A Contradiction in Genes: Phylogeography of the Black Mountain Salamander (Desmognathus welteri Barbour 1950) Jessica A. Wooten1, Zachary I. Felix2, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LG 4 Outline Evolutionary Relationships and Classification
Advertisements

Bioinformatics Phylogenetic analysis and sequence alignment The concept of evolutionary tree Types of phylogenetic trees Measurements of genetic distances.
APPLICATION OF MOLECULAR MARKERS IN THE STUDIES OF PHYLOGENY AND PHYLOGEOGRAPHY: ADVANCES, PITFALLS AND PERSPECTIVES OF DEVELOPMENT Abramson N.I., Kostygov.
Amorphophallus titanum Largest unbranched inflorescence in the world Monecious and protogynous Carrion flower (fly/beetle pollinated) Indigenous to the.
 Aim in building a phylogenetic tree is to use a knowledge of the characters of organisms to build a tree that reflects the relationships between them.
THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF BIODIVERSITY
1 General Phylogenetics Points that will be covered in this presentation Tree TerminologyTree Terminology General Points About Phylogenetic TreesGeneral.
Phylogenetic Trees Systematics, the scientific study of the diversity of organisms, reveals the evolutionary relationships between organisms. Taxonomy,
Classification of Living Things. 2 Taxonomy: Distinguishing Species Distinguishing species on the basis of structure can be difficult  Members of the.
Phylogenetic reconstruction
BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 4- Part II Phylogenetic Inference.
Review of cladistic technique Shared derived (apomorphic) traits are useful in understanding evolutionary relationships Shared primitive (plesiomorphic)
Dispersal models Continuous populations Isolation-by-distance Discrete populations Stepping-stone Island model.
Chapter Geography of Evolution Platyrrhini Catarrhini.
Chapter 2 Opener How do we classify organisms?. Figure 2.1 Tracing the path of evolution to Homo sapiens from the universal ancestor of all life.
Classification and Phylogenies Taxonomic categories and taxa Inferring phylogenies –The similarity vs. shared derived character states –Homoplasy –Maximum.
Topic : Phylogenetic Reconstruction I. Systematics = Science of biological diversity. Systematics uses taxonomy to reflect phylogeny (evolutionary history).
Scientific FieldsScientific Fields  Different fields of science have contributed evidence for the theory of evolution  Anatomy  Embryology  Biochemistry.
Terminology of phylogenetic trees
Molecular phylogenetics
The Evolutionary History of Biodiversity
SB3C. Examine the evolutionary basis of modern classification systems.
Classification and Systematics Tracing phylogeny is one of the main goals of systematics, the study of biological diversity in an evolutionary context.
Speciation history inferred from gene trees L. Lacey Knowles Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI
Lecture 25 - Phylogeny Based on Chapter 23 - Molecular Evolution Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education Inc.
 Read Chapter 4.  All living organisms are related to each other having descended from common ancestors.  Understanding the evolutionary relationships.
APPLICATIONS OF MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS
Molecular phylogenetics 4 Level 3 Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics Jim Provan Page and Holmes: Sections
Announcements Urban Forestry project starts this week. Go through protocol. We'll be sending you off on your own. Please act responsibly. Peer review of.
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THE BOBWHITES Damon Williford, Randy W. DeYoung, Leonard A. Brennan, Fidel Hernández Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute Texas.
Chapter 24: Molecular and Genomic Evolution CHAPTER 24 Molecular and Genomic Evolution.
Figure 1. Map depicting the supposed evolutionary history of terrestrial leeches in North America. Shaded area represents the Appalachian Range. (●) Haemopis.
Teaching about time a biologists perspective Biochemistry Physiology Ecology Evolution Origins of biodiversity and estimates of divergence times TIME Integrative.
Chapter 10 Phylogenetic Basics. Similarities and divergence between biological sequences are often represented by phylogenetic trees Phylogenetics is.
PHYLOGENY AND THE TREE OF LIFE CH 26. I. Phylogenies show evolutionary relationships A. Binomial nomenclature: – Genus + species name Homo sapiens.
Phylogeography of Leucetta chagosensis (Porifera, Calcarea) Christoph Flucke, Jens Kurz, Rasmus Liedigk, Zdenka Valenzova Fig.4: RAxML Phylogram Fig.5:
Ayesha M.Khan Spring Phylogenetic Basics 2 One central field in biology is to infer the relation between species. Do they possess a common ancestor?
Integrative taxonomy Gustav Paulay Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida.
Amorphophallus titanum
Classification Biology I. Lesson Objectives Compare Aristotle’s and Linnaeus’s methods of classifying organisms. Explain how to write a scientific name.
Gene flow and speciation. Mechanism for speciation Allopatric speciation Sympatric speciation.
Section 2: Modern Systematics
From: On the Origin of Darwin's Finches
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Introduction to Bioinformatics Resources for DNA Barcoding
SUNY Korea BioData Mining Lab - Journal Review
Evolutionary genomics can now be applied beyond ‘model’ organisms
Cryptic Sucker Species of the Northeast
Title: Different Types of Evolution
Sierra M. Love Stowell & Andrew P. Martin Student Figures
Pipelines for Computational Analysis (Bioinformatics)
COALESCENCE AND GENE GENEALOGIES
Molecular Phylogenetics and Historical Biogeography among Salamandrids of the “True” Salamander Clade: Rapid Branching of Numberous Highly Divergent Lineages.
Section 2: Modern Systematics
DNA Marker Lecture 10 BY Ms. Shumaila Azam
Topics Need for systematics Applications of systematics
Patterns in Evolution I. Phylogenetic
Summary and Recommendations
SB3C. Examine the evolutionary basis of modern classification systems.
Parsimony is Computationally Intensive
Time morphospace. time morphospace time morphospace.
18.2 Modern Systematics I. Traditional Systematics
Chapter 19 Molecular Phylogenetics
Molecular data assisted morphological analyses
Unit Genomic sequencing
Chapter 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Chapter 20 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Summary and Recommendations
But what if there is a large amount of homoplasy in the data?
Presentation transcript:

A Contradiction in Genes: Phylogeography of the Black Mountain Salamander (Desmognathus welteri Barbour 1950) Jessica A. Wooten1, Zachary I. Felix2, and Carlos D. Camp3 1Department of Biology, Centre College, Danville, Kentucky 2Department of Biology, Reinhardt College, Waleska, Georgia 3Department of Biology, Piedmont College, Demorest, Georgia RESULTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION 78 / 81 96 / 98 Modern molecular techniques have enabled the discovery of numerous cryptic evolutionary lineages, many of which have been recognized as distinct species. This is true for the salamander family Plethodontidae, a taxon characterized by morphological conservatism and rampant homoplasy. Previous studies have identified cryptic lineages within recognized species using electrophoretic extraction of allozymes (e.g., Highton 1989) and, more recently, sequencing of mtDNA (e.g., Beamer & Lamb 2008). Recent investigations, however, have revealed that, at least at the generic level, phylogenetic relationships determined by nDNA sequences may disagree with those based on mtDNA (Fisher-Reid & Wiens 2011). Conflicting phylogenies can result a taxonomy that fails to reflect underlying evolutionary patterns. Therefore, we investigated the phylogeography of a single species of lungless salamander to determine if patterns agree between mtDNA and nDNA. The development of modern molecular techniques has led to the discovery of previously unsuspected levels of genetic variation, particularly within taxa characterized by morphological conservatism and/or rampant homoplasy. The lungless-salamander family Plethodontidae is characterized by both, and molecular-based investigations of phylogeography have uncovered a number of cryptic lineages, including many that have subsequently been described as species. An important phylogeographic tool continues to be the sequencing of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is especially useful for analyses at the specific and generic levels because of its rapid rate of nucleotide substitution relative to nuclear genes (nDNA). MtDNA has been criticized as a phylogenetic marker, however, because it represents only a small fraction of an organism’s genome and is inherited strictly maternally. In fact, recent studies have indicated that mitochondrial-based and nuclear-based conclusions regarding phylogeny may sharply disagree. We used both mitochondrial (ND2, CO1, 12S) and independent nuclear (introns of ILF3 and GAP3) genes to investigate the phylogeography of the Black Mountain Salamander (Desmognathus welteri Barbour 1950). We found that both nuclear introns exhibited considerable genetic structure among populations but that mtDNA sequences showed hardly any variation across the entire geographic range. The most parsimonious explanation is that the mitochondrial genome has undergone a relatively recent selective sweep in this species. Our results underscore the need to use caution when drawing phylogenetic conclusions from mtDNA sequences. 86 / 82 99 / 94 96 / 94 96 / 98 88 / 88 91 / 86 100 / 98 91 / 93 82 / 80 96 / 98 PURPOSE 99 / 98 We investigated the phylogeography of a species of plethodontid to determine whether nDNA and mtDNA patterns of relationship agree at the level of population divergence. Because mtDNA mutates faster than nDNA (Ballard & Whitlock 2004), we hypothesized that mitochondrial genes exhibit greater diversity and structure than nuclear genes. Maximum likelihood (ML) topology for populations of D. welteri and selected Desmognathus lineages based on mtDNA (2350 bp). First number is the maximum-likelihood bootstrap and the second is the posterior probability. Values < 75 were excluded from the figure. METHODS Maximum likelihood (ML) topology for populations of D. welteri compared with southern D. quadramaculatus based on two nuclear introns (780 bp). Individuals of D. welteri were collected from Kentucky, Tennessee, and West Virginia. WV3 WV2 WV1 TN2 TN3 TN1 KY1 KY3 KY2 KY4 KY8 KY9 KY6 KY7 KY5 DISCUSSION The lack of mitochondrial variation relative to nuclear introns in D. welteri is surprising given that mtDNA is believed to evolve faster than nDNA (Ballard & Whitlock 2004). There are three possible explanations for this apparent anomaly. Repeated, male-biased hybridization with one or more other species has continually introduced new nuclear genes via introgression. However, D. welteri does not appear closely related to any other known species (Kozak et al. 2005; Beamer & Lamb 2008); therefore, repeated introgression seems unlikely. Nuclear introns evolve more rapidly than mtDNA. This contradicts current understanding of relative mutation rates. Moreover, our results for D. quadramaculatus show that these introns have less variation than mitochondrial genes. A positive mutation ─ along with linked genes via hitch-hiking ─ has recently swept through the species, erasing genetic variation in the mitochondrial genome. While the frequency of selective sweeps is controversial (Brown et al. 1979; Ballard & Whitlock 2004), this is the most parsimonious explanation for our results. Literature Cited 12S, CO1, and ND2 portions (2350 bp) of the mtDNA and nuclear introns (780 bp) for ILF3 and GAPD were sequenced. Comparisons were made with the large species of Desmognathus, especially southern D. quadramculatus (sensu Kozak et al 2005). Separate phylogenies for mtDNA and nDNA genes were reconstructed using maximum-likelihood methods with models of evolution. Ballard & Whitlock 2004. Mol Ecol 13:729─744. Beamer & Lamb 2008. Mol Phylogenet Evol 47:143─153. Brown, George, & Wilson 1979. Proc Natl Acad Sci 76:1967─1971. Highton 1989. Illinois Biol Monogr 57:1─78. Fisher-Reid & Wiens 2011. BMC Evol Biol 11:300. Kozak, Larson, Bonett, & Harmon 2005. Evolution 59:2000─2016.