Total No. of Learners Enrolled

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Advertisements

Manson School District Elementary: How did we do last year? SMART Goals Reading – 78% of students met the targeted SMART goal Math – 89% of.
WORKSHOP: MEPA SIMULATION
“Taking advantage of numbers for effective decision-making”
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Diverse Populations in Small Rural Schools Presented by: Amy Trujillo-Conway Amy Trujillo-Conway Madalena Barboa-Archuleta.
FEBRUARY KSBA Board Agenda Item focus on Jenkins Elementary.
Students Come First Senate Bill 1110 and Trailer Bill
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
Education For All: A Functionally-Literate Philippines! FY 2007 BUDGET Secretary Jesli A. Lapus October 2006.
ASSESSMENT of SBM PRACTICES: “ SCHOOLS INITIATED ASSESSMENT FOR SELF- DIRECTED IMPROVEMENT.
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP TEAM MEETING JANUARY 22, 2015 Sedgefield Elementary.
“Moving Forward the Reform Agenda” 11 September 2008.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Department of Education NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION.
“Moving Forward the Reform Agenda”
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) & Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) School Board Meeting, March 20,
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
IMPACT OF READ NATURALLY SUMMER AND FALL 2013 ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT AND EDU604 CULMINATION PROJECT DOANE COLLEGE SUE SCHLICHTEMEIER-NUTZMAN, PH.D. By.
Ready At Five & Maryland State Department of Education.
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
M and E in Multilingual Mother Tongue Based ECCE Dr. Jayanti Prakash.
Annual Report to the Public CENTERPOINT OCTOBER 10, 2016 SCHOOL DISTRICT.
The Lubuagan First Language Experiment
Karin Aure Dixon, Ed.D. 87th Annual CERA Conference December 4, 2008
Measuring College and Career Readiness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
ALABEL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
MOON VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL Performance Award System
A conversation among Chelsea School Committee
Nelson Elementary I will act in such a way that I will be proud of myself and others will be proud of me too. I came to school to learn and I WILL LEARN!
Report on the 3rd Regional MANCOM
Improving Student Outcomes for Schools At- Risk Presentation Template
Implementing guidelines on the school calendar for sy
School Title I Planning Meeting July 18, 2017 Welcome
Annual WBWF Student Achievement Report 2017
Improving Student Outcomes for Schools At- Risk Presentation Template
Blue Ridge School District 18
Session 3: Steering Structures
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review Plan Year 1/2
Performance Target Setting
Enhanced SIP, SRC, & RPMS Integration
12/11/2015.
Internal Guidelines on 2019 Budget Preparations
Create 21st Century Northwood Explorers by:
School/Cluster Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment
CALENDAR OF ACTIVITIES
Roswell North Elementary School
IPCRF for T1-3 WILHELMINA P. MATA, Ph.D.
Division of Cebu Province
ERICALANE School IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Mountain Park Elementary School
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Priority 1 – Teachers, Materials, Facilities
Public Schools District Supervisors
Instructions for Using the Program Evaluation Toolkit
Mountain Park Elementary School
Driving Through the California Dashboard
AYP and Report Card.
New Prospect Elementary School
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
La Mesa-Spring Valley Schools
Summit Hill Elementary School
S.T.E.A.M. Focused Instruction:
Roswell North Elementary School
Mountain Park Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Total No. of Learners Enrolled DATA: Enrollment EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Total No. of Learners Enrolled   By Gender For the Last 3 School Years Used End/Middle of School Year Data Used Stacked Bar Graph by Gender per Year ● Optional: If the school has special programs, they can also present in a separate graph the enrolment number of the different types of learners by program (e.g. SPED, ADM, ALS, IPEd, ALIVE) of the current year – schools can show the total for each type of learner

2. Health and Nutritional Status REMARKS EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS No. of Learners who are Severely Wasted or Wasted   By Gender For Every Key Stage (K-3, 4-6, JHS, SHS) Data are for the Current School Year Used Stacked Bar Graph by Gender per Key Stage

Data are for the current School Year 3. Learners’ Materials EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS The count of shortages/excess learners materials per grade level is based on what the students are using during the School Year   Only subjects which have shortage/excess learners materials will be listed per grade level Data are for the current School Year Data are presented using tables per grade level that show the number of shortage/excess learners materials (by subjects)

