Competency to Give an Informed Consent: A Model for Making Clinical Assessments James Drane.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Confidentiality, Consent and Data Protection Elizabeth M Robertson Deputy Medical Director Grampian University Hospitals Trust.
Advertisements

Decision Making Capacity Gary J. Gala, MD. Capacity Competency Clinical judgment Clinical judgment Can be assessed by any physician Can be assessed by.
DECISIONAL CAPACITY FEATURES STANDARDS TESTS AND CRITERIA.
Medical Ethics and Choice of Treatment or Determining decision making capacity – drawing clear lines in a murky sea of gray… James Hallenbeck, MD Director,
Informed consent in research ethics
Harrison et al. Bioethics for Children: Involving Children in Medical Decisions.
For consent to be valid: The patient must be competent – Mental capacity is decision-specific – Ability to understand, retain and weigh in the balance.
ETHICS OF CONSENTING IMPAIRED INDIVIDUALS THERAPEUTICS Col Xolani Currie, Nat Dipl Rad, BA, HED, MPH Regulatory Oversight Manager Project Phidisa.
Autonomy and Beneficence.  Right to make one’s own choices  Respect for persons- not to interfere with choice of another, though persuasion permitted.
Killing and Letting Die Is there a moral difference?
End-of-Life Professional Ethics & Liability Issues “A Day With The Judges” Integris Baptist Medical Center October 15, 2010 Presented by Annette Prince,
The principles In Medical Ethics Lecturer :Noha Alaggad
Competency Assessment. Competency and Capacity Capacity/Competency –Legal, clinical, ethical and social construct –“Ability of an individual to make autonomous.
GARY HAIGH CAPACITY AND CONSENT. CONSENT Establishing consent is fundamental to respect for patients rights. It is a legal obligation.
ETHICS In Field Of Dental Hygiene BY Dr. Shahzadi Tayyaba Hashmi.
Shared Decision Making Professor Michelle Leech Deputy Dean Medicine Monash University Deputy-Director Monash Health Rheumatology.
Baltic Dental Meeting Palanga Dana Romane The Patient in the Centre – Patient’s Involvement in the Treatment Process, Full Awareness and.
Ethical Issues of Elder Care. Objectives Apply the concept of decision-specific capacity to older adults. Apply the concept of decision-specific capacity.
EMERGENCY PSYCHIATRY - MEDICAL COMPETENCY THE PSYCHIATRIC CONSULTATION.
Autonomy: Respect for Persons, Decision-making Capacity, & Informed Consent Walter Limehouse MD MUSC Ethics Committee Chair.
Proxy Consent. Civil code of the Philippines Competency of minors  Art. 38. Minority, insanity or imbecility, the state of being a deaf-mute, prodigality.
Informed Consent. Informed Consent vs. Informed Refusal A)Informed Consent:For treatment For research 1)voluntary and informed conditions __________________.
Dr Mike Ewart Smith Division of Psychiatry, University of Witwatersrand The Ethics of Informed Consent: Revisiting the Doctor Patient Relationship.
Patient Understanding in Informed Consent Robert F. Dunton, MD Chief, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Upstate Medical University.
Decision-Making Adam Burrows, MD Boston University Geriatrics Section Copyright Boston University Medical Center.
Alexiaus Nichols Doctor. Educational requirements You have to train for at least to 8-10 years to become and actual doctor. But that’s just for training.
Case Study: Medical Research Jillian Cudmore Mallory Anne Andrea Currie Amy DeBaie.
Legal and Ethical Issues Kimberley Clow
ETHICS IN FIELD OF DENTAL HYGIENE Dr. Shahzadi Tayyaba Hashmi
Ordering Real Numbers.
Ethics and Clinical Ethics Committee ETHICS. Ethical Dilemma OCCURS IN SITUATIONS WHERE A CHOICE MUST BE MADE BETWEEN TWO OR MORE RELEVANT, BUT CONTRADICTORY.
1 ETHICS. 2 ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOR Ethics: Standards of conduct for a profession Some issues cannot be handled by codes alone Courts may decide.
Chapter 9 Ethics of Caring. Changes Increasing Ethical Dilemmas for Nurses Expanded role of nurses. Medical technology. New fiscal constraints. Greater.
Decision Making at the End of Life Pain Fear Depression (SI) Isolation Cognitive loss Ethics Law Role of Psychiatrist Advance Directive SHC Guidelines.
Informed Consent Maria Lorentzon Tzu-Chuan Liao Bryan Keane.
1 Ethical Issues for Neurological Patients Dr Lynne Russon Consultant in Palliative Medicine. Bradford 2 nd May 07.
Consent & Vulnerable Adults Aim: To provide an opportunity for Primary Care Staff to explore issues related to consent & vulnerable adults.
Competency and Capacity to Choose. Which Term? Competency: Best restricted to legal use when a formal procedure has been conducted Capacity to choose:
1 [INSERT SPEAKER NAME DATE & LOCATION HERE] Ethics of Tuberculosis Prevention, Care and Control MODULE 8: HEALTH CARE WORKER RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS Insert.
Informed Consent l What is it? l Why is it important? l Is the concept different in ethics and in law? l What practical approach is best?
Competency Assessing Decision Making Capacity Jeffrey J Kaufhold, MD FACP Chair, Bioethics Advisory Committee, Grandview Hospital.
Patient-physician Relationship and Clinical Ethics Doç.Dr.Hanzade Doğan Doç.Dr.Hanzade Doğan.
EPECEPECEPECEPEC EPECEPECEPECEPEC Sudden Illness Sudden Illness Module 8 The Project to Educate Physicians on End-of-life Care Supported by the American.
By MUREREREHE Julienne BDT(Hons) KHI..  Informed consent is a legal document, prepared as an agreement for treatment, non-treatment, or for an invasive.
ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapter 1.
Universal Principles of Biomedical Ethics
Making Good Choices. What’s the difference between just making a decision and making a good decision?
Medical Ethics. Medical Ethics [vs. Professional ethics]  Principals to guide physicians in their relationships with others  Ethical dilemma is a predicament.
Medical Necessity Criteria An Overview of Key Components Presented by BHM Healthcare Solutions.
BIOETHICAL PRINCIPLES Beauchamp and Childress 2001;Gillon 1986
Dr.Amira Yahia, Ph.D (N), M.Sc (N), B.Sc (N).  By the end of this session the student will be able to:  Define some terms related to ethic  Explain.
A Matter of Consent….
CLINICAL TRIALS.
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
The Clinical Trial Volunteer’s Bill of Rights
Chapter 2 Ethical and Legal Issues
CHAPTER TWO ETHICAL DILEMMAS AND CRITICAL PROCESSES
Principles of Health Care Ethics
Decisional Capacity and Competence
IMPLEMENTING THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY IN DEMENTIA CARE
CHAPTER TWO ETHICAL DILEMMAS AND CRITICAL PROCESSES
Learning goals and assessment (MBA)
Common Ethical Considerations in Pharmaceutical Care Practice
Lecture 10: A Brief Summary
Capacity vs. Competence Geriatric Interprofessional Training
Ethics and Clinical Ethics Committee
How and When (Not) to Determine Decisional Capacity
Client’s Rights & Choices
Competency Assessing Decision Making Capacity
Capacity Nancy Weintraub, MD, FACP Professor of Medicine, UCLA Director, UCLA Geriatric Medicine Fellowship Director, VA Special Advanced Fellowship in.
Presentation transcript:

