Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Advertisements

The Belle Silicon Vertex Detector T. Tsuboyama (KEK) 6 Dec Workshop New Hadrons with Various Flavors 6-7 Dec Nagoya Univ.
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
The trigger1 The Trigger YETI 7th January 2008 Emily Nurse Outline: Why do we need a Trigger? The trigger system at CDF Rate control at CDF Triggering.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
Electroweak Physics at the Tevatron Adam Lyon / Fermilab for the DØ and CDF collaborations 15 th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics June 2004.
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.
EPS 2003, July 19, 2003David Buchholz, Northwestern University Performance of the D0 Experiment in Run II Detector Commissioning and Performance Accelerator,
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
Nick Hadley Run II Physics (I) Nick Hadley The University of Maryland New Perspectives 2000 Fermilab - June 28, 2000.
Scientific Highlights : CDF Experiment 1.Introduction 2.CDF Run-II detector 3.Phyiscs highlights B Physics, Top, Higgs, … to be continued by Rob October.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
University of Athens, Physics Department Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics & IASA HEP Workshop, Athens, April 17 th 2003 Nikos Giokaris CDF & TEVATRON.
June 28, 2002BEACH2002 B Physics at the Tevatron B Physics at the Tevatron Jack Cranshaw Texas Tech University For the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
CDF Experiment in JFY2002 Shin-Hong Kim (University of Tsukuba) May 30, 2003 at KEK.
Collider Detector at Fermilab Sung-hyun chang High Energy Physics lab. KNU.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
FNAL Users’ Meeting, 06/02/03, p. 1 Top and Electroweak Results from CDF Igor Volobouev LBNL for the CDF Collaboration.
CDF Status and Prospects for Run 2 Tara Shears. Introduction Accelerator / detector overview: Tevatron overview CDF overview Luminosity Physics prospects.
Beautiful B Physics at the Tevatron IOP HEPP half day meeting Results From the Tevatron Imperial College London, 21 September 2005 Rick Jesik Imperial.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
Fermilab Users Meeting June R.J. Tesarek Fermilab CDF 2002 Toward Physics Richard J. Tesarek Fermilab For the CDF Collaboration.
Aurelio Juste (Fermilab) Rencontres de Moriond, March OUTLINE Tevatron Run 2 The upgraded DØ Detector Status Performance First Physics Results Outlook.
B Masses and Lifetimes at the Tevatron Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba Duke University.
Searching for New Matter with the D0 Experiment Todd Adams Department of Physics Florida State University September 19, 2004.
SVT Nov 7, 2002Luciano Ristori - Vertex2002_7Nov02.ppt1 SVT The CDF Silicon Vertex Trigger Vertex 2002 Luciano Ristori Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.
April 5, 2003Gregory A. Davis1 Jet Cross Sections From DØ Run II American Physical Society Division of Particles and Fields Philadelphia, PA April 5, 2003.
CDF Status and Prospects for Run 2 Tara Shears. Introduction Accelerator / detector overview: Tevatron overview CDF overview Luminosity Physics prospects.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
First physics results with the Silicon Vertex Trigger at CDF-II 2 nd Workshop on the CKM Unitarity triangle. April 5 th -9 th IPPP Durham, England, UK.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
IVth LHC Symposium, May 1-3, FermilabJianming Qian, University of Michigan Snapshot of Tevatron collider CDF detector DØ detector & First Run II.
Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool For the CDF collaboration EPS 2003, Aachen, Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Photonic Final.
DOE REVIEW AUGUST 2006: CDF GROUP AT HARVARD MELISSA FRANKLIN - PROF JOAO GUIMARAES DA COSTA---PROF 25% SEBASTIAN GRINSTEIN - POST-DOC DANIEL SHERMAN -
The Collider Detector at Fermilab (aka CDF) Jennifer Pursley Intermediate Seminar Oct. 28, 2003.
Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states PANIC th -14 th November 2008, Eilat, ISRAEL A.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
A.RuizBEACH2000 CP Violation and B-mixing in CDF-II IV International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons June, 27-30, 2000 Valencia,Spain.
The Tevatron’s Run 2 Physics Program Al Goshaw Duke University and Fermilab PHENO 2001 Madison May 8, 2001.
Richard J. Tesarek Fermilab For the CDF Collaboration
More technical description:
14 paesi, 62 universita’ e laboratori
Deep Inelastic Scattering 2006
First CDF Run II Results
Inclusive and dijet b productions at CDF
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
Yuri Gershtein for the DØ collaboration
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Top Quark a particle odyssey Todd Huffman University of Oxford
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Top quark production cross section Top quark mass measurement
