William L. Miller, MD, MA Lehigh Valley Health Network Allentown, PA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Copyright © 2011 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 20 Supervising and Evaluating the Work of Others.
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Coaching Workshop.
TransforMED Lessons from the National Demonstration Project Lori Heim MD FAAFP.
Presented by Vicki M. Young, PhD October 19,
Foundations for a Successful Patient-Centered ACO: First Steps Frank E. Belsito, DO, MMM and James J. Dearing, DO, FAAFP, FACOFP.
Affiliated with Children’s Medical Services Affiliated with Children’s Medical Services Introduction to the Medical Home Part 2 How does a Practice adopt.
Building Capacity for Better Care Behavioural Support Systems Across Canada Dr. J Kenneth LeClair Sarah Clark.
The Role of Health Coaches in Population Health Lauren Scherer, MS, Medical Home Developer 4/21/2017.
Janice Berry Edwards, PhD, LICSW, LCSW-C, BCD, ACSW
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
A Multimethod Tailored QII for Sustainable Practice Change Mary C. Ruhe, B.S., R.N. Kurt C. Stange, MD, PhD Research Association of Practices (RAP) & Case.
AHRQ Safety Program for Long-Term Care: HAIs/CAUTI Long-Term Care Safety Toolkit: Building a Culture of Safety National Content Webinar April 16, 2015.
Making Teamwork Work in the Residency­Based Patient­ Centered Medical Home Tziporah Rosenberg, PhD Stephen Schultz, MD Colleen Fogarty, MD University of.
Phase-1: Prepare for the Change Why stepping back and preparing for the change is so important to successful adoption: Uniform and effective change adoption.
Class 3. Plan for today Delegation Emotional Intelligence Working in Teams Decision Making Performance and Relationship Management.
Clinical Quality Improvement: Achieving BP Control
Channeling Change: Making Collective Impact Work
Life Long Care Citizen’s Health Initiative –
MISBAHUDDIN AZZUHRI SE. MM. CPHR®. CSRS®.
Mount Auburn Hospital Adopts Kristen Swanson's Caring Theory
Models of Primary Care Primary Care – FAMED 530
Practice-based Research Networks’ Role in Implementing Practice Change
Building Our Medical Neighborhood
Welcome! Enhancing the Care Team May 25, 2017
Patient Centered Medical Home
Introduction to Employee Training and Development Chapter 1
UC San Diego, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health
Distributed leadership
Presentation Information
Chapter 10 Understanding Work Teams
MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES
The Clinical Practice Program
George E. Thibault, MD President, Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation
Organization and Knowledge Management
To Promote Creative Innovation
LEADS Impact: CADTH’s Case Study
Coaching.
Cultural Competence and Consumer Involvement: Practice and Theory
Coaching for Math GAINS
Working on and with Interdisciplinary Teams
The Charge Nurse Role in Today’s Environment
Towards More Sustainable Programming for Global Health Missions
EPAs as Curriculum Tools
Lehigh Valley Hospital & Health Network
Practice facilitation as a strategy to spread the adoption of PCMH
OD Interventions.
Facilitating Change: Lessons from the TransforMED National Demonstration Project AHRQ 2009 Annual Conference.
Everyday Lives: Values in Action Using IM4Q Data to Improve Statewide
Peg Bradke and Rebecca Steinfield
Organization Development
On the CUSP: Stop CAUTI Patient and Family Engagement in the ED
Whittlesea Youth Commitment / Hume Whittlesea LLEN City of Whittlesea.
TCPI Project Pathway: Session 3 of 8 Staff Engagement: Teamwork and Joy # 6 and 19 (24) To QIA for possible use: Thank you for taking my call and listening.
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
Success for All Foundation
22 Organization Development in Nonindustrial Settings: Health Care, School Systems, the Public Sector, and Family-Owned Businesses.
Perfect Together: Aligning and Leveraging SEAs and Parent Centers in Shared Work Helen Post and Kim Fratto January 10, :30 pm – 3:45 pm ET (11:30-12:45.
Building Our Medical Neighborhood
Johns Hopkins Medicine Innovation 2023 Strategic Plan
Georges Potworowski, PhD School of Public Health University at Albany
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Highlighting Parent Involvement in Education
Introduction to Employee Training and Development Chapter 1
Building Capacity for Quality Improvement A National Approach
BUSINESS AND LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
Skills-Based Volunteering
By: Andi Indahwaty Sidin A Critical Review of The Role of Clinical Governance in Health Care and its Potential Application in Indonesia.
National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization’s Palliative Care Resource Series Understanding the Importance of the Interdisciplinary Team in Pediatric.
Presentation transcript:

Collaborative Medical Home-Building 101: Harry Potter Learns Practice Jazz William L. Miller, MD, MA Lehigh Valley Health Network Allentown, PA February 29, 2008 2008 STFM CONFERENCE ON FAMILIES AND HEALTH

