Title: A study… Name Abstract Intervantions Discussion Introduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Transforming Districts and Schools A framework to guide culturally responsive and inclusive changes Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Associate Dean University of.
2014 Cradle to Career Network Convening StriveTogether October 16, 2014 Infusing Literacy Into Existing Summer Programming.
Presented by Newton County School System Office of Federal Programs.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Elephant in the Room The Skills Gap – According to employers and collage faculty, high school graduates do not have the skills.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Title: A study… Name Department of Early Childhood Education, University of Taipei References Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. (1995). Parental involvement.
Title: A study… Name Department of Early Childhood Education, University of Taipei ABSTRACT We discuss how a research-based model of the parental involvement.
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Aligning Child Outcome Measurement to Early Learning Standards NECTAC Outcomes Meeting Monday, August 27, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) Title IID Enhancing Education through Technology Initiative 2 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Competitive.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
EARLY LEARNING COUNCIL AND SICC COLLABORATION: Addendum to September 30, 2012 Report on EI/ECSE Unique Complexities and Recommendations to Improve Service.
Why Do Parents Become Involved? What Can We do to Encourage Involvement? Kathleen V. Hoover-Dempsey Associate Professor, Psychology and Human Development.
1 Handout #1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Language Arts)  Performance Indicator Progression  Scope and Sequence  Instructional Guide  Language.
Joan M. T. Walker Long Island University and
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
Minnesota's Approach to Comprehensive Assessment Megan E. Cox, Ph.D. Principal Leadership Academy January 11, 2016 Minnesota’s Approach to Comprehensive.
What is a Title I School? Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C et seq.) is amended to read as follows: TITLE.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Parental Involvement: A Path to Achievement Christa L. Green, Kathleen V. Hoover-Dempsey, Howard M. Sandler; Vanderbilt University Joan M. T. Walker; Long.
National Quality Standards Framework
Division of Student Support Services
National Quality Standards Framework
Parents and Schools Partners in Education
Briefing: Interdisciplinary Preparation for Personnel Serving Children with Disabilities Who Have High-Intensity Needs CFDA K Office of.
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Wisconsin’s Social Emotional Learning Competencies
Amana Academy Title I Annual Parent Meeting September 30, 2016
Parental Involvement Staff Training
Fidelity of Implementation Fidelity 6-8 weeks following live workshop
Supporting Student Success
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Title I Parent Meeting James H. Bright & J.W. Johnson Elementary
Comprehensive Planning
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Developing & Refining a Theory of Action
Opportunities for Growth
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Agenda Welcome and Introductions Purpose of Investment
Sonoraville Elementary School
What Parents Need to Know!
Preschool Snapshot New Jersey Department of Education
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
A Share in the Future – Indigenous Education Strategy
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
ENDS Report Priority #3 Create Spaces of Optimism
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Understanding Title I Programs: An Overview for Parents
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Parent Guide to School Based Planning
Overview of the Kansas Technical Assistance System Network: Using Technical Assistance to Facilitate Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Kerry.
Introductions Introduction
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
SPRING Title I Parent and Family Input Meeting
Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast
Multiple background possibilities
Tier 3 PBIS Wraparound Essentials
INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT
Presentation transcript:

Title: A study… Name Abstract Intervantions Discussion Introduction We discuss how a research-based model of the parental involvement process may be applied to a school. We focus on how one urban elementary school is using such a model and related measures to develop and test interventions designed to increase the incidence and effectiveness of parental involvement. This application serves as an example of how school districts can use theory- and research-based information to guide parental involvement policies and practice. “I think the research is absolutely vital to what we’re doing because (it tells us that)…you can correlate parent involvement with student achievement….If you don’t have the (parental involvement) piece, it has a direct impact on test scores, and test scores have an effect on everything.” –School Principal Following consultation among school, intervention, and research lab staff, several specific interventions were developed. Some have been piloted during the ’06-’07 academic year. All will be implemented during the ’07-’08 year. STUDENT EDUCATION ENHANCEMENT PLAN (SEEP) The SEEP is an electronic conferencing tool designed to foster a partnership between teachers and parents in establishing individualized student learning goals. Teachers and parents use drop-down menus of assessment data to facilitate conversations about student progress on state performance indicators. Teachers, parents, and students