How to be negative Gabi Yamout.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Give an Effective 2ar. 1. Think About the Big Picture  Remember: focus on offense – defend your house  Isolate 1 or 2 Impacts  Decide on impacts.
Advertisements

Matt Gomez Debating the Disadvantage (DA). 4 Part One: What is a Disadvantage?
By Mark Veeder-SCFI How to properly construct an AC and NC -Getting the most out of cross-ex -How to structure a rebuttal.
Mike Shackelford. Factors that make a good counterplan Does it solve the aff better? Is it competitive Does it solve the aff or a portion of the aff.
Advanced cp competition exercises
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Anatomy of a debate Austin Layton.
 A counterplan is a competitive policy option to the affirmative plan.
The 1ar: Debate’s Paramedic Get the patient to the hospital…alive.
Matt Gomez Ph.D in Theoretical Objections to Negative and Affirmative argumentation (Bingham Campus) SCFI 2011 THEORY.
What is Debate? A debater’s guide to the argumentative universe…
Politics. How to pick your disad 1. Link Debate – certain affs just go a certain way. Gotta win that. In my mind, need to win its unpopular or get another.
 Debating the Case Mikaela Malsin, Univ. of Georgia DUDA 2012
By Beth Mendenhall. Introduction Why you should listen Please ask questions.
Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2. What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative.
Counterplans?. Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions.
Counterplans Debate Central Workshop August 30, 2008.
How to Debate Disadvantages. Selecting disadvantages to run  Be strategic in selecting them—a few things to remember—  Don’t run multiple disadvantages.
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions. The negative strategy.
Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Negative’s Best Friend.
INTRO TO COUNTERPLANS!. WHAT IS A CP? A net beneficial alternative proposal to the Plan Competitive with the Plan Strategic if… The Aff is huge The SQ.
Advanced Debate Friday, August 21,  Speaking Drills  Counterplans  Work on cases  Exam 1: Next Friday Preview.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
How to Flow And why you should do it – always, all the time, in every round.
Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.
Disadvantages “Advanced” theory.
Intro to Counterplans Casey Parsons. Introduction to Counterplans Thus far in debate, we have assumed that the neg defends the status quo In the vast.
SCFI 2011 SJK. Understand how to structure and write basic LD constructives Understand the basic components of contention-level argumentation Begin to.
How to Debate Disadvantages. DA Uniqueness: Status of a key issue in the SQ – Example: The economy is improving Link: how the plan disrupts the SQ – Example:
Prison Negative Pay Fucking Attention. Topicality Topicality Substantial-Not Many People in Prisons, Not Much Money] Topicality Subsets.
How to Flow And why you should do it – always, all the time, in every round.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
GDI 2015 THE NEGATIVE.  The counter to the Affirmative  Negates the course of action proposed  So much variety! Many ways to negate  What makes someone.
 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Topicality “That sounds good. That’s a good skill to have.” –Julia Marshall “Naw. Advantages don’t matter when it comes to Topicality.” –Humza Tahir.
Basic Strategies Dallas Urban Debate League December, 2007.
Affirmative Casing Strategies. Characteristics of Great ACs 1.Argument Quality 2.Persuasive Rhetoric 3.Strategic vision.
Matt Gomez.  What will occur in the status quo  Factors for good uniqueness  Post-dating – things change  Brink – why is the squo good but not guaranteed.
FILING BASICS Staying organized is crucial.
The Affirmative.
BASICS OF BEING AFFIRMATIVE
Affirmative vs. negative
Mandatory National Service
Introduction to the Negative
The Politics DA.
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
WELCOME TO DEBATE! Negative Basics.
Types of Debate Lincoln/Douglas Public Forum Policy
8th Annual Great Corporate Debate
Basics of Debate Damien Debate.
What is Policy Debate Pam have other suggestions for this?
Intro to Lincoln Douglas
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Answering the CP Casey Parsons.
Beginning Strategies Novice Debate Henrichsen
Wining the DA Casey Parsons.
Debate What is Debate?.
The 2AC: Answering Disads
Introduction to Policy Debate
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Welcome to Debate! Cross-examination
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
Flowing & Cross-Examination
Introduction to the Neg
Thinking like a Policy Debater
Presentation transcript:

How to be negative Gabi Yamout

What does it mean to be negative? Negate the resolution Disprove the affirmative

Benefits of Being Negative Get multiple options Get to choose the direction of the debate Gets the negative block Presumption Judges tend to lean negative on theoretical issues

Disadvantages of Being Negative 2NR is the hardest speech Can’t win on theory Literature can be aff-biased Have to be prepared for many affirmatives

Offense and Defense Offense: reasons you win Defense: reasons they don’t win You want to win a combination of both

Debating the Case Start big and collapse Put defense on different levels of the advantage Think about the logical reasons the advantages are stupid

What are your options? Disadvantages Counterplans Critiques Topicality Impact turns

2NR #1: Disadvantage and Case What is this? Defends the status quo Make sure you have sufficient defense on the case Choosing between DAs

2NR #2: CP and Net Benefit What is this? Why choose this?

2NR #3: CP, DA, and Case Why choose this? Case arguments will shield the weaknesses of the CP The CP shouldn’t be overly complex

2NR #4: Critique and Case What is this? Framing issues are important

2NR #5: Topicality What is this? Why choose this? Make sure it is viable in the block – strategic option to extend in the block

2NR #6: Impact Turns What is this? Make sure to have defense on the other impacts Can also be combined with counterplans

Preparing to Be Negative Think about what affs you might encounter Have a broad range of generics Write blocks 1NC 2NC/1NR

Constructing a 1NC Have enough options but don’t stretch yourself too thin Don’t contradict yourself Don’t read things you wouldn’t be willing to go for in the end of the debate Put trickier arguments later in the 1NC

The Negative Block Questions to ask What is our best strategy? What has the 2AC messed up? How can we allocate time most effectively? Anything we can’t kick? Theoretical vulnerabilities? 2NC v 1NR 2NC cx

Choosing your 2NR Collapse in the block Assess your options – the best choice isn’t always the easiest one Make sure you include offense and defense Choose ONE option Depth over breadth Offense first

The Education Topic States CP Spending DA Federalism DA Topicality? How broad will the topic be?