Situation in FM Rising Demand Growing Competition Urgent Care Retail Clinics EDs CAM NPs/PAs Internet Specialists More Patient Needs Unmet Shrinking Capacity Less Hospital Care Less ED Care Less Procedures Less Point of Care Services Less Children Less Income Less Students/Graduates Less Investment More Demand More Paperwork More Documentation More Referrals

The Miracle! PRIMARY CARE Patient-Centered Medical Home Better Health Outcomes Lower Costs Greater Equity Patient-Centered Medical Home

www.transformed.com

National Demonstration Project Evaluation Team Center for Research in Family Medicine and Primary Care Carlos R. Jaén, MD, PhD (PI) Benjamin F. Crabtree, PhD Paul A. Nutting, MD, MSPH William L. Miller, MD, MA Kurt C. Stange, MD, PhD & Elizabeth Stewart, PhD (analyst) Reuben R. McDaniel, EdD (consultant)

National Demonstration Project: Background The Future of Family Medicine report (2004) gave recommendations on “developing a strategy to transform and renew the specialty of family medicine.” 1 The American Academy of Family Physicians allocated funding for a demonstration project to “test” the implementation of the new model(s) of family medicine as proposed by FFM. 1 The Future of Family Medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:S3-S32.

National Demonstration Project: Background Proof of concept of a new model(s) of care for family medicine: Quality of care Practice finances Determining the best process for transformation: Facilitated Self-directed

Domains of NDP Evaluation Discovering what the transformed model looks like in the real world Effect of the transformed model on the practice Effect of the transformed model on patients Understanding the process of practice change Understanding transformation

NDP Design Volunteer practices (36) selected by technical advisory committee from over 300 applicants Randomly assigned to two change approaches: Facilitated (18) Self-directed (18) July 2006 to June 2008 (2 yrs) Mixed method assessment: RCT with pre/post and inter-group comparisons Comparative case study

www.transformed.com

Small (3 or less clinicians) 4 Practice Description Number of Sites Facilitated Self-directed Solo and Solo +1 3 Small (3 or less clinicians) 4 New 2 Medium (4-6 clinicians) 5 Large (7 or more clinicians) Total 18

Facilitated Practices Three TransforMED facilitators – each one assigned 6 practices. Intervention includes: Site visits Learning sessions/collaboratives Facilitated conference calls and webinars Connecting to nationally known consultants Constant contact w/facilitators (phone, email) Discounted goods and services (e.g., website, disease registry)

Self-Directed Practices Very minimal intervention that will still allow this group to be a valid comparison group Access to resources and information from TransforMED website Practices self-organized and created their own retreat Site visits by qualitative analyst

Data Sources: Quantitative Patient surveys Clinician/staff surveys Medical chart reviews Practice finances

Data Sources: Qualitative Field notes/observations from facilitators (site visits, phone call logs, etc) Field notes/observations from Qual. Analyst (facilitator huddles, meetings, etc) Key informant & informal interviews Email strings between practices and facilitators Online discussions between practices Conference calls, learning sessions

NDP Early Results Proof of concept of a new model(s) of care for family medicine: Quality of care No difference between FPs & SDPs on patient outcomes No relationship between # components & patient outcomes Practice finances Practices are less facile than initially assumed Other Practice relationship-centeredness ~ Patient-centered care

NDP Early Results Determining the best process for transformation: No difference between FPs & SDPs relative to # of components implemented Tailoring appears helpful Facilitation when relationships need work Individual coaching for leadership, finances, etc. With high motivation & high resources, consultative/instrumental approach helpful The “New Model”  Patient-Centered Care

Emergent Hope Patient-centered medical homes may still be achievable Multiple pathways Full engagement of practice needed Requires particular attention to: The clinical process Relationships among all members of practice Relationships between practice & larger health care system & community Motivation and capacity of key stakeholders Confirmed earlier/current other studies

Personal Family Wisdom Tree House Rule = “Whatever is said in the tree house, stays in the tree house.” Earth is the tree house Adoption Rule = “Nurture & discover the unknown child.” “There is no perfection.” “Mistakes are for learning.”

