Busan High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness An opportunity to forge a new consensus on aid and development? Aid Effectiveness Division Development Cooperation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Bogota to Busan: a new approach for development cooperation.
Advertisements

UN-Water Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water 1 |1 | International Aid Transparency Initiative 8 February 2011 Paris, France.
1 Outcome of Mutual Accountability & Aid Transparency Survey: Bangladesh Monowar Ahmed Joint Secretary Aid Effectiveness Unit, ERD.
Joint Initiative on Mutual Accountability: Cambodia, Lao PDR and Vietnam November 2009 Joint Initiative on Mutual Accountability: Cambodia, Lao PDR and.
Presented at the ECOSOC 2012 Development Cooperation Forum 1 st High-level Symposium Bamako, Mali 5-6 May 2011 by Timothy Lubanga, Assistant Commissioner.
Stephen P. Groff Deputy Director Development Co-operation Directorate ACCOUNTABLE DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IN LDCS: PROMOTING BETTER DEVELOPMENT RESULTS.
The Africa Action Plan An IEG Evaluation CSO Forum April 15, 2011.
ENHANCING AID EFFECTIVENESS
EuropeAid Evaluation of Budget Support: Methodological Approach and Results Jurgen Lovasz DEVCO B/2 EU Expert Group on Results, April 2012.
FOREST EUROPE Preparing the Sixth Ministerial Conference, including a possible legal instrument on forests EFI Annual Conference 15 September 2010, Dresden,
Eun Mee Kim* & Jae Eun Lee** * Dean & Professor, Graduate School of International Studies Director, Institute for Development and Human Security Ewha Womans.
Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
M&E Capacity Development in the AfCoP-MfDR and the Case in Ethiopia Tamirat Yacob AfCoP M&E CMT and Ministry of.
Rio+20 The Role of Major Groups and Stakeholders by Alexander Juras Chief, Major Groups and Stakeholders Branch United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
BUILDING BLOCK FOR HLF-4 PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES ON TRANSPARENCY FOR BETTER PREDICTABILITY, ENGAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY Alma Kanani, World Bank, IATI.
Open Forum on CSO Development Effectiveness as a Response to Paris Declaration IDEAS Global Assembly 2009 Getting to Results: Evaluation Capacity Building.
Capacity Development for Cooperation Effectiveness in Latin America and the Caribbean OAS Subregional Workshop for Cooperation Effectiveness: Caribbean.
Development and Cooperation Engaging strategically with CSOs TUDC Working Group on EU poliy and Instruments Brussels, 16 April 2012 DEVCO Unit D2 « Civil.
Delivering on Commitments to Gender Equality and Women’s Rights Key issues for HLF4 on aid effectiveness, Busan November 2011 Delivering on Commitments.
Partnerships for Prosperity (P4P) An overview PPD Workshop, March 2014.
Commonwealth Local Government Forum Freeport, Bahamas, May 13, 2009 Tim Kehoe Local Government and Aid Effectiveness.
Ongoing Work of the Joint Venture on Managing for Development Results (JV MfDR) Stefan Schmitz, Senior Policy Advisor Aid Effectiveness OECD Development.
CSO’s on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals.
1 Development Cooperation Policies Trade Union Development Cooperation Network February 2009.
CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals March 2011.
The Outcomes of the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate OECD.
Elaine Ireland Policy Adviser: Global Health Global Health Policy Forum 9 th September 2010 Aid Effectiveness in the Health Sector: A civil society perspective.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IN ASIA PACIFIC: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES
Eduardo González Aid Quality Division DCD-OECD 9 May, 2011 Update in THE ROAD TO BUSAN.
July 2011: OECD-DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness, Paris June 2011: Joint Global Assembly of Open Forum and Better Aid Platform to prepare for HLF4.
