Swarm EFI Cal/Val and Quality Working group summary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time & Frequency Products R. Peřestý, J. Kraus, SWRM 4 th Data Quality Workshop 2-5 December 2014 GFZ Potsdam Recent results on ACC Data Processing 1 SWARM.
Advertisements

Status update of ASM on Swarm Charlie Swarm 4th DATA QUALITY WORKSHOP 2 December 2014 GFZ Potsdam Jean-Michel Léger.
Page 1 SCIAMACHY Pointing Meeting Bremen – 30 November 2006 MIPAS Pointing Error Status Gaétan Perron ABB Bomem Inc.
1.STSE 2.Objectives of today 3.Data availability 4.Reprocessing 5.RFI 6.Conferences & user meetings Introduction – SMOS mission status.
Overview of EFI instruments status and recent events I. Coco Swarm Data Quality Workshop Potsdam 02/12/2014.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky CUC September Overall Status of the Instrument 2.Update on Controlling the FP Temperature ACIS Ops.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
Uncertainty in Wind Energy
Comparison of Field-Aligned Currents calculated by single spacecraft and dual spacecraft methods. Yulia V. Bogdanova, Malcolm W. Dunlop RAL Space, STFC,
1 Robert Schaefer and Joe Comberiate for the SSUSI Team Robert SchaeferJoe Comberiate (240) (240)
Overview of the L1B Dataset, Product Baselines updates and data availability. L2 Commissioning Status. Giuseppe Ottavianelli, Ivan Di Lodovico, Igino.
Plans for interim data release J E Russell (Imperial)
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Long-Term Upper Air Temperature.
® Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011 QUAlity aware VIsualisation for the Global Earth Observation system of systems GEOVIQUA workshop February, the.
CODIF Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Space Science Center UNH July 6-8, 2005 Paris, France.
OSTST Hobart 2007 – Performance assessment Jason-1 data M.Ablain, S.Philipps, J.Dorandeu, - CLS N.Picot - CNES Jason-1 GDR data Performance assessment.
PACS Spectrometer Spatial Calibration plan in PV phase A.Contursi D. Lutz and U. Klaas.
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
Joint International GRACE Science Team Meeting and DFG SPP 1257 Symposium, Oct. 2007, GFZ Potsdam Folie 1 Retrieval of electron density profiles.
Preliminary analysis of p-Pb data update n. 6 Lorenzo Bonechi LHCf Catania meeting – 19 December 2013.
Plasma Density Structures in the Inner Magnetosphere Derived From RPI Measurements B. Reinisch 1, X. Huang 1, P. Song 1, J. Green 2, S. Fung 2 V. Vasyliunas.
Page 1 Validation Workshop, 9-13 th December 2002, ESRIN ENVISAT Validation Workshop AATSR Report Marianne Edwards Space Research Centre Department of.
Key RO Advances Observation –Lower tropospheric penetration (open loop / demodulation) –Larger number of profiles (rising & setting) –Detailed precision.
Analysis of Nonlinearity Correction for CrIS SDR April 25, 2012 Chunming Wang NGAS Comparisons Between V32 and V33 Engineering Packets.
Dec 1, FIELDS Top Level Requirements Review S. Harris (UCB)
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Ozone PEATE 2/20/20161 OMPS LP Release 2 - Status Matt DeLand (for the PEATE team) SSAI 5 December 2013.
Electron density profile retrieval from RO data Xin’an Yue, Bill Schreiner  Abel inversion error of Ne  Data Assimilation test.
1 CAA 2009 Peer Review, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March CAA Peer Review: Selected Recommendations.
EFI TII PREL Datasets Johnathan Burchill David Knudsen Alexei Kouznetsov Matthew Patrick Acknowledgments Swarm 5 th Data Quality Workshop, IPGP, Paris.
Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service NON-EXHAUST PARTICLE EMISSIONS.
CGMS-43-ISRO-WP-03, version-1, CGMS WGIII May 2015 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS ROSA Data Processing at ISRO Presented.
CIS Action Items 10 th Cross-Calibration Workshop Observatoire de Paris, Nov
Summary on EFI splinter I. Coco Swarm Data Quality Workshop Potsdam 02/12/2014.
Atmosphere Clouds Aerosols Ozone GHG Issues and remarks (synthesis after presentations and discussion)
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Christian Siemes Swarm Data Quality Workshop , Potsdam, Germany Swarm ACC and GPSR summary.
Temperature dependency of ACC data TUD provides all available GPS-derived linear accelerations to VZLU End of January – end of May To be used for validation.
The validation and user assessment of the SL-CCI products has been performed through: - Internal consistency check and comparison with in-situ data. -
ESA Climate Change Initiative Sea-level-CCI project A.Cazenave (Science Leader), G.Larnicol /Y.Faugere(Project Leader), M.Ablain (EO) MARCDAT-III meeting.
Summary of Session 2M Swarm 5th Data Quality Workshop
3rd Swarm Science Meeting, Copenhagen, 19 May 2014
Title Instrument Simulator and L1B Processor Meeting
ACC/GPSR Splinter Summary
Summary on EFI splinter
MsWG (Apr 22, 2015) Recent L1B LUT delivery since April 8, 2015
DUAL POLARIZATION AND ZDR CALIBRATION IMPROVEMENTS 5.2(6)
ACC and GPS summary Christian Siemes, QWG and Cal/Val team Copenhagen, Denmark 18/06/2014.
The 3rd Swarm Science Meeting, June 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark
Magnetic Splinter Meeting
GSICS Instrument Event Logs: Rational and Draft Template
10th CAA Operations Review Annual Report of the CIS Experiment
Summary on EFI splinter
Introduction to geodesy & accelerometry with Swarm
Cross-Calibration Meeting ESTEC, February 2006
First validation of Level 2 CAT-2 products: FAC/IBI/TEC
RISR-C incoherent scatter radar operations
GENERATION OF NOVEL EEDFS IN A TANDEM PLASMA REACTOR
Devil physics The baddest class on campus IB Physics
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Dorothee Coppens.
Current Status of ROLO and Future Development
Differential Emission Measure
CHAPTER – 1.1 UNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENTS.
Summary & Recommendations of EFI Splinter session 3
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Titan Flyby Altitude – Tour Updates Upcoming Observations in 2006
Evaluation of IRI-2012 by comparison with JASON-1 TEC and incoherent scatter radar observations during the solar minimum period Eun-Young Ji,
Computed Tomography (C.T)
Summary of EFI splinter
Presentation transcript:

Swarm EFI Cal/Val and Quality Working group summary I. Coco, R. Haagmans, S. Buchert, J. Burchill, D. Knudsen, C. Stolle Swarm Cal/Val Meeting Copenhagen 18/06/2014

Summary Langmuir probe data (Ne, Te, Vs) general quality and open issues: investigation strategy, way forward and requests to ESA. Langmuir probe data validation: first results from IRS and IRI model comparisons. TII data (Vion, Ti) general quality and open issues: investigation strategy, way forward and requests to ESA. On plasma data distribution to general users: timeline and caveats. EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 2

Langmuir probe data quality and issues (1/5) Density and temperature data show well known statistical features of a “good” ionosphere (equatorial “double peak” density distribution, latitude and local time dependencies, reasonable orders of magnitudes, etc...) EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 3

Langmuir probe data quality and issues (2/5) Still the effect of SC charging due to the sweep mode activation causes some concern: SC potential small dips (up to 20 mV) and little jumps in the el. temp. (0.01 eV) are regularly reported during the sweeps. All the settings modifications that could be done without major changes in the onboard sw have been done and the effect has been strongly mitigated since the “first light” data. Impacts on TII velocity calculation: 1 mV variation  1 m/s variation. A 20 m/s excursion is within the error budget for the velocity calculation and does not affect TII processing that much. EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 4

Langmuir probe data quality and issues (3/5) The sweep mode itself does not give the expected quality data: sweeps are about the 1% of the total and can be safely discarded in science analyses. IRFU is investigating the sweep mode outcomes for improvements: discarding it completely is not recommended! Sweep mode remains useful for diagnostic purposes. EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 5

Langmuir probe data quality and issues (4/5) Other issues: 1) Datation analysis by GFZ has been taken into account and LP timing has been modified: a residual time shift of 24-25 ms still persists between VFM and LP timestamps but it is considered acceptable due to the uncertainties in the datation analysis and the VFM comparable timestamp resolution (20 ms). 2) Analysis of the time series sub-mode data taken during recent yaw maneuvers (for investigating LP cross-talk effects) not done yet (minor). 3) Observations of SC potential increases after sunset, which seems weird: ...to be better investigated with more statistics. EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 6

Langmuir probe data quality and issues (5/5) LP Summary: 1) Sweep mode should be kept for now as it is: SC charging has been highly reduced and SM is suitable for diagnostics. It is not worth to play further with settings, because one would like to have a still meaningful sweep range for investigations. Ion velocity calculation is not dramatically affected. Work on algorithms improvements for SM is ongoing. 2) To IRFU to look up into the literature for known charging effects in other past missions: see whether historical lessons learnt can prove useful for Swarm too. 3) Investigations are also needed ESA side: go to industry (through PLSO) and find SC electrical cleanliness tests/modeling results done during the development phase. We have to characterize which part of the SC nearby the probes is more likely to be charged. 4) Investigations are needed for characterizing the sunset increase of the SC potential: systematic time series analysis will be done on the 3 SC, comparing with density and temperature. We need a more clear assessment before the end of the summer. 5) To IRFU to produce a technical note on the possible LP cross-talk effects and the strategy for investigating them (low priority activity). EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 7

