Philippe Doublet, LAL Roman Pöschl & François Richard, LAL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
April 19th, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic showers in the SiW ECAL (with 2008 FNAL data) Philippe Doublet.
1 B-tagging meeting overview Li bo Shandong University.
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
Interactions of hadrons in the SiW ECAL (CAN-025) Philippe Doublet - LAL Roman Pöschl, François Richard - LAL CALICE Meeting at Casablanca, September 22nd.
Summary of Results and Projected Sensitivity The Lonesome Top Quark Aran Garcia-Bellido, University of Washington Single Top Quark Production By observing.
Alessandro Fois Detection of  particles in B meson decay.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu LCWS 08, Chicago, 18 November 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Hadronic W Decays in the Jets + MET Final LHC Kittikul Kovitanggoon * & Sung-Won Lee Texas Tech University Michael Weinberger.
Top studies Philippe Doublet Thibault Frisson, Roman Pöschl, François Richard Réunion de groupe ILC - LAL - 22/02/2011.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
LCFI Package and Flavour 3TeV Tomáš Laštovička Institute of Physics AS CR CLIC WG3 Meeting 9/6/2010.
Study of top quark production in the semileptonic decay mode at the ILC Philippe Doublet Roman Pöschl François Richard IWLC Geneva, October 2010.
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
LCWS14, Belgrade, October M. Pandurović, H→WW at 350 GeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC Measurement of H→WW* in HZ at 350 GeV and WW fusion at 1.4 TeV CLIC.
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
May 3rd, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic interactions in the SiW ECAL (with the 2008 data) Philippe Doublet, Michele Faucci-Giannelli, Roman Pöschl,
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
Improving b-jet energy resolution b-resolution mtg Sept. 26, 2007 P. Grannis Improving b-jet energy resolution and raising the di-b jet tag efficiency.
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
Taikan Suehara et al., ILC tokusui meeting, 21 Dec page 1 Status of LCFIPlus Taikan Suehara, Tomohiko Tanabe (ICEPP, U. Tokyo)
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
Marcel Vreeswijk (NIKHEF) B tagging, performance vertexing Neural Net studies tt event selection mass reconstruction in tt events conclusions B tagging.
Tth study Lepton ID with BDT 2015/02/27 Yuji Sudo Kyushu University 1.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Taikan Suehara, ILC physics mini-workshop, 2009/01/21 page 1 SUSY and Tau-pair analysis with full simulation in ILD detector model Taikan Suehara ICEPP,
4 May 2006 First look to the Ke2 decay ● Interesting for the Ke2/k m 2 ratio ● BR(K ±  e n ) = (1.55 ±0.07)10 -5 ● Large radiative decay BR(K ±  e n.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Interactions of hadrons in the SiW ECAL (CAN-025) Philippe Doublet - LAL Roman Pöschl, François Richard - LAL SiW ECAL Meeting at LLR, February 8th 2011.
Top Higgs Yukawa Coupling Analysis – Status Report Hajrah Tabassam Quai-i-Azam University, Islamabad ON BEHALF OF: R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii, KEK.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
Taikan Suehara et al., CERN, 21 Oct page 1 Flavor tagging performance in multi-jet environments (a part of LCFIVertex study) Taikan Suehara.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
LCFI physics studies meeting, 7 th December 04Sonja Hillertp. 1 Charge efficiency and leakage rates  purity vs efficiency plots give only part of the.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Parameterization of EMC response for
Benchmark analysis of tau-pairs
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Erik Devetak Oxford University SiD Workshop 24/02/2009
15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting
Eduardo Rodrigues, Chris Parkes University of Glasgow
Top Tagging at CLIC 1.4TeV Using Jet Substructure
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Bose-Einstein correlations in 8 TeV DATA with jets
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
tth, (h→bb) with EventViews
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
A brief Update on secondary vertex tagged jets
Presentation transcript:

Philippe Doublet, LAL Roman Pöschl & François Richard, LAL Btagging results and LeptonFinder performances with semileptonic top events Philippe Doublet, LAL Roman Pöschl & François Richard, LAL

Ongoing study : semileptonic top events We study tt(bW)(bW)(bqq)(blv) events with l = e , µ Topology : 4 jets + 1 lepton 2 important steps : Find the lepton Find one B jet Btagging discussed 1 month ago : remarks added today Lepton selection improved : results

