Update on coincidences

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing Event Reconstruction for CTA R D Parsons (Univ. of Leeds) J Hinton (Univ. of Leicester)
Advertisements

Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Analysis report of SN1006 D.Nishida( Kyoto-Univ.) JPS meeting Autumn 2005 Osaka.
JNM Dec Annecy, France The High Resolution Fly’s Eye John Matthews University of Utah Department of Physics and High Energy Astrophysics Institute.
Air Shower Simulations for ANITA K. Belov UCLA. Goals Approach Estimate the energy of the UHECRs detected by ANITA using MC simulations Use well known.
Cosmic Rays with the LEP detectors Charles Timmermans University of Nijmegen.
AGASA Masahiro Teshima Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany for AGASA collaboration.
Coincidence group report Analysis meeting, 13/04/20151.
Small-Scale Anisotropy Studies with HiRes Stereo Observations Chad Finley and Stefan Westerhoff Columbia University HiRes Collaboration ICRC 2003 Tsukuba,
Update on the new reconstruction software F. Noferini E. Fermi center INFN CNAF EEE Analysis Meeting - 14/09/20151.
Preliminary MC study on the GRAND prototype scintillator array Feng Zhaoyang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China GRAND Workshop, Paris, Feb. 015.
1 Cosmic Rate Overview Rustem DZHELYADIN (CERN&IHEP, Protvino) The Set-up: Scintillating counters HV setting Coincidence adjustment Accidentals.
ESP & Psychic Solar Flare Models
AGASA Results Masahiro Teshima for AGASA collaboration
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
EAS Time Structures with ARGO-YBJ experiment 1 - INFN-CNAF, Bologna, Italy 2 - Università del Salento and INFN Lecce, Italy A.K Calabrese Melcarne 1, G.Marsella.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan Vladimir Vassiliev UCLA.
1. Last measurement of the distances between schools gave following results: G.Ferraris – A.Volta 1.41 km A.Volta – M.D’Azeglio 1.15 km G.Ferraris – M.D’Azeglio.
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
AGASA Results Masahiro Teshima Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany for AGASA collaboration.
Can we detect a marble tomb with cosmic muons ? Corinne Goy, Max Chefdeville, Jean Jacquemier, Yannis Karyotakis 21 December 2015.
APS April Meeting – St. Louis April 14, 2008 Search for Correlations between HiRes Stereo Events and Active Galactic Nuclei Lauren Scott for the HiRes.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
SADE ANITA Monte Carlo(SAM) Test Results Amir Javaid University of Delaware.
SADE ANITA Monte Carlo(SAM) Test Results Amir Javaid University of Delaware.
Jan Ridky and Petr Travnicek Inst. of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague for DELPHI collaboration Muon Bundles from Cosmic Ray Showers Detected.
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Update on the analysis of muon angular distributions in equatorial coordinates F.Riggi Dept. of Physics and INFN, Catania.
Preliminary search for long distance correlations in EEE
Measurement of high energy cosmic rays by the new Tibet hybrid experiment J. Huang for the Tibet ASγCollaboration a a Institute of high energy physics,
Scaling behavior of lateral distribution of electrons in EAS
Update on the new analyzer and more
Relative alignment of LXE and DCH using AIF
Update on Muon Flux Underground Using Geant4 Simulation
Direct Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Spectrum with IceCube
Analysis and paper on chamber and telescope performance
Preparation for CERN test beam
Checks of TOF Fiducial Cuts
The Status of the ARGO Experiment at YBJ
30th International Cosmic Ray Conference
MUPAGE: A fast muon generator
Multicore Cosmic Shower in the ARGO-YBJ experiment
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Telescope Array Experiment Status and Prospects
The arrival of Gravitational Waves and the EEE network:
Run4 f K+K- analysis: analysis train
Monitoring VHE Extragalactic Sources with ARGO-YBJ detector
Preliminary Comparison of Monte Carlo and 9-string IceCube Data
HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs
Investigation of multi-messenger and rare events in EEE
Measure of muon velocity in EEE data
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
_____________________________
Search for coincidences and study of cosmic rays spectrum
Muon's speed determination using DQM database
Search for long distance correlations by selecting multi-tracks events Update n.1 P.La Rocca and F.Riggi.
Status Report on LDC analysis and MultI-track events
Analysis working groups
Search for anomalous EEE
Status report on CATA-01/POLA-01 coincidence measurements
Search for anomalous EEE
Update on POLA-01 measurements in Catania
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

