Accelerating and injecting polarized beams into FCC-ee I

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
Advertisements

Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Accelerating Polarized Protons Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory PHNIX Focus, Feb. 24,
Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.
08/06/ FCC-ee with kinks Can we conserve polarized beams?
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Multiple spin resonance crossing in accelerators. A.M. Kondratenko (1), M.A. Kondratenko (1) and Yu. N. Filatov (2) (1) GOO “Zaryad”, Novosibirsk (2) JINR,
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Polarized deuterons and protons at NICA А.Коваленко NICA-SPIN_PRAGUE 2013 Charles University, Prague, July 7-12, 2013.
Plans for Polarized Beams at VEPP-2000 and U-70 Yu.Shatunov BINP, Novosibirsk P S IN 2006.
and Accelerator Physics
Control of Beam Polarization at the NICA Collider A.M. Kondratenko 2, A.D. Kovalenko 1, M.A. Kondratenko 2, Yu.N. Filatov 1,3 and V.A. Mikhaylov 1 1 Join.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
Possible Approach for Reaching High Energy Polarized Electron- Positron Beams M. Bai, T. Roser Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory,
EIC Users Meeting, SBU, 6/27/14 Polarized Electron Beams in the MEIC at JLab Fanglei Lin for MEIC Study Group EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook University,
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Simulation of Spin Interference and Echo Effect Abstract Successively jumping across a depolarization resonance twice produces interesting spin dynamics.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
Thomas Roser Derbenev Symposium August 2-3, 2010 Polarized Beam Acceleration In their seminal paper “Radiative Polarization: Obtaining, Control, Using”
FCC-ee booster: preliminary design study Dmitry Shwartz BINP
Transverse polarization for energy calibration at Z-peak M. Koratzinos With valuable input from Alain Blondel ICFA HF2014, Sunday, 12/10/2014.
Polarization Study for CEPC DUAN, Zhe (IHEP) Apr 14th, 2016 Acknowledgements: M. Bai, D. P. Barber, and E. Forest. FCC Week 2016, April 11-15, Rome.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Polarization of CEPC M. Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY Dec , 2013 International workshop on.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
Baseline of Super-c-tau in Novosibirsk
Super-c-tau factory in Novosibirsk
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
Large Booster and Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Discussion on Emittance Evolution through FCC-e+e-
High precision measurement of the beam energy at VEPP-4M collider by Yury Tikhonov KEDR&VEPP-4M collaboration Budker INP, Novosibirsk Outlook Introduction.
Preservation and Control of Ion Polarization in MEIC
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Electron Polarization In MEIC
BINP Tau-Charm Project
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Other issues and concepts under study Conclusions References
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
JLEIC Ion and Electron Polarization
CEPC Z-pole polarization
JLEIC Collaboration meeting Spring 2016 Ion Polarization with Figure-8
Spin Transparency Study and Test
Racetrack Booster Option & Initial Spin Tracking Results
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Status of Proton & Deuteron Spin Tracking in Racetrack Booster
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

Accelerating and injecting polarized beams into FCC-ee I Accelerating and injecting polarized beams into FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-week, Berlin, 01 June 2017

Outline Introduction to a concept. Polarizing damping rings. Acceleration of polarized beams in the booster synchrotrons. Evaluation of the depolarization rates. Free spin precession approach proposed for fast determination of the average beam energy. Conclusion. I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Introduction FCC-ee demands 50 keV beam energy resolution at Z and 100 keV at W, separately in e+ and e- rings. Only the resonant depolarization (RD) can provide such extreme absolute accuracy: ΔE/E ˂ 1 · 10 -6 ! Two 1 - 1.5 GeV damping rings with high field bends can provide fast self-polarization of both beams. Every 10-20 s one or few polarized bunches will be extracted from the damping ring and will be accelerated in a 5-6 GeV linac and then in the cascade of synchrotrons (6-20, 20-45… 175 GeV). Preservation of the polarization will be provided by the use of the solenoid type spin rotators (Siberian Snakes ) installed in 2 or 4 straight sections of each synchrotron. I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Acceleration scheme for FCC-ee: proposal Acceleration scheme for FCC-ee: options #1, #2 Acceleration scheme for FCC-ee: proposal Polarizing Damping Rings 1 GeV Collider rings 45 – 175 GeV e- linac 1 GeV e+ linac 1 GeV Booster 20 - 175 GeV Pre-booster 6 - 20 GeV linac 5 GeV e+ e- Polarizing Damping Rings 1 GeV Collider rings 45 – 175 GeV e- linac 1 GeV e+ linac 1 GeV Booster 15 - 175 GeV linac 14 GeV e+ e- I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Pro and contra of two acceleration scheme options No degradation of the polarization in a linac is expected. Repetition frequency of a linac is high. But synchrotrons are cheaper compared to linacs!? Still the use of many fast ramping solenoids in spin rotators presents a certain challenge: 1) Heat released in coils due to eddy currents – a first problem. 2) High ramp voltage dictates use of many solenoid sections, powered by the independent power-converters. So, it is preferable to eliminate extra synchrotrons except of the last one, which will share a tunnel with the collider and will be not too fast ramping (~10 seconds). I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Polarizing damping ring optimization Optimal energy is about 1 GeV. It is large enough to suppress IBS and small enough not radiate too much SR power. SLAC was operating very successfully 1.2 GeV damping rings! From polarization point of view it is preferable to use the high field bends instead of asymmetric field wigglers. Currently we propose to use of B=5.5 T short dipole magnets (24 identical dipoles, 150 each). But SC wigglers are better developed, could also be considered as an option. I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Polarizing ring parameters Here we assume that every bunch spends in a ring T0 ·Nb==160 s before extraction. So, the polarization degree is high enough, in the order of 70%! Every 10 s one bunch is assumed to be extracted for the energy calibration purposes . Use of high bending field is energetically beneficial to obtain the required polarization degree. Energy, E 1 GeV Circumference, C 22 m Average radius, R 3.5 Bending radius, ρ 0.6 Bending field, B 5.5 T Energy loss / turn, U0 145 keV Momentum spread, σp 0.00155 Number of e± per bunch, N 1010 Number of bunches, Nb 16 Total beam current, I 350 mA SR powrer 50 kW Sokolov-Ternov polarization time , τST 127 s Polarization degree 70 % Injection/Ejection time periodicity, T0 10 I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

High energy booster synchrotron demands Fast acceleration from 15-20 GeV up to 175 GeV of train of unpolarized e± bunches to keep the collider luminosity constant within 10% or better. Preserve during acceleration the polarization of one or few polarized bunches, which are extracted from the polarizing damping ring and be added to the train of unpolarized bunches. The Resonant Depolarization technique can work only below 80-100 GeV (extrapolation from LEP studies). So, there is no much sense to build spin rotators for operation at higher energy. Energy measurement above 80-100 GeV shall be provided by the magnetic spectrometers, which will be calibrated by RD below that threshold. I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Closed spin orbit in a ring with 4 snakes In 70-th such approach was considered by A.Kondratenko, for FCC-ee discussed by S.R. Mane: arXiv:1406.0561v1, physics.acc-ph 3 Jun 2014. φ2=(1+δ)π/2 φ3=(1-δ)π/2 We propose δ=0.002 Then ν=0.363 at 80 GeV Instead of being ν0 = γa =181.5 φ4=(1-δ)π/2 φ1=(1+δ)π/2 The equilibrium spin direction is upright or down in arcs. Snakes rotate spin by 1800 around the longitudinal direction. The spin precession frequency will be zero in case of equally spaced snakes. To make the spin motion stable , a small asymmetry of “positive” and “negative“ arcs has to be foreseen: φ=(1±δ)π/2. Then the spin tune became reduced to ν= δ ·ν0. Here ν0=γa is the unperturbed spin tune, with the anomalous magnetic moment: a=0.001159652187…. I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Booster ring for FCC-ee top up injection Four snakes spaced by the azimuthal angle π/2 ± φ from each other will reduce the spin precession tune by the factor 2φ/π. Solenoids Non-skewed quads! φ=0.003 Solenoid type Siberian Snakes FCC-ee collider arcs FCC-ee collider rings With φ=0.003, one gets ν=0.36 at E=80 GeV, instead of being ν0=181.5 w/o snakes. ~ 200 m I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Depolarization in presence of snakes Derbenev-Kondratenko formula: I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Tolerances on the orbit distortions I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Spin tracking of the depolarization process Spin tracking of 1000 particles in a ring with the spin perturbation w=0.1. The depolarization time 18 s is sufficient for acceleration to 80 GeV in 10 s. Due to perturbation the spin precession frequency became shifted to 0.3702 from the ideal 0.3631 value. Spectrum of the transversal polarization component. Side bands are spaced by synchrotron tune νs=0.1 I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

