Journal of Vision. 2011;11(13):20. doi: / Figure Legend:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From: Test–Retest Reliability of Clinical Shack-Hartmann Measurements
Advertisements

Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Copyright © American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):14. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(9):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: System gamma as a function of image- and monitor-dynamic range
From: Attentive and pre-attentive aspects of figural processing
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Unsupervised clustering method to detect microsaccades
From: Asymmetric interference between the perception of shape and the perception of surface properties Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):13. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(3):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(13):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
From: Does print size matter for reading
From: Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field
From: Subjectively homogeneous noise over written text as a tool to investigate the perceptual mechanisms involved in reading Journal of Vision. 2013;13(11):14.
From: Binocular visual acuity for the correction of spherical aberration in polychromatic and monochromatic light Journal of Vision. 2014;14(2):8. doi: /
From: Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(2):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Spatial attention alleviates temporal crowding, but neither temporal nor spatial uncertainty are necessary for the emergence of temporal crowding.
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(16):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations Journal of.
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Estimating predictive stimulus features from psychophysical data: The decision image technique applied to human faces Journal of Vision. 2010;10(5):22.
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: An escape from crowding
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(6):4. doi: /4.6.4 Figure Legend:
From: What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?
Figure Legend: From: Gating of remote effects on lightness
From: How the global layout of the mask influences masking strength
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perception of light source distance from shading patterns
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(6):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contour extracting networks in early extrastriate cortex
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(1):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Latitude and longitude vertical disparities
From: Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):8. doi: /
From: Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):8. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise Journal of Vision. 2009;9(1):2.
From: The perceptual basis of common photographic practice
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What's color got to do with it
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):20. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Measuring visual clutter
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
From: StarTrek Illusion—General object constancy phenomenon?
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Presentation transcript:

From: Not all aberrations are equal: Reading impairment depends on aberration type and magnitude Journal of Vision. 2011;11(13):20. doi:10.1167/11.13.20 Figure Legend: Representation of the Zernike pyramid indicating the confusability of letters caused by each mode where a value of 1 indicates that letters are completely indistinguishable. Higher order aberrations are those with a radial order greater than 2. In (a), each aberrated letter is compared with the set of aberrated letters representing a subject attempting to recognize letters by looking for differences between the letters they are presented with. In (b), each aberrated letter is compared with the set of non-aberrated letters representing a subject attempting to recognize letters by making comparisons with known letter shapes. The Zernike modes that cause the most confusion between aberrated and non-aberrated letters are Z 2 0 (defocus), Z 4 ±2 (secondary astigmatism), and Z 5 ±3 (secondary trefoil). Date of download: 1/2/2018 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2018. All rights reserved.