The Finite Universe Method

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Exam #3 will be given on Monday Nongraded Homework: Now that we are familiar with the universal quantifier, try

Advertisements

CAS LX 502 8a. Formal semantics Truth and meaning The basis of formal semantics: knowing the meaning of a sentence is knowing under what conditions.

SL Truth value assignments. SL Truth value assignments PL Interpretation.

FOL Practice. Models A model for FOL requires 3 things: A set of things in the world called the UD A list of constants A list of predicates, relations,

Proofs in Predicate Logic A rule of inference applies only if the main operator of the line is the right main operator. So if the line is a simple statement,

The factor theorem The Factor Theorem states that if f(a) = 0 for a polynomial then (x- a) is a factor of the polynomial f(x). Example f(x) = x 2 + x -

For Wednesday, read chapter 6, section 1. As nongraded HW, do the problems on p Graded Homework #7 is due on Friday at the beginning of class. In.

For 42 – 47: UD = everything; Ax = x is an apple; Nxy = x is in y; Px = x is a pear; Rx = x is rotten; b = the basket 42There are apples and pears in the.

Predicate Calculus Subject / Predicate John / went to the store. The sky / is blue. Propositional Logic - uses statements Predicate Calculus - uses predicates.

CPSC-608 Database Systems Fall 2011 Instructor: Jianer Chen Office: HRBB 315C Phone: Notes #8.

Graphs & Recursion Chapter 2 Highlights. Graphs Used to model relationships Includes –Set of vertices (nodes) –Set of edges that connect the nodes Example.

Transformations Transforming Graphs. 7/9/2013 Transformations of Graphs 2 Basic Transformations Restructuring Graphs Vertical Translation f(x) to f(x)

Symbolization in Predicate Logic In Predicate Logic, statements predicate properties of specific individuals or members of a group. Singular Statement:

No man will lift a lance against another. There never was much undergrowth in Boeotia, Such a smooth place, and this girl takes after it. All woes shall.

1 Example 1 Explain why the Intermediate Value Theorem does or does not apply to each of the following functions. (a) f(x) = 1/x with domain [1,2]. Solution.

Predicate Logic What is a predicate? A property that can be attributed to --or said of –a thing. Being greenBeing contingent Being four feet tall Being.

Proofs in Predicate Logic A rule of inference applies only if the main operator of the line is the right main operator. So if the line is a simple statement,

CSCE 4613 Artificial Inteligence

Splash Screen. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 6–5) Then/Now New Vocabulary Key Concept: Remainder Theorem Example 1:Synthetic Substitution.

PART TWO PREDICATE LOGIC. Chapter Seven Predicate Logic Symbolization.

Warm-up over Lesson 5-1.

Review Limits When you see the words… This is what you think of doing…  f is continuous at x = a  Test each of the following 1.

Splash Screen. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–1) Then/Now New Vocabulary Example 1:Identify Linear Functions Example 2:Real-World Example:

Natural Deduction for Predicate Logic Bound Variable: A variable within the scope of a quantifier. – (x) Px – (  y) (Zy · Uy) – (z) (Mz  ~Nz) Free Variable:

1 Section 9.1 Automatic Reasoning Recall that a wff W is valid iff ¬ W is unsatisfiable. Resolution is an inference rule used to prove unsatisfiability.

4.2 – The Mean Value Theorem

Find the critical point of f(x) =(2x - 1) on [0,  ] A. x = ½ B. x = 1 C. x = 2 D. x = 3.

Computational Intelligence Winter Term 2015/16 Prof. Dr. Günter Rudolph Lehrstuhl für Algorithm Engineering (LS 11) Fakultät für Informatik TU Dortmund.

On [a,b], ARC = On [1, 16], find ARC for. On [a,b], ARC = On [1, 16], find ARC for ARC = =

1MPES2 Exponents Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de Neuchâtel Pierre Marchal Attribute to: Pierre Marchal.

4.4 Solve ax 2 + bx + c = 0 by Factoring. Steps to Follow when: “a” > 1 in the form ax 2 + bx + c Use the factored form: (kx + m) (lx +n) kl must multiply.

Multiplying Powers Dividing Powers Zero ExponentsNegative.

Chapter 9: Syntax and Semantics II : Logic & Proofs July 23, 2009 Karin Howe.