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001 Status of CDF-II Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001 Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Outline 2001: Run II has begun Last collisions were in 1996 Goals for Run II What’s new in the CDF experiment How are things working so far Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 Goals of CDF in Run II Physics Goals: Understanding electroweak symmetry breaking - Higgs Boson Study CP violation and CKM Matrix in B system - sin2b, BS mixing Precision Electroweak Physics – W Boson, Dibosons Top physics – top quark properties, single top production Searches for new phenomena – SUSY, Large Extra Dimensions, … Detector Capabilities Handle 132 ns crossing rate Integrated tracking system Precision vertex information Ability to trigger on secondary vertices, hadronic B decays Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 CDF-II Experiment Detectors retained from CDF Run I Central, wall calorimeters Central, extension muon detectors New in Run II Tracking Systems Silicon tracking system Central Outer Tracker End plug calorimeter Cerenkov Luminosity Monitor Forward muon detectors Scintillator time of flight Front-end electronics (132 ns) Pipelined trigger, DAQ All new software MUON CHAMBERS(CMP) CMX COT .5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 END WALL HADRON CAL. Inner silicon 6 layers 3 30 SOLENOID Intermediate silicon 1 or 2 layers = 1.0 = 2.0 n END PLUG EM CALORIMETER END PLUG HADRON CALORIMETER = 3.0 m EM CALORIMETER HAD CALORIMETER TOF MUON CHAMBERS(CMU) Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 CDF-II Detector MUON CHAMBERS(CMP) Solenoid retained from Run I New drift chamber(COT) 96 layers 3d silicon tracking 7 layers in central region 8 layers in forward Scintillating tile plug calorimeter covers to |h|=3.6 CMX COT .5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 END WALL HADRON CAL. Inner silicon 6 layers 3 30 SOLENOID Intermediate silicon 1 or 2 layers = 1.0 = 2.0 n END PLUG EM CALORIMETER END PLUG HADRON CALORIMETER = 3.0 m EM CALORIMETER HAD CALORIMETER TOF MUON CHAMBERS(CMU) Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Silicon Detector (Side View) Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 Data taken with CDF-II CDF rolled in early September 2000 for the commissioning run Prototype silicon (60o), ~65% COT electronics coverage 5 stores 10/3/00 – 11/4/00, 1p x 8pbar and 36p x 36pbar Peak luminosity ~ 1029 CDF rolled back in February 2001 for the start of Run II 2 1p x 8pbar stores 4/3/01-4/5/01 Peak Luminosity ~ 1028 1 36p x 36pbar store 4/27/01 Peak luminosity ~ 1030 ~10 nb-1 written to tape Latest running started last Thursday Data used extensively to evaluate performance Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 CDF Detector Roll-In Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Calorimeter, Shower Max Extension, Forward Muon CDF-II Status (June 1) Sub-system Instrumented Operational Luminosity Monitor 100% Silicon : L00,SVX ISL 95% 67% COT Calorimeter, Shower Max Central Muon Extension, Forward Muon 90%, 50% Time-of-Flight 8% Level-1 Level-2 80% commissioning Level-3 developing filters Data Logging full rate (20 Mb / sec) Offline being tuned with data Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 COT Performance COT Event Display Single Hit Resolution s ~ 200mm (Goal 180mm) -0.2 cm 0.2 cm Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 COT Performance Conversions Some Simple Measurements: (commissioning run data, Level 3 tracking) Ks  p+p- m = 499 ± 0.2(stat) MeV/c2 L  p+p- m = 1116 ± 0.1(stat) MeV/c2 Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Silicon Performance: Beam Line Impact parameter (d0) will show a sinusoidal f-dependence if the true beamspot is different from the nominal Plot d0 vs. f, fit beamspot Compare: Offline silicon tracks Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) Runs online Used in Level 2 Secondary Vertex Trigger True Beamspot d0 d0 Nominal Beamspot x=0,y=0 Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Silicon Performance: Beam Line Silicon Online (SVT) d0(cm) f=0 f=360o Silicon Offline d0(cm) f=0 f=360o Offline: x=-1.3mm y=4.1mm SVT : x=-1.5mm y=4.3mm Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

COT Performance: Beam Line COT Offline D0(cm) f=0 f=360o Can do the same thing with COT offline tracks and the XFT hardware tracker For the XFT, a shift in the beamspot can be seen as a shift in the PT bin XFT DPT f=0 f=360o Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Tracking Performance: COT + Silicon COT Outside-In tracking: Start with COT track Extrapolate inward and add silicon hits Compare impact parameter COT only vs. COT+Silicon Corrected for beam offset COT+SVX COT Only Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Calorimeter Performance April Collision Data - 1.1 million events Jet ET (GeV) Jet h New Plug Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Muon System Performance Old muon chambers New reconstruction code Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 Trigger Performance Level 1 Triggering on jets, tracks, electrons, muons, SET, Missing ET XFT Df= 6 mrad (Goal 8 mrad) Level 2 Tagging trigger decision based on jets, SET, Missing ET Decisions made correctly Df(XFT-Offline) Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 Interesting Events 1st W  en Candidate Missing ET 38 GeV Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 Interesting Events 3 Jet Event Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001

Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001 Conclusions 2001: Run II is happening What’s new in the CDF experiment? Almost everything How are things working so far? Excellent When do we expect first results? Summer 2002 Kevin Burkett, FNAL Users' Meeting - June 12, 2001