Tolerances on magnetic field along the beamlines from accelerator physics point of view Tentative, suggested for discussion at IRENG07 WG-D meeting, August.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
Advertisements

4.1/9.1m L* Optics & Performance Glen White, SLAC SiD Meeting, SLAC Jan 13, 2015.
On Cavity Tilt + Gradient Change (Beam Dynamics) K. Kubo K. Kubo.
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
January 2004 GLC/NLC – X-Band Linear Collider Peter Tenenbaum Beam Dynamics of the IR: The Solenoid, the Crossing Angle, The Crab Cavity, and All That.
Global Design Effort Detector concept # Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Name September 17, 2007.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
1 27 Sep 05 Discussion of anti-DID ( “DIDNT” ? ) A.Seryi September 27, 2005.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
BPM Orbit Data Analysis with Wakefields Glen White, SLAC January 2013.
NLC Intra-Pulse Fast Feedback Simon Jolly Oxford University NLC Beam Delivery Meeting July 2001.
1 IR with elliptical compensated solenoids in FCC-ee S. Sinyatkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 13 July 2015, CERN.
DESY GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 / 12 Status of RTML Design and Tuning Studies PT SLAC.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
DESY: From High Energy Physics to Synchrotron Radiation Accelerator Operation in a changing Environment Michael Bieler DESY: From High Energy Physics to.
ILC-BDS Collimator Study Adriana Bungau and Roger Barlow The University of Manchester CERN - October 15.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
11th December 2007 LET workshop, SLAC 1 Beam dynamics issues in Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
ATF2 Software tasks: - EXT Bunch-Bunch FB/FF - IP Bunch-Bunch FB - FB Integration Status Javier Resta-Lopez JAI, Oxford University FONT meeting 1th August.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
Preliminary results on simulation of fast-ion instability at 3 km LBNL damping ring 21 April 2005 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Eun-San Kim.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Extraction Line Laser-wire 24 th January 2013 A.Aryshev, G.A.Blair, S.T.Boogert, L.Corner, L. Nevay, P.Karataev, N.Terunuma, J.Urakawa, R.Walczak.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
ATF2: Summary of Scheduling Strategy Session Grahame Blair Feedback and Feedforward systems Fast Kicker for ILC bunch train structure Laser-wire Shintake.
Beam Dynamics IR Stability Issues Glen White / SLAC September IRENG07 Vibration tolerances for final doublet cryomodules Settlement of detector.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
September 18, 2007 Magnetic Field Requirements in the IR Sergei Seletskiy IRENG07 September 17-21, 2007 September 18, 2007.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
CESR as Light Source David Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &
Electron Cloud Studies at DAFNE Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.
1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Near IR FF design including FD and longer L* issues
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
The Interaction Region
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
ILCDR08 10 July 2008 Plan of measuring cloud density in the solenoid field and in the quadrupole field K. Kanazawa (KEK)
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
A.S. Ghalumyan, V.T. Nikoghosyan Yerevan Physics Institute, Armenia
Jim Crittenden Electron Cloud/Impedance Meeting 27 May 2015
Electron Polarization In MEIC
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Design of Interaction Region
EIC Accelerator Collaboration Meeting
JLEIC Collaboration meeting Spring 2016 Ion Polarization with Figure-8
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

Tolerances on magnetic field along the beamlines from accelerator physics point of view Tentative, suggested for discussion at IRENG07 WG-D meeting, August 15, 2007

Background information Magnetic field along the detector axis or along the beamline cause Y shift of the IP position and beam size growth via coupling and other terms In details this is considered (for somewhat different parameters and optics) at Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 021001 (2005) http://prst-ab.aps.org/abstract/PRSTAB/v8/i2/e021001

Effects from short 0.5T*m solenoid placed on detector axis

Summary of effects For older version of optics and old parameters, the effects from 0.5 T*m (or 5000 Gs*m) along the detector axis for Z>10m are, roughly: coupling term ~20 IP orbit offset ~10microns The offset is to be compared with ¼ sigma or 1nm of maximum tolerable bunch-to-bunch jitter in the train with 300ns between bunches about 100nm of train-to-train offset which intratrain feedback could comfortably capture (0.2s between trains) roughly 10nm which intratrain feedback could follow with time-constant of ~100 bunches (0.03ms) for duration of the train (1ms) The coupling effect should be compared with desired tuning stability time, say 10 hours (coupling term 0.2 would give 2% effect on beam size)

Tolerances for magnetic field on the beamline outside detector, tentative Time scale, max integrated field: 300ns < 0.5 Gs*m 0.03ms to 1ms < 5 Gs*m 0.2 s < 50 Gs*m up to 10 hrs < 50 Gs*m