Impact of male age on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology cycles using donor oocytes E.H. Duran, D. Dowling-Lacey, S. Bocca, L. Stadtmauer, S. Oehninger Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 848-856 (June 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.005 Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Frequency distribution of male age in the study’s population sample. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 20, 848-856DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.005) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 (A) Semen volume (ml), (B) sperm motility (%) and (C) fertilization rate (%) by male age categories. Linear regression lines are superimposed to the bar graphs. ANOVA=analysis of variance. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 20, 848-856DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.005) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Box and whisker plots of male age by (A) pregnancy, (B) miscarriage status and (C) implantation rate categories. Upper edges of boxes represent upper quartiles; lower edges represent lower quartiles. Horizontal lines inside the box represent medians. Whiskers represent 10th and 90th percentiles. Filled circles represent outliers. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 20, 848-856DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.005) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions