Hello Adam Cibulka Chuck Syperski

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation A Metric for Performance
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
1. Learning Targets 2 Staff will understand the various Teachscape platforms offered by South Dakota Staff will be able to login to their Teachscape account.
Who’s on our Team? CLASS Phoenix Design Team Classroom educators, specialists, administrators, and classified from all grade levels Association groups.
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
Differentiated Supervision
Copyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011 Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2014 Overview of Final Evaluation Report Administrator.
Learning with a Purpose: Learning Management Systems Patti Holub, Director District Initiatives and Special Projects Miguel Guhlin, Director Instructional.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve Student Achievement.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Teacher Evaluations Swartz Creek Community Schools.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Teacher Evaluation: Professional Practice Compass Update April 2012.
Technology Integration within Our School into the Community
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Framework In Action: Theory into Practice
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
EVAL Introduction RIG 2 – Cohort 1 October 29, 2012 Cathey Frederick ESD 189 eVAL Specialist.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
FOR TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS AUGUST 2012 TRAINING Randa Tower Software.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Group 1 Pages
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Welcome to Home Base You can also re-emphasize that all of these benefits can be found using one login all in one place, saving teachers more time to focus.
Writing and Submitting Student Learning Objectives
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2017 Complete.
Teacher Evaluation System
Teacher Performance Evaluation
Classroom Walk-Through
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
eChalk for NBPS Teachers
KEEP2 Training and Updates
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
Georgia Department of Education
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Staff Finalization Using Thoughtful Classroom
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Teacher Practice Instruments
Student Growth Measures
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Hello Adam Cibulka Chuck Syperski Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment at DuPage High School District 88 Chuck Syperski Software Engineer at DuPage High School District 88 www.linkedin.com/in/charles-syperski

Background - Timeline Prior to 2014-2015 Paper-based workflow of all evaluation documents. 2014 - 2015 Pilot of new professional practice evaluation system based on the work of Charlotte Danielson. Use of Excel workbook and Microsoft Word to manage all documents. 2015 - 2016 Continue use new professional practice rubric and integrate student growth pilot. Expanded use of Excel workbook and Microsoft Word to manage all documents. 2016 - 2017 Year 1 of official implementation of both professional practice and student growth components. Further expansion of use of Excel workbook and Microsoft Word to manage all documents. Exploration of third-party vendors to manage workflow.

The Need for a Change Excel limitations - Slow, character limitations and not flexible. Working in two worlds - Multiple users unable to view without a structure for saving documents. Living in a paper-based world - Summative evaluations were printing over 50 pages per employee. Taking up of district storage space and slowing down the system. Inability to collect data on areas to support staff.

2016 - 2017 - Development of Spark Our goal was to create a system that: Managed the workflow of all stakeholders and was easy to use for all team members (admin, department chairs and teachers). Provided immediate feedback for all stakeholders on the progress of staff and meeting specific timelines for evaluation. Flexible enough to adapt to any evaluation system for any employee group (i.e., student growth for some employee groups, but not all).

2016 - 2017 - Development of Spark Process of development: Engaged all stakeholders: Administration Department Chairs Teachers Human Resources

Components of Spark The District 88 Evaluation process consists of the following components: Meeting Purpose Initial Conference To establish professional practice and student growth goals for the year. Midpoint Conference To check-in and make any changes to initial student growth goals. Formal Observations Planned classroom observations which includes a pre-observation conference, the scheduled observation and post-observation conference. Informal Observations Unannounced classroom observations which includes the unannounced observation itself and post-observation conference. Summative Meeting To establish final professional practice and student growth ratings.

Unique Features Information at a glance. Instant teacher feedback. Automatic organization of information. Online sketching and signatures. Single login for many environments.

Show Me Spark http://sparkdemo.dupage88.net

https://www.dupage88.net/spark Why do you care? Because you probably need an evaluation system We have an evaluation system We are nice and we are giving Spark away, get it below… https://www.dupage88.net/spark

Other Stuff GrowIEP Telescreen UserCentral Report Out FOG Project

Questions and Contact Info Adam Cibulka - DuPage High School District 88, Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment (630) 530-3993 or acibulka@dupage88.net Chuck Syperski - DuPage High School District 88, Software Engineer (630) 530-3978 or csyperski@dupage88.net