LTE-A Relays and Repeaters

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison of different MIMO-OFDM signal detectors for LTE
Advertisements

On E-MBS with Layered Transmission Document Number: IEEE C80216m/09_0355r1 Date Submitted: Source:Debdeep Chatterjee, Furuzan Atay, Jong-Kae.
10 th MCM - Novi Sad, March 2006 Joaquim Bastos ( ) 1 The information in this document is provided as is and no guarantee or warranty.
Event: CUBAN/WIP Workshop - Tunisia Date: May 2005 Slide 1 Adaptive modulation and multiuser scheduling gains in adaptive TDMA/OFDMA systems in the.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0 Slide 1 Non-linear Multiuser MIMO for next generation WLAN Date: Authors: Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR.
Supervisor: Prof. Jyri Hämäläinen Instructor: M.Sc Zhong Zheng A part of NETS2020 project Ying Yang
A 4G System Proposal Based on Adaptive OFDM Mikael Sternad.
C GPP2 TSG-C WG3 TITLE : UMB performance results SOURCE: TSG-C WG3 EMAH Contact to: Satoshi Konishi, Vice-chair of EMAH
1 Performance comparison of Modulation and Coding set for IEEE m system Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0555r3 Date Submitted: Source:
C GPP2 TSG-C WG3 TITLE : UMB performance results SOURCE: TSG-C WG3 EMAH Contact to: Satoshi Konishi, Vice-chair of EMAH
[Qualcomm, Ericsson, Nokia Networks, Huawei,…]
Performance Evaluation of MIMO midamble design for IEEE m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/1237.
[Qualcomm, Ericsson, Nokia Networks, Huawei,…]
1 Performance comparison of Modulation and Coding set for IEEE m system Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0555r2 Date Submitted: Source:
Problem Description Primary receiver Secondary receiver eNodeB Aim: Reception of MIMO signals by a secondary receiver Parameterize design of secondary.
MU-MIMO System Performance of 8TX codebook IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0803 Date Submitted:
Title: Evaluation of DL MIMO Schemes: OL SU Spatial Multiplexing with 2-D MMSE channel estimation Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1043r2 Date Submitted:
IEEE C80216m-08/630 1 Interference Constraint Power Control Document Number: IEEE C80216m-08/630 Date Submitted: Source: Xiaoyi Wang, Chunye.
Title: Improvements in System Performance with spatial multiplexing for MBS Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/609r1 Date Submitted: 2008 – Source:
Interference Mitigation using Multi-BS Precoding with UL Sounding Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_1072 Date Submitted: Source: Mohamed Abdallah,
System Level Performance of 8TX Measurement Pilot IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0808 Date Submitted:
1 DL Power Control A-MAP Design (AWD ) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1363 Date Submitted: Source: Debdeep Chatterjee, Yi Hsuan,
Michael Einhaus, ComNets, RWTH Aachen University Distributed and Adjacent Subchannels in Cellular OFDMA Systems Michael Einhaus Chair of Communication.
Technology training (Session 6)
Offline discussion on remaining details on RRM measurements
3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting NR#3 Nagoya, Japan, 18 – 21 Sep, 2017
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
Offline Discussion on remaining details about RACH Procedure
Title: MIMO Transmission modes for E-MBS
Interference Mitigation using Multi-BS Precoding with UL Sounding
LRTC 3.4 – 3.8 GHz Ericsson input PT1 XO 29 – 31/
Proposals on remaining issues on PDCCH structure
Summary of offline discussion for PDCCH structure
System-Level simulation Inter-cell RRM Multi-cell RRM
Interference Mitigation using Multi-BS Precoding with UL Sounding
Performance Evaluation of Femto-based HetNet
R : SRS Enhancements for LTE-A
Sounding Antenna Switching for IEEE m Amendment Working Document
Shanghai, China, April 11-15, 2011 Source: Qualcomm Incorporated
Motorola Mobility, Lenovo, …
WF on UE mandatory channel bandwidth for NR bands
WF on scenarios and evaluation assumptions for flexible duplex
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
Modulation and Coding set design for IEEE m system
WF on UL Beam Management
WF on UL Beam Management
5G Micro Cell Deployment in Coexistence with Fixed Service
John Ketchum, Bjorn A. Bjerke, and Irina Medvedev Qualcomm, Inc.
SPID transmission order in IEEE m UL HARQ
OFDMA Performance Analysis
HDR a solution using MIMO-OFDM
Month Year November 2018 November 2018
UL Fast Feedback and HARQ Feedback Channel Structure
Supplementary Channel for Talk-around Direct Communications
Performance Evaluation of Codebooks for CL SU MIMO and CL MU MIMO
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Synchronization Requirements
Hybrid Multiple Access in ax
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Box 5 Calibration Result
Month Year doc.: IEEE /0578r0 May 2016
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Discussion on IMT-2020 mMTC and URLLC
Current Status of submission about EUHT
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
PHY Structure for UL Fast Feedback Channel in m Systems
Jing Sun, Qualcomm Incorporated Rapporteur of Rel.16 NR-U Work Item
Simulation of LTE-V and WAVE
Consideration on System Level Simulation
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date: September, 2019
Presentation transcript:

LTE-A Relays and Repeaters May 20, 2008 R1-101491 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 #60 22nd - 26th February, 2010 San Francisco, US Link Analyses of SU-MIMO Operation for UL of LTE-A with Agreed Simulation Assumptions Agenda item : 7.3.1 Source : Qualcomm Inc Document for : Discussion and Decision

Introduction Background In 3GPP RAN1#58bis, the following were concluded for further alignment of simulation parameters in studies of layer shifting + ACK Bundling for UL SU-MIMO: - Provide correlation statistics of error events of two TBs The throughput results should be accompanied by the assumptions on the respective BLER targets of 2 CWs Composite UL-CQI delay/periodicity impact: Measured in subframe n, apply in n+10 Gaussian noise (in lognormal) is added to the SINR upon which the link adaptation is based This noise is to model the uncertainty of UE power headroom, flashlight effect, channel estimation error Exact method to be further discussed, e.g. 2-3dB (lognormal) variation for flashlight effect Link adaptation should assume the highest MCS that still meets 10% BLER target (outer loop) - 25% BLER results can also be considered

Introduction Contents of this contribution In this document, with the agreed simulation parameters, we compared the two remaining options for UL SU-MIMO operation: - Option 1: no Layer Shifting & no ACK Bundling (LP0+AB0) - Option 2: Layer Shifting & ACK Bundling (LP1+AB1) Meanwhile, the requested statistics of error events of the two codewords are provided.

Simulation Parameters Carrier frequency 2.0GHz System bandwidth 5MHz Data transmission BW 4 RBs (48 subcarriers) Slot format Normal CP (7 symbols per slot) Channel model (PDP) Typical Urban, 6 paths Fading speed 3, 30, 60, 120km/h Antenna configuration 2x2 Tx Antenna correlation 0.0 Rx Antenna correlation Channel coding Turbo code Modulation QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM Receiver MMSE-SIC Channel estimation Perfect AMC target BLER 10% at 1st subpacket for both CWs Link measurement/prediction delay 10ms Precoding codebook 2x2 Identity matrix Layer blanking during re-txmn for 2 Ack/Nacks No Interference Variation Modeling for Link Prediction (dB) Gaussian with 2.5dB deviation AGI 0, 6dB

Interference Variation Modeling Parameter Configuration Simulation Scenario D1 (500m ISD) 19 Cell-Sites wrap-around layout Traffic Model Full Buffer #UEs/Cell 10 Max UE Tx Power 23dBm Configured SRS Period Once every 2ms Channel Estimation Loss Modeled Channel Model Typical Urban Receiver LMMSE Overload Indicator (OI) Sent Period 10ms X2 Delay Modeling Exponential with 20ms mean min: 10ms, max: 100ms Power Control Algorithm Adaptive Power Control IoT Target 7.0dB Antenna Config 1x2 Scheduling Algorithm Proportional fair with sub-band scheduling (1 subband = 4RB) Adaptive Power Control: Every 10ms, each cell sends the OI via X2 interface, the serving cell receives the relevant OIs from neighbors and determines the PSD adjustment for each scheduled UE. A UE will change its PSD as it receives its scheduling grant: IF Overloaded NextScheduledPSD = PreviousScheduledPSD – Delta_Dw; ELSE NextScheduledPSD = PreviousScheduledPSD + Delta_Up; where Deleta_Dw and Delta_Up are chosen from {0.4, 0.8}dB adaptively according to the received SINR.

Simulation Results: AGI=0dB, 3km/h Prob(CW2 Terminates at 1st Txmn | CW1 Terminates at 1st Txmn) Achieved BLER at 1st Txmn for each Codeword

Simulation Results: AGI=0dB, 30km/h

Simulation Results: AGI=0dB, 60km/h

Simulation Results: AGI=0dB, 120km/h

Simulation Results: AGI=6dB, 3km/h

Simulation Results: AGI=6dB, 30km/h

Simulation Results: AGI=6dB, 60km/h

Simulation Results: AGI=6dB, 120km/h

Conclusion From previous simulation results, we can have the following observations: layer shifting with 1 ACK option achieves similar performance as no layer shifting with 2 ACKs at low mobility better performance than no layer shifting with 2 ACKs at medium to high mobility As a result we recommend the following: Layer shifting with a single ACK as a single LTE-A UL MIMO operation mode References: [1]. R1-091628, “Link Analyses of SU-MIMO for UL of LTE-A,” Qualcomm Europe. [2]. R1-094222, “Further Link Analyses of SU-MIMO Operation for UL of LTE-A,” Qualcomm Europe.