2010 PSSA RESULTS.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 R-2 Report: Success in algebra by the end of ninth grade A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional.

Advertisements

NM ELD Standards l Education Secretary García states: ELD Standards developed by state taskforce of NM educators led by professional team from World Class.

Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.

Parent Academy Topic: English Learner Programs 1.

NCCRESt 2007 Collaborative Planning in Middle School Mathematics: Meeting the needs of ALL students Anna McTigue Education Development Center

Meadowlark Middle School

Read to Achieve Newton Conover City Schools. What is the Goal? The goal of the State is to ensure that every student reads at or above grade level by.

ACADEMIC SUPPORT Fifth Grade Parent Orientation April 16, 2015.

CREEKSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATA REVIEW FOR FY 2015.

Materials and Resources This Portion of the SAS website includes sample materials, and units which align with state standards. Materials are created.

McKinley Elementary School McKinley Elementary

Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.

OASD Annual Report October 14, 2013 Maximizing Opportunities For Success.

Comparison PVAAS Scatter Plots State to IU Region to School District Grades 4-8, Math & Reading PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Contact your IU PVAAS.

Updated Sept. 21, 2012 OHIO’S 3 RD GRADE READING GUARANTEE.

Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.

 PLANNING FOR SUCCESS Real Strategies For Raising Student Achievement CLINTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.

EnVision Mathematics Council Rock School District March, 2013.

PSSA-M January 19, 2012 LEA meeting January 19, 2012 LEA meeting.

Horizonte Instruction and Training Center Salt Lake City School District School Community Council Meeting November 14, 2012.

Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.

TRAIN THE TRAINER FOUR YEAR PLAN. FIRST YEAR FTA’S AND U.S. MENTORS CHOOSE TOP TWO STUDENTS FROM COURSES. THESE STUDENTS WILL HAVE THE BE KNOW AS STUDENT.

Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.

The Wave of the Future?. Online education more widely accepted within the last 5 years 48 states have online learning opportunities 39 states with virtual.

Developing Common Course Syllabi November 20, 2010 Heather Sass, Education Consultant Preview.

FCRR Reports: A Resource for Selecting Reading Programs

September 2014 Information Provided by Misty L. Slavic, Director of Curriculum & Instruction.

Instructional Consultation and Teaming: A Parent’s Perspective Closing the Gap Conference November 11, 2009 Tina Greene.

Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.

Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.

K - 12 students are identified as English Language Learners (ELLs) if, at the time of their enrollment, they meet the following criteria: 1. There is a.

Welcome to the Resource Room A16 Mrs. Karole Tobias- Resource Room Teacher- Mrs. Angela Walsh- Homeroom Teacher- Mrs.

EDU 673 Week 4 Differentiated Instruction for Student Readiness Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

Parent Academy September 17, 2016

Morton Elementary School Kerstin Stiffler

School Grades and Data Estancia Secondary Schools School Grades and Data

Welcome to Back to School Night in room 240

Implementation Strategy: K-8, Algebra I, Algebra II and Geometry

Mrs. Debbie Urso Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Closing the Gap for Students with Disabilities

The Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC), Personal Curriculums (PC) and Certificates of Completion (COC): Addressing the Needs of Students with ASD.

Annual WBWF Student Achievement Report 2017

Comprehensive Planning

Bellview Back to School Night 2017 Purpose:

Effective Instructional and Accommodative Practices

Programs Supports and Accommodations Staff

Southmoreland Primary Center

Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.

Prescriptive Teaching Plan

Brigade Woods near ITPL Brochure

RDG 541 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com

Where teaming makes a difference!

FSA Parent Presentation

Standards-aligned IEPs

30 Days, 90 Days – What Does It All Mean? Learner Persistence

On-Demand Writing 5th, 6th, 8th.

LEAP 360: Accessing K-2 Formative Tasks

Whole group instruction

Prescriptive Teaching Plan

Welcome Everyone!.

Pacing Guides, Assessments and Report Cards

Ms. McCarty Practical Math Fall How to contact me

Somerset Primary Data Report/SBG Information Session

Proficiency & Achievement

LINKS Peer to Peer Support Program

Math Information Map and Guide.

Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.

