Banning them, securing us?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Human Security Act of 2007 Protect life, liberty, and property from acts of terrorism. Condemn terrorism as inimical and dangerous to the national security.

Advertisements

Can we fight Terrorism with Force? Braunwarth. Some Pre-War Claims Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11 Saddam Hussein posed a direct threat to the.

Marie DeffayetLeaksmy Reth. The attacks in Paris killed 17 people, including four cartoonists who worked at the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, four.

European experience with migration and integration problems: Ways for overcoming xenophobia and extremism ELDR&YABLOKO International Conference Youth under.

Budapest, September 29-30, 2011 Terrorism and Democracy in the 21 st Century Supervising Intelligence Networks: the new challenge for oversight Peter Gill.

The Power of Modern Weapons Although the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty was signed by 62 countries, nuclear weapons are still a threat and some countries.

Does the First Amendment protect free speech if humanitarian groups want to provide support to designated terrorist organizations? Must a humanitarian.

Human Rights: Civil Rights & Liberties Meryl Mohan Monica Thomas Sherine Rahimi Meryl Mohan Monica Thomas Sherine Rahimi.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HOMELAND SECURITY Patrick Hathaway CS572 – Advanced Artificial Intelligence.

Created by Curt Harrell & Jesse Kuzy for THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

Conceptual definition of the European Union as a security actor

Supporting Children and Young People Vulnerable to Radicalisation and Violent Extremism ‘Prevent Duty’ St Joseph’s High School September 2015.

European Standards on Confidentiality and Privacy in Healthcare Dr Colin M Harper Division of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Queen’s University.

Miriam’s Vision: A Response to the 2005 London Bombings Citizenship Different Needs, Common Ground Human Rights & Surveillance.

The influence of terrorist threat perception in the USA during the period of upon the condition of international security.

Terrorism. Calculated use of violent acts against civilians and symbolic targets to publicize a cause, intimidate, or coerce a civilization or government.

Legislating for Otherness: Proscription and Parliamentary Discourse Lee Jarvis School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies University.

Susan Scholefield CMG Director General Cohesion and Resilience.

Democracy and Human Rights Sydney J, Ashley H, and Jordan S.

Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/

A Post September 11 Morality; A “paradigm shift” in human rights ideology? Chris Gallavin Lecturer in Law University of Hull.

Safeguarding Update October 2015.

The Prevent Duty Implications for Schools

Information Security Legislation Moving ahead Information Security 2001 Professional Information Security Association Sin Chung Kai Legislative Councillor.

Prevent Fighting extremism Alison Woodcock Pastoral Director – Carmel College 16 th September 2015.

What are some understandings of Canadian citizenship?

Prevent in Bradford District

STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE MANAGEMENT Chapter by Kristian Krieger, M. Brooke Rogers Chapter 7 - Promoting Public Resilience against Chemical, Biological, Radiological.

Warrantless Wiretapping Sara Rudman Julie Sugarman Louise Matthiesen.

The State of Democracy In the Contemporary World March 2 nd, 2004.

Selina Stewart Lead associate: Prevent duty Further Education and Sixth Form Colleges Seminar.

What is the Prevent Duty? Part of the 2015 Counter Terrorism and Security Act. A duty to protect ‘people from being drawn into terrorism’ by “extremists.”

Prevent Duty Briefing.

 Not a magic wand? Proscription and the ritual of parliamentary scrutiny Lee Jarvis[1] and Tim Legrand [2] 1 School of Politics, Philosophy, Language.

From Kosovo to Libya: NATO and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P)

PREVENT 2015 The Prevent Strategy “Stopping people becoming

Student Conference 2016 Safeguarding

‘A tough but necessary power’: Making sense of proscription

Rights based approaches to disability

Rachel Williams, Inger Mordre, Kyra Ward, Rory Langan, Dillon Yeh

RICHMOND SCHOOL & Sixth Form College

Legislating for Otherness: Terrorism, Proscription and Identity

Unit 7, Section 1 U.S. Foreign Policy

Southwark Prevent programme

WEEK 4 September 11th, Global Terrorism and War on Terrorism

Rotational Leadership Programme

PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 9 FEBRUARY :00 -11:30 PROCLAMATIONS BY THE PRESIDENT UNDER SECTION 26.

Stopping people becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism.

Preaching to the Converted: Parliament and the Ritual of Proscription

What is terrorism? There is no agreed definition of terrorism internationally. The UK’s Terrorism Act 2000, defines terrorism as: The use or threat of.

7th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs (23.3)

The Prevent Strategy.

TERRORISM The use of indiscriminate violence to spread fear in a bid to achieve political, religious, ideological or financial aims.

Nationalism Verses Internationalism: Understanding the Dilemma

Moral Philosophies in.

How Does the Charter Affect Law Making in Canada?

“Today’s Issues” The United States and Canada

Alphington Primary School January 2018

POWER! Promoting Opportunities for Women’s Empowerment and Rights Webinar on unpaid care work and Violence Against Women.

TERRORISM The use of indiscriminate violence to spread fear in a bid to achieve political, religious, ideological or financial aims.

I. September 11, 2001.

US Involvement in International Conflict

7th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs (23.3)

Staff and Trainer Responsibilities explained:

Role of US Security and Intelligence Agencies

The Prevent Statutory Guidance:

Presentation transcript:

Banning them, securing us? Lee Jarvis School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies l.jarvis@uea.ac.uk

Countering terrorism

Banning terrorists Proscription powers: Make specific terrorist groups illegal within a particular territory Criminalise support for and membership of proscribed groups Trigger further crimes, e.g. uniforms In the UK, the Home Secretary has the power to proscribe an organisation: ‘…if it commits or participates in acts of terrorism, prepares for, promotes or encourages terrorism or is otherwise concerned in terrorism’ Extended, in 2006, to include the glorification of terrorism

The UK in Context June 2017: Compares with: 71 international terrorist organisations listed in the UK 14 in Northern Ireland Nine groups added to the UK’s list since 2015 September 2017, Red Hand Commando – a Loyalist group – applies to be legalised Compares with: 60 groups on the US’ Foreign Terrorist Organizations List. 54 organisations listed in Canada 23 organisations listed in Australia Only 13 across all four

Security, democracy, identity Does banning terrorist groups make us more secure? Perhaps, although hard to measure Political and moral implications? Freedoms of speech, organisation Rights to resistance and opposition Identity?

Terrorists are We are Good _ Bad Irrational, extremist - ‘cowards [who] like to target civilians’ (Hopkins, 2011) ‘contorted and evil individuals’ (Mercer, 2013) ‘Free speech is a cornerstone of our democracy’ (Blunt, 2010) ‘We must ensure that we properly respect individual freedoms and liberties while providing collective security’ (Brokenshire, 2013) Irrational, extremist - Responsible , moderate ‘fundamentalist organisations are, by their nature, barking mad’, (Simpson, 2005) ‘the random slaughter of innocent individuals’ (Grieve, 2005) ‘we all know that the nature of terrorism has changed’ (Smith, 2013) ‘with the utmost seriousness and care’ (Blunkett, 2002) ‘only after the most thorough scrutiny of all the intelligence’ (Bassam, 2005) The problem The solution ‘a perpetual threat in this country’ (Ruffley, 2008) ‘We will be attacked again’ (Mercer 2005) ‘supporting the rest of the international community to tackle terrorism’ (Blears, 2005)

Thanks for listening!