Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Warning Timing for AEBS AEBS/LDWS Proposal of Warning Timing 1) Warning has two functions; to induce the driver to take an avoiding maneuver.
Advertisements

Collision Mitigation break system (CMS) What is CMS? How it works System Configuration Warning Devices Collision Avoidance Maneuvers Conclusions.
Concept of Driver Assistance The ASV Project of Japan Geneva November 2003 Informal Document No. 20 (131 st WP.29, agenda item 2.4.)
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
United States Rulemaking on Electronic Stability Control (ESC) for Light Vehicles 138 WP.29 March, 2006 Informal document No. WP (138th WP.29,
1 Consideration of Issues Japan Presentation Informal document No. GRRF-S08-13 Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008 Agenda item 5.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
Speed Limits, Speed Control and Stopping Regulations.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
Identification of regulatory needs for ACSF Oliver Kloeckner 16-17th June nd meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo – Jasic Office Informal Document.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal.
Research on HMI Homework item 1 (ACSF-01-13)
Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
1 ISO TC204/WG14 FVCMS Operation Performance, and Verification Requirements 9, December 2008 WG14 Expert Member of Japan Informal document No. GRRF-S08-08.
Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.
1 Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions review of some research literature referred to in the ITS guidelines.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES Presented by Anju.J.S. CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS
Software and Regulation
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
Chapter 3 Cruise Control
Dr. Patrick Seiniger, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt)
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
The Safety Technologies to Consider While Buying a New Car.
Confirmation on application to EVs unique cycle
Informal document GRRF-86-36
John Lenkeit, Terry Smith
TUGS Jason Higuchi && Julia Yefimenko && Raudel mayorga
Statement of Principles on the Design of High-Priority Warning Signals
Industry Homework from AEB 02
on Transition for level 3 Automated Driving system
Expansion of consideration target of ITS-AD IWG
ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
AEBS 4th Meeting UK Position Paper December 18 OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE
Informal document GRSG
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
AEB IWG 06 – Industry Input
Safety Distance to the front
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
AEB IWG 02-XX Industry Position
AEB IWG 02 ISO Standard: FVCMS
AEB 07 – Industry Input.
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Terms of Reference (AEBS Rev.1)
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
Submitted by the Secretary
Emergency Steering Function
AEBS-08 – Industry Input.
GRSG/VRU-Proxi Informal Working Group Japan Proposals for Technical Requirements on Sonars November 21th 2017 Tokyo.
AEB Pedestrian and Cyclist - minimum velocities Sensor opening angles
Introduction: Modifications to UN R131 AEBS for Heavy Vehicles
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
AEBS-09 – Industry Input.
Presentation transcript:

Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) 2nd IWG of Advanced Emergency Braking Systems for light vehicles Transmitted by Expert from Japan 20-21 November 2017 Item 5 of the agenda Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) Explanation of Japanese guideline

DETAIL Definition of AEBS Speed Range Timing of Braking Control Collision Judgment Line Requirement of Braking Deceleration Enhance Damage Reducing Effect Collision Risk Judgment Line Emergency Event Preparation and Collision Warning Other Principal Requirements

Definition of Automatic Emergency Braking Systems 1. Definition of AEBS Definition of Automatic Emergency Braking Systems "Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (hereafter AEBS)" AEBS has functions of the collision warning and the emergency event preparation to the driver in case of occurrence of a danger of collision with a forward obstacle. AEBS has a function of the braking control for mitigating the damage of vehicle collision with a forward obstacle in case of that collision is judged imminent or unavoidable.

1. Definition of AEBS z 1st Stage Collision Warning Collision Warning Emergency Event Preparation Collision Warning Emergency Event Preparation 2nd Stage Braking Control for Damage Mitigation Braking Control for Damage Mitigation or Collision Avoidance Damage Mitigation or Collision Avoidance

(a) The vehicle speed is exceeding a maximum speed. 2. Speed Range Speed Range The system need not to start the braking control in the following speed ranges. (a) The vehicle speed is exceeding a maximum speed. (b) The absolute speed of the vehicle is equal to or less than 15 km/h. (c) The relative speed of the vehicle is equal to or less than 15 km/h. (d) In case of vehicle malfunctions.

3. Timing of Braking Control The most of driver operates the braking or the steering in the normal driving. Mandatory Optional The most of driver has already operated the braking or the steering in the emergency situation. A driver can’t avoid the collision, even if a driver operates the braking or the steering with the maximum vehicle dynamic performance. The braking control shall be activated. The braking control may be used. The braking control shall not be activated.

3. Timing of Braking Control The most of driver operates the braking or the steering in the normal driving. Mandatory Optional Why is the timing of the braking control prescribed in the regulation? DRIVER ACCEPTANCE If AEBS activates in the normal driving condition, a driver has nuisance feeling. A driver may use off-control. A driver may have distrust to AEBS. And then, AEBS might not activate efficiently in the emergency situation. Consideration of driver acceptance is important for the effect of AEBS. Therefore, the timing of the braking control is prescribed in this draft.

