Identify Top Savings Options

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Advertisements

Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
Budget Hearing South Orange-Maplewood School District March 21, 2013.
Looking ahead to school year
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
1 Oregon Department of Education (ODE) State School Fund Ways & Means Education Sub-Committee March 24, 2003 Pat Burk, Deputy Superintendent Brian Reeder,
Using Metrics to Drive Efficiency Moderator: Ali Mehanti. Business Manager, J. Sterling Morton High School District 201 Presented by: Christine Smith,
Proposed Budget.  Teaching – Regular School  Special Education  Pupil Personnel Services  Revenue  Budget Summary.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Team Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.Need for a District Leadership Implementation Team.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? March 2015 Note: This is one of eight slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
ILP Intervention Plans Tutorial. Intervention Plans in the ILP The Intervention Plan module was added to the ILP in May 2009 to meet requirements of SB.
(c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 School District Budgeting.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Regional School District 13 Board of Education’s Recommended Budget
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
Funding Sources The District receives ongoing revenue from several funding sources General Fund Greatest Flexibility $76,347,543 Ongoing Federal Title.
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
SES Training on Screens 11, 12, and Part of 8. By Steve Crew September 12, 2007.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
1 Measuring Impact Guide This guide is an introduction to assessing the impact and spending effectiveness of your district’s initiatives and the resources.
1 Identify Top Savings Options Step #6. 2 Step 6: Identify Top Savings Options Pay for Priorities By this Step in the process your districts has …  Identified.
Budget Overview March 27, K – 3 Elementary Maintains small class sizes (19-22 students per class) Maintains current level of teaching assistants.
1 Analyze Top Savings Opportunities Step #7. 2 After completing the screening & sizing tools, you may use the Deep Dive tracker to identify the biggest.
What is AYP? AYP stands for Adequate Yearly Progress
End of Year Report: Proposed Changes for FY17 and FY18
Office of School Facilities and Finance
Moving from Reactive to Proactive:
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Local Control Accountability Plan Board of Education June 25, 2015 Alvord Unified School District Students | Teachers | Instructional Content.
Portland Public Schools Proposed Budget
Division of Student Support Services
Measuring Impact Guide
UPDATE: 8/8/2011 Batavia City School District
Budget FY 12 Summary Chelmsford Public Schools
Milford School District
Huntsville Board of Education Presentation
Quarterly Meeting Focus
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
Duxbury Public Schools Fiscal Year 2017 Operating Budget
Supporting Student Success
Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Development
Title I A Comparability Report
Research Program Strategic Plan
Title I, Part A Supplement not Supplant (SNS) Under ESSA
TIIA and IVA in the FY19 ESSA Consolidated Grant Application
Resource Allocation and District Action Reports: RADAR
Award-Winning Strategies for Cost Savings in Districts
Anderson Elementary School
Operating Budget Proposal Update from the Administration
Opportunity Culture Models in
Improve IEP Project IEP Form Improvement Project
PEMBROKE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Resource Allocation and District Action Reports: RADAR
Systemic Student Support (S3) Academy
Bell Times Analysis Task Force Budget
Menands Union Free School District
Additional Staffing Request
Budget.
Wallkill Central School District OPEN HOUSE
Budget Report to NISD Board of Trustees
Schoolwide Programs.
An Introduction to Evaluating Federal Title Funding
REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #16 PROSPECT / BEACON FALLS
2019 – 2020 School Year Budget The Elmont Union Free School District
Presentation transcript:

Identify Top Savings Options

of 31 potential opportunities Pay for Priorities There are 3 steps to identifying high-potential opportunities for resource reallocation A Review full list of 31 potential opportunities B Screen the 31 opportunities to identify the opportunities that are likely to have the highest potential for your district C Conduct “shallow dive” of the 10-15 opportunities with the highest potential for savings At the end of the process, your district will have identified 3-6 high-potential opportunities that will identify sufficient savings to pay for your priorities. More in-depth analysis will still be needed to confirm and operationalize the opportunities.

There are two main types of resource reallocation opportunities Pay for Priorities There are two main types of resource reallocation opportunities A Key Questions Can the district free up funds for its strategic priorities? Can the district increase the impact of current spending at little or no additional cost, thus reducing the need to free up funds for priorities? Cost Savings Options: Screening and Sizing Tool