Langmuir probe validation: comparison with IRI (C. Stolle) LP captures well geophysical variations Ne: Absolute values too low at northern mid-latitudes (IRI radar + ionosonde availability) Absolute values too high in regions of high Ne (e.g. low latitudes) LP Te about 700K above IRI (at northern mid-latitudes) LP shows lower variability in Te than does IRI – clouds of constant LP Te? Concentrate point-to-point LP-IRI comparison on mid-latitudes only Validation of LP with low-latitude radars (Jicamarca?) and radars at different latitudes All points: LP=1.5669*IRI-1.8246*10+5 IRI above 2*10+5: LP=1.8712*IRI -3.470*10+5 Point-by-point comparison 10-14 LT Ne_LP (cm-3) Ne_IRI (cm-3) Suggestion: investigate different behaviors of P1 (high gain) and P2 (low gain) on a statistical basis in a suitable density range. EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 8

Langmuir probe validation: comparison with ISR (S. Buchert) EISCAT VHF and ESR 2014-04-04 Ne seems too low, factor 1.3–2? Te seems too high, of about 300 K We are nonetheless far from assessing a reliable “scale factor” to be applied to un-calibrated data. EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 9

TII data quality and issues (1/6) Extended good quality periods can be selected where most ionospheric features clearly show up (example on the left: southern cusp characterization and evolution for a particular event). EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 10

TII data quality and issues (2/6) Since March meeting: New gain map technique refined and implemented on all three satellites. No more need of slew maneuvers: defocusing by means of a VG sweep only in nominal attitude conditions and AGC off proved to be safer and as reliable as with maneuvers. Request from ESA: update of the calibration and characterization plan including a description of the new calibration procedures. EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 11

TII data quality and issues (3/6) Most images improved after correction... But some do not... This is physical: low density regions (solstice winter high-lat, dawn-dusk orbits) host a much less dynamic plasma. Such events result in high 2nd moments (and eventually ion temperature) and are quality-flagged in the final 1B data. EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 12

TII data quality and issues (4/6) TII Image anomaly Anomalous Good EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 13

TII data quality and issues (5/6) TII Image anomaly It affects about 10% of images of SW A and B, and, in the last period, a large part of SW C images. The 2nd moment grows high and this leads to a worsening of the TII quality flag (flag becomes > 10). Actual reason unknown but most likely instrumental (phosphor residual charging?). There are indication that the issue disappears for several orbits after a HV switch-off of at least 24 hours. A “workaround” is possible: mask the halo region out imposing a gain =0 outside the detector region most sensitive to the O+ signal. The new gain maps already include such settings. In the meanwhile UoC could figure out a dedicated test campaign on SW C. EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 14

TII data quality and issues (6/6) TII Summary: Image anomaly: On SC C new gain maps already uploaded, image anomaly already mitigated. Impacts: a) data with anomalous images are flagged as no good. b) routinely calculation of detectors parameters (detector centers, direction cosines, etc...) not possible. This, for now, will be done “by hand” by J. B. 2) Image anomaly investigation: to UoC to provide a test plan to be submitted to ESA for dedicated calibration campaigns on SW C. 3) Request to ESA: products derived from the 16Hz first moments existing in L0 data are desired as a L1b product or added to an existing L1b product for scientific analysis. 4) UoC will analyze results of the MTQ datation maneuvers on A and B for characterizing MTQ effects on the velocity calculation (low priority activity) 5) First validation comparisons with ISR: comparisons with several Poker flat radar passes show a TII velocity way too high wrt to radars, but the comparison technique is under refinement. EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 15

On Plasma data distribution to users. New version (6796) of the EFI prototype just released to DTU (11/06/2014). Industry has started to work on the implementation of the changes in the operational processor. CCDB will be updated with new settings, cross-verifications OP-Prototype will be done and, crossing fingers and touching wood, we will start the reprocessing and plasma data distribution in mid-september. Users will be made aware of: NOT use sweep mode data (clearly flagged) NOT use TII data characterized by Flags_TII > 10. NOT use density, el. temp and Sc potential errors EFI summary | I. Coco | Copenhagen | 18/06/2014 | Swarm Cal/Val Meeting | Pag. 16