The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#
Advertisements

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.
Salmonid Natural Production Monitoring & Evaluation Project Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation BPA Project #
Interior Columbia Basin TRT Draft Viability Criteria June, 2005 ESU & Population Levels.
A Study to Evaluate Delayed (Extra) Mortality Associated with Passage of Yearling Chinook Salmon Smolts through Snake River Dams Project No
Comparative Survival Study Smolt Monitoring Program 2010 PIT Tag Mark Groups.
Evaluate recreational and commercial mark-selective fisheries. (35018) Geraldine Vander Haegen, WDFW Charmane Ashbrook, WDFW Chris Peery, U. Idaho Annette.
Workshop: Monitoring and Evaluation of Harvest on Columbia River Salmonids July 31- August 1, 2007.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
Management Implications of ISAB Tagging Report # Council Meeting June 9, 2009 Whitefish, Montana.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Rebecca A. Buchanan Columbia Basin Research School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, WA INVESTIGATING MIGRATORY PROCESSES.
Growth and Development of the Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System Growth and Development of the Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System Overview.
Rebecca Buchanan and John Skalski, University of Washington Gregory Mackey, Douglas County PUD Charles Snow, Washington DFW TRIBPIT: ESTIMATING SALMONID.
1 Bonneville 2 nd Powerhouse Corner Collector PIT Tag Detection System Project Bonneville Power Administration and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Portland.
Experiences Handling PTAGIS Data in Comparative Survival Study By Tom Berggren Fish Passage Center Portland OR.
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
Assessing the use of PIT Tags as a Tool to Monitor Adult Chinook Salmon Returns to Idaho John Cassinelli Regional Fisheries Biologist Idaho Department.
Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.
Tagging  Fish are captured via angling & implanted with a VEMCO acoustic transmitter (V13, V9, or V7) – (Figure 4).  Specific age classes are targeted.
Fecundity Management Strategies. Why Talk About This? As managers, we utilize various methods in managing broodstock collection – we never want to be.
History  Need to mark fish to get survival & exploitation rates for Treaty negotiations, to determine differential survival of various release strategies.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.
New genetic technology for the management of Columbia River salmon and steelhead Proposal : Parentage Based Tagging Matthew Campbell Idaho Department.
Combining PIT Tags with Scale Reading to Better Understand the Life History of Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Douglas Marsh and William Muir - NOAA Fisheries.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 2009 Technical Management TeamDecember 11, 2009 Lessons Learned 2009 Bill.
1 Mainstem Passage Strategies In The Columbia River System: Transportation, Spill and Flow Augmentation Presented By: Albert Giorgi, Ph.D.
Documenting O. mykiss life histories in the White Salmon River prior to the reintroduction of anadromous fish above Condit Dam. Brady Allen and Patrick.
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection (SMP Traps) Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting Feb. 11,
Lewis River Fish Passage Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (draft)
RMIS Overview & Infomap Service PSMFC Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) Overview of RMPC & CWT Database Since 1977 the RMPC has provided essential.
Mass Marking and Electronic Recovery of CWTs In the Pacific Northwest Ron Olson Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission Olympia Washington.
Annual SARs by Study Category, TIR and D: Patterns and Significance Presenter: Charlie Petrosky CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting February 20,
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
Status of Columbia River salmon and links to flow: What we do and do not know Presentation to Northwest Power Planning Council December 11, 2002
Effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing and release practices at Winthrop NFH William Gale and Matt Cooper -USFWS, Mid-Columbia River Fishery.
Downstream Survival of Juvenile Stream Type Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Through the Snake/Columbia River Hydropower System and Adult Return Rates AFEP.
Recovery Patterns of Coded-Wire Tagged Spring Chinook Salmon in the Upper Willamette River Basin David S. Hewlett Cameron S. Sharpe Oregon Department of.
Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service.
CRITFC Video Smolt Project Developed in response to Fish Passage Center interest to see if video could be substituted for at least some of the handling.
2010 work planned, new operations, and wrap up Presenter: Robin Ehlke CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
Hydraulic and Biological Evaluations. Hydraulic Evaluations  Measuring flow distribution for fixed vertical or rotating drums (with adjustments available).
Performance of a New Steelhead Line Derived from Hatchery Parents Collected in Autumn in the Grande Ronde River Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,
Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.
Estimated survival of juvenile salmonids through the lower Columbia River and estuary, and estimated mortality from avian predation John Ferguson NOAA.
2016 Smolt Monitoring Program Juvenile Passage Data and
Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
Age at ocean entry of Snake River Basin fall Chinook and its significance to adult returns prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
Comparative Survival Study Project #
Paul Hoffarth, Todd Pearsons, and Russell Langshaw
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Steelhead status in Idaho – 2012 Update
2017 TMT Year-end Review December 12, 2017 Brandon R. Chockley
Steelhead status in Idaho 2010 update
Steelhead status in Idaho 2010 update
NOAA Mainstem PIT Tag Research
Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman
Presentation transcript:

