Update of the Eurotop Manual: new insights on wave overtopping

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Objective - To find the slope of a line.
Advertisements

Chapter 4 Functions of Random Variables Instructor: Prof. Wilson Tang CIVL 181 Modelling Systems with Uncertainties.
A COMPARISON OF HOMOGENEOUS AND MULTI-LAYERED BERM BREAKWATERS WITH RESPECT TO OVERTOPPING AND STABILITY Lykke Andersen, Skals & Burcharth ICCE2008, Hamburg,
Analysis of dike breach sensitivity using a conceptual method followed by a comprehensive statistical approach to end up with failure probabilities 4 th.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
OUTLINE SPATIAL VARIABILITY FRAGILITY CURVES MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS CONCLUSIONS EFFECTS DESIGN RECOMMEND BEARING CAPACITY OF HETEROGENEOUS SOILS APPENDIXOUTLINE.
Hydrologic Statistics
Simple Linear Regression
May 6-8, PROBABILISTIC SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF DUNE EROSION CALCULATIONS 4 th International Symposium on Flood Defence, Toronto, Canada Kees den.
SCALE EFFECTS RELATED TO SMALL SCALE PHYSICAL MODELLING OF OVERTOPPING OF RUBBLE MOUND BREAKWATERS Burcharth & Lykke Andersen Coastal Structures 2007,
Yard. Doç. Dr. Tarkan Erdik Regression analysis - Week 12 1.
9. SIMPLE LINEAR REGESSION AND CORRELATION
Quantitative Methods for Flood Risk Management P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder $ $ Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology THE.
Statistical variation of material properties In practice, material properties are seldom homogenous, as they are sensitive to variations in parameter such.
Statistics and Probability Theory Prof. Dr. Michael Havbro Faber
Distribution of Defects in Wind Turbine Blades & Reliability Assessment of Blades Containing Defects Authors: Henrik Stensgaard Toft, Aalborg University.
Linear Regression/Correlation
Toronto, May 6-8, 2008Flood Defence1 Risk assessment in trans-boundary cooperation between the Netherlands and Germany Jan Stijnen.
Linear Regression Analysis Additional Reference: Applied Linear Regression Models – Neter, Kutner, Nachtsheim, Wasserman The lecture notes of Dr. Thomas.
1 Least squares procedure Inference for least squares lines Simple Linear Regression.
SINGLE WAVE OVERTOPPING VOLUMES AND THEIR TRAVEL DISTANCE Lykke Andersen, Burcharth & Gironella Coastal Structures 2007, Venice, July, of 17 Single.
Moment Generating Functions
11.6 Slope. Rate of Change – identifies the relationship between two #’s that are changing Slope – a line’s rate of change Slope formula =
Slope describes the steepness of a line By Angela Gallacher.
Stormy Weather.
Correlation and Prediction Error The amount of prediction error is associated with the strength of the correlation between X and Y.
1. 2 Contents Aim: why this work? Probabilistic design Some results Conclusions.
Longshore sediment Chang Hsien Kuo 國立交通大學土木工程學系 中華民國102年5月2日.
Slope of a Line Slope basically describes the steepness of a line.
4.4 Slope of a Line. Slope – a measure of how steep a line is. Slope is the ratio of the vertical change to the horizontal change of a non- vertical line.
Goes with Activity: Measuring Ocean Waves
Chapter 8: Simple Linear Regression Yang Zhenlin.
Penny Coombes Sarah Wharton Gary Davies Simon White River Bee, Desing FLOOD ALLEVIATION FEASIBILITY.
Regression Analysis Deterministic model No chance of an error in calculating y for a given x Probabilistic model chance of an error First order linear.
Uncertainty and Reliability Analysis D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M6L2 Stochastic Optimization.
1.5 Parallel and Perpendicular Lines on the Coordinate Plane
VIEWING SURVEY DATA IN CONTEXT: CRITICAL, MAINTENANCE AND DESIGN TRIGGER LEVELS Jonathan Clarke Canterbury City Council.
11-1 Copyright © 2014, 2011, and 2008 Pearson Education, Inc.
Overtopping of Seawalls Tony Mignone National Weather Service Caribou Maine
OVERVIEW OF CLARA MODEL IMPROVEMENT TESTING Kenneth Kuhn – RAND Corporation Jordan Fischbach – RAND Corporation David Johnson – Purdue University.
Note: Normal Distribution Many sets of data collected in nature and other situations fit what is called a normal distribution. This means the data would.
Seoul National University Kyung-Duck Suh, Jin Sung Kang ICCE2012, Santander, Spain, July 1-6,
A probabilistic approach for the waves generated by a submarine landslide Patrick J. Lynett Civil Engineering, University of Southern California Arturo.
Finding the slope of a Line
RELIABILITY-BASED CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OF WATER STORAGE SYSTEM
The simple linear regression model and parameter estimation
Tsunami heights off southeast Indian coast from run-up measurements
National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory
Chapter 11: Simple Linear Regression
Slope of a Line (6.1).
Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
ECONOMETRICS DR. DEEPTI.
Leave-one-out cross-validation
Statistical Methods For Engineers
Regression Inference.
Linear Regression/Correlation
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
The Normal Probability Distribution Summary
Hydrologic Statistics
Year-3 The standard deviation plus or minus 3 for 99.2% for year three will cover a standard deviation from to To calculate the normal.
Introduction To Slope.
Chapter 6: Normal Distributions
Continuous distributions
3.6 Parallel Lines in the Coordinate Plane
Simple Linear Regression
Wave overtopping of sea defenses and related structures
3D Shape + Addition.
What kinds of graphs would be useful in calculating work and energy?
Probabilistic Surrogate Models
Presentation transcript:

Update of the Eurotop Manual: new insights on wave overtopping Jentsje van der Meer William Allsop, Tom Bruce, Julien DeRouck, Leopoldo Franco, Andreas Kortenhaus, Tim Pullen, Holger Schüttrumpf, Peter Troch, Barbara Zanuttigh

Contents Tolerable wave overtopping Formulae: approaches Wave run-up on steep slopes Wave overtopping Slopes Vertical structures Very steep slopes

Tolerable wave overtopping Limits for: Structural design of breakwaters, seawalls, dikes and dams Property behind the defence People and vehicles

Influence of wave height on same discharge A small wave height gives many but small overtopping wave volumes. A large wave height gives a few but very large overtopping wave volumes. Video

5 l/s per m for Hm0 = 1 m; Nw = 1079; Now = 234 Movie on: www.overtopping-manual.com or: www.vdm-c.nl

Limits for structural damage

Limits for property behind structure

Limits for people and vehicles

Shape parameter in Weibull distribution EurOtop (2007): b = 0.75

Different approach of formulae in EurOtop (2016) Mean value approach. Use the formula as given with the mean value of the stochastic parameter(s). This should be done to predict or compare with test data. Model factor m (often a coefficient) is given with σ(m). In EurOtop (2007) probabilistic design; Design or safety assessment approach. This is an easy semi-probabilistic approach (partial safety factor); this is the mean value approach above, but now with the inclusion of the uncertainty of the prediction: m = μ(m) + σ(m); In EurOtop (2007) deterministic design; Probabilistic approach. Consider the stochastic parameter(s) with their given standard deviation and assuming a normal or log-normal distribution; The 5%-exceedance lines, or 90%-confidence band, can be calculated by using μ(m) ± 1.64σ(m) for the stochastic parameter(s).

Different approaches

Wave run-up on steep slopes (new)

Wave run-up on steep slopes (new) Very shallow foreshores What about very steep slopes? Use new overtopping formulae.

From slopes to vertical; various cotα; sm-1,0=0.04

cotα = 10; 6; 4; 3; 2; 1.5; 1.0; 0.5; 0.33; 0.25

cotα = 10; 6; 4; 3; 2; 1.5; 1.0; 0.5; 0.33; 0.25

cotα = 10; 6; 4; 3; 2; 1.5; 1.0; 0.5; 0.33; 0.25

cotα = 10; 6; 4; 3; 2; 1.5; 1.0; 0.5; 0.33; 0.25

cotα = 10; 6; 4; 3; 2; 1.5; 1.0; 0.5; 0.33; 0.25

cotα = 10; 6; 4; 3; 2; 1.5; 1.0; 0.5; 0.33; 0.25

cotα = 10; 6; 4; 3; 2; 1.5; 1.0; 0.5; 0.33; 0.25

cotα = 10; 6; 4; 3; 2; 1.5; 1.0; 0.5; 0.33; 0.25

cotα = 10; 6; 4; 3; 2; 1.5; 1.0; 0.5; 0.33; 0.25

cotα = 10; 6; 4; 3; 2; 1.5; 1.0; 0.5; 0.33; 0.25

Influence of slope angle for overtopping

Wave run-up for very steep slopes

Overtopping over sloping structures Slopes: up to zero freeboard Maximum

More insight in overtopping formulae Vertical walls: three situations No h* Allsop et al., 1995 Franco et al., 1998

Vertical structures No influencing foreshore: Influencing foreshore, non-impulsive: Influencing foreshore, impulsive: valid for 0 < Rc/Hm0 < 1.35 valid for Rc/Hm0  1.35

Thank you!