Lumber Liquidators Chinese Manufactured Laminate Flooring

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
Advertisements

Shibing Deng Pfizer, Inc. Efficient Outlier Identification in Lung Cancer Study.
COMPARISONS OF SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS MEASUREMENTS TO MODELED EMISSIONS FROM SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION by John A. Menatti and Robin V. Davis Utah Department.
TRP Chapter Chapter 2.3 Environmental impacts and health risks.
Risk Assessment.
Inference about the Difference Between the
Impact Area 1-hour standards. SILs used to determine when a proposed source’s ambient impacts warrant a comprehensive (cumulative) source impact analysis.
Distribution of NO 2 concentrations over shooting (400 µg/m 3 per 1 hour) calculated with POLAIR dispersion model using (2004) NO 2 concentrations from.
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
Sources of Uncertainty and Current Practice for Addressing Them: Toxicological Perspective David A. Bussard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The views.
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
Chapter 11a: Comparisons Involving Proportions and a Test of Independence Inference about the Difference between the Proportions of Two Populations Hypothesis.
Phillip Ray Gibson NC Radon Program
Summary: Results Cumulative Risk from exposure to contaminants Use of household appliances results in emissions of VOCs into indoor air from contaminated.
1 Occupational Air Sampling Strategies – who, when, how…. Lecture Notes.
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
T.C. DINKINS RYAN PETERS MALERIE SHERROD Radon Exposure and Lung Cancer.
Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant Public Workshop Cal/EPA Headquarters Building Sierra Hearing Room Sacramento,
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
ACTIVITIES, NEEDS, AND FUTURE ACTIONS ON INDOOR AIR QUALITY April 26, 2001 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
(IAQ). What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment: provides information on the health risk Characterizes the potential adverse health effects of human exposures.
ARB Evaluation of Composite Wood Products California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board Air Quality Measures Branch Stationary Source.
Michael J. Sullivan, Ph.D., CIH, REA
Reinhard Mechler, Markus Amann, Wolfgang Schöpp International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis A methodology to estimate changes in statistical life.
THE USE OF HPV DATA IN GREEN PURCHASING. 2 Incorporate Hazard/Risk Criteria in Green Procurement Contract specifications Voluntary standards EMS Supply.
Take a Stand Murphree, Bella Period 1B Abrams March 29, 2012.
1 Sarasota Health Care Access: Impacts and Opportunities Linda L. Stone, Ph.D. Program Administrator Melanie Michael, M.S., ARNP-C Division Director.
PCa Screening New Areas of Research Francesco Montorsi Milan.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality Effects of Trap-Related Emissions John DaMassa April 18, 2002 Originally Presented.
PM Network Assessment: Speciated Network Planning Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis,
A Novel Bottom Up Approach to Bounding Potential Human Cancer Risks from Endogenous Chemicals Thomas B. Starr, PhD TBS Associates, Raleigh NC SOT RASS.
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide Chapter 11 Comparisons Involving Proportions n Inference about the Difference Between the Proportions of Two Populations Proportions of Two Populations.
Tier 1 Environmental Performance Tools Economic Criteria.
Dieterich, M.F., Gieseler, M.E., Short, D.B., and Signorelli, R.T. Abstract Formaldehyde, a group 1 carcinogen is a component of indoor air and may be.
2015 Profile of International Home Buying Activity of International Clients For the Twelve Month Period Ending March 2015 National Association of REALTORS®
1 1 Slide © 2009 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences | SOT Meeting March 9, 2011 Update on Formaldehyde Case Study: Adaptation of the Biologically Based Dose Response.
Indoor Air Quality Update June 27, Indoor air quality reflects outdoor and indoor air pollution sources Improving outdoor air quality reduces indoor.
IH&S 725 Dr. Myers, C.I.H. Occupational Air Sampling Strategies – who, when, how…. Lecture Notes.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Occupational exposure to.
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
George M. Woodall, PhD NCEA Toxicologist Leland Urban Air Toxics Research Center October 18, 2005 EPA Reference Values: Regulatory Context.
An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.
Exposure Assessment for Health Effect Studies: Insights from Air Pollution Epidemiology Lianne Sheppard University of Washington Special thanks to Sun-Young.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Health Risk Assessments Revised OEHHA Guideline and HARP2 ARB Compliance Training Presented by: Matthew O’Donnell ARB Enforcement Division.
이 장 우. 1. Introduction  Bisphenol A is a high production volume chemical -Annual production of over six billion pounds -polycarbonate plastics.
Formaldehyde Emission Modeling in Manufactured Homes Jacqueline Bayer 1, Dr. Patrick Gurian 2, and Dr. Jin Wen 2 1 BS/MS Student, Dept. of Civil, Architectural,
An Overview DCC Annual Retreat February 20, 2012.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
From Surveillance to Intervention to Policy Change: Air Pollution Models & Public Health Mark Werner, Ph.D. Wisconsin Division of Public Health
Characterization of Phthalate Exposure among Pregnant Women Assessed by Repeat Air and Urine Samples XIAOZHUO LU.
Use of sodium bromide in swimming pools resulting in exposure to bromate Kevin Cox Senior Research Toxicologist NSF International.
N Engl J Med Jun 29;376(26): doi: 10
Midwest Lenders Association HUD Radon Policy Update September 27, 2017
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
Diane Jackson, PE, Hatice Zahran, MD, MPH, Greg Zarus, MS
WESTAR Recommendations Exceptional Events EPA response
Duration of Therapy of Colony Stimulating Factors in Oncology
Which method is most appropriate for assessing exposure?
Wolaita Sodo University Department of Physics , Wolaita Ethiopia Indoor radon concentration and its health hazard in the dwellings of Wolaita Sodo.
THE DOSE MAKES THE POISON
Jay Peters Gina M. Plantz Richard J. Rago
At facilities with subsurface contamination, what other chemicals may your workers be breathing? Matt Raithel.
Chapter Nine Part 1 (Sections 9.1 & 9.2) Hypothesis Testing
Radon Vapor Intrusion Screening Level Calculator
The U.S. Practice of Regulatory Review Practical Exercise: Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act Shannon Joyce and Christine Kymn White.
Presentation transcript:

Lumber Liquidators Chinese Manufactured Laminate Flooring ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED Lumber Liquidators Chinese Manufactured Laminate Flooring Evaluations of Formaldehyde Emissions from Installed Laminate Flooring and Risk to Lumber Liquidators Customers DRAFT

Objective Collect representative and statistically robust data sets for analysis Conduct evaluations to characterize airborne formaldehyde concentrations in residences specifically from installed Lumber Liquidators (LL) Chinese manufactured laminate flooring to assess consumer risk Characterize acute irritation risk and chronic cancer risk from formaldehyde emissions from LL laminate flooring for its U.S. customers using standard and accepted methods DRAFT

LL Evaluation Approach Step 1: Characterize formaldehyde emissions from new flooring Step 4: Characterize emission decay rate and develop model to estimate initial and TWA formaldehyde concentrations in customer residences from laminate flooring Step 2A: Measure indoor formaldehyde concentrations in residences of LL customers Step 2B: Survey customers to collect data on home conditions related to emissions Step 3 Characterize emissions from installed flooring of customer residences with “elevated” badge concentrations Step 5 Calculate residence-specific initial and TWA formaldehyde concentrations from laminate flooring and assess consumer risk from flooring emissions DRAFT

Formaldehyde Emissions from New Laminate Flooring Manufactured 2009-2015: Phase I Testing Results Parameter LL CPSC Sample Size (# of tests) 399 33 Mean ER (µg/m2/h)* 61 65 ER = emission rate * No significant difference between LL and CPSC mean emission rate DRAFT

LL Customer Population Badge Results 31,760 badge results available from 19,316 residences >99.5% of badges have concentrations ≤0.250 ppm Approximately 91% had formaldehyde concentrations ≤100 µg/m3 or ≤81ppb (WHO Guideline); substantial majority were <50 µg/m3 or <40ppb Approximately 9% (~1,940 residences) had concentrations >100 µg/m3 These customer residences were selected to focus further evaluations of flooring-specific contributions to residential formaldehyde concentrations DRAFT

Survey of Phase II Participants ~1,660 completed surveys as of March (out of ~2,900 residences) subset including reported laminate-board measure: n = 899* Age of Residences* Representative air exchange rate (AER) derived from age of residence ≤20 years old (44%) (assumed AER = 0.329; Persily et al. 2010) >20 years old (56%) (assumed AER = 0.621; conditional on ≤20-yr data) Area of laminate flooring in each residence* Floor area of residence from survey and area of flooring purchased from customer records Combined to estimate residence-specific Flaminate (fraction of total floor area covered with laminate) Mean Flaminate = 0.458 5.8% Flaminate = 1 (100% coverage) DRAFT