The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin

Adipose Fin Clip Steelhead with Adipose Fin Steelhead without Adipose Fin

Issues with Adipose Fin Clips Hatchery = Clipped Wild = Not Clipped In Hanford Reach = Wild can be Clipped In Snake River = Hatchery can be not Clipped Below McNary Dam = Can only determine Clipped and Unclipped, (not hatchery and wild)

Coded Wire Tags (CWTs) Unclipped hatchery fish are treated as wild fish in the Lower Columbia River Directives for 100% marking of hatchery fish can be achieved by using CWTs for hatchery fish. A CWT detector can detect the presence or absence of CWTs. The fish must be dead in order to read the CWT to connect it with a particular hatchery release or stock and brood year. Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) is a central database of CWTs, all parties have access to the same data.

Freeze Brands Authors: McCutcheon and Georgi An assessment of PIT tag and Freeze Brand Recovery Data for Juvenile Salmonids at McNary Dam, 1988 This study evaluated mark recovery data from PIT -tagged and freeze-branded river-run yearling and subyearling chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), sockeye salmon (O. nerka), and steelhead (O. mykiss) at McNary Dam in 1988. Double-marked (PIT-tagged and freeze-branded) juvenile salmonids were released within the McNary Dam collection system upstream from the PIT -tag detectors and brand sampling system. Results indicate that brands were recovered in smaller proportions than PIT tags and the variability of brand data was considerable. Most of the error associated with brands was attributable to human error inherent in brand detection and interpretation.

Visual Implant Elastomer Tags (VIE) Visual Implant Elastomer Tags are good for some uses (hatchery to hatchery, etc.) Limited colors available (Red, Yellow, Orange, Pink, Green, Blue) Limited locations available (left eye, right eye) No coordinating body responsible for VIE tags across the Columbia Basin. Thus, when observed at mainstem dams, or in ocean, tags can be from multiple origins. Tag duplication is common between agencies and tribes.

PIT Tags Passive Integrated Transponder Tags Centralized database, named PTAGIS. The same data sets are available to all parties. Individual fish can be tracked from smolt to adult life stages. Tag can be read without killing the fish, by a PIT tag detector. Tagging cost is about $5 per fish, including labor. Extensive antenna and detector systems across Columbia Basin can be used by all parties. Large data sets can be generated at reasonable cost, detector redundancy provides some assurance that misreads are a low probability event.

PIT Tag Analyses Data Sets can be large enough to provide reasonable confidence intervals for Smolt to Adult Return Ratios (SARs), and for Reach Survivals. Analyses using parametric methods to calculate confidence intervals often assume a normal distribution (usually gaussian). Confidence intervals are therefore symmetric. Analyses using bootstrapping methods to calculate confidence intervals do not assume a distribution, but determine the distribution from the actual data set. Confidence intervals can therefore be asymmetric. Recent tag loss and mortality studies suggest that survival calculations are biased high.

PIT, Radio, and Acoustic Tags PIT Tags have certain limitations Radio and Acoustic Tags address those limitations Ocean is too large to cover with PIT tag detectors PIT tags are not useful for determining approach routes to and exit routes from mainstem dams in water column. PIT tags are not very useful for determining which pools and areas under ice are being used for overwintering. On the other hand: PIT tags have no batteries, and are cheaper. Acoustic detectors can cover a large area of the Ocean Radio tags and acoustic tags are much more useful for determined approach routes to and exit routes from mainstem dams in water column. Radio tags are much more useful for determining what pools and areas under ice are being used for overwintering. On the other hand: Radio and acoustic tags have a limited battery life, and are more expensive.

Tag Data Analysis If you can demonstrate that confidence intervals for any given parameter are different than a study shows, you’ve cast doubt on that study. If you can show that the average value for a parameter is different than a study shows, you’ve cast doubt on that study. If you can show that assumptions which are not necessary have resulted in bias, you’ve cast doubt on that study. PIT Tags, and CWTs have same data sets available to all parties. Data sets from fin clips, VIEs, Freeze Brands, Radio Tags, and Acoustic Tags may not be available to all parties. Management decisions in the Columbia Basin do not depend on data sets that are not available to all parties.