IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS OAM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MPLS-TP Lock Instruct MPLS WG, IETF 76, Hiroshima, 9 Nov 2009 draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00 ZTE Corporation Xuehui.
Advertisements

OLD DOG CONSULTING Challenges and Solutions for OAM in Point-to-Multipoint MPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Ltd. Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems, Inc.
BIER Ping IETF 92 draft-kumarzheng-bier-ping-00
SBFD for VCCV (draft-gp-pals-seamless-vccv, draft-gp-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator) IETF-82, Dallas, TX Vengada Prasad Govindan Carlos Pignataro Presented.
IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format IETF 84 Vancouver 1.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 IETF 84 – Vancouver August 2012 LSP Ping Support for P2MP PWs (draft-jain-pwe3-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-00.txt)
Draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple Nobo Akiya George Swallow Carlos Pignataro Loa Andersson Mach Chen Shaleen Saxena IETF 88, Vancouver, Canada.
1 © 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv-00.txt IETF #56 San Francisco, CA USA Thomas D. Nadeau Monique.
Internet Control Message Protocol ICMP. ICMP has two major purposes: –To report erroneous conditions –To diagnose network problems ICMP has two major.
9/8/2015 draft-bocci-mpls-tp-gach-gal-00.txt MPLS Generic Associated Channel draft-bocci-mpls-tp-gach-gal-00.txt Matthew Bocci (ALU) & Martin Vigoureux.
Updates to LDP for IPv6 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-02 Vishwas Manral Rajiv Papneja Carlos Pignataro Rajiv Asati IETF 80 - Prague, Czech.
1 Behcet Sarikaya Frank Xia Ted Lemon July 2011 DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation as IPv6 Migration Tool in Mobile Networks IETF 81
ICMP
IETF 81: V6OPS Working Group – Proxy Mobile IPv6 – Address Reservations 1 Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Sri Gundavelli (Cisco)
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 IETF 84 – Vancouver August 2012 LSP Ping Support for E-VPN and PBB-
Entropy Labels in MPLS Forwarding draft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label-01 Kireeti Kompella Juniper Networks Shane Amante Level 3 Communications.
Entropy Labels in MPLS Forwarding draft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label-02
Gap Analysis for Operating IPv6- only MPLS Networks draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-01 Wes George (operator asking for it) Carlos Pignataro, Rajiv Asati.
LSP-Ping extensions for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-extensions-01 Nitin Bahadur Sami Boutros Rahul Aggarwal Eric Gray 1IETF 77 MPLS WG IETF 77,
NVO3 Overlay P2MP Ping draft-xia-nvo3-overlay-p2mp-ping-00 Liang Xia, Weiguo Hao, Greg Mirsky July 2014 Toronto.
Pseudo Wire (PW) Virtual Circuit Connection Verification (VCCV) Update Thomas D. Nadeau Cisco Systems, Inc Rahul Aggarwal (Presenter) Juniper Networks.
111 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Presentation_ID Mobile IPv4 Dynamic Home Agent Assignment Framework (draft-kulkarni-mobileip-dynamic-assignment-02.txt)
Generic Overlay OAM and Datapath Failure Detection Kanwar Singh (Nuage Networks) Pradeep Jain, Florin Balus Nuage Networks Wim Henderickx Alcatel-Lucent,
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
IETF 67, Nov 2006Slide 1 VCCV Extensions for Multi- Segment Pseudo-Wire draft-hart-pwe3-segmented-pw-vccv-01.txt draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-04.txt Mustapha.
MPLS-TP OAM Analysis Nurit Sprecher / Nokia Siemens Networks Tom Nadeau / BT Huub van Helvoort / Huawei Yaacov Weingarten / Nokia Siemens Networks.
Connecting IPv4 Islands over IPv6 MPLS Using IPv4 Provider Edge Routers(4PE) Zhenqiang Li China Mobile.
A Fragmentation Strategy for Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)
Requirements for LER Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets
UDP Encapsulation for IP Tunneling
Residence Time Measurement draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-02
MPLS-TP Fault Management Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault-01
Tal Mizrahi Marvell IETF Meeting 78, July 2010
GRE-in-UDP Encapsulation
PCEP extensions for a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN
8 Network Layer Part V Computer Networks Tutun Juhana
MPLS P2MP OAM <draft-swallow-mpls-mcast-cv-00.txt>
Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP)
Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP)
Signaled PID When Multiplexing Multiple Payloads over RSVP-TE LSPs draft-ali-mpls-sig-pid-multiplexing-case-00.txt Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems.
N. Kumar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, Z. Ali (Presenter) - Cisco Systems
Greg Mirsky IETF-99 July 2017, Prague
Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura Mach Chen Ilya Varlashkin
draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-01
BFD Directed Return Path draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-07
Ryan Zheng Lizhong Jin Thomas Nadeau George Swallow
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs
IETF 100 – Singapore November 2017
IETF 103 Bangkok, Thailand - November 2018
Return Path Specified LSP Ping
IETF 103 – Bangkok November 2018
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-02.txt SRv6 OAM
OAM for Deterministic Networks with IP Data Plane draft-mirsky-detnet-ip-oam Greg Mirsky Mach Chen IETF-105 July 2019, Montreal.
OAM for Deterministic Networks with MPLS Data Plane draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam Greg Mirsky Mach Chen IETF-105 July 2019, Montreal.
PW Control Word Stitching
Active OAM in Geneve draft-mmbb-nvo3-geneve-oam
How OAM Identified in Overlay Protocols draft-mirsky-rtgwg-oam-identify Greg Mirsky IETF-104 March 2019, Prague.
Quan Xiong(ZTE) Gregory Mirsky(ZTE) Chang Liu(China Unicom)
draft-ietf-bier-ipv6-requirements-01
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-19 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-10 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-05 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls-01.
OAM for Deterministic Networks draft-mirsky-detnet-oam
Editors: Bala’zs Varga, Jouni Korhonen
Parag Jain, Samer Salam, Ali Sajassi (Cisco),
Supporting Flexible Algorithm Prefix SIDs in LSP Ping/Traceroute
MPLS-TP Loopback Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-li-lb-02
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-01.txt SRv6 OAM
IESG LC: BFD for VXLAN draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan
Inter-AS OAM for SR Networks IETF 105, Montreal
E. Bellagamba, Ericsson P. Sköldström, Acreo D. Ward, Juniper
Presentation transcript:

IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS OAM IETF 90 – Toronto July 2014 IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS OAM (draft-raza-mpls-oam-ipv6-rao-00) Kamran Raza Nobo Akiya Carlos Pignataro (Cisco Systems, Inc.)

Problem Statement The LSP Ping/Traceroute specification [RFC4379] requires the use of Router Alert option (RAO) in the IP header: Section 4.3 states that IP Router Alert option MUST be set for an MPLS Echo Request message. Section 4.5 states that IP Router Alert option MUST be set for an MPLS Echo Reply message if the reply mode in the echo request is set to “Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet with Router Alert”. For MPLS OAM use, while there is a generic RAO defined for IPv4, there is no such generic value defined for IPv6. As vendors are starting to implement MPLS IPv6 (e.g., [draft-ietf- mpls-ldp-ipv6], [draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap]), there is a need to define and allocate such a code point for IPv6 in order to comply with RFC 4379 and use LSP Ping/Traceroute.

Generic RAO For IPv4, RFC 2113 defines a generic option value (0) for RAO that is used by LSP Ping and LSP Traceroute for MPLS IPv4. IPv4 RAO value 0: “Router Shall examine packet” IANA: IPv4 Router Alert Option Values

Generic RAO (cont’d) For IPv6, RFC 2711 defines the router alert for a general IPv6 purpose but required the Value field in the RAO to indicate a specific reason for using the RAO. IANA: IPv6 Router Alert Option Values Currently, MPLS OAM tools can not use this as there is no defined value for “general” use nor for MPLS OAM use.

IPv6 RAO for MPLS OAM This I-D defines a new option value for the IPv6 RAO to instruct transit routers to examine the packet more closely for IPv6 MPLS OAM purposes. This new code point is to be assigned under IANA managed “IPv6 Router Alert Option Values” registry as originally defined by RFC 5350. The registry is updated as: value Description Reference ----- ---------------------------- --------------- TBD1 MPLS OAM [this.I-D] This new option value (code point) is to be used by any IPv6 MPLS OAM application that requires their packets to be examined by a transit router. In the scope of this I.D, this value will be used by the MPLS Echo Request and MPLS Echo Reply for its IPv6 messages

I-D Status New draft, but gap identified in draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap I-D has already been presented in IntArea WG on Mon. Next Steps: Seeking WG feedback; WG adoption; Early allocation of the code point by IANA (to allow implementations to proceed) Thank you!