4. Teachers’ Professional Development REMARKS EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Number of teachers who attended training/further studies   By kind/type of professional development (e.g. ICT, Further studies, INSET, LAC, etc) For the current School Year Bar graph by kind/type of professional development

Funding amount and sources (MOOE, LGU, canteen, donors, etc.) 5. Funding Sources EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Funding amount and sources (MOOE, LGU, canteen, donors, etc.)   For the current School Year Pie graph by funding source

6. School Awards and Recognitions REMARKS EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Top 3 awards/ recognition from award-giving bodies duly recognized by DepEd   Listing by title, award-giving body, level (school, division, regional, national, international) Categorized into student, teacher, school head, and school awards For the current School Year Presented using tables.

7. Number and Rate of Dropouts by Causes REMARKS EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Count and percentage of learners who do not finish a particular grade level. (It does not capture learners who finish a grade level but do not enrol in the next grade level the following school year)   Five (5) major causes of dropout in the school For the last 3 years Stacked bar graph by causes per year; percentage is shown through a line graph over the bar graph

For the current School Year 8. Percentage of learners who completed the School Year (Promotion Rate) EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Percentage of learners who completed the school year (Number of promoted learners over number of total learners x 100)   Per grade level For the current School Year Presented using bar graph

9. National Achievement Test (NAT) – by Mean Percentage Score (MPS) EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS MPS per subject   Grade 6 or 10 or 12 results For the current School Year Bar graph by MPS of each subject *Use the average of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Quarterly Assessment Results (QAR).

Should show pre and post test results For the current School Year 10. Literacy Level EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Total number of learners who are in the frustration, instructional, and independent levels for English and Filipino (oral and silent reading)   Should show pre and post test results For the current School Year Bar graphs showing oral and silent reading results (one for English and Filipino) * If PHIL-IRI is used, will cover grades 2-6 only * In the absence of a tool to measure literacy, schools can use PHIL-IRI results or any existing tool to measure literacy

11. School-Based Management Assessment Level REMARKS EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS SBM Level and its corresponding qualitative interpretation   12. Child-Friendly School Survey result Points and Status For the current School Year

13. Stakeholders’ Participation REMARKS EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Percentage (number of attendees over those invited) of parents/guardians and other stakeholders who attend during: a. Co-curricular activities (Science month, Reading month, contests, etc.) b. Extra-curricular activities (Boy Scouts, Brigada Eskwela, sports fests, etc.) c. Meetings and Assemblies (SIP, CI, General PTA, etc.)   Total contribution (in kind, manhours, etc.) of stakeholders which are accounted By reporting period (Midyear and Year-end) of the current School Year For percentage: stacked bar graph by activity (cocurricular, extracurricular, meetings/ assemblies) per stakeholder For total contribution: stacked bar graph by type of contribution per reporting period, with total

14. Learner-Teacher Ratio REMARKS EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to teachers against the standard: -Kinder (25:1) -Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) -Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) -SHS (40:1)   Per grade level For the current School Year Ratio per grade level shown as bar graph Standard is shown as line graph over the bar graph

15. Learner-Classroom ratio REMARKS EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to classrooms against the standard: Kinder (25:1) Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) SHS (40:1)   Per grade level For the current School Year Ratio per grade level shown as bar graph Standard is shown as line graph over the bar graph

Total number of toilets 16. Learner-Toilet Ratio EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to functional toilets against standards (50:1)   Total number of toilets By gender For the current School Year Standard is shown as line graph over the bar graph

For the current School Year 17. Learner-Seat Ratio EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to seats against the standard (1:1)   Total number of chairs For the current School Year Standard is shown as line graph over the bar graph

Top three (3) Priority Projects 18. Status of Annual Implementation Plan (AIP)/Continuous Improvement (CI) Projects* EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Top three (3) Priority Projects   Target vs. Actual Accomplishment Percent of accomplishment based on the target

19. Other Stakeholders’ Accomplishments REMARKS EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT REMARKS Top three (3) stakeholders’ accomplishments/initiatives/activities   * Initiatives/activities independent from the PIA/CI projects (e.g. activities of the SGC, SPG/SSG, etc.)