal Resource Size: 10 MW blocks DR can be more granular than 10 MW All programs have five year life (recurring enablement costs) Multiple sector potential Non-Firm DR potential

Demand Response Resource Program Potential by Cost Bin (2012$ per kW-year)   Levelized Costs 2021 Winter MW 2026 Winter MW 2035 Winter MW 2021 Summer MW 2026 Summer MW 2035 Summer MW Demand Response Price Bin 1 $25 per kW-yr 1246 1337 1462 1294 1388 1518 Demand Response Price Bin 2 $57 per kW- yr 1016 1094 1196 764 823 899 Demand Response Price Bin 3 $77 per kW-yr 47 50 55 342 368 402 Demand Response Price Bin 4 $144 per kW-yr 697 752 822 395 426 465

Resource Adequacy as a Guide

Factors Driving the Pace for Demand Response Development Need for seasonal capacity Assumptions about conservation development Assumptions about the availability and cost of external market resources in extreme weather and poor water conditions Assumptions about further CO2 emissions reduction policies

Updated Scenario Analysis Shows Material Change In Demand Response Development Through 2021

Demand Response Deployment Probability in 2021 by Magnitude of Capacity Shortfall

Minimal New Gas Generation Development Across Scenarios, Except for the “No DR” Scenario

Balancing and Flexibility Curtailment Analysis FY 2021 Name of Scenario Hydro Years (out of 80) Percent of Hydro Years Total Events Existing System 37 46% 260 + 1400 aMW Energy Efficiency 17 21% 38 + 1400 aMW Energy Efficiency + 620 MW Demand Response 6 8% 14 + 1400 aMW Energy Efficiency + 1360 MW Demand Response 3 4% 8

System Cost and Economic Risk of Alternative Resource Strategies

Observations Without developing the 7th Power Plan recommended energy efficiency and at least 600 MW of demand response the region may not meet adequacy standards and/or could have difficulty providing balancing reserves Instead pursuing demand response, the region could build additional new gas-fired generation However, this alternative resource strategy increases system cost by $4 billion and system risk by $5 billion

Questions? Council’s DR Webpage: http://www.nwcouncil.org/energy/dr/home/ RPM Online: http://www.nwcouncil.org/energy/rpm/rpmonline 7th Power Plan Technical Data DR supply curve derivation and potential study http://www.nwcouncil.org/energy/powerplan/7/technical