Update on coincidences F. Coccetti, M. Garbini, F. Noferini

Outline Status of coincidence studies after Run-3 Report on the status of all our Clusters Comparison with previous results after: Changes in the analyzers Changes in the Top-Bottom (T-B) distances Results from preliminary study with Corsika MC Energy dependence vs distance in coincs studies Energy dependence vs multi-track events in a single Tel

BOLO-01/BOLO-04 (nov16 – feb17) Standard for all the clusters BOLO-01/BOLO-04 (nov16 – feb17) SETTINGS Analyze output from new Analyzer Input file = coincBOLO_0104n.root School distance = 96.0 m, angle = -160.75 deg School orientation: tel1=277.70 deg, tel2=278.00 deg Max Chi2 = 50 Theta Rel Range = 0.00 - 60.00 deg Range for N sattellite in each run = (tel1) 4 – 10, (tel2) 4 - 10 Min N satellite in a single event = 0 Telescope parameters: BOLO-01: T-B distance:100 cm BOLO-04: T-B distance: 100 cm (120 cm in Run1&2) STATS Good days: 281.8 (62 Run-3) Counts (bin counting): 31090 +/- 320 Rate: 110 +/- 1 (143.6 +/- 2.6 only Run-3) Rate/acc = 197 +/- 4 Acc only Run-3= 0.73 m4 sr Note: before of nov16 old T-B dist (skipped) after feb17 coincs were lost (to be checked)

LODI-01/LODI-02 (jan16 – jun17) SETTINGS Analyze output from new Analyzer Input file = coincLODI_0102n.root School distance = 167.0 m, angle = -106.78 deg School orientation: tel1=250.00 deg, tel2=0.00 deg Max Chi2 = 50 Theta Rel Range = 0.00 - 60.00 deg Range for N sattellite in each run = (tel1) 4 - 10, (tel2) 4 - 10 Min N satellite in a single event = 0 Telescope parameters: LODI-01: T-B distance: 93 cm LODI-02: T-B distance: 104 cm STATS Good days: 99.5 Counts (bin counting): 13460 +/- 200 Rate: 135 +/- 2 Rate/acc = 185 +/- 3 Acc = 0.73 m4 sr Note: angle w.r.t. North has to be provided for LODI-02

LAQU-01/LAQU-02 (feb15 – jun16) SETTINGS Analyze output from new Analyzer Input file = coincLAQU_0102n.root School distance = 204.0 m, angle = -164.05 deg School orientation: tel1=-94.10 deg, tel2=49.10 deg Max Chi2 = 50 Theta Rel Range = 0.00 - 60.00 deg Range for N sattellite in each run = (tel1) 4 - 10, (tel2) 4 - 10 Min N satellite in a single event = 0 Telescope parameters: LAQU-01: T-B distance: 100 cm LAQU-02: T-B distance: 100 cm STATS Good days: 160.7 Counts (bin counting): 1900 +/- 170 Rate: 80.5 +/- 1.3 Rate/acc = 110.2 +/- 1.8 Acc = 0.73 m4 sr Note: after jun16 coincs were lost (to be checked)

GROS-01/GROS-02 (jan17 – jun17) To be checked!!!! GROS-01/GROS-02 (jan17 – jun17) SETTINGS Analyze output from new Analyzer Input file = coincGROS_0102n.root School distance = 418.0 m, angle = 165.88 deg School orientation: tel1=144.74 deg, tel2=289.54 deg Max Chi2 = 50 Theta Rel Range = 0.00 - 60.00 deg Range for N sattellite in each run = (tel1) 4 - 10, (tel2) 4 – 10 Min N satellite in a single event = 0 Telescope parameters: GROS-01: T-B distance: 100-110 cm GROS-02: T-B distance: 100-110 cm STATS Good days: 108.9 Counts (bin counting): 1690 +/- 125 Rate: 15.5+/- 1.2 Rate/acc = 21.2 +/- 1.6 Acc = 0.73 m4 sr Note: before jan17 T-B dists were at 110 cm later rate unstable on GROS-02

CAGL-01/CAGL-02 (oct14 – jun17) SETTINGS Analyze output from new Analyzer Input file = coincCAGL_0102n.root School distance = 520.0 m, angle = 72.19 deg School orientation: tel1=233.00 deg, tel2=100.00 deg Max Chi2 = 50.000000 Theta Rel Range = 0.00 - 60.00 deg Range for N sattellite in each run = (tel1) 4 - 10, (tel2) 4 - 10 Min N satellite in a single event = 0 Telescope parameters: CAGL-01: T-B distance: 100 cm (140 in Run1&2) CAGL-02: T-B distance: 100 cm (140 in Run1&2) STATS Good days: 350.4 Counts (bin counting): 5060 +/- 190 Rate: 12.4 +/- 0.5 (18.4 +/- 1.9 only Run-3) Rate/acc = 25.2 +/- 2.6 Acc only Run-3= 0.73 m4 sr