3. Timing of Braking Control Operational Range Based on Physical Avoidance Limit Operational range based on physical avoidance limit The timing of the braking control is called collision judgment line in this draft. Collision judgment means a state of a judgment that a collision cannot be avoided physically by operating either the braking or the steering. The braking control shall be activated.

3. Timing of Braking Control Driver operates either the braking or the steering for the purpose of avoiding the collision. Phase 3 Phase 2 Braking Steering Phase 1 The timing of braking control is prescribed in this draft based on considering the operation of both the braking and the steering.

4. Collision Judgment Line Collision avoidable limit line by braking Collision avoidable limit line by steering Collision judgment line Collision avoidable limit line by braking Collision avoidable limit line by steering Collision avoidable limit line by braking is TTC which is calculated by minimum stopping distance with the braking test. Collision avoidable limit line by steering is TTC which is calculated by minimum lateral displacement with the steering test. Braking: Braking performance of each vehicle is different. Therefore, this line is changed by each vehicle. Steering: TTC = 0.6 (s) fixed value is used for all large trucks.

5. Requirement of Braking Deceleration Requirement of automatic braking: Braking control shall be activated with average deceleration of 6.0 m/s2 or more. Collision judgment line Collision avoidable limit line by steering by braking

6. Enhance Damage Reducing Effect Operational Range Based on Driver’s Normal Maneuvers Limit Operational range based on driver’s normal maneuvers limit The timing of the braking control is called collision risk judgment line in this draft. Collision risk judgment means a state that has a risk of a collision. The most of driver has already operated the braking or the steering in the emergency situation. The braking control may be used by manufacture.

6. Enhance Damage Reducing Effect Operational Range Based on Driver’s Normal Maneuvers Limit Expanded range The most of driver has already operated the braking and the steering in the emergency situation. The most of driver operates the braking and the steering in the normal driving.(Normal driving area) Collision risk judgment line 衝突可能性判断ライン Time to collision (TTC) Lower limit line for collision avoidance by normal steering Lower limit line for collision avoidance by normal braking Collision judgment line Expanded range (Collision risk area) 衝突判断ライン Collision avoidable limit line by steering A driver can’t avoid the collision, even if a driver operates the braking and the steering with the maximum vehicle dynamic performance.(Collision area) Collision avoidable limit line by braking Relative velocity Braking control may start functioning in the collision risk area.

6. Enhance Damage Reducing Effect Collision Risk Judgment Line Collision risk judgment line is the lowest limit of drivers’ normal avoiding maneuver. Braking: TTC = 0.0167 * Rv + 1.00 Steering: TTC = 0.0167 * R + 1.13 (s) R : Ovelapping ratio Rv : Relative velocity The steering timing for collision avoidance in large trucks The braking timing for collision avoidance in large trucks Lower limit line for collision avoidance by normal braking Collision risk judgment line Lower limit line for collision avoidance by normal steering Confirmed by real world operation Draft : Para. 2.12, 2.13, 2.14 , 2.15, 5.4.2, 5.4.2.1, 5.4.2.2

6. Enhance Damage Reducing Effect Collision Risk Judgment Line Overlapping Ratio Lateral Distance for Collision Avoidance (B) = Overlapping Ratio x Vehicles Overall Width (A) B A Lateral Distance for Collision Avoidance Vehicles Overall Width Steering: TTC = 1.4 (s) If the AEBS can detect the overlapping ratio, TTC can be increased by the overlapping ratio.

6. Enhance Damage Reducing Effect Requirement of Braking Deceleration From collision risk judgment line : Braking control may be activated. Braking control may be activated in this range.

7. Emergency Event Preparation and Collision Warning “Collision Warning" means a function that alerts the driver to a risk of collision in advance and prompts him/her to make an avoiding action. “Emergency Event Preparation" means a function that notices the driver in advance that the system detects an unavoidable collision and starts controlling the brake system. “Collision Warning Braking" means a function that alert the driver a risk of collision by the braking. Warning braking have a limitation of deceleration that shall not exceed 6.0 m/s2.

8. Other Principal Requirements “AEBS Off” control The vehicle may equips with a means to manually deactivate the AEBS. If the vehicle may equips with a means to manually deactivate the AEBS, a deactivation warning shall be given when the system is deactivated. Fail safe function The system shall have a function to monitor the operating state of the system, and shall detect failures by means of this function. If any failure has occurred in the system, the operation of the system shall stop safely and the system shall return to its basic (manual) braking function as a brake system. Malfunction tell-tale If any failure occurs with the system, a warning shall be given. Indication of over limit of function If AEBS recognizes an unfavorable situation which precludes its operation, such as when the system detects contamination on the forward obstacle sensor, the driver in the driver’s seat shall be warned by an optical warning indicating that AEBS is not able to function.