Sara Eddy Fisheries Protection Program Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Colville Confederated Tribes and the Okanagan Nation Fisheries Commission.
Advertisements

Planning for fish bearing waters between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead.
Meadowbank Gold Project Cumberland Resources Ltd. Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut March 30, 2006.
1 Environment Canada Environnement Canada Bill C-5, Species at Risk Act November 2002.
Species at Risk Act : K O D A K January 7, 2004 Implications for Pacific Fisheries.
Consultation Under the Endangered Species Act Garwin Yip, NOAA Fisheries Service, Southwest Region.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Amendments to Part 182: Endangered Species Regulations.
Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Baker Lake, NU March 2-14,
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Briefing on Proposed Amendments to Endangered Species Regulations.
Hamlet of Rankin Inlet Type A Water Licence Application Role of Fish Habitat Management Fisheries and Oceans Canada Eastern Arctic Region Rankin Inlet.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
MNR’s Role February 6 th, 2014 Presented by Kerry Reed, Species at Risk Biologist 1.
Intersection of the Magnuson Stevens Act with the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act Roger Williams University School of Law November.
Endangered Species Act
Environmental Law CLN4U.
South March Highlands Blanding’s Turtle Conservation Needs Assessment March 18, 2013.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
SPECIES AT RISK LAW FEBRUARY 26, Species Extinction Species extinctions occurring at 1000 times the natural rate Habitat loss is the primary cause.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 (ESA) Larsen Schlachter Per. 3.
Biological Opinions & Endangered Species Act Consultation – A “How To” Guide for Working with Agencies on ESA Issues MATTHEW A. LOVE Partner- Seattle,
1 Risk Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation. “Consideration of Design and Construction of Culverts for Fish Passage: A Risk Assessment Approach” 2.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
The Lesser Prairie Chicken Has Been Listed As Threatened: Now What!? The Lesser Prairie Chicken Has Been Listed As Threatened: Now What!? Jim Jones Power.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
Newmont Mining Corporation Mineral Development Advisory Group Meeting Fisheries and Oceans Canada October 26 th to 28 th, 2010 Cambridge Bay, Nunavut.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fish Habitat Management Program Intervention to the Nunavut Water Board on the Doris North Gold Project Cambridge Bay August.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
Species At Risk Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Legislation - Update on Status Bill C-5 currently before the Senate Has been given 1st and 2nd readings Bill.
Fisheries Protection Program: An overview November
Environmental Law CLN4U. Environmental Law  Environmental protection in Canada is not within the exclusive jurisdiction of any one level of government.
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.
THE SPECIES AT RISK ACT (SARA) CBA/Justice National Section Meeting National Environmental Energy Resources Law Group Ottawa – October 24, 2004.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
Puget Sound Salmon Hatcheries April 2003 Puget Sound Salmon Hatchery Management Decision Making ESA & NEPA Processes Independent Scientific Review Process.
NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion for Water Supply, Flood Control Operations & Channel Maintenance by the Army Corps, SCWA, and.
TOWARDS A COMMON GOAL Coordinating actions under the Clean Water Act (FWPCA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
National Flood Insurance Program ESA Consultation for Online Information Sessions May 11 th and 12 th 2016 Oregon.
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
Endangered Species Act (Section 7) Consultation In Federal Land Management Agencies American Chemical Society National Meeting Boston, Mass. August 2015.
Habitat Conservation Planning In Collier County: Challenges and Opportunities Trust Resources South Florida Ecological Services Office - Vero Beach Spencer.
FL Endangered Species Devils Hole Pupfish. FL Manatee atee-endangered-species-feat/
Oil Spill Response and the Endangered Species Act RRT IX Meeting Oakland, California June 28, 2012 Elizabeth Petras- National Marine Fisheries Service,
California WaterFix Aquatic Science Peer Review Sacramento, California April 5, 2016.
Indiana Bats, Fire, and the Endangered Species Act Sue Cameron US Fish & Wildlife Service April 16, 2013.
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting Cambridge Bay, NU January 28-29,
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 12-14,
Back River Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 25-30,
REVIEW OF THE FISHERIES ACT Major changes & preliminary issues
Draft Environmental Assessment Report for Bradley International Airport October 2016
Ontario’s Drainage Legislation
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Final ESA Listing Determination for Nassau Grouper
Endangered Species Act
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
One Perspective on an effort to improve the implementation of the Endangered Species Act David Bernhardt.
Drainage 101 – Council Educational Session
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Canadian Navigable Waters Act
Endangered Species Act of 1973
Endangered Species.
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Presentation transcript:

Sara Eddy Fisheries Protection Program Fisheries and Oceans Canada Review of Projects in Redside Dace Habitat under the Fisheries Act and Species at Risk Act Sara Eddy Fisheries Protection Program Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Key SARA protection clauses SARA Prohibitions Sec. 32. Individual Organisms No killing, harming, harassing, buying, collecting, selling of extirpated, endangered or threatened species (Schedule 1) Sec. 33. Residences Only for species to which the concept of residence applies Not yet defined for any aquatic species in Ontario Sec. 58. Critical Habitat Prohibits destruction of Critical Habitat once defined in a recovery strategy or action plan

When are SARA Permits Issued? May be issued when: Activity is for scientific research Activity benefits the species Affecting the species is incidental to the activity The following pre-conditions are met: All reasonable alternatives have been considered Impacts will be minimized The activity will not jeopardize survival or recovery of the species

Distribution of Federally Listed Aquatic SAR in Ontario Currently 32 SARA-listed, aquatic species at risk in Ontario 21 fishes 11 mussels

Redside Dace – Ontario Distribution Lake Huron Two Tree Saugeen Gully South Gully Lake Erie Irvine Creek Lake Ontario Spencer Bronte 14 Mile 16 Mile Credit Humber Don Rouge Duffins Carruther’s Lynde Holland River * Exist in 17 watersheds - extirpated in 8

Fisheries Act Serious Harm: Fish Habitat: The death of fish or any permanent alteration to, or destruction of, fish habitat Fish Habitat: spawning grounds and any other areas, including nursery, rearing, food supply and migration areas, on which fish depend directly or indirectly in order to carry out their life processes Section 35(1) Prohibition for Serious Harm No person shall carry on any work, undertaking or activity that results in serious harm to fish that are part of a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery, or to fish that support such a fishery

DFO’s Integrated Regulatory Review DFO guidance on “Projects Near Water” website: www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/pnw-ppe/index-eng.html Contact DFO in Ontario at: Fisheries Protection Program Fisheries and Oceans Canada 867 Lakeshore Road Burlington, Ontario L7S 1A1 Telephone: 1-855-852-8320 Email: FisheriesProtection@dfo-mpo.gc.ca

DFO’s Integrated Regulatory Review Proponents determine whether aquatic SAR are present Then review FA/SARA self-assessment criteria and measures - does DFO need to review the project? Note new Species at Risk considerations for Project Activity Types and Measures to Avoid Harm If required, proponent submits a Request for Review to Fisheries Protection Program (FPP) Triage unit

LOA & SARA Permit Proponent submits Request for Review Triage staff review and conclude SARA s.32 applies, but no FA “serious harm” Project involves fish salvage (development related) Need to be in compliance with SARA s.32 Send to Regulatory Review for SARA permit & LOA Example: dewatering for new culvert placement

FA Authorization or SARA-Compliant Authorization Regulatory Review staff review and conclude: FA s.35(1) “serious harm” only – issue FA Authorization SARA s.32 “harm” only, or with FA “serious harm” – consult with DFO SAR Biologist and OMNRF to determine whether to issue SARA-compliant FA Authorization Completeness of application Conduct consultation with Indigenous groups as required

Existing files For existing projects for which an LOA or Authorization has been issued, need to ensure compliance with SARA Proponent is to submit a SARA permit application and provide information on alternatives and mitigation measures related to the project

SARA Registry All SARA permits and SARA Compliant Fisheries Act Authorizations are posted on the SARA Public Registry Purpose, description, locations, species, pre-conditions (alternatives and mitigation measures) http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/sar/permit/permits_e.cfm

General coordination principles (DFO/MNRF) Coordinate with MNRF for streamlined approach avoiding duplication Each legislation requires separate approvals DFO integrating SARA reviews under Fisheries Act Regular communication to discuss projects and coordination Intent to align regulatory requirements for consistency of review and approvals DFO maps = ESA mapping (for Redside Dace)

New Aquatic SAR Maps Webpage Photo by G. Coker

Instructions on Use

NEW MAP

Determine Species Present

Questions? We would now be pleased to address any questions you have or provide further clarification.