Profile of LL U.S. Laminate Customer Population (for Comparison) California customers who installed LL Chinese laminate flooring between 2011 and 2015 based on Experian data, as surrogate for U.S. customers Age of residence Based on age of home 25% residences constructed after 1990 with possible “tight” construction) 75% residences constructed in decades before 1990 Fraction of floor area as LL laminate Mean Flaminate = 0.32 79% of customers have Flaminate ≤0.50 0.02% have Flaminate of 1.0 (100% coverage) DRAFT

Greater Phase I Emission Rates Indicate Decay of Formaldehyde Concentrations Over Time DRAFT

Decay Pattern Estimated from Combined Phase I and Phase II Test Results NOTES:   biexp(p, k1, k2) = p exp(–k1 t)  +  (1–p) exp(–k2 t) Blue parameter values are those of the Bogen (2015) fit to Zinn et al. (1990) data The biexp fit is significantly better than the Zinn-fit-conditioned fit DRAFT

Current Residential Formaldehyde Concentrations for Phase II Customers 899 emission rates from Phase II testing All residences have estimated current flooring-related formaldehyde concentrations <90 µg/m3; 99.9% are <35 µg/m3 Mean flooring-related current formaldehyde concentration = 5.2 µg/m3 DRAFT

Selected Percentile and Mean Concentrations in Residences Initial Formaldehyde Concentration from Laminate Flooring in Residences with Elevated Badge Concentrations Based on Residence-Specific Phase II Emissions Data (n = 899) Initial Formaldehyde Concentration (µg/m3), unadjusted for residential occupancy   Residence duration Selected Percentile and Mean Concentrations in Residences (years) Fdecay Foccup 5 10 25 50 Mean 75 90 95 1.0000 2.12 3.72 8.85 18.4 23.3 30.2 48.5 66.1 DRAFT

Selected Percentile and Mean Concentrations in Residences TWA Formaldehyde Concentrations (CTWA) from Laminate Flooring in Residences with Elevated Badge Concentrations Based on Residence-Specific Phase II Emissions Data (n = 899) TWA Formaldehyde Concentration (µg/m3), unadjusted for residential occupancy Residence duration Selected Percentile and Mean Concentrations in Residences (years) Fdecay Foccup 5 10 25 50 Mean 75 90 95 2 0.3363 1.0000 0.71 1.25 2.98 6.19 7.84 10.2 16.3 22.2 12 0.2262 0.48 0.84 2.00 4.16 5.27 6.83 11.0 14.9 20 0.1862 0.39 0.69 1.65 3.42 4.34 5.62 9.03 12.3 26 0.1633 0.35 0.61 1.44 3.00 3.80 4.93 7.92 10.8 2 years is the exposure duration used in the ATSDR assessment 12 years is the average duration of residency in the U.S. (U.S. EPA Exposure Factors Handbook) 20 years is the expected use life of laminate flooring 26 years is the 90th percentile duration of residency in the U.S. (U.S. EPA Exposure Factors Handbook) DRAFT

Predicted TWA Formaldehyde Dose from Laminate Flooring in all Residences with Phase II Emissions Data (n = 899) Residence Time (years) Median daily dose (µg/day) Mean daily dose 12 8.5 11 20 15 26 13 17 Note: Proposition 65 safe harbor dose is 40 µg/day DRAFT

Conclusions Installed LL Chinese manufactured laminate flooring poses neither a significant acute irritation risk nor chronic cancer risk to customers Substantial sampling, testing and risk assessments have been performed to characterize formaldehyde in residences with installed LL Chinese manufactured laminate flooring Only ~9% of the ~ 20,000 residences with LL laminate flooring samples had total formaldehyde concentrations from all sources >100 µg/m3, the WHO Guideline None of the residences with elevated badge concentrations currently has a formaldehyde concentration from flooring >100 µg/m3 Only 6 out of 899 of the residences with elevated badge concentrations are estimated to have had initial formaldehyde concentrations >100 µg/m3 (<1%) Rate of formaldehyde emissions and in-residence concentrations diminish by >3-fold within one year of installation and continue to diminish slowly thereafter Estimated median and mean daily formaldehyde doses from laminate flooring for customers in residences with elevated badge concentrations are below the Proposition 65 safe harbor level of 40 µg/day for formaldehyde as a carcinogen Based on the U.S. EPA cancer model, average and upper bound TWA exposures from laminate flooring for the 9% of customer with residences with elevated badge concentrations are expected to pose cancer risks of <1 to 3 in 100,000 The vast majority of LL laminate customers have cancer risks <1 in 1,000,000 from LL Chinese manufactured laminate flooring DRAFT