FRAS-02/FRAS-03 (nov15 – jun16) SETTINGS Analyze output from new Analyzer Input file = coincFRAS_0203n.root School distance = 627.0 m, angle = -124.50 deg School orientation: tel1=178.00 deg, tel2=215.00 deg Max Chi2 = 50 Theta Rel Range = 0.00 - 60.00 deg Range for N sattellite in each run = (tel1) 4 - 10, (tel2) 4 - 10 Min N satellite in a single event = 0 Telescope parameters: FRAS-02: T-B distance: 80 cm FRAS-03: T-B distance: 70 cm STATS Good days: 86.0 Counts (bin counting): 1900 +/- 170 Rate: 22 +/- 2 Rate/acc = 22 +/- 2 Acc = 1.02 m4 sr Note: no coinc in Run-3

TORI-03/TORI-04 (oct15 – jun17) SETTINGS Analyze output from new Analyzer Input file = coincTORI_0304n.root School distance = 1075.0 m, angle = 85.75 deg School orientation: tel1=27.00 deg, tel2=297.00 deg Max Chi2 = 50 Theta Rel Range = 0.00 - 60.00 deg Range for N sattellite in each run = (tel1) 0 - 10, (tel2) 0 - 10 Min N satellite in a single event = 0 Telescope parameters: TORI-03: T-B distance: 100 cm TORI-04: T-B distance: 100 cm STATS Good days: 295.2 Counts (bin counting): 2220 +/- 370 Rate: 7.5 +/- 1.3 Rate/acc = 10.3 +/- 1.7 Acc = 0.73 m4 sr Note: runs with Hytech kept

SAVO-01/SAVO-02 (nov14 – jun17) SETTINGS Analyze output from new Analyzer Input file = coincSAVO_0102n.root School distance = 1182.0 m, angle = -18.90 deg School orientation: tel1=56.00 deg, tel2=170.00 deg Max Chi2 = 50 Theta Rel Range = 0.00 - 60.00 deg Range for N sattellite in each run = (tel1) 4 - 10, (tel2) 4 - 10 Min N satellite in a single event = 0 Telescope parameters: SAVO-01: T-B distance: 92 cm SAVO-02: T-B distance: 87 cm STATS Good days: 394.7 Counts (bin counting): 2430 +/- 420 Rate: 6.2 +/- 1.1 Rate/acc = 7.1 +/- 1.2 Acc = 0.86 m4 sr

Status To be checked SALE-01/SALE-02

Old vs New (new  new analyzer + new T-B dist + Run-3) To be checked

Extrapolation at higher distances F(x) = A e-Bx xC

Corsika simulations INPUT Realistic flux of cosmic rays 1014 < E < 1016 eV T-B distance for all telescopes = 100 cm 11 telescope 200m-spaced No simulation of the material in front of the telescopes

Simulation setup (20 days of cosmic flux) 11 telescopes 200m-spaced to cover from 200m to 2000m Statistics for 200 m  10 pairs  200 days 2000 m 200 m 200 m 200 m 200 m 200 m 200 m 200 m 200 m 200 m 200 m Tel-1 Tel-2 Tel-3 Tel-4 Tel-5 Tel-6 Tel-7 Tel-8 Tel-9 Tel-10 Tel-11 Shower generated randomly: Energy Direction (,) Position core (x,y)

Simulation setup (20 days of cosmic flux) 11 telescopes 200m-spaced to cover from 200m to 2000m Shower generated randomly: Energy Direction (,) Position core (x,y)

Comparison with Corsika sims F(x) = A e-Bx xC Corsika sims Very preliminary!!!!

Mean energy vs distance <E>  2.5 1015 eV Old Corsika simulations New simulations differs by a factor 1.7 w.r.t. older ones (it may be due to low energy cutoff in the newest). In both cases no significant dependence on the distance observed  The shape of the lateral distribution has a small dependence on the energy.

Energy vs multi-track events in a single telescope 20 days x 11 telescopes Track density has a strong dependence on the energy of the primary cosmic ray. Very preliminary!!!!

Combining coincs and multi-track (20 days) x (10 tel pairs at 200m) For pairs with a small distance we could add the multi-track information (very preliminary) Very preliminary!!!!