Methods of Proof A mathematical theorem is usually of the form pq

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discrete Mathematics University of Jazeera College of Information Technology & Design Khulood Ghazal Mathematical Reasoning Methods of Proof.
Advertisements

Discrete Math Methods of proof 1.
MA/CSSE 473/474 How (not) to do an induction proof.
Get Ready To Be Logical! 1. Books and notebooks out. 2. Supplies ready to go. 3. Answer the following: The sum of 2 positive integers is ___________ True.
1 Discrete Structures CS Johnnie Baker Comments on Early Term Test.
Discussion #131/18 Discussion #13 Induction (the process of deriving generalities from particulars) Mathematical Induction (deductive reasoning over the.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 01/31/12 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
1 Intro to Induction Supplementary Notes Prepared by Raymond Wong Presented by Raymond Wong.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 02/01/11
1 Inference Supplementary Notes Prepared by Raymond Wong Presented by Raymond Wong.
Copyright © Zeph Grunschlag,
1 Section 3.3 Mathematical Induction. 2 Technique used extensively to prove results about large variety of discrete objects Can only be used to prove.
1 Strong Mathematical Induction. Principle of Strong Mathematical Induction Let P(n) be a predicate defined for integers n; a and b be fixed integers.
Mathematical Induction
Methods of Proof & Proof Strategies
CSCI 115 Chapter 2 Logic. CSCI 115 §2.1 Propositions and Logical Operations.
Chapter 6 Mathematical Induction
Discrete Mathematics, Part II CSE 2353 Fall 2007 Margaret H. Dunham Department of Computer Science and Engineering Southern Methodist University Some slides.
CSNB143 – Discrete Structure Topic 5 – Induction Part I.
March 3, 2015Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 5: Mathematical Reasoning 1Arguments Just like a rule of inference, an argument consists of one or more.
Methods of Proofs PREDICATE LOGIC The “Quantifiers” and are known as predicate quantifiers. " means for all and means there exists. Example 1: If we.
Methods of Proof Lecture 3: Sep 9. This Lecture Now we have learnt the basics in logic. We are going to apply the logical rules in proving mathematical.
Logical Reasoning:Proof Prove the theorem using the basic axioms of algebra.
Section 3.3: Mathematical Induction Mathematical induction is a proof technique that can be used to prove theorems of the form:  n  Z +,P(n) We have.
1 Discrete Structures – CNS2300 Text Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Kenneth H. Rosen (5 th Edition) Chapter 3 The Foundations: Logic and Proof,
Methods of Proof Dr. Yasir Ali. Proof A (logical) proof of a statement is a finite sequence of statements (called the steps of the proof) leading from.
Chapter 2 Symbolic Logic. Section 2-1 Truth, Equivalence and Implication.
MAT 2720 Discrete Mathematics Section 2.2 More Methods of Proof Part II
CSE373: Data Structures and Algorithms Lecture 2: Proof by Induction Linda Shapiro Winter 2015.
2.3 Methods of Proof.
CS104:Discrete Structures Chapter 2: Proof Techniques.
Methods of Proof – Page 1CSCI 1900 – Discrete Structures CSCI 1900 Discrete Structures Methods of Proof Reading: Kolman, Section 2.3.
MAT 2720 Discrete Mathematics Section 2.1 Mathematical Systems, Direct proofs, and Counterexamples
Quiz 5 1.5, 3.1 Methods of Proof.. Quiz 5: Th. May pm 1) Give 2 rules of inference and the tautologies on which they are based. 2) Explain.
1 Review for Quiz 1. 2 Summations 3 Binomial expansion.
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I Lecture 8 Proofs Autumn 2012 CSE
1 Formal Proofs. 2 Deductive Proofs From the given statement(s) to a conclusion statement (what we want to prove) Logical progression by direct implications.
Introduction to Proofs. The use of Reasoning and Logic in proofs Inductive Reasoning- “reasoning from detailed facts to general principles” – Specific.
Lecture 10 Methods of Proof CSCI – 1900 Mathematics for Computer Science Fall 2014 Bill Pine.
1 Discrete Mathematical Mathematical Induction ( الاستقراء الرياضي )
Mathematical Induction
Chapter 1 Logic and proofs
3.3 Mathematical Induction 1 Follow me for a walk through...
Lecture 2: Proofs and Recursion. Lecture 2-1: Proof Techniques Proof methods : –Inductive reasoning Lecture 2-2 –Deductive reasoning Using counterexample.
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
11.7 – Proof by Mathematical Induction
CSE15 Discrete Mathematics 02/01/17
Methods of proof Section 1.6 & 1.7 Wednesday, June 20, 2018
Advanced Algorithms Analysis and Design
EECS 203: Discrete Mathematics
CSE 311: Foundations of Computing
Proof Techniques.
CSNB 143 Discrete Mathematical Structures
Explorations in Artificial Intelligence
Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
BaSIC Math Reviews.
Methods of Proof. Methods of Proof Definitions A theorem is a valid logical assertion which can be proved using Axioms: statements which are given.
Exercise Use mathematical induction to prove the following formula.
Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 2: Proofs
Section 2.1 Proof Techniques Introduce proof techniques:   o        Exhaustive Proof: to prove all possible cases, Only if it is about a.
Follow me for a walk through...
Induction Chapter
Advanced Analysis of Algorithms
Logic Logic is a discipline that studies the principles and methods used to construct valid arguments. An argument is a related sequence of statements.
Mathematical Induction
Mathematical Induction
Follow me for a walk through...
CS344 : Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
Agenda Proofs (Konsep Pembuktian) Direct Proofs & Counterexamples
Presentation transcript:

Methods of Proof A mathematical theorem is usually of the form pq where p is called hypothesis or premise, and q is called conclusion. p is often of the form p1p2…pn If pq is a tautology, then q logically follows from To ‘prove the theorem’ means to show that the implication is a tautology Arguments based on tautologies represent universally correct methods of reasoning; such arguments are called rules of inference.

Indirect Proof Methods The first indirect method of proof, follows from the tautology (pq)  (~q~p), i.e. an implication is equivalent to its contrapositive The second indirect proof: by contradiction is based on the tautology (pq) ((p  ~ q)  F) To disprove the result, only to find one counterexample for which the claim fails The proof of pq is logically equivalent with proving both pq and qp

Mathematical Induction To prove nn0 P(n), where n0 is some fixed integer, begin by proving the basic step: P(n0) is true and then the induction step: If P(k) is true for some kn0, then P(k+1) must also be true Then P(n) is true for all nn0 The result is called the principle of mathematical induction. In the strong form of mathematical induction, or strong induction, the induction step is to show that P(n0)P(n0+1)P(n0+2)…P(k)  P(k+1) is a tautology.