SPA-CABRI Project on “Putting Aid on Budget” Presentation to DAC Joint Venture on Public Finance Management Paris, July 2007 Peter Dearden, Strategic Partnership.
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores República de Colombia.
Regional Forum On CSO Governance Post-Busan Challenges On CSO Development Effectiveness Work at a Regional Level December 14, 2011 Borithy LUN Executive.
Composition and Mandate BetterAid is the successor to the CSO Parallel Forum of the Accra High Level Forum organized since January It is designed.
Overview Outcomes from Busan HLF 4 Faye Lee, Korea NGO Council for Overseas Cooperation.
Findings from the gender equality module of the 2011 Paris Declaration Survey: Towards HLF-4 Jenny Hedman DAC Network on Gender Equality 28 July 2011.
1 Setting the Scene: Overview of the Mexico HLM Setting the Scene: Overview of the Mexico HLM Young-kyu PARK Director, Development Policy Division Ministry.
An overview of the Istanbul Principles: Improving our development effectiveness as CSOs Canadian Council for International Co-operation – January 2014.
AID EFFECTIVENESS A GLANCE FROM GLOBAL TO COUNTRY LEVELS Cao Manh Cuong Foreign Economic Relations Dept. Ministry of Planning and Investment.
The Open Forum – Towards Principles of CSO Development Effectiveness Background to the Open Forum Objectives: What does the OF seek to achieve? Process:
HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS Building Blocks Core Busan Commitments Common principles.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011.
Task Team on South South Cooperation General overview Name Position Meeting.
AfCoP and the AAA Reflections on future engagement By Richard Ssewakiryanga
The Accra High-Level Forum: A Roadmap to Aid Effectiveness July 2008.
Aid Coordination Roundtable Meeting 09 July 2009 Accra Agenda of Action and The Paris Declaration.
A Primer on the CSO Development Effectiveness Process October
GENERAL APPROACH FOR PHASE II OF THE EVALUATION OF THE PARIS DECLARATION ON AID EFFECTIVENESS Phase II Approach Paper.
PARIS21 Involvement at HLF4 on Aid Effectiveness Board meeting OECD Conference Centre 27 April 2011.
1. Background to CSO Development Effectiveness 2. What is the Open Forum process 3. International Framework for CSO Development Effectiveness 5. GLOBAL.
“AID EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH Challenges and opportunities Marielle Hart Action for Global Health.
1 Evaluation Utilization: the case of the Paris Evaluation (Phase 1) and its use in the Accra HLF3 process Paris Evaluation Phase 2 Planning Meeting, Feb.
Roundtable 3: Enriching the Paris Declaration Democratic Ownership: Alignment, Co-operation and Harmonisation.
Joint Evaluation of the Paris Declaration, Phase 2Core Team Country Evaluations Generic Terms of Reference & Common Evaluation Matrix Presentation to International.
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
Viet Nam Partnership Document (VPD) Hanoi, November 7, 2012 MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND INVESTMENT CAO MANH CUONG DGG- FERD/MPI AEF NATIONAL COORDINATOR.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.
SWA’s Role in Improving Aid Effectiveness in the WASH sector SWA Country Processes Task Team Geneva, November 2013.
The Roadmap to Accra Pacific Regional Workshop on Aid Effectiveness Nadi, Fiji (April 4, 5 & 7, 2008) Bee Ean Gooi, World Bank.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
The Global Partnership
Reference Group Meeting 11 – 13 February 2009
Vincent Grimaud, Head of Unit
Session 3 The monitoring framework
The Road to Busan: Ensuring Citizens Drive Their Own Development
The Accra High-Level Forum: A Roadmap to Aid Effectiveness
Programming and Engaging Stakeholders in the PDE
Busan Partnership for Climate Finance and Development Effectiveness
HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS
(Further) Improving Development Cooperation
Presentation transcript:

Busan High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness An opportunity to forge a new consensus on aid and development? Aid Effectiveness Division Development Cooperation Directorate, OECD March 2011

Table of Contents 1.The Aid Effectiveness Journey 2.Facts on Busan HLF-4 and Main Objectives 3.Busan – A Unique Opportunity 4.Busan – An Evidence-Based Process 5.Emerging Areas for Political Outcomes 6.Raising Partner Country Voice : Partner Country Contact Group 7.Next Milestones

Busan HLF 4: The aid effectiveness journey… Rome Declaration on Harmonisation Accra Action Agenda Busan 29 Nov – 1Dec Monterrey Consensus HLF-1 HLF-2 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness Bogota Declaration on SSC Dili Declaration on Fragile States Istanbul principles on CSO effectiveness HLF-3 HLF-4

Who? Where? When? A political event that attracts ministerial attendance, with decisive outcomes Busan, Korea. Host: Government of Korea 29 November to 1 December 2011.

Busan HLF 4: Main Objective Draw conclusions on the Paris/Accra process and reaffirm commitments Draw on evidence to develop aid quality framework towards 2015 (MDGs) Address impact and role of aid in the broader development agenda – 2005 – 2006 – 2007 – 2008 – 2009 – 2010 – 2011 – 2012 – 2013 – 2014 – 2015 – 2016 –

Busan HLF-4: A Unique Opportunity Forging a new consensus on aid and development? – Last and best chance to realise the global commitment towards the MDGs; – Refresh and reaffirm Paris / Accra principles; – Recognise the role of aid as contributor and catalyst for development results; – Improve the quality of partnerships through embracing partner country leadership, diversity and mutual respect; – Seek convergence based on complementary strengths and differentiated responsibilities; – First time to be held in Asia – lessons from economic transformation.

Busan HLF 4: An Evidence-Based Process Evidence on what worked and what didnt work Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Clusters and Task Teams PD Evaluation (22 partner countries, 18 donors) PD Monitoring Survey (90 countries, incl. 14 fragile states) Regional & Sectoral consultations First draft of the Busan Outcome Document will be available in July 2011, drawing on evidence

Emerging Areas for Political Outcomes – Results and transparency for better accountability – Ownership and Leadership – Human and institutional capacity development – Diversity at country level – fragile states, middle income countries, LDCs – Recognise all forms of partnerships (SSC, PPPs…) – Role of CSOs, Parliaments and local government

First Narrative of Busan Outcomes I.PREAMBLE II.CONCLUSIONS ON AID EFFECTIVENESS PROGRESS III.ROLE OF AID AS CONTRIBUTOR / CATALYST FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS IV.LIST OF COMMITMENS TO ENHANCE THE AID EFFECTIVENESS AGENDA V.AGENDA ON OTHER DEVELOPMENT RESULTS VI.FOLLOW UP ON GOVERNANCE SYSTEM AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK I.PREAMBLE II.CONCLUSIONS ON AID EFFECTIVENESS PROGRESS III.ROLE OF AID AS CONTRIBUTOR / CATALYST FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS IV.LIST OF COMMITMENS TO ENHANCE THE AID EFFECTIVENESS AGENDA V.AGENDA ON OTHER DEVELOPMENT RESULTS VI.FOLLOW UP ON GOVERNANCE SYSTEM AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK Written comments by 3 April

Partner Country Contact Group – Objectives Candid assessment of progress at the country level Identify issues with limited / no progress, determine reasons why Consult on national priorities for future domestic and international actions Contribute to a common Position Paper on common and differentiated positions on actionable outcomes and building blocks to be presented at Busan Engage senior (ministerial) level political support / endorsement Partner Country Position Paper by July 2011 WP-EFF

Partner Country Contact Group – Composition Co-ordinated by WP-EFF Partner Country Co-Chair Constituted by WP-EFF partner country representatives; Supplemented by ad-hoc meetings of the PCCG at ministerial level (for example, to engage with donors at this level) Position Paper to be drafted by drafting team. RegionsConfirmed Countries (as of 7 March) AfricaCameroon, Egypt, Ghana, Mali, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda (CSO) Asia-PacificNepal, Philippines, Timor-Leste, Vietnam Latin America & Caribbean CARICOM, Colombia, Honduras,

Road to Busan – Africas engagement 44 African countries (out of total 90 countries) taking part in the 2011 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration 9 African countries (out of 22) taking part in Phase II of the Paris Declaration Evaluation African countries will be the main source of evidence for Busan.

Key milestones in 2011 Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Meetings and Key EventsHLF4 EvidenceConsultations Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 4 th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness 29 November – 1st December, Busan, Korea 1st draft outcome document Monitoring Survey: country level data collection Evidence for Progress Since Paris Deadlines: 31 March Regional and stakeholder consultations Evaluation: Synthesis report (April 2011) Monitoring Survey: preliminary results 1 st draft Progress since Paris (July 2011) Report finalisation (September 2011) Themes for Busan Deadline: January Preliminary Menu of Options WP-EFF EXCOM (9-10 March) WP-EFF + ExCOM (7-9 July) WP-EFF + ExCOM (5-7 Oct) 2 nd draft outcome document DAC SLM (6-7 April) WB/IMF Spring Meeting (16-17 April) Other key events WP-EFF co-chairs First Narrative Outline for Outcome Document (comments by 3 April)

THANK YOU (launch on 31 March)