Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages e9 (June 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Advertisements

UV as an Amplifier Rather Than Inducer of NF-κB Activity
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages e9 (June 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
ppGpp Controls Global Gene Expression in Light and in Darkness in S
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Sequential Polarization and Imprinting of Type 1 T Helper Lymphocytes by Interferon-γ and Interleukin-12  Edda G. Schulz, Luca Mariani, Andreas Radbruch,
Botao Liu, Yan Han, Shu-Bing Qian  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Transient N-6-Methyladenosine Transcriptome Sequencing Reveals a Regulatory Role of m6A in Splicing Efficiency  Annita Louloupi, Evgenia Ntini, Thomas.
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages e7 (July 2018)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Volume 140, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Dynamic Control of dNTP Synthesis in Early Embryos
m6A Facilitates eIF4F-Independent mRNA Translation
Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks of Human Myeloid Differentiation
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Andreas Hilfinger, Thomas M. Norman, Johan Paulsson  Cell Systems 
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Lea Goentoro, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
TED-Seq Identifies the Dynamics of Poly(A) Length during ER Stress
Homeostatic Cell Growth Is Accomplished Mechanically through Membrane Tension Inhibition of Cell-Wall Synthesis  Enrique R. Rojas, Kerwyn Casey Huang,
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Modeling Enzyme Processivity Reveals that RNA-Seq Libraries Are Biased in Characteristic and Correctable Ways  Nathan Archer, Mark D. Walsh, Vahid Shahrezaei,
Rosanna P. Sammons, Claudia Clopath, Samuel J. Barnes  Cell Reports 
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages e5 (May 2017)
An RpaA-Dependent Sigma Factor Cascade Sets the Timing of Circadian Transcriptional Rhythms in Synechococcus elongatus  Kathleen E. Fleming, Erin K. O’Shea 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages e13 (November 2016)
Slow Chromatin Dynamics Allow Polycomb Target Genes to Filter Fluctuations in Transcription Factor Activity  Scott Berry, Caroline Dean, Martin Howard 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Dynamic profiling of the protein life cycle in response to pathogens
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Jong-Eun Park, Hyerim Yi, Yoosik Kim, Hyeshik Chang, V. Narry Kim 
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages e12 (September 2018)
Stefano Di Talia, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Comparison of proteomics and RNA‐Seq data.
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Impact of Alternative Splicing on the Human Proteome
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Botao Liu, Yan Han, Shu-Bing Qian  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 11, Pages (January 2019)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Semblance of Heterogeneity in Collective Cell Migration
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Yun Wah Lam, Angus I. Lamond, Matthias Mann, Jens S. Andersen 
Modeling Enzyme Processivity Reveals that RNA-Seq Libraries Are Biased in Characteristic and Correctable Ways  Nathan Archer, Mark D. Walsh, Vahid Shahrezaei,
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Oxidative stress globally impairs translation.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (October 2018)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
On the Dependency of Cellular Protein Levels on mRNA Abundance
Joana Pinto Vieira, Julien Racle, Vassily Hatzimanikatis 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (June 2018)
Iain G. Johnston, Nick S. Jones  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 636-644.e9 (June 2017) Time-Resolved Proteomics Extends Ribosome Profiling-Based Measurements of Protein Synthesis Dynamics  Tzu-Yu Liu, Hector H. Huang, Diamond Wheeler, Yichen Xu, James A. Wells, Yun S. Song, Arun P. Wiita  Cell Systems  Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 636-644.e9 (June 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.05.001 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Direct Monitoring of Protein Synthesis by Targeted pSILAC Mass Spectrometry with Simultaneous Measurement of Transcript Abundance and Ribosome Footprint Density (A) Example time-course SRM data for peptides from PROF1 and DDX5. Red traces, “light” channel intensity (degraded from baseline); blue traces, “heavy” channel intensity (newly synthesized post-stable isotope pulse). Each trace represents added intensity of all monitored SRM transitions (four per peptide per channel). Inset: intensity values for each channel plotted over time; error bars reflect ±SD from replicate assays. (B) Relative mRNA abundance and ribosome footprint read density (ratio versus 0 hr [0h], in RPKM) move together over the time course. Changes in protein abundance are not as prominent as transcript-level changes. SRM measurements of total protein here refers to the sum of all peptide intensities in light and heavy channels. Cell Systems 2017 4, 636-644.e9DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.05.001) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Measuring and Modeling Translational Rate by pSILAC Proteomics and Ribosome Profiling (A) Early in the time course, before any biochemical evidence of translational inhibition (Figure S2), comparison of average ribosome footprint density on transcript coding sequence and newly synthesized proteins per cell, measured by SRM intensity and extrapolated based on iBAQ estimate of total protein copies per cell, show a strong correlation (Pearson’s R = 0.80 on log-transformed data). Red line is line of best fit, with slope = 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.86–1.06). Molecules synthesized per cell by SRM represent “heavy” protein copies at 12 hr (12h) minus “heavy” copies at 0 hr (see STAR Methods); footprint data are average RPKM from the 6, 12, and 24 hr time points. (B) Example plots from proteins EIF6 and YWHAE show proteomic data. Lines represent fits from model fitting based on orthogonal splines with linearity constraints (see STAR