First instance review in Slovenia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COLLECTIVE REDRESS IN CROATIA NATIONAL REPORT. 1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK Consumer Protection Act (CPA) Consumer Protection Act interrupted the collective.
Advertisements

CEARM CHAMBER OF ENFORCEMENT AGENTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA The Macedonian System of Transfer of Old Unfinished Enforcement Cases, Applied in the.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU HUNGARIAN SYSTEM OF REVIEWS AND REMEDIES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT.
REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY Introduction to the Albanian Public Procurement System Central Asia Regional Public Procurement.
Control procedures in polish public procurement law Public Procurement Office 2007.
Judicial reform in Montenegro in the scope of the European Union integration process The road forward and the steps taken Ms. Branka Lakočević Deputy Minister.
Public Procurement Authority of Montenegro 8th Regional Public Procurement Forum -Electronic Procurement - a big step towards transparency et efficiency.
THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.  Established in 1952  The judicial authority of the EU  Cooperates with the courts and tribunals of the.
1 TURKISH REVIEW SYSTEM Nihal SAGUN Public Procurement Authority Head of Department 27 FEBRUARY 2008 ANKARA.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU The Danish system for Review and Remedies by Jens Fejoe.
Commission for the Prevention of Corruption Republic of Slovenia INTEGRITY I ACCOUNTABILITY I RULE OF LAW.
Public Procurement Conference BRNO, Czech Republic November, 2007 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE IN TURKEY Şakire Kural Chief Legal Adviser.
Oversight and Monitoring in Public Procurement in the Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OFFICE Role and Significance of the Public.
Implementation of the EU PP Remedies Directive – the AUT case EBRD Project Ukraine Dr. Michael Fruhmann Federal Chancellery, Austria 9/6/
Public Procurement Exchange Platform Efficient implementation of Procurement - Centralized Purchasing Mr. Safet Hoxha, President of PPRC Mr. Ilaz Duli,
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Public Procurement Review and Remedies in the Member States.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU The Current Remedies Directives: History and Main Provisions.
Project:“Support to the Internationalization of Kosova Higher Education System through establishment of the Kosova Students’ Union” Status Quo on Student.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Trends and Features in the Review and Remedies System in.
Towards improvement: Institution of appeal in public procurement – topical procedural and evidentiary issues Kyiv, April , 2012 Oleksandr Voznyuk.
Controls and actions made by Public Procurement Council Hungary Dr. András Nagy legal advisor Public Procurement Council.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Private sector interests in legal protection Tomaž Vesel First.
THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Aims Need to understand the respective, composition, roles and powers of the institutions in relation to: (a)
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Public Procurement Review and Remedies in the Member States.
PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.
Essential Elements of the Complaint Request for Review of Public Procurement Procedure Kiev, 19 April 2012 Essential Elements of the Complaint Hubert Reisner.
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REFORMS IN ALBANIA 10 th PUBLIC PROCUREMENT EXCHANGE PLATFORM May, 27-30, 2014 Istanbul, Turkey 1.
Dr Jarosław Sułkowski.  Constitution of the Republic of Poland  the Act of 15 July 1987 on the Commissioner for Human Rights LEGAL ACTS.
European Labour Law Institutions and their Competencies JUDr. Jana Komendová, Ph.D.
The institutional system of public procurement in Hungary Dr. András Nagy Public Procurement Council Hungary.
REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY Eighth Regional Public Procurement Forum May, 22-25, 2012 Tirana
Reforms in the Albanian Public Procurement System 7 th Regional Public Procurement Forum Tbilisi, Georgia May 16-19, 2011 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening:
Confiscation of assets: the relationship between administrative control and criminal investigation bodies Corina Badea Counsellor Department for the relation.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 5 – Public Procurement Bilateral screening:
REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SLOVENIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION - structure and system Barbara Koželj Sladič Public Sector Directorate.
The European Court of Justice EU Institutions The European Commission The European Parliament The Council of the European Union The European Court of.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Public Procurement Agency - Bulgaria
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
Institutions Acting in the Social Policy and their Competencies
Tender Evaluation and Award Process
Tax Court system in Germany The role of the Federal Tax Court
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Content of Tender Dossier - Instructions to Tenderers - Tenders
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
OFFICE FOR THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
Simplification and reduction of administrative burden.
ROMANIA’s contribution to the EU Digital Single Market The remedies directives perspective THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOLVING COMPLAINTS (N.C.S.C.)
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
Public procurement oversight
European actions.
FIRST INSTANCE REVIEW IN CROATIA Goran Matešić, President
The New Provisions of the Amended Remedies Directive
Dr. Tamás BALÁZS Attorney-at-law, Associate Professor
Judicial Training on EU Taxation Law
Andrea Sundstrand Associate Professor
UN Secretariat Article 97 The Secretariat shall comprise a Secretary-General and such staff as the Organization may require. The Secretary-General shall.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Legal regulation of mediation and the institutions involved: Latvia
Second Regional Conference Montenegro, Budva, November 2016
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
Mechanisms of Preventing Retaliation against Whistleblowers
CRISTINA BREDEN – Director ROMANIAN COURT OF ACCOUNTS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Public Procurement in Macedonia Achievements in 2014
Presentation transcript:

First instance review in Slovenia Budapest, 14 November 2017

PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN SLOVENIA IN NUMBERS Slovene GDP in 2016: 39,4 billion EUR PP Contracts Value in 2016: 3,91 billion EUR = 9,8 % of GDP Number of contracting authorities: app. 3000

PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN SLOVENIA IN NUMBERS   2016 Number of contracts Contracts value PP above the (national) thresholds 5.851 2.361.293.513 PP below the (national) thresholds 1.076.939 969.567.949 Total 1.082.790 3.330.861.462 Total including VAT 3.912.762.959