Holt McDougal Algebra Multiplying Polynomials Multiply polynomials. Use binomial expansion to expand binomial expressions that are raised to positive.

Section 1.5 and 1.6 Predicates and Quantifiers. Vocabulary Predicate Domain Universal Quantifier Existential Quantifier Counterexample Free variable Bound.

Legal reasoning – a continental approach and a common law approach.

Review for Final Exam : Logic & Proofs August 6, 2009 Karin Howe.

Fractions, Decimals, and Percents Probability Polynomials.

Last Answer LETTER I h(x) = 3x 4 – 8x Last Answer LETTER R Without graphing, solve this polynomial: y = x 3 – 12x x.

Precalculus Lesson 1.4 Shifting, Reflecting, and Stretching Graphs.

4.2 The Mean Value Theorem In this section, we will learn about:

Sec. 4-3: Matrix Multiplication 8/24/17

Computational Intelligence

Modal, Dynamic and Temporal Logics

8.1 Symbols and Translation

Remainder Theorem What’s left over?.

Polynomial Let R be a ring. A polynomial over R is an expression of the form: f (x) = a0 + a1x + a2x2 +…+ anxn where the ai  R called the coefficients.

4.1 Notes day 2 Remainder Theorem: If a polynomial f(x) is divided by x – c, then the remainder is f(c). Ex. f(x) = x3 + 3 divided by g(x)= x -1.

Database Programming PL SQL.

Analysis of Linear and quadratic polynomials

Combinations COURSE 3 LESSON 11-3

Today’s Topics Universes of Discourse

Line, line segment and rays.

Part (a) 1 1 ax ax ax 2 g(x) = e + f(x) g’(x) = e (ln e) (a) + f’(x)

Computational Intelligence

Combinations of Functions:

4.6 The Mean Value Theorem.

Proofs in Predicate Logic

Selected Problems on Limits and Continuity

Algebra 1 Section 12.9.

زيارت عاشورا.

Remainder Theorem.

1. Evaluating Expressions and Functions

Herbrand Semantics Computational Logic Lecture 15

V1a – In Need Arr: Shane Coffman Words and Music by: Ross King

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

Inference Rules for Quantified Propositions

Presentation transcript:

The Finite Universe Method Bottom Line Meanings Where H__ = is happy . . . (x) Hx = Everything is happy. (x) Hx = Something is happy. In a Universe containing only Tom . . . Everything is happy = Tom is happy (x) Hx = Ht

Something is happy = Tom is happy (x) Hx = Ht In a Universe containing only Tom and Dick . . . Everything is happy = Tom is happy, and Dick is happy. (x) Hx = (Ht · Hd) Something is happy = Tom is happy, or Dick is happy. (x) Hx = (Ht v Hd)

In a Universe containing only Tom, Dick, and Harry . . . Everything is happy = Tom is happy, and Dick is happy, and Harry is happy. (x) Hx = [(Ht · Hd) · Hh] Something is happy = Tom is happy, or Dick is happy, or Harry is happy. (x) Hx = [(Ht v Hd) v Hh]

In a Universe of two. (x) (Lx  ~Qx) = (La  ~Qa) · (Lb  ~Qb) (x) (~Nx · Bx) = (~Na · Ba) v (~Nb · Bb) (x) (~Gx  Kx) v (x) (Wx · ~Ax) = [(~Ga  Ka) · (~Gb  Kb)] v [ (Wa · ~Aa) v (Wb · ~Ab)] (x) ~(Fx · ~Qx) ≡ (x) (~Sx  Tx) = [~(Fa · ~Qa) v ~(Fb · ~Qb)] ≡ [(~Sa  Ta) · (~Sb  Tb)]

In a Universe of Three (x) ~(~Hx  Gx) = [~(~Ha  Ga) · ~(~Hb  Gb)] · ~(~Hc  Gc) (x) (Ox · ~Vx) = [(Oa · ~Va) v (Ob · ~Vb)] v (Oc · ~Vc) (x) ~(Fx · ~Gx)  (x) (Cx  ~Zx) = {[~(Fa · ~Ga) v ~(Fb · ~Gb)] v ~(Fc · ~Gc)}  {[(Ca  ~Za) · (Cb  ~Zb)] · (Cc  ~Zc)}

The number of items needed in the universe is always equal to the number of combinations of truth values needed for the Predicates (Capital Letters) to yield all true premises and a false conclusion.