Production of 3D silicon pixel sensors at FBK for the ATLAS IBL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
of Single-Type-Column 3D silicon detectors
Advertisements

P. Fernández-Martínez – Optimized LGAD Periphery25 th RD50 Workshop, CERN Nov Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica.
Giulio Pellegrini 4th SILC Collaboration Meeting, Dec. 2006, Barcelona, Spain Giulio Pellegrini 4th SILC Collaboration Meeting, Dec. 2006,
Test of Pixel Sensors for the CMS experiment Amitava Roy Purdue University.
MEMs Fabrication Alek Mintz 22 April 2015 Abstract
20th RD50 Workshop (Bari)1 G. PellegriniInstituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona G. Pellegrini, C. Fleta, M. Lozano, D. Quirion, Ivan Vila, F. Muñoz.
Status and outlook of the Medipix3 TSV project
Fabrication of Active Matrix (STEM) Detectors
Fabian Hügging – University of Bonn – February WP3: Post processing and 3D Interconnection M. Barbero, L. Gonella, F. Hügging, H. Krüger and.
Dahee Kim (Ewha womans university) for MPC-EX collaboration TEST OF MINI-PAD SILICON SENSOR FOR PHENIX MPC-EX.
Development of n-in-p planar pixel sensors with active edge for the ATLAS High-Luminosity Upgrade L. Bosisio* Università degli Studi di Trieste & INFN.
P. Riedler- GGT Meeting 3/4/20061 Status of Sensor Irradiation and Bump Bonding P. Riedler, G. Stefanini P. Dalpiaz, M. Fiorini, F. Petrucci.
SILICON DETECTORS PART I Characteristics on semiconductors.
3D-FBK pixel sensors with CMS readout: first tests results M. Obertino, A. Solano, A. Vilela Pereira, E. Alagoz, J. Andresen, K. Arndt, G. Bolla, D. Bortoletto,
Summary of CMS 3D pixel sensors R&D Enver Alagoz 1 On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration 1 Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Top Down Manufacturing
Silicon detector processing and technology: Part II
16 sept G.-F. Dalla BettaSCIPP Maurizio Boscardin a, Claudio Piemonte a, Alberto Pozza a, Sabina Ronchin a, Nicola Zorzi a, Gian-Franco Dalla Betta.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory NU Status-1 JAB 11/20/2015 Advanced Photodiode Development 7 April, 2000 James A. Burns ll.mit.edu.
16th April 2008R. Bates Glasgow University Experience with an industrial vendor in the manufacture of 3D detectors R. Bates, C. Fleta, D. Pennicard, C.
Communications G. Darbo – INFN / Genova IBL MB#15, 5 October 2009 o Bump Bonding Selex / INFN Roma, October, 30 th 2009 G. Darbo - INFN / Genova.
CERN, November 2005 Claudio Piemonte RD50 workshop Claudio Piemonte a, Maurizio Boscardin a, Alberto Pozza a, Sabina Ronchin a, Nicola Zorzi a, Gian-Franco.
Simulations of 3D detectors
Report on CMS 3D sensor tests Enver Alagoz 1 On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration 1 Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
9 th “Trento” Workshop on Advanced Silicon Radiation Detectors Genova, February 26-28, 2014 Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica.
Ljubljiana, 29/02/2012 G.-F. Dalla Betta Surface effects in double-sided silicon 3D sensors fabricated at FBK at FBK Gian-Franco Dalla Betta a, M. Povoli.
3D sensors for tracking detectors: present and future applications C. Gemme (INFN Genova) Vertex 2013, Lake Starnberg, Germany, September 2013 Outline:
ICT 1 SINTEF Edge-On Sensor with Active Edge Fabricated by 3D-Technology T. E. Hansen 1), N. Ahmed 1), A. Ferber 2) 1) SINTEF MiNaLab 2) SINTEF Optical.
Giulio Pellegrini 27th RD50 Workshop (CERN) 2-4 December 2015 Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona 1 Status of.
FBK 3D CMS pixel sensors preliminary lab measurements E. Alagoz 1, A. Krzywda 1, D. Bortoletto 1, I. Shipsey 1, G. Bolla 1, and G. F. Dalla Betta 2, M.
Claudio Piemonte Firenze, oct RESMDD 04 Simulation, design, and manufacturing tests of single-type column 3D silicon detectors Claudio Piemonte.
Sabina Ronchin 1, Maurizio Boscardin 1, Nicola Zorzi 1, Gabriele Giacomini 1, Gian-Franco Dalla-Betta 2, Marco Povoli 3, Alberto Quaranta 2 ; Giorgio Ciaghi.
Latest news on 3D detectors IRST CNM IceMos. CNM 2 wafers fabricated Double side processing with holes not all the way through, (aka Irst) n-type bulk.
Giulio Pellegrini Actividades 3D G. Pellegrini, C. Fleta, D. Quirion, JP Balbuena, D. Bassignana.
ICT 1 Pixel 2008 International Workshop, FNAL September 23-26, 2008 T. E. Hansen a, A. Kok a, C. Da’Via b, T. A. Hansen a, J. Hasi b, C. Kenney d, N. Lietaer.
Journée simulations du réseau semiconducteurs TCAD simulations of edgeless pixel sensors aimed at HL-LHC Marco Bomben – LPNHE, Paris.
R&D Pixel Phase-2 CMS INFN Activities Update Marco Meschini on behalf of Bari, Firenze, Milano B., Perugia, Pisa, Torino CMS Tracker Week, Phase-2 pixel,
R&D Pixel Phase-2 CMS INFN Activities Update Marco Meschini on behalf of Bari, Firenze, Milano B., Perugia, Pisa, Torino CMS Tracker Week, Phase-2 pixel,
Giulio Pellegrini 12th RD50 - Workshop on Radiation hard semiconductor devices for very high luminosity colliders, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2-4 June 2008 Report.
Manchester, 24/02/2010 G.-F. Dalla Betta The common floor-plan of the ATLAS IBL 3D sensor prototypes Gian-Franco Dalla Betta (Univ. Trento and INFN) for.
Development of N-in-P Silicon Strip and Pixel sensors for very high radiation environments Y. Unno For the Collaboration of KEK, Univ. Tsukuba and Hamamatsu.
Sensors Pixel dimension 300 x 300 μm2 Standard p-in-n sensors
Process integration 2: double sided processing, design rules, measurements
New Mask and vendor for 3D detectors
Axel König, HEPHY Vienna
Available detectors in Liverpool
Characterization and modelling of signal dynamics in 3D-DDTC detectors
3D/Active edge sensors with FBK
Simplified process flow for bonding interface characterization
Preliminary results from 3D CMS Pixel Detectors
FBK / INFN Roma, November , 17th 2009 G. Darbo - INFN / Genova
Summary of discussion in 3D Design Group during ITk Week
First production of Ultra-Fast Silicon Detectors at FBK
Development of n-in-p Silicon Planar Pixel Sensors and flip-chip modules for very high radiation environment Y. Unno For Y. Unnoa*, Y. Ikegamia, S. Teradaa,
Status of 3D detector fabrications at CNM
Irradiation and annealing study of 3D p-type strip detectors
Alternative process flows for reduction of steps
Bonding interface characterization devices
Highlights of Atlas Upgrade Week, March 2011
Sensor Wafer: Final Layout
Thin Planar Sensors for Future High-Luminosity-LHC Upgrades
EENP2 Silicon Detectors.
Report from CNM activities
Lecture #25 OUTLINE Device isolation methods Electrical contacts to Si
Presentazione Nuovo Progetto Gr. V (ACTIVE - Call 2014)
New UK-Planar Pixel mask
Enhanced Lateral Drift (ELAD) sensors
3D sensors: status and plans for the ACTIVE project
Possible types of Si-sensor: SILICON CALORIMETRY FOR A LINEAR COLLIDER G.Bashindzhagyan, Il Park August Silicon sensor.
Fabrication of 3D detectors with columnar electrodes of the same doping type Sabina Ronchina, Maurizio Boscardina, Claudio Piemontea, Alberto Pozzaa, Nicola.
Presentation transcript:

Production of 3D silicon pixel sensors at FBK for the ATLAS IBL Alvise Bagolinia, Maurizio Boscardin a, Gian-Franco Dalla Bettab, Gabriele Giacominia, Francesca Mattedia, Marco Povolib, Nicola Zorzia a Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK-CMM) Italy b INFN and University of Trento, Italy

3D silicon pixel sensor production The layout has been developed in the in the framework of the ATLAS 3D Sensor Collaboration FE-I4 (8x) FE-I3 (9x) CMS (3x) test structures 3D_DDTC with passing-through columns technology was used for the first production oriented to the ATLAS insertable B-Layer

Layout details of a FE_I4 sensor Ohmic Side Junction side 50 µm 125 µm FE-I4 sensor  80 x 336 pixels dead area of 200 mm

3D-DTC with passing through columns n+ col. Column depth equal to the wafer thickness, etched from both sides Full double side process Surface isolation with p-spray on both sides No support wafer Columns (~12 µm diam.) are “empty”, doped by thermal diffusion and passivated by SiO2 Edge protection in order to improve the mechanical yield p-sub t p-spray p+ col. edge protection

Main technological aspects Optimization of DRIE recipe for holes with higher aspect ratio in order to improve the uniformity of the etch rate throughout the process. Optimization of edge protection in order to increase the mechanical yield after DRIE etching reduce the wafer bowing and consequently the leakage current

Optimize DRIE recipe for holes with higher aspect ratio Etch stop for DRIE etching

Optimize edge protection Mechanical fragility of wafers manly due to a cracks on the wafer edge caused by D-RIE etch step: Need a special edge protection during DRIE etching (electrostatic clamping) to prevent the creation of cracks that could cause the breakage during the processing. Need a special care during processing Mechanical yield with the optimized edge protection:   initial wafers broken wafers mechanical yield (%) 3D ATLAS 10 25 5 80% 3D ATLAS 11 3 88% 3D ATLAS 12 23 6 74% 3D ATLAS 13 20 8 60%

Optimize edge protection: wafer bowing Edge protection effects on the wafer bowing. A high bowing induces High leakage current Misalignment among columns Bonding problem Old edge protection  wafers warp up to 120 µm Optimized edge protection  wafers warp < 30 µm 3D_ATLAS10

Wafer bowing: leakage current The wafer bowing strongly influences the leakage current. With the optimized edge protection it is reduced of one order of magnitude. Leakage current on planar test diodes (4mm2) Old edge protection Optimized edge protection

Wafer bowing: Column alignment left side center right side old edge protection misalignment of a several μm optimized edge protection layer Misalignment < 5μm

Temporary metal for electrical characterization The temporary metal shorts 336 pixels together in a strip Allows to perform electrical tests on the FE-I4 pixel sensors before bump-bonding The IV characteristics of 80 strips form a FE-I4 pixel sensor 336 pixels ( 2 electrodes per pixel) 80 strip

Temporary Metal: IV characteristics The IV characteristics of 80 strips of two sensors The IV characteristics of FE-I4 pixel sensor as a sum of 80 IV strips curves

VBD and Ileak of the FE-I4 strips Good uniformity from batch to batch related to the 80 strips of each detector

Yield on Selected Wafers (%) Numbers of production 4 production batches Batch Tested Wafers Selected Wafers Total Sensors Number of Good Sensors Yield on Selected Wafers (%) 3D ATLAS 10 20 12 96 58 60% 3D ATLAS 11 11 4 32 14 44% 3D ATLAS 12 16 13 104 63 61% 3D ATLAS 13 15 47% Selected wafers  at least 3 FE-I4 sensors qualified Selection criteria before bump-bonding: Vdepl ≤ 15V and Vop ≥ Vdepl +10V I (Vop) < 2mA per tile Vbd > 25V [I (Vop) / I(Vop – 5V)] < 2

Problem Investigation on 3D_Atlas11 Litho n+ on junction side Problem with resist adhesion Low final yield

Conclusion Outlook Upgrade to 6 inch FBK has developed and optimized the technology used for the production of Si-3D pixel sensors for the ATLAS IBL with a relatively good yield. Outlook advantages Production capability = double the wafers area DRIE upgrade with a thin ceramic edge protection = increasing of the mechanical yield Upgrade to 6 inch disadvantage We have to learn how to process a thin wafers