Pay for Priorities A list of 31 potential opportunities can help reveal opportunities otherwise overlooked A Reducing operational costs Rethinking service delivery models for students who struggle Maximizing revenue Boosting the impact and cost-effectiveness of professional development for teachers Can the district free up funds from general education transportation? Can the district free up funds from energy expenditures? Can the district free up funds from maintenance services? Can the district free up funds from custodial services? Can the district free up funds from food services? Can the district free up funds from classroom and other instructional technology? 7 Can the district address mild special needs differently? Can the district free up funds from paraprofessional positions? Can the district free up funds by increasing the impact of intervention teaching positions? Can the district free up funds from special education teaching positions? Can the district free up funds from speech and language therapist positions? Can the district increase the impact of Title I spending? Can the district free up funds by reducing reliance on out- of-district special education placements? Can the district free up funds by reducing its reliance on alternative schools for students with behavioral challenges? Can the district increase federal Medicaid reimbursement for health- related student services? Can the district free up funds from professional development expenditures? Can the district provide more professional development opportunities for core teachers at little or no additional cost? Can the district increase the impact of the coaching model at little to no additional cost? Can the district free up funds from instructional coaching positions? 1 17 16 8 2 18 3 9 4 19 5 10 20 6 11 12 13 14

Pay for Priorities A list of 31 potential opportunities can help reveal opportunities otherwise overlooked A Examining staffing levels of non-instructional staff Using instructional time more cost-effectively Managing class size 21 Can the district free up funds from central office spending? Can the district free up funds from school-based administrator positions and/or increase the impact of existing positions? Can the district free up funds from clerical support positions? Can the district free up funds from library/media specialist positions and/or increase the impact of existing positions? Can the district free up funds from guidance counselor positions? 26 Can the district free up funds associated with teacher absences? Can the district free up funds from extended school day and/or year programs? Can the district free up funds from blended learning and/or online classes and/or increase the impact at little or no additional cost? Can the district free up funds by managing class sizes differently at the elementary schools? Can the district free up funds by managing class sizes differently at the middle schools? Can the district free up funds by managing class sizes differently at the high schools? 29 27 22 30 23 28 31 24 25 This list is not meant to be comprehensive, but these 31 ideas can help your district identify opportunities that may have otherwise not been considered.

How are the tools scored? Pay for Priorities Conduct a “quick and simple” assessment of all 31 potential opportunities for resource reallocation B What is the goal? This step in the process can help districts consider opportunities that at first glance may not have seemed to have high potential, but are in fact worthy of further investigation What are the tools? A set of 31 Screening Tools will prompt your district to answer a few, straightforward questions that do not require data collection Who should be involved? A wide group of district administrators, including all relevant department heads and well as their "second- in-commands," who have a detailed knowledge of current practices Screening the opportunities should not take longer than a half a day, provided the right people are in the room How long should it take? After completing the Screening Tools, districts will have a score for each opportunity. The score indicates whether or not districts should consider exploring the opportunity further using the Sizing Tools and other analyses. It is not worth completing the Sizing Tool for any opportunity that scores fewer than 50 points. The higher the score, the greater the potential opportunity. Sizing up to 15 of the highest-scoring opportunities should be ample to identify the highest-leverage opportunities How are the tools scored? Cost Savings Options: Screening and Sizing Tool

Pay for Priorities Complete the Screening Tools to identify opportunities that may be relevant and are worthy of further consideration and analysis B Read the notes and instructions carefully Answer straight-forward questions about your district… …And select the score that corresponds to the points for your answer choice Your total score will automatically sum at the bottom of the page The 10-15 highest scoring opportunities should be investigated further using the sizing tools.

Pay for Priorities Conduct a “shallow” dive of the 10-15 opportunities previously identified as high potential using the sizing tools C What is the goal? This step in the process can help identify the 3-6 opportunities that may have the highest potential financial impact for your district What are the tools? Sizing Tools can help your district roughly estimate the financial impact of the 10-15 high-potential opportunities that were identified using the Screening Tools. They can help to create momentum for deeper analysis, especially for opportunities that would otherwise be overlooked due to misconceptions about their potential financial impact. Rough estimates of potential financial impact are based on benchmarking, best practice, and the experiences of other districts who have implemented the opportunities Who should be involved? The Chief Financial Officer should coordinate the shallow dive, seeking input and data from knowledgeable parties (including the action team), as needed The Sizing Tool for each opportunity may take up 2-4 hours to complete, and will require collecting data that is easily accessible for most districts How long should it take? The Sizing Tools can identify opportunities that are worth further analysis, but are not intended to replace a "deep dive." More rigorous analysis is required to confirm the potential financial impact of the most promising opportunities and shed light on how to operationalize the opportunities. Cost Savings Options: Screening and Sizing Tool

Pay for Priorities Complete the Sizing Tools to identify which opportunities are worthy of a “deeper dive,” because they have the highest potential financial impact C Read the notes and instructions carefully Fill in yellow-shaded cells with district data All other cells will automatically update with rough estimates of the potential financial impact of the opportunities Notes at the bottom of the page provide additional caveats and considerations