Workshop LSP Assessment Christian Krekeler Konstanz University of Applied Sciences krekeler@htwg-konstanz.de.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Materials for ELT.
Advertisements

Lecturette 1: Culturally Responsive Progress Monitoring: Universally Designed Classroom Assessment.
Supporting Teachers to make Overall Teacher Judgments The Consortium for Professional Learning.
Teaching and Testing Pertemuan 13
Principles of Language Assessment Ratnawati Graduate Program University State of Semarang.
Raili Hildén University of Helsinki Relating the Finnish School Scale to the CEFR.
Education office, Evaz district, autumn 1393 Presenter: Rahmanpour CEF (Common European Framework): The basis of the new course book development in Iran.
Four Basic Principles to Follow: Test what was taught. Test what was taught. Test in a way that reflects way in which it was taught. Test in a way that.
Developing Communicative Dr. Michael Rost Language Teaching.
TECHNICAL ENGLISH READING COURSE The course will be taught at a B2/B2+ level according to the Common European Framework.
Selected Teaching-Learning Terms: Working Definitions...
1 Using the Learning Progression Framework (LPF) to Enhance the Learning, Teaching and Assessment of English Language at Primary Level 8 & 10 December.
How Much Do We know about Our Textbook? Zhang Lu.
Drama Cultivating Creativity and Individuality. Personal Curriculum Goals Drama curriculum that is forward looking so that student’s earlier learning.
Criterion-Referenced Testing and Curriculum-Based Assessment EDPI 344.
FSM NSTT Teaching Competency Test Evaluation. The NSTT Teaching Competency differs from the three other NSTT tests. It is accompanied by a Preparation.
ACCET 2014 Presented by: Brenda Nazari-Robati The Language Company Lynore M. Carnuccio The Language Company.
1 Using DLESE: Finding Resources to Enhance Teaching Shelley Olds Holly Devaul 11 July 2004.
Paulding County School District Hutchens Elementary Parent Presentation Powerpoint information has been adapted from resources available at
BILC Conference Athens, Greece 22 – 26 June 2008 Ray T. Clifford
Language Assessment.
Primary Mathematics 2014: embracing the opportunity
Use of Literature in Language Teaching
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
The Interpersonal Mode
academic language development
Standards-Based Assessment Linking up with Authentic Assessment
NEEDS ANALYSIS.
Designing Rubrics with the Three Categories of Knowledge
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Learning Model for English 2-8 grades
Oleh: Beni Setiawan, Wahyu Budi Sabtiawan
TIER 4 LANGUAGE REQUIREMENTS
CLIL: the next teaching challenge!
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
MYP planning: the unit planner
Common European Framework of References (CEFR)
COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING
Language skills Four skills – L,S,R,W Receptive skills
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
AP Computer Science Principals Course Importance and Overview
SYSTEM APPROACH TO EDUCATION
The European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe
SPEAKING ASSESSMENT Joko Nurkamto UNS Solo 11/8/2018.
Mapping it Out! Practical Tools to Use Assessment Well
Language learning is believed to depend on immersing students not merely in “comprehensive input” but in tasks that require them to negotiate meaning.
Teaching All Children: Planning and Assessment
Different methods.
LinguaFolio standards-based self-directed formative assessment tool
PORTUGUESE FOR FOREIGNERS
Research topic Investigating how the use of visual models can enhance teaching of common fractions for conceptual understanding to grade 8 learners.
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
Applying Psychology to Teaching
SPEAKING ASSESSMENT Joko Nurkamto UNS Solo 12/3/2018.
Theory meets Practice: Teacher Training in the Digital Era
Theory meets Practice: Teacher Training in the Digital Era
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
Assessment for Learning
BILC Professional Seminar - Zagreb, October 16, 2018 Maria Vargova
Writing Learning Outcomes
Applying Psychology to Teaching
AP Computer Science Principals Course Importance and Overview
Exit Ticket: BICS AND CALPS
Where do these terms come from?
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
How can we teach effectively?
COURSE INTRODUCTION Prof. Cinzia Giglioni 1.
Why do we assess?.
Planning a Speaking Lesson
Presentation transcript:

Workshop LSP Assessment Christian Krekeler Konstanz University of Applied Sciences krekeler@htwg-konstanz.de

LSP tasks for teaching LSP tasks for assessment 1 LSP tasks for teaching LSP tasks for assessment

LSP teaching, LSP tasks Task Renewable energy supply: Make a video of a news item on a catastrophe/problem with a source of renewable energy (water, wind, solar). Work in groups of three or four students.