Background Collaborative team has conducted a series of descriptive and intervention projects over a 15 year period. Funded by NCI, NHLBI, NIDDK, NIMH and American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) Results from these projects have informed an evaluation of the AAFP’s National Demonstration Project (TransforMED)

Observation Intervention DOPC STEP-UP Direct Observation of Primary Care (1994-97) Study To Enhance Prevention by Understanding Practice (1996-2000) P&CD Prevention & Competing Demands in Primary Care (1996-99) ULTRA IMPACT Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation (2002-07) Insights from Multimethod Practice Assessment of Change over Time (2001-2004)

First insights into role of complexity in understanding practices Practices could not be described in mechanistic terms – too many non-linear relationships among events All the parts and people of a practice are interconnected and interdependent in terms of both relationships and functions. Any change in one part of the practice will have ripple effects through the other parts of a practice. Those ripple effects will create tension and problems that can be barriers to change. Changes don’t occur in a linear fashion. Small changes can have dramatic effects at times, large changes can produce small results at others. What works in one practice may not work in another---many different ways of achieving good outcomes

Properties of Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) CAS consist of ‘agents’ with capacity to learn and freedom to act in unpredictable ways. Agents are often individuals, they may be teams, organizational processes, technical components. Agents are connected in non-linear ways--one agent’s actions changes the context for other agents. The quality of the interactions among agents is more important than the quality of the agents.

Properties of Complex Adaptive Systems Self-organization: systems generate new structures and patterns over time as a result of their own internal dynamics. Order emerges from patterns of relationships among agents. Emergence: process by which non-linear interactions among agents results in new patterns of behavior. The system that evolves over time is more than the sum of its parts. Co-evolution: process of mutual transformation of the agent and the environment in which it exists.

Implications for Practice Change Patterns of relationships among staff (‘agents’) are critical determinants of practice change. (The quality of the interactions is more important than the quality of the staff.) From high quality interactions, process will emerge to create high quality change Emerging processes will not be the same in every practice.

According to CAS principles, successful practices will: Move from an ‘organization as machine’ paradigm and begin to understand their practices as complex adaptive systems. Pay more attention to the quality of the interactions among staff than on the quality of the staff. Focus on staff learning rather than on what they know today. Encourage cognitive diversity among staff (and teams) and leverage diversity to foster learning and emergence Recognize that the practice is a social entity, and foster sense-making, learning, and improvisation Expect and celebrate surprise as opportunities to learn and grow Begin to understand the interdependence between the formal and informal organizations rather than making everyone conform to the formal organization

According to Complexity Science … There are ghosts in the system because of Sensitivity to Initial Conditions. Persistence of self-organization when there is much loose coupling and multiple feedback loops. Power laws are operating because of Non-linearity (think 80/20) No normal distributions so averages are meaningless Examples: Length of stay – can’t use averages since the distribution isn’t a “normal” one – 80% of LOS # is based on 20% of the outlier patients Referred admissions from family docs – 80% of admissions come from 20% of the docs 80% of a practice’s attention is devoted to 20% of their patients 80% of employee challenges in a practice are related to only 20% of the employees

IMPACT CHANGE MODEL

Relationship-Centered Practice Capacity Model Reflection Action Trust Mindful Respect Heedful Diversity Social/ Task Rich/Lean STORIES Learning CULTURE Teamwork Sensemaking Improvisation Build Memory Dynamic Local Ecology Facilitative LEADERSHIP Knowledge Skills Finances Operations

NDP Early Lessons Implementation of new model components, especially technology, is a monumental undertaking… requiring a level of effort and intensity well beyond what most practices have done in the past. Practices are unfamiliar with changes at the systems level, and many do not function as a coordinated system and therefore lack insight into the complexity of their practice.

NDP Early Lessons: Motivation & Capacity Leadership & key stakeholders need to be motivated and engaged in the change process. A practice's resources & capacity for change at baseline is a huge determinant for that practice's progress, and equally important is the ability to increase that capacity.

NDP Early Lessons: Leadership & Reflection The most successful practices seem to have shared leadership systems rather than an individual physician leader. So little leadership So much power A critically important role of leadership is to assure adequate time for personal and practice-level reflection.

NDP Early Lessons: Relationships & Conversations Despite being highly motivated some practices had serious dysfunctional problems within the relationship infrastructure that required significant time and energy on the part of the facilitator. A critical factor in improving relationships is for leadership to assure adequate and appropriate conversations.

Early Lessons: Technology & Fatigue The technology in the New Model, while shining with possibilities, is not by any means an easy "plug and play" interface for the practices. Due in part to the ongoing challenges of technology, even the most successful practices are experiencing change fatigue.

NDP Early Lessons: Help & Support Depending on initial practice capacity assessment, may need one or more: Targeted consultation – e.g. Advanced Access, EMR, finances, specific operations, etc. Coaching – e.g. leadership, finances, etc. Facilitation – e.g. relationships, reflection, leadership, etc (different intensity of joining practice and/or system, ranging from just being there to active facilitation). Group Learning & Knowledge Access

More Lessons from NDP Essential New Skills/Curriculum Identity Issues Paradigm Problems Dual Organization Importance of IMPACT Model Breathe & Celebrate No Transformation Yet

NDP Early Lessons: It’s Personal For some physicians, the new model requires transformation at the personal level, as practices must move from a physician-centric approach to one that is more patient & relationship (team) centered. Each practice not only has a different way of implementing the new model, but each physician has a different vision of what transformation really is. Some physicians believe it is moving from a patient-approach to population-approach… others think it is when their practice is a joyful place or efficient place to work… still others believe transformation can only occur when the national system of compensation changes.

Harry Potter Wisdom Make choices Seek good friends Do what matters

Change Thinking Unfreeze & Initiate Set initial conditions & start conversations Requires HEAT Everyone must be unfrozen Transition & Trouble Prepare for & deal with difficult emotions & conversations Requires good & flexible project management COMMUNICATE Chill & Accelerate Continue culture change & seek disruptions Expect “change fatigue” Unfreeze = Sunny vision; fiery passion; burning platform = This is the Harry Potter part - Assure everyone is regularly connected and has skills to converse Transition = this is the jazz part Chill & Accelerate = this means you built adaptive capacity (relationships/leadership/reflective space/skills)

Being “Tempered Radicals” Resisting quietly & staying true to one’s self Turning personal threats into opportunities Broadening the impact through negotiation Leveraging small wins Organizing collective action - Debra E. Meyerson (2001)

Jazz Secrets Turn-taking Building Empathetic listening Soloing Supporting Passing-off Building Empathetic listening Continual negotiation Facilitative leadership Hanging out Here & Now In the Groove

Leadership Types Leadership as Leader – Engineer Strategic Engineer (design for fit with environ.) Economic Engineer (design for perfor. outcomes) Social Engineer (design for behav. outcomes) Leadership for Emergence Administrative Leadership Enabling Leadership Adaptive Leadership - See Complexity Systems Leadership Theory by Hazy, et al (2007)

Emergent Leadership Properties Distributing Intelligence Fostering Conversations & Enriching Connections Sustaining Tensions Looking for Patterns - See Complexity Systems Leadership Theory by Hazy, et al (2007)

The Magnificent 7 Mindfulness Respectful interaction Heedful inter-relating Mix of rich and lean communication Diversity Mix of social and task relatedness Trust

Types of Teams CONTROL (Think Football) AUTONOMY COLLABORATION (Think Baseball) COLLABORATION (Think Basketball) From R. Keidel, Corporate Players

Characteristics of Good Team Relational Coordination Frequent, timely communication Shared goals Shared knowledge Mutual respect Problem-solving Team Culture (supportive) Other Key Features Clinical & administrative systems Training & cross-training

Roles of Future FP Manager of Care Staff Manger of Informational System Doer of the Tough Clinical “It’s OUR patient” and not “It’s MY patient.”

3 Conversational Intents Doing the Project Stakeholder/Structure/Matrix Development Work Adaptive Capacity Building

Some New Models The BIG Home The LITTLE Home TransforMED Ambulatory Practice of the Future Optimal Healing Environments Cooperative Clinics The LITTLE Home Micropractices Concierge practices Access Healthcare Real Estate Agents with Perks “Retail” clinics Urgent care/ED express care

References Organizational Change & Complexity Science Cohen D, McDaniel RR Jr, Crabtree BF, et. al. A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice. J Healthc Manag. 2004 May-Jun;49(3):155-68. Miller, W.L., Crabtree, B.F., McDaniel, R.A., and Stange, K.C. Understanding Primary Care Practice: A Complexity Model of Change. J Fam Pract, 1998 46(5):369-376. Miller WL, McDaniel RR, Jr., Crabtree BF, Stange, K. Practice Jazz: Understanding variation in family practice using complexity science. J Fam Pract 2001; 50(10):872-878.

References Stroebel CK, McDaniel RR, Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Nutting PA, Stange KC. How complexity science can inform a reflective practice improvement process. Joint Comm J Qual and Patient Safety. 2005; 31(8):438-446. Safran DG, Miller W, Beckman H. Organizational dimensions of relationship-centered care. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: S9-15.

References Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Tallia AF, Cohen DJ, DiCicco-Bloom B, McIlvain HE, Aita VA, Scott JG, Gregory PB, Stange KC, McDaniel RR. Delivery of Clinical Preventive Services in Family Medicine Offices. Ann Fam Med. 2005; 3(5): 430-435. Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Healing landscapes: Patients, relationships and optimal healing places. J Complementary and Alternative Med. 2005, 11 Suppl 1:S41-9. Crabtree B. Primary Care Practices are Full of Surprises! Health Care Manage Rev, 2003, 28(3):279-283.

References Tallia AF, Lanham H, McDaniel R, Crabtree BF. Seven Characteristics of Successful Work Relationships Family Practice Management 2006 Jan; 13(1):47-50. Solberg LI, Hroscikoski MC, Sperl-Hillen JM, Harper PG, Crabtree BF. Transforming medical care: Case study of an exemplar small medical group. Ann Fam Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;4(2):109-16.