Competency to Give an Informed Consent: A Model for Making Clinical Assessments James Drane

The Complexity & Importance of Consent Autonomy But, the appearance only of consent does not equal autonomy and may lead patients to ‘choose’ things that harm them. Standards of competency involves law, ethics, and psychiatry. Must ensure that competent patients are prohibited from choosing and that incompetent patients aren’t allowed to make decisions.

Models for Making Assessments A variety depending on different medical conditions: Acute vs. chronic Critical vs. noncritical 3 different standards or definitions of what it means to be competent

Standard 1 Least stringent – applies to medical decisions that are not dangerous and objectively are in the patient’s best interests. Awareness Assent (a an objectively rational course of action). Will apply to people who will not be able to give “full consent” to other types of treatment.

Standard 2 For situations where the illness is chronic (rather than acute) Where the treatment is more dangerous Where there are real alternative treatments Understanding (as opposed to awareness) of various options and their risks-benefits is required. This doers NOT require the ability to articulate conceptual or verbal understanding. The patient can choose to let the physician make the decision.

Standard 3 Most stringent. Occurs when: medical action decided upon is dangerous and opposes both professional and public rationality. The available treatment is effective and not taking it is dangerous, perhaps life threatening. The decision appears (at least) to be irrational.

Standard 3 Appreciation is required here where person understands the medical info + the nature and consequences of their alternate decision. The person must be able intelligently and coherently describe their reasons.