Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Clk_ch2 Clk_ch1 L1A global L1A _ch T0+T0r

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Test beam 2001 Results M.C. Fouz Muon Week, CERN Nov 01.
Advertisements

Time Tracking in PTC. First order Time Tracking A high order integrator in the so-called “ s ” variable can be turned into a first order time tracker.
Marzo 2004Flavio Dal Corso INFN-Pd1 Results from May 2003 Test Beam First test of all the electronics integrated in a MB1 Minicrate Items tested: Hardware.
CMS week mar 051 Results of the Analysis of 2004 DT Test Beam C. Battilana and S. Marcellini – INFN Bologna Trigger Performance: -Single Muons -Di-Muons.
Calibration for different trigger sources (DT,CSC,RPC) S.Bolognesi for the Torino group (with a big help from M. Dalla Valle) DT Cosmic Analysis meeting.
MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
RPC timing in simulation Current Situation MC Geant4 RPCSensitiveDetector.cxx Or RPCSensitiveDetectorCosmics.cxx RPC_Digitization RPC_digit_To_RDO RPC_RDO_To_Prep:
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Trigger o Reminder: DAQ Trigger vs Particle Trigger o DAQ Trigger o Particle Trigger 1) Possible.
Commissioning data are taken with individual chambers TP data autotriggered Cosmic rays data  ( different configuration) Different cosmic track angle.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
A.meneguzzo, 03 april 2002 LNL- MB3 chamber test with cosmic triggers Some results on the tests performed on the MB3 chambers produced in Legnaro are presented.
Debugging of M2-M5 G. Passaleva. 11/02/2009 Muon System mini review G. Passaleva 2 outline Short summary of Muon readout channel organization Connectivity.
RPC PAC Trigger system installation and commissioning How we make it working… On-line software Resistive Plate Chambers Link Boxes Optical Links Synchronization.
Discrete Distributions The values generated for a random variable must be from a finite distinct set of individual values. For example, based on past observations,
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
Track-Finder Trigger at the Beam Test Results and Features Darin Acosta, Rick Cavanaugh, Victor Golovtsov, Lindsey Gray, Khristian Kotov, Alex Madorsky,
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
NA62 Trigger Algorithm Trigger and DAQ meeting, 8th September 2011 Cristiano Santoni Mauro Piccini (INFN – Sezione di Perugia) NA62 collaboration meeting,
A. Ranieri / RPC-CMS Pre-loaded profile Synchronization & Control Board (SCB) The RPC electronics will consist of the FE board plus the Synchronization.
Tracker Timing and ISIS RF Edward Overton 1. At CM32… 2 Had done some preliminary checks on the ISIS RF. Was beginning to think about how to handle the.
HLT DT Calibration (on Data Challenge Dedicated Stream) G. Cerminara N. Amapane M. Giunta CMS Muon Meeting.
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
CMS WEEK – MARCH06 REVIEW OF MB4 COMMISSIONING DATA Giorgia Mila
TGC Timing Adjustment Chikara Fukunaga (TMU) ATLAS Timing Workshop 5 July ‘07.
Status of New TPC( Ⅱ ) Performance Study Yohei Nakatsugawa LEPS Meeting in Taiwan.
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
CMS Latency Review, 13th March 2007CSC Trigger 1 Latency and Synchronization update.
HES HKS collaboration meeting 3/11/2010 T.Gogami.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
Optics, Tracking, and TOF Status/Update/Roadmap Xin Qian KRL Caltech.
Radioactive source and cosmic-ray test for the MWPC Davide Pinci on behalf of the Frascati-Roma1 MWPC group.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
DAQ deadtime memo Kaz, Grass 2012/01/04 1. Current dead time Dead time measured on 2011/09/29  With TDCmax=4, Deadtime =350 us  With TDCmax=8, Deadtime.
Preliminary results on DT T0s in beam collisions J. Santaolalla, J. Alcaraz (+ help/suggestions from C. Battilana, C. Fouz)
D. Bertrand, J. De Bruyne, P. De Harenne, L. Etienne, S. Hannaert, G. Van Beek The Arch.
Low Momentum dE/dx Testbeam H.P. 7/24/98. Goals for Spectrometer are based on tracking and PID –Multiparticle correlation –production of particle species.
Notes in preparation by the Torino group Sara BolognesiDT Cosmic Meeting 01/11/2007  MTCC note:  calibration section  DQM section  Internal note about.
S.MonteilPS COMMISSIONING1 MaPMT-VFE-FE ELECTRONICS COMMISSIONING AND MONITORING. OUTLINE 1)Ma-PMT TEST BENCHES MEASUREMENTS 2)VFE AND FE ELECTRONICS FEATURES.
Evelyn Thomson Ohio State University Page 1 XFT Status CDF Trigger Workshop, 17 August 2000 l XFT Hardware status l XFT Integration tests at B0, including:
Large GEM test beam November 2012 C. Armaingaud, J. Merlin, S. Colafranceschi, A. Marinov Y. Maghrbi, P. Barria, S. Salva.
1 Timing of the calorimeter monitoring signals 1.Introduction 2.LED trigger signal timing * propagation delay of the broadcast calibration command * calibration.
1 The Scintillation Tile Hodoscope (SciTil) ● Motivation ● Event timing/ event building/ software trigger ● Conversion detection ● Charged particle TOF.
Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives
ETD meeting Architecture and costing On behalf of PID group
RPC – status / results Blanco On behalf of HADES RPC Group
Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva
Commissioning and Calibration Strategies for Micromegas Vertex Tracker
Proposal for Experiments
Timing/Synchronization Status
FURTHER STUDIES ON COMMISSIONING DATA
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
PADME L0 Trigger Processor
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
eXtremely Fast Tracker; An Overview
TPC status - Offline Q&A
HCAL Configuration Issues
Conceptual design of TOF and beam test results
Regional Cal. Trigger Milestone: Production & Testing Complete
CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies
Deng Ziyan Jan 10-12, 2006 BESIII Collaboration Meeting
2003 test beam with 25 ns bunched muons
Test of Link and Control Boards with LHC like beam, CERN, May 2003
Sector Processor Status Report
Global Trigger Finds Correct BX
Plans for the 2004 CSC Beam Test
Presentation transcript:

Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Clk_ch2 Clk_ch1 L1A global L1A _ch T0+T0r TOF (ch, track) Absolute time t 25 ns L1A _ch L1A global T0+T0r TDC (ch,layer,cell) = TOF (track,ch,layer,cell) +[Tdrift(ch,layer,cell) +wire_p(trak(j)] + T0(ch,layer,cell)-{[Clk_ch(ch)+T0r(ch,rob)]+ Phase(ch) } +K+ *25ns

What is recorded in the TDC is : TDC (ch,layer,cell) = TOF (trak,ch,layer,cell) +[Tdrift(ch,layer,cell) +wire_p(trak(j)] + T0(ch,layer,cell)-{[Clk_ch(ch)+T0r(ch,rob)]+ Phase(ch) } +K+ *25ns TOF is different from chamber to chamber and from track to track since the path length can be different due to the curvature (momentum and B) and position in the chamber. In principle it can be computed once we have the track parameters. In simulation it is known . Clk_ch(ch) takes into account the possible different clock phase It is fixed and due to ‘cables from the TTRX to the Mini Crate of a chamber ‘. T0r(ch,rob) takes into account the different cables length of the clock distribution to each ROB inside the Mini Crate(there are 7-10 rob/ch and it is 1-2 ns for phi robs and 10 ns for theta robs). Values from the information of the Test Pulses data. T0(ch,layer,cell) contains the behavior of the Front End electronics. Phase(ch) is the delay adjustment of the clock in each Mini Crate in order to maximize the Local Trigger efficiency. It can vary from run to run ; it is written in the condition Data Base .It is the parameter to be set chamber by chamber and can, in principle, varies ( it depends on the chamber data i.e. HV, gas, etc etc ). K(ch) is a fix number of bx which defines the dimension of the window read out from the tdc data.Only data of the TDC in a defined window ( K++K-*25ns units) around a required bx will be output.

Data analysis: Up to now we just used one chamber so ‘TOF - Clk_ch’ was computed directly from the data : it is the T0 computed from the MeanTime and the Time box (see CMS NOTE 2004/001 , CMS NOTE-2003/007 etc). In these data the information were recorded in Caen TDC ; only on the Test Beam 2003 and 2004 we used the Mini Crate read out. In these Test Beam anyway the spot of the beam was very narrow so few elements of the Mini Crate were involved . In the Test Beam 2004 the TOF and the Clk_ch had started to play a role. In the cosmic data at LNL with 2 chamber the Clk_ch , TOF and the wire_propagation(trak(j)) are important. Simulation of the DIGI: Up to now in the simulation it was assumed that each chamber has Clk_ch = TOF of infinite momentum track normal to the chamber So it was simulated a the situation with all the detector already tuned in their best possible shape. That should be correct for physics predictions . But we need these parameters if, with the program of ORCA, we want to simulate real data. If we want indeed to simulate the different conditions of data taken at Test Beam or cosmic ray data and the situation at the magnet test we need to include all the parameter listed above.

TDC (ch,layer,cell) = TOF (ch,layer,cell) - Simulation ( new) : TDC (ch,layer,cell) = TOF (ch,layer,cell) - {[Clk_ch(ch) +T0cl(ch,rob) ]}+ +Phase(ch) } + T0(ch,layer,cell) +[Tdrift(ch,layer,cell) +w_delay(trak(j)] +K(ch) *25ns The trigger emulator will use the data information of the TDC subtracting from the data ‘K+ *25ns ‘ and ‘T0cl(ch,rob) ‘ ; the Phase(ch) will be used in the algorithm. The values of ‘T0(ch,layer,cell) + T0cl(ch,rob)’ are computed from the test pulses data ie from TP(ch,layer,cell) . In the DAQ output data format we may see the dependence as TP(DDU,Ros,Rob,tdc#,chan#). The computation of T0cl(ch,rob) can be performed from the dependence of the TP on the DDU,Ros,Rob numbers. Actually from the Test Pulse data collected with the TDC and with the new Mini Crates, the Front End behavior the spread of the T0(ch,layer,cell) is around 1 ns showing that the cabling in the Mini crate is done very accurately. The spread of the T0cl(ch,rob).

Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Clk + Phase Clk Phase Clk_ch1 L1_local L1A _ch T0+T0r TOF (ch, track) L1A _ch 25 ns Clk + Phase Clk Phase L1_local Absolute time t T0+T0r TDC (ch,layer,cell) = TOF (ch,layer,cell) +[Tdrift(ch,layer,cell) +wire_p(trak(j)] + T0(ch,layer,cell)-{[Clk_ch(ch)+T0r(ch,rob)]+ Phase(ch) } +K+ *25ns

Local TS Syncronisation Drift-time+wirePropagation Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Local TS Syncronisation Clk + TS Phase Clk_ ch2 Clk Phase Clk_ch1 TOF (ch, track) 25 ns LT_out TS Sector Collector output/ input Track Finder TS LocalTrigger Mini Crate output FE input & BTI ( phase=0)

Local Trigger Syncronisation Drift-time+wirePropagation Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Local Trigger Syncronisation Clk + TS Phase Clk_ ch2 Clk Phase Clk_ch1 TOF (ch, track) 25 ns LT_out TS Sector Collector output/ input Track Finder TS LocalTrigger Mini Crate output FE input & BTI ( phase=0)

Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Clk_ch2 Clk_ch1 L1A global L1A _ch T0+T0r TOF (ch, track) Absolute time t 25 ns L1A _ch L1A global T0+T0r TDC (ch,layer,cell) = TOF (track,ch,layer,cell) +[Tdrift(ch,layer,cell) +wire_p(trak(j)] + T0(ch,layer,cell)-{[Clk_ch(ch)+T0r(ch,rob)]+ Phase(ch) } +K+ *25ns