National PP thresholds amounts PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN SLOVENIA IN NUMBERS National PP thresholds amounts   Classical Sector Utilities Sector Public supply and service contracts 20.000 EUR 50.000 EUR Public works contracts 40.000 EUR 100.000 EUR Public service contracts for social and other specific services 750.000 EUR 1.000.000 EUR

PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN SLOVENIA IN NUMBERS

NATIONAL LEGISLATION Public Procurement Act (ZJN-3) Public Procurement for Defence and Security Act (ZJNPOV) Public-Private Partnership Act (ZJZP) Legal Protection in Public Procurement Procedures Act (ZPVPJN) Civil Procedure Act (ZPP – subsidiary use) Minor Offences Act (ZP-1)

PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PORTAL (http://www.enarocanje.si/)

STATUS OF THE NRC a specialized, independent, professional, expert state institution legal protection at all procedural levels of the award of public contracts not acting as a formal court, but it fulfils all the requirements for a tribunal according to the Court of Justice of European Union established by Law permanent, independent applies rules of Law its jurisdiction is compulsory inter-partes procedures (ECJ case C-296/15 - Medisanus) 53 ,233bzhz 1h+šhšhhšhššštšš

ESTABLISHMENT LEGAL BASIS Commission competent for reviewing public procurement award procedures National Review Commission Public Procurement Act 1997 – 1999 Auditing of Public Procurement Procedures Act, 1999 Legal Protection in Public Procurement Procedures Act, 2011 + 3 amendments Rules of Procedures Public Procurement Act

Adviser to the President ORGANIZATION OF THE NRC Adviser to the President PRESIDENT OF THE NRC MAIN ACTIVITES SUPPORT ACTIVITES 4 MEMBERS OF THE NRC (one is a Deputy-President of the NRC) Advisers and Senior advisers Head of cabinet of the President Head of the register Secretary of the NRC Legal Secretary Administrator  

MEMBERS OF THE NRC appointed by the National Assembly on the proposal of its committee, responsible for terms of office and elections, eight year period of office, status of state officials, general conditions for judges apply (age, personal competence…); president and two members shall be educated in the field of law, while two other members shall be educated in other fields; the president must fulfil the additional requirement of passing the state judicial exam (bar exam); president and members shall have at least six years of experience in the field of public procurement.

ADVISERS TO THE NRC The NRC currently employs 13 advisers, all lawyers, 10 advisers work on review procedures, 3 on minor offence procedures, Status of civil servants.

REVIEW OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AWARD PROCEDURE Two - stage procedure: Before the Contracting Authority (pre-review procedure) Before the National Review Commission (review procedure) + lawsuit for annulment of contract (regular civil court)

REVIEW OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AWARD PROCEDURE Before the Contracting Authority capacity to initiate proceedings: each person having interest in being awarded a public contract, who suffer or could suffer damages due to the alleged infringement + representatives of public interest: Ministry of public administration (PPA), Court of Audit, Commission for protection of competition, Commission for prevention of corruption. b) admissibility of legal protection: a review claim may be lodged during all stages of the procedure and against each action of the contracting authority

REVIEW OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AWARD PROCEDURE c) contents of a review claim (among other): alleged infringements, facts and evidence proving the infringements, proof of paying the procedural fee: 1.500 EUR – 7.000 EUR - if the review claim is lodged against the contents of a call, an invitation to submit a tender or tender documentation, 2% of the value of the selected tender (not less than 500 EUR, not more than 25.000 EUR) - if the review claim refers to a decision on awarding of a contract.

REVIEW OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AWARD PROCEDURE d) time limits for submitting a review claim: Review claims against a call for tenders/tender documentation: 8 working days from publishing a call for tenders/availability of complete documentation, not possible after the time limit to receive tenders has expired (with exceptions). Review claims against decision on awarding of a contract: 8 working days from publishing the decission on the Public Procurement Portal Review claims in small value procurement procedures: 5 working days

REVIEW OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AWARD PROCEDURE e) Consequences of the submitted review claim ex lege suspension effect only as regards to concluding of the contract, Possibility of issuing interim measures by the NRC: allowing conclusion of the contract; stoping further activities of the contracting authority f) Contracting authority‘s decision: Decision on rejection of the review claim as unfounded, Decision on adoption of the review claim and partially/completely annulling the procedure Deadline for adopting a decision: 8 working days

REVIEW OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AWARD PROCEDURE 2. Before the National Review Commission no direct approach, the NRC cannot commence a review procedure on its own, when the contracting authority rejects the review claim it has to deliver the entire documentation to the NRC (3 WD); the review procedure starts automatically upon receiving of the documentation,

SENATE AND ADVISERS Senate of three Members / Individual member in case of appeal natural judge principle, varies Advisers appointed for each specific case, rotation system

NATIONAL REVIEW COMMISSIONS‘ DECISION Request is rejected as unsubstantitated/inadmissible Request is sustained, procedure invalidated Within the limits of the review claims subsidiary use of the civil procedures act, competence of an appelate body / but can advise 15 working days (+ 15 working days) = instructive time limits transparency of work – all decisions published on the webpages of the NRC no legal remedies (claim for damages)

EFFICIENCY OF THE SYSTEM

STATISTICAL DATA 300 - 400 review procedures per year (5 % of all PPP), 1/4 of review claims filed against call for tender (tender documentation), 3/4 filed against decision on awarding of the contract; 30-40 % of review claims are sustained.

MOST COMMON INFRINGEMENTS Discriminatory technical specifications, Suitability criteria (past performance…) Selection criteria, Abnormally low tenders, Tender guarantee…

Thank you for your attention! borut.smrdel@dkom.si