How to utilize polarized bunches in FCC-ee The accelerated to Z or W thresholds polarized bunches can be used for energy calibration in FCC-ee in two ways: 1) They simply can be resonantly depolarized, being injected into collider with vertical direction of spin. 2) Alternatively, they can be injected with spins directed in the horizontal plane. And using the laser polarimeter one can observe the modulation of Compton backscattering cross-section by the coherent precession of bunch spins ensemble. The last option can provide much faster and robust method of the spin precession frequency determination. Still it works if the synchrotron tune is large enough, only! Few examples of spin tracking results are presented in next slides. I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Spin tracking oscillogram. 125 test-particles. E=45. 5 GeV, σδ=0 Spin tracking oscillogram. 125 test-particles. E=45.5 GeV, σδ=0.0005, νs =0.035, τs =1320 turns I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Spin precession spectrum. Number of turns 8192. E=45. 5 GeV, ν0=103 Spin precession spectrum. Number of turns 8192. E=45.5 GeV, ν0=103.25, σδ=0.0005, νs =0.035, χ=1.48 We want: χ < 1.7. With χ > 1.7 peaks in spectrum disappear! I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Spin tracking oscillogram. 125 test-particles. E=80 GeV, σδ=0 Spin tracking oscillogram. 125 test-particles. E=80 GeV, σδ=0.001, νs =0.15, τs =243 turns I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Spin precession spectrum. Number of turns 8192. E=80 GeV, ν0=181 Spin precession spectrum. Number of turns 8192. E=80 GeV, ν0=181.55, σδ=0.001, νs =0.15, χ=1.21 I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Spin tracking oscillogram. 125 test-particles. E=80 GeV, σδ=0 Spin tracking oscillogram. 125 test-particles. E=80 GeV, σδ=0.001, νs =0.10, τs =243 turns Fast de-phasing due to too slow synchrotron motion! I. Koop-FCC Week-2017

Conclusion Four Siberian snakes installed in the main booster at proper locations provide preservation of the polarization during acceleration up to E=80 – 100 GeV beam energy. Free precession approach can be applied for fast determination of the spin tune after injection of single polarized bunch into the collider. Important: the synchrotron modulation index should be small: χ < 1.8 (χ= ν0σδ/νs ), otherwise it will happen fast decoherence of the spin precession. This leds to operation of the collider with high value of the synchrotron tune: νs > 0.10 at E=80 GeV. The Sokolov-Ternov self-polarization mechanism requires also small value of the synchrotron modulation index: χ < 1. Seems, unrealistic above 80 GeV? A set of energy monitors (well controlled magnetic spectrometers?) shall be used for the local beam energy measurements in the full energy range of FCC-ee. I. Koop-FCC Week-2017