LSP teaching, LSP tasks Complexity Complex tasks Meaning Focus on a communicative goal Authenticity Real-world relationship Cognition Congintively demanding tasks Skehan 1998; Ellis 2003; Van den Branden 2006

LSP teaching, LSP tasks Task Content Language Renewable energy Types Applications Efficiency … Language Presenting Pronunciation Genre Terminology Structures

LSP tasks and language assessment Task Renewable energy supply gone wrong: Make a short video of a news item on a catastrophe/problem with a source of renewable energy (water, wind, solar). Work in groups of three or four students. Why is this a problematic task for assessment purposes?

task design: adapting LSP tasks to assessment purposes 2 task design: adapting LSP tasks to assessment purposes

TBLT and Assessment mismatch LSP TBLT LSP Assessment Complexity Meaning However, more often than not, tasks set for the assessment do often not incluce these qualities. They are often very different and there is a mismatch between the course content and the assessment. This should be avoided because assessements communicate to learners what is valued. Authenticity Cognition

Task-based language assessment TBLA is a direct performance assessment which uses authentic, complex and cognitively demanding tasks. Such "holistic" assessments are scored with regard to the desired communicative outcome of the task. My first point is therefore that assessment and couse content should be alingned and that TBL courses should include TBLA which can be defined as: I will return to the scoring aspect later on in my talk. Ellis 2003; Wigglesworth 2008

TBLT and Assessment LSP TBLT LSP Assessment Complexity Complexity Meaning Meaning If a language course is based on the use of complex, meaningful, authentic and cognitively demanding tasks, this should be reflected in the assessment. This relationship works both ways, as the assessments will also impact the curriculum, causing positive washback. Authenticity Authenticity Cognition Cognition

LSP tasks and language assessment Content and Language Tensions Task Difficulty Generalizability From an assessment perspective, it is positive to have a good performance sample from a learner. However, the are also tensions: content and language: role of background knowledge, content as construct irrelevant variance task difficulty: complex tasks, task features generalizability: language use in other situations, rationale of performance testing scoring: communicative goal Scoring

LSP tasks and language assessment Assessment Task Renewable energy gone wrong: Make a short video of a news item on a catastrophe/problem with a source of renewable energy (water, wind, solar). Work in groups of three or four students. Alter/replace this task to make it more suitable for assessment purposes.

LSP tasks and language assessment Alter/replace this task to make it more suitable for assessment purposes. compare results describe competences reduce complexity control input

LSP tasks and language assessment Assessment Task The dam of a large reservoir used for hydroelectricity is leaking. Write and read a news item on the possible reasons, the efforts of the engineers to stop the leakage and the design of the reservoir. Input: Use the chart "Hydroelectric dam". Language … Time …

3 Scoring Lsp tasks

Scoring TBLA quantitative scoring general impression scoring Focus on meaning and a communicative goal quantitative scoring general impression scoring global/holistic scoring Before we turn to rating scales, it may be useful to look at four different scoring methods and consider their usefulness for scoring LSP assessment tasks. systematic/analytic scoring

Quantitative scoring Counting errors Error ratios  objective, safe  not suitable for scoring complex LSP tasks for the very insecure teacher, who rates exams with the lawyers in mind, knowing that a score based on an error ratio is easily justifiable.

General Impression Scoring No fixed criteria unsystematic, difficult to legitimize improve accuracy by comparisons flexible, open mind

Global/holistic scoring Systematic/analytic scoring Rating scales Rating scale with global descriptors Global score for performance Rating scales Sub-scales for different features Separate scores Weighted overall score

Rating scale development Write descriptors for a rating scale for the task on the reservoir dam.

Rating scale development Specific descriptors – not: Can understand the main ideas of complex text on both concrete and abstract topics, including technical discussions in his/her field of specialisation. Can interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible without strain for either party. […] CEFR for the overly confident teacher: I know a good picture when I see one. At least they are keeping an open mind, wich may be useful because there are a wide range of performances. It is also a flexible method which can take unforseen strenghts or weaknesses into account. However, from a measurement perspective, GIS is a no go.

Rating scale development a priori method rating scale developed by experts "armchair approach" a posteriori method descriptors derived from observations of performance behavioural rating scales theory-derived rating scales Taylor 2011

Rating scale development Write descriptors for a rating scale for the task on the reservoir dam. specific, based on task observable Would you use your descriptors for global/holistic scoring or systematic/analytic scoring?

1 tasks and assessment 2 task design 3 Scoring LSP tasks LSP Assessment 1 tasks and assessment 2 task design 3 Scoring LSP tasks