Improving Surgical Technical Quality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EDGE Institute 2014 Photo Story 3 for Windows Nancy Shimeall.
Advertisements

Online Assignment Submission (January 2010 Semester)
PRO-FRIENDS Continuous Improvement Discussion (CID)
The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) Helen M. MacRae, M.D., FRCSC, D.H. Gales Director Technical Skills Centre, University of.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 8: Developmental Milestones Checklist - Evaluator Edition Instructions for completing the Developmental Milestones Checklist.
READI – Readiness Evaluation and Discharge Interventions Study
Copyright © 2012 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Administration of the Youth Skills and Beliefs Survey American Institutes for Research.
Assessment Assessment Planning Assessment Improvements Assessment Data Dialogue & Reflection.
IDsurv.org An innovative Infectitious Disease and Serious AEFI surveillance system.
Training for Teachers goteachpoint.com
National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit Clinical Audit Platform How to Register, Submit and View Reports CAP: |
Matthew Roberts, Vanessa Bacal, Mohammed Mahdi, Ethan D. Grober Mount Sinai & Women’s College Hospital, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University.
Can a Brief On-line Education Tool Improve Surgical Resident Operative Dictations? A Prospective Evaluation Alicia Kieninger, MD, Yi Wei Zhang, MD, Anna.
Feasibility and Value of a Procedural Workshop for Surgery Residents Based on Phase-II of the APDS/ ACS National Skills Curriculum Dimitrios Stefanidis.
Does the Rate of Achieving Competency on simulated Laparoscopy Training Programs Predict Actual Skill in Performing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? Warren.
Principles of Surgery Laparoscopic Skills 2 D. Trottier MIS Fellow March
What is WEBDesk? Web based claims management tool Accessible from Detailed view on all claims submitted through MediSwitch Various.
One to One Meetings To be used in conjunction with the 1st Class HR ‘One to One Meetings’ Management Guide available at
The first thing you need to do is log in. This is what the “Log In Screen” looks like. Remember to get teacher permission and login information prior.
Using PCM Virtual Class By: Mr.Shesha Kanta Pangeni, PhD scholar, KU Mr.Padam Raj Pant Consultant/Expert in ICT in Education Contact:
Neal E. Seymour, MD Baystate Medical Center Tufts University School of Medicine Baystate Simulation Center—Goldberg Surgical Skills Lab 2010 APDS Annual.
Assessment Submission Procedures Wayne College uses a web-based application for reporting course assessment activities. The next few slides describe the.
MRCGP The Clinical Skills Assessment January 2013.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Creating Customized Resident Self-Evaluation Assessments in PharmAcademic TM Andrea Weeks, PharmD PGY1 Residency Co-Director and Preceptor Paoli Hospital.
My Learning Plan Observation and Appraisal SYStem
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
7 Day Self Assessment Tool (7 Day SAT) March 2016 Survey - User Guide v4 (March 2016)
Present apply review Introduce students to a new topic by giving them a set of documents using a variety of formats (e.g. text, video, web link etc.) outlining.
Evaluation and Assessment Process etc net Finding the Best Solution: Tailoring Programs to Fit Your Needs and the Consultation Process.
The New Validated Programme 3 year plan + continued 85 week All practice is now graded not just the last midwifery practice module New module - Contemporary.
GÉANT 4 Managing People & Performance in Virtual Teams - MPiViT
OTLA Report Writing Training
Assessment in student life
Today we will talk about:
Using PCM Virtual Class
Sigma-Aldrich PT Portal
MRCGP The Clinical Skills Assessment January 2013.
The early use of Antibiotics in at Risk CHildren with InfluEnza
Dialogic Reading Dialogic Reading Coaching & ePATT Grant
PN Comprehensive Predictor Testing at the Joliet Junior College Academic Skills Center PowerPoint created by AIAS Director on February 3, 2015.
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
The Use of Data to Promote Physician Learning: Cholecystectomy Conversion Rates for the Province of Alberta Dianne Johnson1, Brock Setchell1, Dereck Mok2,
[insert Module title here]
International Consensus on Defining and Measuring Quality in Surgical Training Pritam Singh, Rajesh Aggarwal, Boris Zevin, Teodor Grantcharov, Ara Darzi.
Please send completed application form to:
Cardiothoracic Surgery Specialty Training Courses
TCPI Project Pathway: Session 3 of 8 Staff Engagement: Teamwork and Joy # 6 and 19 (24) To QIA for possible use: Thank you for taking my call and listening.
Using Action Research to Guide Student Learning Experiences & Assessments Exploring the synergistic activities of curriculum design/delivery and assessment.
Kasee Hildenbrand and Darcy Miller
[insert Module title here]
Collaborative Leadership
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
Addressing the challenges of preceptor development and recruitment
My Performance Journey
OTLA Report Writing Training
[insert Module title here]
Signing in for Patient Access
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
Scratch – Game Testing My Game Creation.
Scholarship America Dollars for Scholars: Completing the Student Profile All Dollars for Scholars scholarships are applied for online via the Dollars.
What is StudentWeb? In StudentWeb you can access:
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Members Only Area Guide Book
Accessing the Test: Logging In
UQ Course Site Design Guidelines
5b. Presentation for Reviewing Photos
Presentation transcript:

Laparoscopic Colectomy Video Review Program Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative

Improving Surgical Technical Quality Improving technical outcomes through peer to peer feedback and coaching while maintaining surgeon anonymity Adapt a rating scale for technical quality for colorectal surgery using video submission Assess its relationship to short term surgical outcomes Participate in video review sessions in which surgeons can discuss particular cases of interest for peer input and feedback

Background Rooted in the landmark work of the bariatric surgeons from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative Determined that surgical skill is a strong predictor of clinical outcomes NJEM 2013; 369: 1434-1442 Colorectal surgery is uniquely positioned as an extension of this work due to: High complication rates High penetrance of laparoscopy in Michigan

Consent The University of Michigan IRB has waived the need for informed patient consent as the study group is not patients but surgeons. By sending videos and agreeing to rate the videos of others, consent is implied. We will house the surgeon identifiers here at MSQC and they will only be used to correlate peer ratings with MSQC colectomy outcomes. Please make sure that your consent for surgery allows for the use of photos or video for educational purposes and, as mentioned, remove patient identifiers. Permission on the part of the patient to have their surgery video recorded is an important detail for the home institution, as determined by our IRB, and an important step as these projects move forward into further aspects such as being part of a national surgeon coaching project.

Video Review Process Submit your contact form to participate: http://msqc.org/video- coaching-project Record a recent laparoscopic colectomy surgery of your choice. Remove any patient identifiers Upload your video to Box and provide a few details about the video submitted Note: Once the contact form has been submitted, MSQC will send instructions on how to upload your video and details of next steps Our team edits the video to include only the most important parts and uploaded to our review application (each video is approx. 20 minutes after editing)

Performing Reviews After the surgeon’s video is uploaded to the MSQC Video Review Application: Video review is done through the MSQC Video Review Application using your MSQC username and password Note: Same that is used to view your hospitals reports, surgeon specific reports The MSQC Colectomy Video Review Project uses a tool validated for laparoscopic right colectomy in conjunction with the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS).

Performing Reviews Each video review consists of 10 questions with 1-5 ratings Review Requirements: Self Review: Surgeon should complete a self-review their own video Self-reviews are private- not able to be viewed by peers and also not included in the overall review results Peer Reviews: Each surgeon should also complete 10 anonymous peer video reviews Approx. 30 minutes per a video

Review Questions Pedicle- Evaluate handling of the major vascular pedicle for the colectomy performed Exposure- Evaluate ability to create tension and view for the procedure Respect for Tissue- Evaluate handling of tissue during dissection Tissue Planes- Evaluate ability to stay in the appropriate dissection planes Time and Motion- Evaluate the efficiency of movement during the procedure Completeness of Dissection- Evaluate the overall level of colon mobilization achieved Instrument Handling - Evaluate ability to use the instruments of laparoscopy Overall Technical Skill- Evaluate the overall technical skill Flow of Operation- Evaluate overall flow through the steps of the procedure How technically difficult did this case appear to be?

Screenshot of a Video Review

Viewing Your Results Videos are closed to reviews after 10 peer reviews Results can be viewed in real time Self-review marked in a different color only reviewable to the surgeon who the video belong to

Get Involved Today! Complete our contact form to sign up! Contact MSQCustomerSupport@med.umich.edu with further questions