Context Organization Response Team

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gun Control in the U.S.. Firearms 1. Handguns 2. Rifles 3. Shotguns.
Advertisements

The Second Amendment. District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) Background: The District of Columbia passed legislation barring the registration of handguns,
Mary Kate Wisnieski.  Passed in 1987  Sex Discrimination  Federal funding.
John Vandercar. The Internet has become a permanent part of daily life. How is this affecting grade school children? -Access -Emotional effects.
The Right to Carry and Its Effects on Violent Crime Scot Hein Introduction Right to Carry: Right to carry is defined as “Handling of a firearm or other.
MEDIATION OF INDOOR SMOKING BAN By: Josh Fullenkamp.
The Second Amendment is not Absolute By: Hannah Cremo.
This motto was adopted in 1782 by the Founding Fathers.
Homework: 4 th amendment “research questions” for Monday FrontPage: Turn in your FP sheet to the back box.
Second Amendment Facts  Proposed on Sept. 25, 1789  Ratified on Dec. 15, 1791  Actual words in the 2 nd Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being.
Homework: #5 due tomorrow FrontPage: Can anything be done to avoid tragedies like Newtown, the shooting in Colorado, or other incidents of gun violence?
Gun Control By: Shanna Luedtke Nico Jao Shawn Stacey.
Concealed weapons! By Madeleine. Allowed or not? Most states allow concealed weapons in side there state building few do not. You are allowed to carry.
5.3 From Bill to Law Do Now: What makes a “right” a “right?” Can our “rights” be changed?
Gun Laws Every Shooter Should Know 2/22/05. 2 nd Amendment, Bill of Rights, US Constitution, 1791 “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security.
Supremacy of the 2nd Amendment by Justin Acres Andrew Stone BSEP: May 14, 2002 Gun Control Opening Central Issue Supreme Law Status Quo Rulings Philosophies.
Article III – US Constitution The Supreme Court. The “Supremes” Great group – but NO – we aren’t talking about them. Great group – but NO – we aren’t.
By: Michael Dembinski. » Some climbing gear can harm the rock just by using it.
Handguns “Sawed-off” shotguns Tanks “Automatic” or “assault” rifles Grenades F-16 Fighter Jets Hi-Capacity magazines (hold up to 50 bullets in one “clip”)
Alex Albuagh Industrial Hemp “A tall, coarse plant, Cannabis Sativa, that is native to Asia but naturalized or cultivated in many parts of the world and.
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Is There A Middle Ground Solution?
Halloween Costumes Katelyn Pringnitz.
CURRENT ISSUES 2 ND AMENDMENT DEBATE Warm Up: What is the Second Amendment?
Definitions Open Carry- Carrying a firearm out in the open Concealed carry-carrying a firearm that cannot be seen openly Types of concealed firearm permits.
Gun Control Kimmy Watmuff Avery Rogusky Carliss Egan.
The Second Amendment A Brief Overview. The History of the Constitution Signed in Philadelphia in 1787 Established a national government and fundamental.
 Positives:  Energy Independence  Economically Beneficial  Less Air Pollution.
Consider the feelings and emotions caused by gun crime. Gun Crime Should all countries have strict gun laws, or not? How are individuals influenced and.
Objective 1.01 Foldable. Strict & Loose Interpretation of the U.S. Constitution Different opinions or points of view about what portions of the Constitution.
Constitution Presentation
Social Studies Review for GHSGT
Why is this Amendment So Controversial?
BA Art Extension Examination Preparation
Chapter 5 section 3: Creating the Constitution textbook pages
Let’s get Started! Copy the Venn below and complete. Scan the QR Code for help. Federalist Anti- Federalist.
Article III – US Constitution
The Constitution.
2nd Amendment A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
All there is to know about Essays.
Right to Keep and Bear Arms
The United States Constitution
The Research Paper: An Overview of the Process
Literature reviews and reading lists
The Constitution: Structure and Principles
McDonald v. Chicago By: Allie Pagel.
This motto was adopted in 1782 by the Founding Fathers.
AP Seminar: irr directions & rubric analysis
The In-Class Critical Essay
3 Branches of Government
The 2nd Amendment.
GUNS Team trivia challenge.
The Constitution Chapter 3.
The In-Class Critical Essay
2nd Amendment A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Militia and Right to Bear Arms
The Historical Investigation
The Constitution: Structure and Principles Mr
Thursday, September 8, 2016 Objective: We will go over the perspectives on the Second Amendment and evaluate the effectiveness of gun safety laws and.
The United States Constitution
Section 3 Amending the Constitution
The Constitution: Structure and Principles Mr
Bell Work Please take out your composition book and your colors
Communicating in Writing
The 2nd Amendment.
The Second Amendment The Right to Bear Arms.
LEGALIZATION OF GUN ON CAMPUS
INFORMATIVE ESSAY RUBRIC
The Essay Process: Topic Selection, Brain Storming, and Thesis Writing
Discursive Writing Performance Criteria.
Presentation transcript:

Context Organization Response Team   Excellent Good Fair Needs Work Context Purpose: perceptive definition of central question, visual & verbal; scope is narrow, question consistent throughout X Substance Development: sufficient summary & insight; slides focused & yet fully developed; mix of verbal & visual information Sources: appropriate for topic, pertinent in placement, and accurately cited; quotations & data introduced correctly Organization Thesis: a thesis, early or late, that clearly states both sides of question & its mediation Introduction and Conclusion: overview of organization given at the beginning; conclusion sums up key points Relationship: relationship of ideas clear; coherent; visual cues guide us through presentation Style Style: clear & to-the-point text on-screen; same for data on-screen; the verbal component fits the visual Verbal performance: engaging presence, name given, neither too colloquial nor too formal; no mumbling Conventions & Correctness free from data errors free from word errors (SP, etc.) Response Team Response: Questions in class & written responses demonstrate understanding; response helps enhance presentation (rated “Excellent,” “Good,” or “Fair.”

Response to Ortiz Presentation Sarah Delhotal, Ryan Schneider, Greg Zwiers English 250 section VE Summary: Brian compared the firearms laws of New York with those of Texas trying to find a middle ground for the nation between them. Texas has the most lenient gun laws of all the states, while New York has the most strict. In Texas there is no waiting period following purchase, concealed carry is allowed, and any type of firearm can be purchased with no need for state registration. On the other hand in New York, a permit is required to buy a gun along with the waiting period for the permit, record of sale and registration of firearms is required, and only hand guns can be purchased in the state. A short part was said about the constitutional issue of changing the second amendment. Critique: All of Brian’s points were clearly presented and it was clearly based on a lot of research. There was a good balance between a conversational presentation and representing the information on the power point. His mediation basically admitted that the Systems in both places work well and should be implemented throughout the country. A potential weak point may be the open-endedness of the mediation, because Brian also said that leaving the issue up to the individual states might be the way to go. Brian did a very good job of handling the issues with the projector and gave his presentation well.

Gun Rights: Mediation between Texas and New York By: Brian Ortiz

Issue The issue with Gun Rights is that there is a wide variation of the laws that range from state to state. It becomes an issue when dealing with mediation between gun rights for a nation wide law.

Thesis The possibility of a national law to set a precedent for gun rights across America is a far-fetched theory but for one to consider an area’s population and crime rate, a possible mediation for gun rights can be met. States such as Texas and New York provided two textbook differences for state gun rights, using ideas from both, finding mediation between the two could possibly create the first national law for gun rights.

Texas Gun Rights State Requirements Rifles and Shotguns Handguns •Need Permit to purchase rifles and shotguns? No. •Need Registration of rifles and shotguns? No. •Need Licensing of owners of rifles and shotguns? No. •Need Permit to carry rifles and shotguns? No. Handguns •Need Permit to purchase handgun? No. •Need Registration of handguns? No. •Need Licensing of owners of handguns? No. •Need Permit to carry handguns? Yes.

New York Gun Rights State Requirements Handguns Rifles and Shotguns •Need Permit to purchase rifles and shotguns? No. • Need Registration of rifles and shotguns? No, except in New York City. •Need Licensing of owners of rifles and shotguns? No, except in New York City. •Need Permit to carry rifles and shotguns? No, except in New York City. Handguns •Need Permit to purchase handgun? Yes. •Need Registration of handguns? Yes. •Need Licensing of owners of handguns? Yes. •Need Permit to carry handguns? Yes.

Mediation? The possible mediation of national gun laws would have to consider both Texas, the most lenient state in regards to gun laws, and New York the most drastic. The mediation would come in with looking at the demographics of every state. Considering both Texas and New York Gun laws are made because of population and crime rate “Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States during 2008. Of these, about 10,886 or 67% were committed with firearms” (Gun and Self Defense)

Mediation Cont. “Gun control advocates argue that not enough gun rights consider crime rate, they state that crime rate is an important factor when making gun rights” (NRA, Do Gun Control Crime?) These are important factors in making a mediation This mediation would either consider Texas “Style” or New York “Style” Gun rights looking at the demographics of each state. With this a possible national law could be made.

Constitutional Issue The constitutional issue that comes with the mediation that I proposed is that it directly affects the states rights to govern their own citizens “The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them, but only the state can govern its citizens in regards to the right to bear arms” -Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story of the John Marshall Court

Conclusion In conclusion, the possible mediation might far in the future but it can benefit all states The other possible solution is to leave everything alone, let the states decide how to govern their citizens instead of the federal government Gun Laws will be what ever our government, state or federal, makes them to be

Bibliography "Gun Control." Just Facts. Web. 28 Apr. 2012. <http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp>. "What Are the Gun Laws in New York?" About.com Crime / Punishment. Web. 28 Apr. 2012. <http://crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbystate/f/gunlaw_ny.htm>. "What Are the Gun Laws in Texas?" About.com Crime / Punishment. Web. 28 Apr. 2012. <http://crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbystate/a/gunlaws_tx.htm>. Reynolds, Glen H., and Don B. Kates. "THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND STATES' RIGHTS: ATHOUGHT EXPERIMENT." THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND STATES' RIGHTS: A THOUGHT EXPERIMENT. Sept. 2009. Web. 02 Apr. 2012. <http://www.guncite.com/journals/rk-exp.html>. Spitzer, Robert J. The Politics of Gun Control. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1995. Print. "NRA: National Rifle Association." NRA. Web. 02 Apr. 2012. <http://home.nra.org/>.