Special Education Services in the Most Restrictive Environment

Using the math4life Resources

Killeen ISD Mission and Vision Statement

Presentation transcript:

2010 PSSA RESULTS

11TH GRADE RESULTS READING: 58% PROFICIENT OR ABOVE MATH: 38% PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

11TH GRADE IMPROVEMENT PLAN

QUARTERLY PRE/POST TEST EVERY TEACHER WILL GIVE A PRE TEST AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH MARKING PERIOD THE TEACHER WILL HAVE A GRID TO COMPLETE SHOWING THE INSTRUCTIONAL INTERVENTIONS THEY HAVE USED TO ASSIST STUDENTS IN MASTERING THE CONTENT STUDENTS WILL TAKE THE SAME TEST AT THE END OF THE MARKING PERIOD

STANDARDS ALIGNED CURRICULUM MAPS EVERY TEACHER HAS DEVELOPED A CURRICULUM MAP FOR EACH COURSE HE/SHE TEACHES. THE CURRICULUM MAPS ARE ALIGNED WITH THE STANDARDS ASSOCIATED WITH CONTENT ON THE PSSA’S THE CURRICULUM MAPS CAN BE FOUND ON THE WEBSITE UNDER CURRICULUM

“CATCH UP DAY” EVERY TEACHER WILL PROVIDE STUDENTS WITH ONCE A WEEK OR TWICE A MONTH OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONTENT 11TH GRADE MATH STUDENTS WILL PARTICPATE IN A PROGRAM FEATURING 28 MINI-LESSONS DESIGNED TO ADDRESS THE MATERIAL FOUND ON THE PSSA MATH TEST

STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS LAST YEAR MR. GESUALDI INSTITUTED A PLAN TO PROVIDE ADDITONAL ACADEMIC SUPPORT TO IEP STUDENTS THIS YEAR THE SUPPORT CLASSES WILL FOCUS ON SPECIFIC AREAS OF MATH AND READING TO ADDRESS AREAS OF CONCERN

TRANSIENT STUDENTS ALL STUDENTS NEW TO THE DISTRICT WILL TAKE THE QUARTERLY EXAM FOR THEIR NEW MATH AND READING COURSE INFORMATION FROM THE EXAMS WILL BE USED TO ASSIST TEACHERS IN DEVELOPING LESSONS TO HELP STUDENTS UNDERSTAND THE MATERIAL

11TH GRADE MENTORS EVERY 11TH GRADE STUDENT WILL HAVE AN ADULT (TEACHERS, COUNSELORS, AIDES, SECRETARIES, ETC.) ASSIGNED AS HIS/HER MENTOR. THE MENTOR WILL MEET WITH THE STUDENT TO DISCUSS ANY ACADEMIC OR OTHER CONCERNS

3RD GRADE RESULTS READING: 77% PROFICENT OR ABOVE MATH; 86% PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

4TH GRADE RESULTS 3RD GRADE (2009) READING : 80% (36 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 4TH GRADE (2010) READING: 84% (38 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 3RD GRADE (2009) MATH: 86% (38 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 4TH GRADE (2010) MATH: 84% (37 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

5TH GRADE RESULTS 4TH GRADE (2009) READING : 82% (37 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 5TH GRADE (2010) READING: 67% (30 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 4TH GRADE (2009) MATH: 87% (39 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 5TH GRADE (2010) MATH: 82% (37 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

6TH GRADE RESULTS 5TH GRADE (2009) READING : 68% (30 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 6TH GRADE (2010) READING: 68% (30 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 5TH GRADE (2009) MATH: 71% (31 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 6TH GRADE (2010) MATH: 87% (39 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

7TH GRADE RESULTS 6 TH GRADE (2009) READING : 70% (30 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 7 TH GRADE (2010) READING: 70% (30 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 6 TH GRADE (2009) MATH: 72% (31 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 7 TH GRADE (2010) MATH: 81% (35 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

8TH GRADE RESULTS 7 TH GRADE (2009) READING : 79% (34 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 8 TH GRADE (2010) READING: 81% (35 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 7 TH GRADE (2009) MATH: 81% (35 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE 8 TH GRADE (2010) MATH: 74% (32 STUDENTS) PROFICIENT OR ABOVE