Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Graduation Action Plan 11th Grade Career/College Planning Unit
Advertisements

Future Ready Schools ABCs/AYP Background Briefing August 23, 2007 Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Services NC Department of Public.
UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CSIP) Implementing the Missouri Standards for Performance, Process and Resource used in the Missouri School.
MSIP Accountability Plan
Submitted by: Dr. Cleopatra Figgures, Chief Accountability Officer
St. Louis Public Schools Student Performance Update December 2009 Dr. Cleopatra Figgures Deputy Superintendent Accountability 1.
Sophomores: Ready or Not: College Readiness for All
AYP Changes for 2007 K-20 Videoconference June 11, 2007 Presented by: JoLynn Berge OSPI Federal Policy Coordinator.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
Southern Regional Education Board 1 Preparing Students for Success in High School.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
1 1  1 =.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Florida Department of Education Office of Student Financial Assistance Florida Department of Education Office of Student Financial Assistance (OSFA) Florida.
ASSESSMENT UPDATE Rhonda Sims, Director Division of Support and Research Office Of Assessment And Accountability
High School School Performance Framework (SPF)
English 12 CR & Transition Math WV Department of Education.
State of Education Brad Neuenswander, Interim Commissioner
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/18/2008 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
MCSD EQUITY UPDATE Presented by Sergio Sanchez K-12 Math and ESOL Program Specialist Educational Equity and ADA Coordinator MCSD sanchezs 1.
2013 College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All.
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All of.
Deana Holinka, MA, CRC, Administrative Coordinator,
Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates April 16, 2014 Jana Schreiner, Accountability and State Assessment Consultant.
EDUCATIONAL PROFICIENCY PLAN
Florida School Accountability Dr. Karen Schafer Accountability and Testing Adapted from Presentation June, 2014 by Ed Croft Bureau Chief, Accountability.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Maryland Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Maryland is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
How to graduate from Riverdale High School. Requirements to graduate: What year did you enter High School? Use the year entered high school to determine.
School Grades Model and Historical Background
MSIP 5 Becky Odneal October 27, Education Link Consulting2 Background on MSIP 5 Rule  , first MSIP 5  March 2011, MSIP 5 rule approved.
Making Career Readiness Count Tuesday, May 27 th 2:00-3:00 p.m. ET.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
Missouri school Improvement program (MSIP 5)
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
February 21, /6/ College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School Model Grades DRAFT Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
2012 MASSP SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 March 27, 2012.
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
1 Missouri School Improvement Program (MSIP) Fourth Cycle Becky Kemna, Coordinator School Improvement and Accreditation (573)
SIGNIFICANCE OF MAP SCORES PRESENTED BY DR. LEIGH ANNE TAYLOR KNIGHT SOURCE: Linda Lacy – Consultant UMKC Regional Professional Development Center SEPTEMBER.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
Road Maps to High School Graduation Dr. Michael A. Grego Superintendent Pinellas County Schools.
South Carolina Succeeds
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
MSIP 5 and You What it means for your student and the Kansas City Public Schools.
Objective  The workplace of today must be dedicated to excellence in skills and personal qualities  There are many different pathways that you.
Communication Webinar:
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
USING DATA TO IMPROVE YOUR SCHOOL Presenters: Area Supervisors for DESE – Jill Janes; Shelly Aubuchon; Nancy Greeley 1.
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Personal Education Requirements
College and Career Readiness (CCR)
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Mississippi Succeeds Madison County Business League & Foundation
Texas State Accountability
Laredo Independent School District Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) January 8, 2019.
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Personal Education Requirements
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1/6/2011 MSIP 5 MARE Dr. Ron Wilken, State Supervisor Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education February 16, 2013

Major MSIP 5 changes Status is three year average not five year Eliminates 14 METS…..Uses 140 points Replaces H1, H2, AVG, BA, Floor with TARGET, ON-TRACK, APPROACHING, FLOOR New Super Subgroup designation Emphasis placed on AP & dual credit classes Measures Growth in addition to progress Considers ACT, SAT, COMPASS, & ASVAB test New Accreditation with Distinction designation Emphasis on Alg I & English I EOC at 8th grade.

MSIP 5 Performance Standards Academic Achievement 56 48 2. Subgroup Achievement 14 12 3. College and Career Readiness 30 10 4. Attendance Rate 10 10 5. Graduation Rate 30 ---- Total Points 140 points k-12 80 points k-8

Status Progress Growth 16 8 56 Academic Achievement CA Science Mathematics Science Social Studies TOTAL Status Target = 16 On Track =12 Approach =9 Floor =0 Target = 8 On Track =6 Approach =4.5 Progress Target = 12 Approach =3 Exceeds = 12 On Target =6 On Target =6 Exceeds = 6 On Target =3 Approach =1.5 Growth Points Possible 16 8 56 Subgroup Achievement Target = 4 On Track =3 Approach =2 Target = 2 On Track =1.5 Approach =1 Target = 3 On Track =2 Target = 1.5 On Track =1 Approach =.5 Points Possible 4 2 14

30 40 10 Status Progress Points Possible College & Career Ready CCR * 1-3 *4 * 5-6 High School Ready HSR TOTAL Status Target= 10 On Track =7.5 Approach =6 Floor =0 Progress Target = 7.5 On Track =4 Approach =2 Points Possible 10 30 Attendance Graduation Rate 4/5/6/7 Target = 30 On Track =22.5 Approach =18 Target = 22.5 On Track =12 40

APR

APR Breakdown

Academic Achievement

Subgroup Achievement

College/Career Ready

Attendance/Graduation Rate

Academic Achievement - Status Set Standardized Status Expectation for all districts. Use 3 most recent years to calculate status. Full academic year for accountability; report all students. Use an Index to calculate and add percent proficient for reporting. Achievement Level Point Value MSIP 5 Below Basic 1 Basic 3 Proficient 4 Advanced 5

MPI---Map Percentage Index (4th) Achievement Level Index Point Value # of Students Index points Below Basic 6 x 25 = 150 Basic 7 35 245 Proficient 8 40 320 Advanced 9 30 270 Total Index Points 130 985 Total Index Points Total # of Students MPI 985 / 130 = 7.58 *100 758 Year 1 Year 2 Year 4 3 year total 3 year average 758 762 763 = 2283 / 3 261

1/6/2011 3. (K-12 only) College and Career Readiness (CCR) – The district provides adequate post-secondary preparation for all students. 10 points each grouping…30 points total. The percent of graduates who scored at or above the state standard on any department- approved measure(s) of college and career-readiness, for example, ACT®, SAT®, COMPASS® or Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), meets or exceeds the state standard or demonstrates required improvement. The district’s average composite score(s) on any department-approved measure(s) of college and career readiness, for example, ACT®, SAT®, COMPASS® or Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), meets or exceeds the state standard or demonstrate(s) required improvement. The percent of graduates who participated in any department-approved measure(s) of college and career readiness, for example, ACT®, SAT®, COMPASS® or Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), meets or exceeds the state standard or demonstrates required improvement. The percent of graduates who earned a qualifying score on an Advanced Placement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), or Technical Skills Attainment (TSA) assessments and/or receive college credit through early college. dual enrollment, or approved dual credit courses meets or exceeds the state standard or demonstrates required improvement. The percent of graduates who attend post-secondary education/training or are in the military within six (6) months of graduating meets the state standard or demonstrates required improvement. The percent of graduates who complete career education programs approved by the department and are placed in occupations directly related to their training, continue their education, or are in the military within six (6) months of graduating meets the state standard or demonstrates required improvement,

CCR * 1-6 HSR * 1

CCR *1-3 Status ACT SAT-R/M COMPASS ASVAB Weight 26> 1190> NA 88-99 1.25 22> 990> 66M & 81R 63-87 1.00 18> 870> 66M OR 81R 30-62 0.75 <18 <870 <66 & <81 <30 NO TEST at graduation 0.25 0.00

CCR *1-3 Status Calculation STEP 1- Determine the number of students scoring at or above the state standard and multiply by associated point value. No. of Graduates Points Points Earned No Score 19 x .25 24 6.0 .75 46 34.5 1.0 37 37.0 1.25 30.0 Total 150 107.5 * ACT® scores and approximately equivalent scores derived from other assessments must be equal to or greater than the ACT® anchor score in order to be included in the number of students scoring at or above the state standard.

CCR *4 Status 10 status/ 7.5 progress Qualifying Score AP (any) 3 or higher IB (any) 4 or higher TSA (approved) Pass Early College College credit Dual Enrollment A or B Dual Credit (approved)

CCR *5-6 Status 10 status/ 7.5 progress STEP 1- Determine the number of students with recognized post-secondary placement and multiply by associated point value. No. Grads X Points Number of Graduates who attend post-secondary education 147 1.0 Number of Graduates who attend post-secondary training 118 Number of Graduates who are in the military 17 Number of Graduates who complete a Department-approved Career Education Program and are placed in an occupation directly related to their training 57 Number of Graduates Without recognized placement 46 0.0 Total 385 339

Attendance 10 Points possible

Attendance Status STEP 1- Determine the number of students with qualifying attendance and multiply by associated point value. STEP 2- Divide the number of points earned by the number of students and multiply by 100. No. of Students Points Points Earned With Attendance Rate < 90% 30 x With Attendance Rate >90% 240 1.0 Total 270 Points earned No. of Students Percent 240 / 270 = .888 x 100 88.8%

Graduation Rate 4, 5, 6, 7 year graduation rates will be calculated, the highest will be used.

Accreditation Levels Accredited With Distinction >90% of points + other criteria as determined Accredited >70% of points Provisional >50% to 69.9% of points Unaccredited < 50% of points

PRELIMINARY Impact 90% + 109 20.9% 205,339 23.8% 80%-89.9% 231 44.3% Percent Total Points Earned No. of Districts Percent of Districts Cumulative Number of Students Percent of Students Cumulative Percent of Students 90% + 109 20.9% 205,339 23.8% 80%-89.9% 231 44.3% 65.3% 348,843 40.4% 64.2% 70%-79.9% 124 89.2% 157,422 18.2% 82.5% 60%-69.9% 41 7.9% 96.9% 65,225 7.6% 90.0% 50%-59.9% 9 1.7% 98.7% 28,734 3.3% 93.4% 40%-49.9% 3 0.6% 99.2% 9,123 1.1% 94.4% 0%-39.9% 4 .08% 100.0% 47,993 5.6%

Questions? Comments? Ron Wilken Ron.Wilken@dese.mo.gov 417-722-1246

1/6/2011 THANK YOU!!! Type comments here.