Btagging in semileptonic top environment 4 jets + 1 lepton to identify The lepton with highest energy was removed Jet clustering forced to 4 jets and B tagging were reapplied on the signal events The 2nd highest B tagged jet has a rather small Btag value. Why ? Look at inputs of the NeuralNet Smaller decay length (+ larger significance) pT corrected mass smaller Lead to suggestion that leptonic decays of B mesons are the culpurit We are in touch with the LCFI Vertex Group

Investigating leptonic B decays We have a look at B  lvX decays Histograms shows Btag value for real Bjets : all jets and leptonic B jets (re-scalled)  No difference is seen Confirmed by LCFI Group : leptonic decays of Bs should not be a problem Black = All Bjets Red = leptonic B jets Distribution of Btag value for real B jets (all and leptonic only)

A problem of decay length We then investigate the true decay length of B mesons w.r.t. the Btag of the jet We find that an important fraction is lost there Nothing can be done against this True B decay length (from MC table) vs Btag of the corresponding jet

NN input variables for B, C and light jets Major differencies

NN input variables for B, C and light jets with Btag > 0.8 Small fraction of non Bjets with Btag > 0.8 Purity for the jet with highest Btag = 97%

NN input variables for B, C and light jets with Btag < 0.8 For small Btag, Bjets have a tendency to mimic C jets (thus leading to small Btag) Maybe due to bad jet clustering

Partial conclusion on Btag Efficiency to find one event with highest Btag > 0.8 = 82% Purity = 97% (highest Btagged jet) Btagging performances get worse If decay length is small

Finding the lepton of the semileptonic top decays Marlin Processor developped : LeptonFinder Ask for a lepton : electron or muon Looks for candidates in PandoraPFO collection Best candidate put apart in a new collection Other PFOs separated Number of candidates associated to the lepton collection

Identification We apply identifiaction criteria on each PFOs with Ptrack > 5 GeV : If Ecluster/Ptrack < 0.5, then muon If Ecluster/Ptrack > 0.8 and Eecal/Ecluster > 0.9, then electron We identify 99.3% of the good muons, 98.1% of the good electrons Remark : Ptrack > 5 GeV suppresses 0.4% of muon events

Isolation (1/2) We require isolation criteria inside the jet to define a lepton as a good candidate Rejects most of leptonic B decays Rejects most of particles inside the jet Real leptons (from MC table) Non isolated candidates  suppressed Remark : if condition looser, larger contamination (not desired)

Isolation (2/2) Events left after identification and isolation = 93.9% for muons, 93.6% for electrons Maximum efficiency reachable ≈ 94% Remark : tracking assumed perfect, i.e. we only look at events where the MC lepton’s track is reconstructed  real efficiency will be smaller than 94%

Number of candidates (all events) We draw the distribution of the number of candidates We define x = rate of good lepton identified (the one from tbW decay), y = rate of misidentification (pions, …) Histogram permits to calculate x and y x(1-y) + y(1-x) Contamination term Negligible xy² Population in « bin 2 » should decay in « bin 1 » when a criteria for the best lepton is defined xy (+y²) (1-x)(1-y)

Results Type x y contamination Muon 92.5% 8.2% 0.6% Electron 87.7% 10.5% 1.3% Contamination for muons = 0.6%, for electrons = 1.3% (i.e. if only one lepton found, rate of wrong lepton) We deduce the tracking inefficiencies, assumed to be xmax – x (with xmax≈94%)

Tracking inefficiencies Type x xmax difference Muon 92.5% 93.9% 1.4% Electron 87.7% 93.6% 5.9% If difference consists only of tracking inefficiencies, it is 1.4% for muons 5.9% for electrons (TPC central disk + |cos θ|>0.97)

What if Ncandidates > 1 ? What is the best method to select a lepton among several ?  isolation criteria (i.e. highest jet energy fraction z = Elepton / Ejet) 93% (91%) of good muon (electron) candidates selected if N > 1 In the end, contamination = 1% for muons and 2% for electrons 93% of events with muons found and 89% of events with electrons found

Conclusion on the LeptonFinder Efficiency (≈ 90%) and purity (≈99%) of the sample are satisfying Now, LeptonFinder is applied on all DST files, then : Jet clustering forced to 4 jets B tagging Cut based analysis Preliminary results on semileptonic tt cross-section and ALR available for ECFA meeting