identify steps they will each take to achieve specific learning goals and record any potential challenges to learning. After completion, a copy of the SEEP is given to the Program Coordinator, who works individually with parents to develop a Parent Enhancement Plan (PEP). The SEEP intervention targets Level 1 (e.g., personal motivations, invitations) of the model. “You have to have a model…for guiding your behavior….When you have a theoretical framework, it helps you understand specifically what factors you have to work on. You’re not out there just fishing in the dark….Plus, you have a way to do the research because your variables are identified and it’s much clearer what it is you’re doing.” –Intervention Program Director PARENT ENHANCEMENT PLAN (PEP) The PEP is designed to equip parents with the specific knowledge and skills necessary for helping their children achieve learning goals identified in the SEEP. The Program Coordinator and parents work together individually or in small-group workshops on strategies to aid student learning. The PEP intervention targets Level 1 (e.g., personal motivation, invitations) and Level 2 (mechanisms). ePORTFOLIO The ePortfolio is an electronic tool used to involve parents and students in career planning. Students also track their progress in achieving learning goals identified in the SEEP. Targets Level 4 (student attributes conducive to achievement). This collaboration provides an informative example of how a school can use research-based models of parental involvement to enhance the effectiveness of parental involvement and assess its effects on student attributes that lead to academic success and student achievement. Given recent federal and state mandates (e.g., No Child Left Behind Act of 2001) that require schools to use research-based practices, this intervention program represents a first step in developing comprehensive parental involvement programs that are grounded in theory and empirical research. Importantly, this intervention also includes validated measures of program outcomes to assess effects on parental beliefs and behaviors as well as student attributes and measures of achievement. Results from these intervention efforts may guide the adoption of parental involvement program policies to be implemented district- and state-wide. For more information about this and related projects, please see our website: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/Peabody/family-school/index.html Introduction Ten years ago, Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler (1995, 1997) offered a theoretical model of the parental involvement process to answer two critical questions: Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? How does their involvement influence children’s educational outcomes? They identified relevant constructs and processes, focusing on those most salient from parents’ perspectives and potentially amenable to change. Next, Hoover-Dempsey, Sandler, and colleagues launched a study to develop measures of model constructs and test model-driven hypotheses (Hoover-Dempsey & Sandler, 2005). Across four studies, with data from 2,150+ parents of elementary and middle school children in 25+ public schools in a socioeconomically diverse metropolitan public school system in the mid-south, they produced reliable and valid measures for all model constructs and empirically validated many model constucts and processes (Walker, Wilkins, Dallaire, Sandler, & Hoover-Dempsey, 2005). The opportunity to apply the model occurred through collaboration with a public, urban elementary school which was seeking to develop an evidence-based parental involvement intervention to satisfy federal guidelines and enhance……………. References Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97, 310-331. Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandler, H.M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children's education? Review of Educational Research, 67, 3-42. Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandler, H.M. (2005). Final Performance Report for OERI Grant # R305T010673: The Social Context of Parental Involvement: A Path to Enhanced Achievement. Presented to Project Monitor, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, March 22, 2005. Shepard, K. W. (2007). In-service training to support and enhance teachers’ invitations to parental involvement. Thesis submitted to fulfill requirements of M.S. degree, Psychology, Vanderbilt University. Walker, J. M., Wilkins, A. S., Dallaire, J., Sandler, H. M., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. (2005). Parental involvement: Model revision through scale development. Elementary School Journal, 106, 85-104. Many thanks for support from: Vanderbilt University, Peabody College Small Research Grants Program (2006-2008); Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant #R305B040110 to Vanderbilt University (2001-2004); Hamilton County, Tennessee Department of Education. Participants Ten years ago, Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler (1995, 1997) offered a theoretical model of the parental involvement process to answer two critical questions: Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? How does their involvement influence children’s educational outcomes? They identified relevant constructs and processes, focusing on those most salient from parents’ perspectives and potentially amenable to change. Next, Hoover-Dempsey, Sandler, and colleagues launched a study to develop measures of model constructs and test model-driven hypotheses (Hoover-Dempsey & Sandler, 2005). Across four studies, with data from 2,150+ parents of elementary and middle school children in 25+ public schools in a socioeconomically diverse metropolitan public school system in the mid-south, they produced reliable and valid… Name Department of Early Childhood Education, University of Taipei