Methods). Solid lines, total protein; short dashed lines, degradation; long dashed lines, synthesis. (C) Differential rate equation model describes protein abundance as a function of protein synthesis and degradation as measured from proteomic experiments and mRNA-seq. The primary free fitting parameter kgs(t) describes the number of proteins synthesized per transcript per unit time, Pgd(t) is abundance of “light” proteins, kgd is protein degradation rate constant derived from single-exponential fit to light channel data, Mg is absolute transcript abundance as derived from mRNA-seq data, and Pgs(t) is abundance of newly synthesized “heavy” protein. The definition of translational efficiency from ribosome profiling literature is denoted by TE per gene: ribosome footprint read density rg(t) divided by mRNA-seq read density mg(t) (both in RPKM). The normalized translational efficiency is denoted by TE˜: ribosome footprint read density normalized to mitochondrial footprints Rg(t) divided by absolute transcript abundance Mg(t). (D) Baseline comparison of TE and kgs(t) show that they are correlated, but imperfectly (Pearson’s R = 0.58 on log-transformed data). (E–G) TE (E), kgs (F), and TE˜ (G) plotted across all 272 proteins across the time course, as a ratio to the value at 0 hr (0h), shows no change in TE by standard analysis but similar changes in translational rate as measured by proteomics (F) and mitochondrial-corrected ribosome footprints (G). Cell Systems 2017 4, 636-644.e9DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.05.001) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Biochemical Measurements of Protein Synthesis and Translational Efficiency Are Consistent with Targeted pSILAC and Allow for Simulations of Protein Synthesis Based on Experimental Data (A) Puromycin incorporation into nascent protein chains (1 hr pulse of puromycin added at each time point prior to cell harvest; western blot with anti-puromycin antibody) demonstrates decreased global protein synthesis at later time points. (B) Simulation of protein abundance using the differential equation we proposed with the derived mRNA abundance Mg(t), degradation rate constant kgd and translational rate parameter kgs(t). At each sampling time τ we simulated the protein abundance after 1 hr with the initial conditions that the protein abundance at τ = 0 was 0. The heatmaps were normalized to the first column to show the relative abundance. (C) Relative intensity in puromycin incorporation shows a slight increase at 6 hr and 12 hr and then a decrease in synthesis at 36 hr and 48 hr. The line represents fits using degree-3 orthogonal natural cubic splines with four knots and linearity constraints (see STAR Methods). (D) The ratio of total ribosome footprint reads in each sample to the total number of ChrM-mapping reads, an independent measurement of global protein synthesis, also shows a very similar decrease across the time course. Here, the total number of ChrM-mapping reads is the sum of the individual genes in Figure S2C. The line represents the orthogonal natural cubic spline fits. (E) The computationally estimated changes in global protein synthetic capacity Gr(t) (STAR Methods) demonstrates a very similar pattern to both the puromycin incorporation measurements (C) and the ratio of total ribosome footprint reads to the total number of ChrM-mapping reads (D). (F) The total mRNA nucleotide abundance Gm(t) per cell is obtained from the biochemical data shown in Figure S1D. The line represents the orthogonal natural cubic spline fits. (G) The ratio of the relative intensity in puromycin incorporation (C) to the total mRNA nucleotide abundance (F) is used to represent bulk translational efficiency from biochemistry experiments. This ratio shows a global translational repression over the time course. The line represents the orthogonal natural cubic spline fits. (H) The average normalized translational rate parameter 1N∑g=1Nkgs(t)/kgs(0) derived from pSILAC proteomics also shows a global translational repression, similar to the pattern observed for the independent biochemical measurements in (G). The line represents the orthogonal natural cubic spline fits. Cell Systems 2017 4, 636-644.e9DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.05.001) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A Dynamic Model Predicts Absolute Protein Synthesis under Conditions of Cellular Stress (A) Simulation of absolute protein copies synthesized as a function of different levels of translational capacity (denoted by Gr(t)) in MM1.S, with inputs of iBAQ protein copy number, ribosome footprint density, mRNA-seq, β, and kgd from MM1.S data. Three conditions are considered: Gr(t) being constant, as in untreated cells (black); Gr(t) varying as found in low-dose bortezomib (btz)-treated MM1.S (blue); and Gr(t) decreasing toward zero, as in high-dose bortezomib-treated MM1.S (green). (B) The simulated heavy channel protein abundance Pgs(t) normalized by the heavy channel protein abundance at 48 hr under constant Gr(t), denoted by Pgs∗(48) in MM1.S. Under high-dose btz, protein synthesis is strongly curtailed, consistent with Wiita et al. (2013). (C) The simulated total protein abundance Pgs(t)+Pgd(t) normalized by the total protein abundance at 48 hr under constant Gr(t), denoted by Pgs∗(48)+Pgd∗(48). High-dose btz again shows a significant decrease in total protein abundance. (D) Untreated Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized B cells also show a strong correlation (Pearson’s R = 0.84 on log-transformed data) between absolute protein synthesis and footprint RPKM as in Figure 2A. Red line is line of best fit, with slope = 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.84–1.02). (E) SRM pSILAC-measured absolute protein copy number synthesis per B cell (left) compared with simulated estimates of total absolute proteins synthesized in untreated B-cells over 48 hr using quantitative model (right), with inputs of iBAQ protein copy number, ribosome footprint density, and mRNA-seq measured in B cells and β and kgd from MM1.S data, show good agreement. Cell Systems 2017 4, 636-644.e9DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.05.001) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Systems 2017 4, 636-644.e9DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.05.001) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions