University of California, Berkeley

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THEMIS Instrument PDRRob Duck 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 EFI Axial Booms (AXB) Preliminary Design Review Rob Duck Mechanical Engineering Department and.
Advertisements

HokieSat Thermal System Michael Belcher Thermal Lead December 11, 2002.
Thermal Modeling and Model Correlation of the LORRI Telescope
MPSRThermal- 1 UCB, Oct 26, 2006 THEMIS MISSION PRE-SHIP REVIEW Thermal Christopher Smith University of California - Berkeley.
SPP FIELDS V5 Antenna Mechanical Peer Review David Glaser, Paul Turin, Jeremy McCauley, John Bonnell, Dennis Seitz SSL UCB 7/17/13.
STEREO IMPACT SEP Critical Design Review 2002-Nov-20 TvR IMPACT/SEP Thermal Design John Hawk, GSFC (301)
M. Diaz-AguadoFIELDS iPDR – Thermal Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument PDR Thermal Subsystem Millan F. Diaz-Aguado SSL Berkeley
3-4 Sept. 2008EFW INST+SOC PDR141 Electric Field and Waves (EFW) Spin Plane Boom (SPB) Gregory Dalton Space Sciences Laboratory University of California.
THEMIS Instrument Thermal Peer Review 1 UCB, February 26, 2004 THEMIS T IME H ISTORY OF E VENTS AND M ACROSCALE I NTERACTIONS DURING S UBSTORMS RESOLVING.
THEMIS F2/F3 IPSR and F4/F5 IPER 1 By Telecon, November 10, 2005 THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE FM2/FM3 PRE-SHIP REVIEW FM4/FM5 PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Thermal.
MAVEN CDR May 23-25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Peer Review May 8 -10, 2011 Christopher Smith, Thermal Engineer Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Test Plan Michael Ludlam Space Sciences Laboratory.
THEMIS Instrument PDR 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 IDPU Mechanical / Thermal Preliminary Design Review Heath Bersch University of California - Berkeley.
THEMIS Instrument CDR 1 UCB, April , 2004 EFI Axial Booms Thermal Christopher Smith Thermal Engineer
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 Presenter1 Thermal Control R.Eby Impact Boom Stowed and Deployed SWEA STE Magnetometer Bob.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW Boom PER 30 June RBSP EFW Spin Plane Booms Greg Dalton Space Sciences.
FM1 Instrument Suite Pre-Ship Review (PSR)Thermal-1UCB, September 21, 2005 THEMIS FM1 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) THERMAL Chris Smith University.
Sept. 2008EFW INST+SOC PDR IDPU Chassis Mechanical Design and Development Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL
Sept. 2008EFW INST+SOC PDR EFW AXB Jeremy McCauley Aerospace Engineer Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB AXB Spacecraft +Z.
GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Peer Design Review, Mar 17-18, 2003 P. Prat CNRS/IN2P3-LLR Ecole Polytechnique GLAST Large Area Telescope Calorimeter Subsystem Gamma-ray.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PEREnvironments- 1 Teleconference 8/30/2005 THEMIS Instrument FM2/3 Pre-Environmental Review Environments Jeremy McCauley University.
THEMIS SUITE PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1 UCB May 2, 2005 THEMIS Pre-Environmental Review Instrument Verification Overview Ellen Taylor University of California.
THEMIS IDPU PDR I&T REQUIREMENTS- 1 UCB, October 16, 2003 I&T REQUIREMENTS Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
MAVEN CDR May 23-25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Critical Design Review May , 2011 Christopher Smith, Thermal Engineer Mars Atmosphere and.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 213 Low Voltage Power Supply & Power Controller Board Peter.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes LVPS+PCB Peter BergRBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 IDPU LVPS AND PCB Critical Design Review.
THEMIS Instrument PDR 1 UCB, April 19-20, 2004 Spin Plane and Axial Boom Preamps & Sensor Cable Fabrication Critical Design Review Daniel Schickele University.
F1, F3, F4, F5 PER 1 UCB, June 23, 2006 THEMIS MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Thermal Christopher Smith Thermal Engineer University of California - Berkeley.
THEMIS Instrument PDR Bill Donakowski/ EFI Radial Boom 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 EFI Radial Boom EFI Radial Boom Mechanical (SPB Spin Plane Boom) Bill.
THEMIS Instrument CDR 1 UCB, April 19-20, 2004 Flux Gate Magnetometer and Boom Thermal Christopher Smith Thermal Engineer
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes 3-4 Sept. 2008EFW INST+SOC PDR447 Command, Telemetry, and Ground Support Equipment (CTG)
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
109-IDPU-Chassis-Donakowski 1 30 Sep – 01 Oct 2009DRAFT RBSP EFW ICDR 109-IDPU-Chassis-Donakowski IDPU Chassis Mechanical Design and Development Bill Donakowski.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Thermal Analysis Huade Tan 6/27/05.
STEREO IMPACT SEP Critical Design Review 2002-Nov-21/22 TvR1 SEP Mechanical Design Sandy Shuman, GSFC ) Tycho.
THEMIS Instrument CDR 1 UCB, April 19-20, 2004 EFI Preamp Sensor G.T. Delory, A. Hull, D. Schickele, J. Bonnell & The EFI Team University of California.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 535 IDPU Chassis Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 Thermal Design Christopher Smith RBSP Thermal Engineer Space.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Systems Engineering Michael Ludlam Space Sciences.
FM4/FM5 IPSRSYS - 1 UCB, May 5, 2006 THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE FM4/FM5 PRE-SHIP REVIEW SYSTEM OVERVIEW Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes Sept 30 – Oct RBSP EFW ICDR1 Integration and Test Michael Ludlam (EFW Systems Engineer)
1 PFP Team Meeting Particles and Fields Package Weekly Team Meeting, SSL January Dave Curtis, PFP PM.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) Thermal Analysis Christine Cottingham LM/GSFC 545 Hume Peabody GSFC.
Rose Navarro HMI Lead Thermal Engineer
FIELDS MEP Thermal Vacuum Cycling iPER
FIELDS MEP & V5 Pre-Ship Review Thermal Summary
SO RPW Antenna FEM Details
Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016
University of California - Berkeley
THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE FM4/FM5 PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
FIELDS MEP & V5 Pre-Ship Review Thermal Summary
Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL
Spacecraft Interface and I&T
ESA – IDPU – SCM Preamp Thermal Christopher Smith Thermal Engineer
(EFW Systems Engineer) University of California, Berkeley
SPP FIELDS V1234 Thermal PSR
Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Integrated Thermal Analysis of the Iodine Satellite (iSAT) from Preliminary to Critical Design Review October 20th 2016 Stephanie Mauro NASA Marshall Space.
FIELDS SCM Thermal iPER
Boom Electronics Board (BEB)
Mini-RF Requirements Overview
Low Voltage Power Supply & Power Controller Board
Precision Oven Thermal Design
Spacecraft Thermal System
CRATER MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
JOSH STAMPS ROBIN HEGEDUS
LRO CRaTER Preliminary Temperature Predictions Design A Concept  Old Concept April 12, 2005 Cynthia Simmons/ESS.
Presentation transcript:

University of California, Berkeley Thermal Design Christopher Smith RBSP Thermal Engineer Space Sciences Lab University of California, Berkeley

Outline Requirements APL – UCB Interface Thermal Model Description IDPU Board Level Thermal Analysis Thermal Model Case Set Inputs Current Predicts Current Testing Overview

Spacecraft Level Thermal Requirements Orbit: 500-675 km x 30,050 - 31,250 km (EFW-7, EFW-8) Inclination: 10 degrees +/- 0.25 (EFW-6) 2 year design life, plus 60 days (EFW-1) Spacecraft top deck pointed to sun within: 25 degrees N/S and E/W, normal operation (EFW-201) 27 degrees composite, normal operation (EFW-202) 33 degrees, Safe mode (SCRD 3.10.4.4) (Was 47) S/C spin rate (about top deck): 4 to 6 RPM, normal and safe modes (EFW-9) 3 to 15 RPM, instrument commissioning (EFW-203) S/C shall survive 112 minute eclipse (Derived EFW-6, EFW-7, EFW-8)

EFW Thermal Requirements Conductive external surfaces with 105 Ohms/Sq. (EFW-133) Contamination: 100,000 class (EFW-132) Instruments to operate within specification with -25 to +55 spacecraft boundary conditions. (EFW-76, EFW-77) -25 to +65 for top deck interface, new since PDR Instruments to survive without damage with -30 to +60 spacecraft boundary conditions. (EFW-79, EFW-80) -30 to +70 for top deck interface, new since PDR Comply with contamination control plan. APL document 7417-9007. (EFW-132) Comply with Environmental Design and Test Requirements Document. APL document 7417-9019. (EFW-136) Comply with RBSP_EFW_SYS_301_ETM, RBSP engineering test matrix

Engineering Test Matrix 7 total cycles per instrument, 5 at component level, 2 at suite level. Pre-Amps cycled separately due to larger temperature swing. No need for thermal balance as all instruments are conductively coupled to the spacecraft.

APL Thermal Modeling Interface Berkeley maintains a Thermal Desktop model of the EFW instrument and a boundary node definition of the spacecraft. APL Maintains a TSS geometry and SINDA network model of the spacecraft. APL integrates Berkeley geometry via Thermal Desktop TSS export. Provides environmental heat flux data to instruments. APL integrates Berkeley SINDA network model into the SINDA spacecraft network model. APL specifies spacecraft connection nodes. APL runs integrated model and provides temperature predicts back to Berkeley. Design cycles as necessary. APL is responsible for producing high fidelity temperature predicts.

Thermal Model Overview Instruments and Boundary Spacecraft IDPU AXBs SPBs

Thermal Model Overview AXB -Stowed Sphere / Preamp in Caging Mechanism (Clear Alodine, GeBK Blanket) Sphere / Preamp (DAG 213) Rod to Stacer Hinge (DAG 213) Mounting Tube (M55J) Stacer (Elgiloy)

Thermal Model Overview AXB -Deployed Stacer (Elgiloy) Sphere (DAG 213) DAD (AntiSun: Clear Alodine) (Sun: Clear Alodine / GeBk Tape mix) Sphere Caging Mechanism (AntiSun: Clear Alodine) (Sun: GeBk Blanket / Clear Alodine mix)

Thermal Model Overview SPB Deployed Elements SPB Sphere SPB Preamp Thick Wire Thin Wire

Thermal Model Overview SPB & IDPU SPB - Deployed IDPU (Mostly Black Kapton XC Tape, Some Gold Alodine) (Black Kapton XC Tape) (Clear Alodine) SPB - Stowed (Black Kapton Blanket, Shown in Green)

DCB Component Dissipations

DFB Component Dissipations

LVPS Component Dissipations

LVPS Board Distribution

Optical Materials Most properties tested, used, and correlated for the THEMIS mission Properties approved by the GSFC coatings committee July 07, 2008.

Thermophysical Properties Hot Cases Use Low e* Anti-Sunward and High e* Sunward Cold Cases Use High e* Anti-Sunward and Low e* Sunward

Interfaces IDPU SPB AXB Conductively mounted to spacecraft side panel. 9 #10 Bolts = 0.75 W/C each. Radiative coupling to spacecraft interior, Black Kapton XCTape SPB 4 #10 Bolts = 0.75 W/C each. Deployed elements are completely isolated from the spacecraft by wire. Low radiative coupling to spacecraft interior, Clear Alodined Aluminum AXB Conductively mounted to the top and bottom spacecraft deck. 6 #8 Bolts at each end = 0.75 W/C each. Radiative coupling somewhat isolated from major portions of the spacecraft since the mechanical units are stowed inside a carbon fiber tube which is also stored inside a spacecraft carbon fiber tube. Deployed elements are isolated from spacecraft influence by stacer. Caging mechanisms conductively mounted to top deck, 4 #8 Bolts = 0.75 W/C each.

Power, Heaters Current power used in model IDPU, SPB and AXB do not have any survival heaters

General Case Sets APL Case Set Parameters UCB Case Set Parameters

Limit Categories Science Operation Limit Operation – Out of Spec Limits placed on an operating instrument Specifies the range of temperatures the instrument will provide calibrated / useful science data Operation – Out of Spec May represent a wider range that is survivable but may be out of spec Temperatures beyond Science Op Limit need not be calibrated to Non-Operation Limits placed on a non operating instrument Pre-Deployment Limit Limits placed on a mechanical system before it is actuated Deployment Limit Limits placed on a mechanical system at the time of actuation Post-Deployment Limit Limits placed on a mechanical system after it has executed its one-time deployment

Current Thermal Limits

Predicts, Deployed Case Sets

Margins, Deployed Case Sets Positive Margins for all deployed cases

APL and UCB Predict Comparison, Table Each case set compared at a specific time and a representative node All case sets agree to within 1.5 degrees

APL and UCB Predict Comparison, Plot

ETU Thermal Vac Testing Completed