The solicitation process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Procurement Management
Advertisements

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
POSTING, EVALUATING AND AWARDING THE SOLICITATION PROCESS.
Procurement: What Everyone Needs to Know. What is Procurement? “The act of obtaining something”
November 19, 2013 Preparing a Successful RFP to get Desired Results.
Presented by: Kathryn Hodges, NH
Gene Shawcroft, P.E. Central Utah Water Conservancy District April 29-30, 2013.
How to become a DIR Vendor
Foundations of Real Estate Management BOMA International ® Module 1: Real Estate Administration Contracting for Goods and Services ®
PROPRIETARY PROCUREMENTS David D. Duncan Deputy General Counsel Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts.
AVOIDING THEM WHERE POSSIBLE, DEALING WITH THEM WHEN THEY ARRIVE PROTESTS.
Office of Purchasing and Contracts Procurement Outreach Training Level III Procurements $50,000 and Above.
Procurement.
New Procurement Rules Training Purchases Greater Than $25,000.
Presented by Department of Finance Purchasing Division Cecelia H. Stowe, CPPO, C.P.M., Purchasing Director Eileen M. Falcone, Senior Buyer.
RFP Overview Alan A. Phillips, CPPB CTPM Texas Southern University Summer 2012.
How To Prepare For A Procurement Audit Shabrel Hoyt-Davis Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Procurement Review October 3, 2007.
Effectively Responding to Award Solicitations Objective Identify elements of a government solicitation package. Respond more effectively to government.
School District Purchasing. Purchasing Authority Arizona Statutes Arizona Statutes Arizona Administrative Code Arizona Administrative Code  Primary source.
Procurement Cycle and Tips on Doing Business with the State Statewide HUB Program Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Texas4Hubs.org.
Cheryl Scott, CPA, CTP. 2 OVERVIEW Intent to Audit Questionnaire Entrance Interview Planning Phase 3.
Multiple Award Contracts Training Presented by Jennifer Salts State of Utah - Division of Purchasing 1.
1 Doing Business with the University of North Texas System September 2015.
PUBLIC PURCHASING IN FLORIDA ROLES IN THE PURCHASING PROCESS (rev. 05/27/2008)
Submitting IT Purchasing Statements of Work to DIR SB 20 COMPLIANCE FOR TEXAS STATE AGENCIES TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS FOR GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION.
TBPC Brown Bag Presentation Texas State Government
Elevating the Quality of Life in the District Contracting and Procurement Division Information Session 2 Request for Proposal November 5, 2015.
Contracting Process Overview Agenda Item #12 July 2007.
OGS Procurement Services Group 2009 State Purchasing Forum PURCHASING 101.
HOW TO DO BUSINESS WITH THE CITY OF ATLANTA Department of Procurement Presented by: Keith O. Brooks, CPPO.
Small Purchase of Professional Service Providers Administrative Rule R
MAKING A SUCCESSFUL PURCHASE Prepared by the Contracts and Procurement Department of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department 2/24/2016.
CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE TOWN OF MIAMI LAKES Construction Services October 28, 2013.
1. 2 Cost & Price Analysis Breakout Session # 312 Beverly Arviso, CPA, Fellow, CPCM, CFCM, Arviso, Inc. Melanie Burgess, CPA, CFCM, Burgess Consulting,
Contract Basics For Utah State Agencies Prepared by:
Copyright 2014  Procurement means acquiring goods and/or services from an outside source  Other terms include purchasing and outsourcing Information.
PROCUREMENT 101 Texas Woman’s University. Procurement Process Overview Department determines need and where to purchase Requisition created Requisition.
Compliance with CCNA F.S..  Advertisement  Longlist  Shortlist  Request for Proposal  Scope of Services Meeting  Technical Proposal Review.
Contract Compliance Training
HUB Participation and HUB Subcontracting Plan Requirements Training
Processes and Procedures for Contracting at UO
Conduct Procurement-II
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE Office of the Attorney General
Processes and Procedures for Contracting at UO
Statewide Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) Program
Procurement Timelines Overview
12.2 Conduct Procurements The process of obtaining seller responses, selecting a seller and awarding the contract The team applies selection criteria.
Chapter 12: Project Procurement Management
Sample Bid Evals and Best Practices
Request for Proposal - Best Value
Contract Compliance Training
How to Submit a Winning Bid
Department of Community Development
Request for Proposal & Proposal
THE OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACT TRAINING MAY 2018
Solicitation Step by Step Process
DIVISION OF STATE SERVICES BUREAU OF CONTRACTS
Facility Operations Contracting Support… Request for Proposals
© 2017 Universal Service Administrative Co.
Request for Proposal - Best Value
NAST Webinar SEC Proposed Amendments to Rule 15c2-12 May 5, 2017
The Contract Review Process
Procurement Timelines Overview
Presenter’s Contact Information Diane Robinson/Gail Weiglhofer Financial Administration Office of General Services
Procurement Planning Mani Ram Gelal
Presenter’s Contact Information Larry Klein Procurement Services Group Office of General Services (518) OGS Website.
United Nations Procurement Division
Diversity management system (DMS)
STARTING FUNDING YEAR (FY) 2020
Presentation transcript:

The solicitation process Posting, evaluating and awarding

Posting requirements Gov’t Code §2155.083 describes Electronic State Business Daily (ESBD) posting requirements Any procurement over $25K must be posted in the ESBD. Posting must include: Brief description of goods/services Date for submission of bids/proposals Estimated quantity of goods/services to be procured If applicable, previous price paid by the state for the same goods/services Estimated date the goods/services will be needed State employee responsible for the bid and their contact information

Posting time If the agency provides “the entire bid or solicitation package” in the posted materials, the solicitation notice can be posted for 14 calendar days. If bidders/respondents must go elsewhere to obtain some or all of the material necessary to respond to the bid, then the package must be posted for 21 calendar days. Postings may only be placed on ESBD by authorized purchasers and registered agents. IF THE POSTING TIMES ARE NOT MET . . . THE CONTRACT/AWARD IS VOID. Gov’t Code §2155.083(j) Note – 2155.083 does not apply to state universities.

Other posting types/requirements Gov’t Code §2156.002 gives notice requirements for IFBs – seven days in a “newspaper of general circulation in the state.” Best not to use this unless you’re sure §2155.083 does not apply. “Consulting services” of $15,000 or more ($25K for universities) under Gov’t Code Ch. 2254, subchapter B must be published in the Texas Register 30 days prior to “entering the contract”. Gov’t Code §2254.029 Texas Counties post pursuant to Tx. Local Gov’t Code §§262.025 – 262.0255: published in a “newspaper of general circulation in the county” for 14 days. Cities posting requirements governed by Tx. Local Gov’t Code §252.041: notice must be “in a newspaper published in the municipality” for 14 days. If no such newspaper, then it must be posted at City Hall for 14 days. Universities’ notice requirements much less specific – under their own rules or “as directed by the board” for construction projects (Ed. Code §51.783(e)).

CentralIZED Master Bidder’s List The CMBL is a database of vendors registered to provide specific goods or services. Procurement Manual states that “the CMBL is to be used for all available procurement processes . . . to the fullest extent possible by state agencies that make purchases exempt from CPA purchasing authority” and “must be used for all procurements subject to CPA’s procurement authority” unless exempt under other law. With approval from their E.D. agencies may supplement the CMBL to enhance competition where using only the CMBL “is not in the best interests of the state,” for example, some showing that supplementation will increase competition, or increase number of HUB bidders.

Receiving Bids/proposals Be careful to make sure proposals are logged in and tracked to ensure compliance with submittal timelines, etc. Review solicitation package for all required elements – make sure the HUB Subcontracting Plan is included if one was required. New HUB rules allow minor deficiencies (absent signature, for example) to be corrected after submission.

Evaluation The time to arrive at an evaluation strategy is actually well before bids are received, possibly even before the RFP is posted. Items to consider: Is it a complex task to determine whether the bidders have met the published specifications and requirements? Are there components where the evaluation criteria require some exercise of judgment to determine “best value”? Are there multiple users/customers whose opinions could matter as to which product or service provider should be selected? If the answer to one or more of these questions is “yes”, you might consider a team evaluation approach.

Evaluation teams Best approach is to pick a manageable number of evaluators (more than two, less than ten). Each member of the team should be required to sign a non-disclosure agreement (“NDA”). The NDA can be combined with the required SAO nepotism form for signature. Set up the first meeting of the evaluation team - make sure you get NDAs from all evaluators before they leave with bid materials. At the first meeting, give evaluators guidance on how to perform their review, and “do’s and don’ts” of being an evaluator.

Evaluation team scoring Prepare a scoring matrix that will give a fair comparison of the RFP/RFO requirements and the bidders’ strengths and weaknesses, and make sure the matrix matches up well with what you said in the RFP/RFO about how bidders would be scored. As part of the kickoff meeting, walk the evaluators through the scoring matrix, give them your expectations for scoring, and answer questions. Give the evaluators a timeframe when their scoring is due, then collect and tabulate the scores. Make sure to track the response packages to ensure no gaps in the process. If there are statistical outliers, you may want to consider a “recalibration” meeting.

BAFO, Barfo, and so on… It may be beneficial to the process to ask vendors to submit a “best and final offer” or BAFO. It helps to mention the possibility of a BAFO in the RFP/RFO, so vendors are not surprised when they get one. The BAFO should only be on price. If you allow modifications/resubmission on technical criteria, you may not be comparing apples to apples on the technical scores. Give vendors a specific timeframe and parameters for the BAFO responses. It may be necessary in rare cases to ask for “best and really final offers” or BARFO. Generally we have only done this when we decide to drop certain criteria from the solicitation and we want to gauge how much that would save.

Exceptions & assumptions Respondents will often take “exceptions” to parts of the bid/proposal specifications or the terms or conditions of the solicitation. Respondents may also make “assumptions” about how the work is to be carried out in their response. These issues must be worked out prior to award; otherwise you may not be comparing the respondents on equal proposals. If an exception or assumption is fundamental enough that it affects how respondents structure their proposal, you may need to issue a new solicitation to allow ALL respondents to clarify their proposals consistent with the new published specifications.

Tie bids & preferences In the unlikely event that there are two or more bids that are equal after all the evaluation and price scoring, the foremost method for breaking these ties is through use of preferences. Preferences are listed in statute and discussed at length in the Procurement Manual. There is even a priority for which preferences take precedence over others. Note that while some preferences are product-type specific, and affect what you solicit for, others are vendor-specific and those are generally used to break tie bids.

TPASS Preference attachment

Award Different philosophies for award. In TPASS, all award letters contain any final negotiated terms that differ from the RFP. As specified in the RFP, the “order of priorities” listed in the award letter controls over everything else, so any agreed exceptions, negotiated points and the like will be found in the award letter only. Award letters must always be signed by the appropriate authorized person (CTPM or ED if required). Always check vendor status against EPLS before making an award. It is rare to get a “hit” but it has happened. EPLS has been difficult lately, but back up and operating currently.

Questions? David Duncan – Deputy General Counsel Tx. Comptroller of Public Accounts (512) 463-9482 Manuel Perez, CTPM – Technical Lead, Statewide Procurement (512) 463-2469