Informing policy, Improving programs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Illinois Department of Human Services Home Visiting Programs for New and Expectant Parents 2009 Request for Proposals Grant Information Conference.
Advertisements

Parents as Teachers All children will learn, grow and develop to realize their full potential.
FamilyWise and Healthy Families Americas Accreditation Standards How our system will help YOU!!
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
“It’s All About the Data” The Interface of Evaluation, Program Development, and Partnership to Address Substance Abuse and Reduce Child Abuse and Neglect.
1 Measuring the Oral Health of Washington’s Children Challenges and Practical Solutions.
Supporting Young Homeless Children with Developmental Delays: A Successful Cross- System Model July 10, 2007.
Healthy Child Development Suggestions for Submitting a Strong Proposal.
YOUR LOGO HEAD START COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT February 2015.
Promoting Father Engagement New York State Office of Children and Family Services.
Lynn H. Kosanovich, HFA Regional Director Introduction to the Model.
Healthy Families America—Lincoln
ILLNESSES, INJURIES, AND HOSPITALIZATIONS AMONG INNER-CITY MINORITY INFANTS IN CHICAGO.
Ionia County Great Start Collaborative Strategic Planning Reviewing trends from new information & data Setting Priorities for Goals & Strategies.
Ramey & Ramey (1998) Early Intervention: activities designed to enhance a young child’s development Initial evaluation of child’s abilities and needs (in.
PATHS Equity for Children: a program of research aimed at monitoring equity in children’s outcomes Marni D. Brownell, PhD CPHA Annual Conference Toronto,
Collaboration and data in a County Initiative : Cuyahoga County – Invest in Children Claudia Coulton & Rob Fischer, Ph.D. Center on Urban Poverty & Community.
WIC and WCOMO: By Terri Trisler Outreach Coordinator, State WIC Office
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
Healthy Families America Overview. Healthy Families America Developed in 1992 by Prevent Child Abuse America Evidence-based home visiting model 400 Affiliated.
Demographics. National Statistics  “America’s Children: Key National Indicators of Well- Being, 2009” Report:  In 2008, 73.9 million children 0-17 y/o.
Oklahoma Parents as Teachers (OPAT) Program Results 1.
Keeps Kids Healthy!. What is Preventive Healthcare? “Going to a health care provider on a regular basis when you are well in order to identify early or.
GEORGE L. ASKEW, MD, FAAP OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AMERICAN.
Health and Caseload Evaluation of 1995 WIC Prenatal Program Presented by: Victoria Lazariu-Bauer Authors: Victoria Lazariu-Bauer,
Home Visiting at EIPH.  All children will learn, grow and develop to realize their full potential.  To provide the information, support and encouragement.
Demographics. Why focus on children & adolescents?  Unique population – especially this generation.  The first to understand terrorism as a domestic.
State of the Child: Madison County Developed and Presented by Cecilia Freer, MPA Freer Consulting April 25, Freer Consulting.
Welcome Home Baby Report to the First Steps Commission July 31, 2014.
Enrollment and Retention in Voluntary Home Visiting Programs Deborah Daro.
ASQ-3 HMG Home Visiting July Discussion points What is developmental screening What are the basic features of the ASQ-3 When should you adjust for.
Reducing health inequalities among children and young people Director of Public Health Report 2012/13.
Welcome Baby [Insert Organization Name] PROVIDER INFORMATION PRESENTATION INSERT DATE I PRESENTER.
Portland State University
Virginia Department of Health Staysi Blunt, Evaluator
Cecil County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Screening and Monitoring Programs for Children Who are At Risk
Impact of SCHIP on Racial Disparities in Medicaid Enrollment and Prenatal Care Initiation among Pregnant Teens and Young Adults in Florida Tzy-Mey Kuo,
Biennial Service Review Training
Georgia’s Pre-K Summer Transition Program
Baltimore County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Of Note A HEALTHY START Birth Weight
Population geography POPULATION GROWTH AND POLICY OPTIONS IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD.
NEWBORN DEVELOPMENT RISK ASSESSMENT:
Head Start  Head Start was established in 1965 as part of President Johnson’s War on Poverty  It is the only early childhood program, then and.
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes 2016
Citizen Review Panels Home Visiting Symposium
History of Healthy Families Oregon (HFO)
Bronx Community Health Dashboard: Maternal and Child Health Last Updated: 1/31/2018 See last slide for more information about this project.
Aging Globally & Aging Subcultures
Current Activities to Support Dual Language Learners and Early Education and Care and Out of School Time Staff October 2010.
Decline in Varicella Incidence in Texas
Benefits of Home Visitation
Maryland How Do Premiums Affect Enrollment?
RJ Jacobs AS Meyerhoff Capitol Outcomes Research, Inc.
Understanding and Using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)
Denver Office of Children’s Affairs
Lynn A. Karoly RAND Corporation January 2019
Demographics.
Child Care and Young Children’s Development
”Supporting Parents Right from the Start”
Inequality Starts Before Kindergarten
Department of Social Services Home Visiting Program
Lower Hudson Valley Community Health Dashboard: Maternal and Infant Health in Westchester, Rockland, and Orange counties Last Updated: 3/20/2019.
Strengthening a Community Through Evidence-Based Home Visitation
SPENDING NEEDS A BOOST According to the latest data from the American Dental Association (ADA)/Health Policy Institute (HPI), total dental spending.
The Norwalk Story: How one community is using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ®) to build a system for developmental screening for young children.
PRAMS: SC Residents Having a Live Birth, 2007
Primary and acute care to reduce morbidity and pain
Context and Methodology
Presentation transcript:

Informing policy, Improving programs Healthy Families Evaluation Update 2014-15 Key Outcome and Service Findings Beth L. Green, Ph.D. Jerod Tarte, M.A. Beth.green@pdx.edu tarte@npcresearch.com www.npcresearch.com Best Beginnings Meeting March 10, 2016 Informing policy, Improving programs

Presentation Overview HFO Family Characteristics Key Outcome Findings Service Delivery Findings Looking Ahead 3/10/2016

Demographics of IS Families Families Served FY 2014-15 Are at High Risk for Negative Outcomes Demographics of IS Families 3/10/2016

Demographics of IS Families Healthy Families Oregon: Parent History and Other Risks Demographics of IS Families More screened families scored at high risk this year: 68% vs. 42% in 2011-12 3/10/2016

Status Report Outcomes Families Served FY2014-15 3/10/2016

Parenting Outcomes at 12 Months Reading to children decreased slightly— only 83% of parents nationally read to their young child 3 or more times per week - 67% for low income families. HOME scores improving generally Fewer families had complete HOMEs Slightly fewer families reported improved parenting skills 3/10/2016

Daily Reading Outcomes HFO parents much more likely to report reading daily to young children Especially true for Hispanic parents Randomized study found that HFO parents were significantly more likely to read daily compared to controls. 3/10/2016

Health Outcomes Overall health outcomes very strong, meet HFA standards Only 68-74% of Oregon 2-year olds fully immunized Insurance coverage has continually increased. 3/10/2016

Outcomes for Families Served Prenatally Statewide, only about 255 mothers screened AND served prenatally These mothers were more likely to be breastfeeding at 6 months. May be less likely to have premature birth Families served prenatally also remain in the program longer 3/10/2016

Child Development Most children are developing normally, although trend towards more delays indicated. Staff take appropriate action when delay indicated. % of children receiving ASQ screening has been decreasing (HFA standard) 3/10/2016

Service Delivery Findings 3/10/2016

Eligibility Screening: Numbers Screened Continues to Decline 3/10/2016

New Screening Target Population as of 2014-15: All Births 45,620 births last year statewide 17% (7,681) screened by HFO 92% of screens within 2 weeks of birth 90% of home visits within 3 months of birth Service improvement note: 262 families were not offered services because of incorrect NBQ scoring 3/10/2016

Program Acceptance Rates 70% of screened=eligible + interested 78% of those offered HFO 545 could not be located 98 “caseloads full” 38% of offered received first HV (e.g., “Accept”) 78% of these (1,151) did not have a reason for no visit Families more likely to get 1st HV if: Spanish speaking, Hispanic Married Regional variability in other factors 3/10/2016

Intensive Home Visiting Component Enrollment Decreased Slightly 3/10/2016

Program Retention Rates Overall, retention patterns are similar for last 3 cohorts 12-month retention varies by program (44%-81%) Spanish-speaking families have highest retention—77% at 12 months vs. 50% for English speaking. Older, married moms also somewhat higher retention 39% of teens retained at 12 months 3/10/2016

Why do Families Leave? 33% decline further service 22% age out 20% move out of county 14% “other” 11% cannot locate 3/10/2016

Program Strengths Engaging higher risk families and families of color (especially Hispanic/Latino) Parents reading to children Family HOME environment Health outcomes generally Outcomes for prenatally served moms 3/10/2016

Suggestions for Improvement Consider more prenatal screening & services Increase on-time ASQs Work on site-specific performance indicators Ensure accurate NBQ scoring, HOME completion, data systems improvements Monitor new service population 3/10/2016

Questions? Thoughts? Recommendations? 3/10/2016