Validation of remote dielectric sensing (ReDS™) technology for quantification of lung fluid status: Comparison to high resolution chest computed tomography in patients with and without acute heart failure Offer Amir, Zaher S. Azzam, Tamar Gaspar, Suzan Faranesh-Abboud, Nizar Andria, Daniel Burkhoff, Aharon Abbo, William T. Abraham International Journal of Cardiology Volume 221, Pages 841-846 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.323 Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Wearable vest and console. International Journal of Cardiology 2016 221, 841-846DOI: (10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.323) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 (a) CT of ADHF patient with pulmonary edema (b) CT of ambulatory non-heart failure patient (dry lungs). International Journal of Cardiology 2016 221, 841-846DOI: (10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.323) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 ReDS™ vs. CT — comparison of lung fluid level quantification (N=31). International Journal of Cardiology 2016 221, 841-846DOI: (10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.323) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 4 Bland–Altman analysis comparing ReDS™ and CT pulmonary fluid quantifications. International Journal of Cardiology 2016 221, 841-846DOI: (10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.323) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Fig. 5 Pulmonary fluid content: CCT and ReDS comparison between ADHF and non-ADHF group. International Journal of Cardiology 2016 221, 841-846DOI: (10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.323) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions